• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:11
CEST 22:11
KST 05:11
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection5Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview5[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO12 Preview2herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2026)7
Community News
[BSL22] Non-Korean Championship from 13 to 28 June0Weekly Cups (May 25-31): Clem doubles, 2v2 circuit heads toward finale0StarCraft II 5.0.16 PTR Patch Notes may 26th151Weekly Cups (May 18-24): MaxPax wins doubles0Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League6
StarCraft 2
General
Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection My starcraft 2 changes SCFusion - WoL, HotS & LotV Build Order Optimizer TL Poll: How do you feel about the 5.0.16 PTR balance changes?
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League GSL Code S Season 2 (2026) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 528 Infection Detected Welcome to the External Content forum Mutation # 527 Hell Train
Brood War
General
The Korean Terminology Thread BW animated web series: seeking contributors FlaShFTW vs A.Alm Grudge Match Event 14k games analyzed: Cross Spawn Nexus first good? Data needed
Tourneys
[ASL21] Grand Finals [BSL22] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CEST [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Any training maps people recommend? Why doesn't anyone use restoration? Muta micro map competition [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Dating: How's your luck? Trading/Investing Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread How cold is too cold to be outdoors?
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
Esportsmanship: How to NOT B…
TrAiDoS
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 5145 users

WCS Premier Players Cannot Be Considered Good - Page 10

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next All
eeZe
Profile Joined April 2011
United States54 Posts
February 20 2015 17:26 GMT
#181
On February 21 2015 02:12 Zealously wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2015 02:09 Deathstar wrote:
You guys are being too silly.


Agreed. Please keep the discussion (however flawed it may have been from the start) on topic.


I'm struggling with what the OP topic even is.

Casters should make disparaging remarks about non-KR players to keep the universally known "skill standard" in context? Is the OP really Artosis?
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-20 17:30:52
February 20 2015 17:29 GMT
#182
It is really simple tbh. If you wanna rate progamers you will encounter a point where you just can't call player X good anymore.
He's maybe average or something like that, but if all progamers are "good" (remember, we rate progamers only here), then what about the absolute best and the tiers (slightly) under it?
It simply makes no sense if you wanna rate them to call every single one of them at least good in the context of professional players.
"Good" loses its meaning completely.
That doesn't mean that you can't say Mana (cause it was brought up here) played well or anything like that obviously.
So it really just depends, what does "good" in this context mean? Do you have to be in the top 50? Do you have to be in the top 100? How many professional players do we even have to compare them?
It's not that anybody thinks an average professional (or even "bad" one) is bad in comparison to the entire playerbase. Or that he has to be bad in comparison to the competition he faces in his region. But if you wanna talk about actuall skill compared to the very best you also have to be more drastic to value these players, otherwise it doesn't mean anything anymore.
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24239 Posts
February 20 2015 17:42 GMT
#183
On February 21 2015 02:29 The_Red_Viper wrote:
It is really simple tbh. If you wanna rate progamers you will encounter a point where you just can't call player X good anymore.
He's maybe average or something like that, but if all progamers are "good" (remember, we rate progamers only here), then what about the absolute best and the tiers (slightly) under it?
It simply makes no sense if you wanna rate them to call every single one of them at least good in the context of professional players.
"Good" loses its meaning completely.
That doesn't mean that you can't say Mana (cause it was brought up here) played well or anything like that obviously.
So it really just depends, what does "good" in this context mean? Do you have to be in the top 50? Do you have to be in the top 100? How many professional players do we even have to compare them?
It's not that anybody thinks an average professional (or even "bad" one) is bad in comparison to the entire playerbase. Or that he has to be bad in comparison to the competition he faces in his region. But if you wanna talk about actuall skill compared to the very best you also have to be more drastic to value these players, otherwise it doesn't mean anything anymore.

All progamers are good. Above "good" is very good, excellent, incredible, amazing, outstanding, exceptional, Mvpesque... It's not like we'll run out of adjectives. On the other hand, calling a pro "bad" sounds just wrong to me.
Yorbon
Profile Joined December 2011
Netherlands4272 Posts
February 20 2015 17:47 GMT
#184
Someone's 'goodness' is only useful compared to someone else's or some expectation or something like that. So if some foreigner owns a group, he's good (compared to the others/compared to someone's expectations). Effectively the op is mistaking good for best.
I'm really annoyed by the notion that someone's skills apparently may not be praised if they're not world class.

I can understand criticisms about the current system, but that's a different matter alltogether.
Darthsanta13
Profile Joined July 2011
United States564 Posts
February 20 2015 17:49 GMT
#185
I'm not sure why this is a topic. Superlatives casters use are always based on the talent pool of all of the players playing. Are casters for sub-pro level tournaments supposed to preface every comment with "Amazing splits!.. for a gold player."
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-20 17:51:52
February 20 2015 17:50 GMT
#186
On February 21 2015 02:42 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2015 02:29 The_Red_Viper wrote:
It is really simple tbh. If you wanna rate progamers you will encounter a point where you just can't call player X good anymore.
He's maybe average or something like that, but if all progamers are "good" (remember, we rate progamers only here), then what about the absolute best and the tiers (slightly) under it?
It simply makes no sense if you wanna rate them to call every single one of them at least good in the context of professional players.
"Good" loses its meaning completely.
That doesn't mean that you can't say Mana (cause it was brought up here) played well or anything like that obviously.
So it really just depends, what does "good" in this context mean? Do you have to be in the top 50? Do you have to be in the top 100? How many professional players do we even have to compare them?
It's not that anybody thinks an average professional (or even "bad" one) is bad in comparison to the entire playerbase. Or that he has to be bad in comparison to the competition he faces in his region. But if you wanna talk about actuall skill compared to the very best you also have to be more drastic to value these players, otherwise it doesn't mean anything anymore.

All progamers are good. Above "good" is very good, excellent, incredible, amazing, outstanding, exceptional, Mvpesque... It's not like we'll run out of adjectives. On the other hand, calling a pro "bad" sounds just wrong to me.

All progamers are good in comparison to normal people. But not all progamers are good in comparison to progamers.
Take all progamers, rate their skill. Take the average and look which progamers are around that (arbitrary, but just as an example) number. These are the average ones, etc.
Let's take terror for example, is he really good? No absolutely not, he isn't a good progamer.
I totally understand why people make fun of this idea of rating, it feels weird calling someone who puts in that much effort "bad" or "average", but not everybody can be remembered as a good sc2 progamer.

Above "good" is very good, excellent, incredible, amazing, outstanding, exceptional, Mvpesque...

what is the difference between amazing, outstanding, incredible and exceptional?
If you wanna rate it should be as clear as possible, that's why there is something below "good", "average" and "bad" for example
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24239 Posts
February 20 2015 17:52 GMT
#187
On February 21 2015 02:50 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2015 02:42 [PkF] Wire wrote:
On February 21 2015 02:29 The_Red_Viper wrote:
It is really simple tbh. If you wanna rate progamers you will encounter a point where you just can't call player X good anymore.
He's maybe average or something like that, but if all progamers are "good" (remember, we rate progamers only here), then what about the absolute best and the tiers (slightly) under it?
It simply makes no sense if you wanna rate them to call every single one of them at least good in the context of professional players.
"Good" loses its meaning completely.
That doesn't mean that you can't say Mana (cause it was brought up here) played well or anything like that obviously.
So it really just depends, what does "good" in this context mean? Do you have to be in the top 50? Do you have to be in the top 100? How many professional players do we even have to compare them?
It's not that anybody thinks an average professional (or even "bad" one) is bad in comparison to the entire playerbase. Or that he has to be bad in comparison to the competition he faces in his region. But if you wanna talk about actuall skill compared to the very best you also have to be more drastic to value these players, otherwise it doesn't mean anything anymore.

All progamers are good. Above "good" is very good, excellent, incredible, amazing, outstanding, exceptional, Mvpesque... It's not like we'll run out of adjectives. On the other hand, calling a pro "bad" sounds just wrong to me.

All progamers are good in comparison to normal people. But not all progamers are good in comparison to progamers.
Take all progamers, rate their skill. Take the average and look which progamers are around that (arbitrary, but just as an example) number. These are the average ones, etc.
Let's take terror for example, is he really good? No absolutely not, he isn't a good progamer.
I totally understand why people make fun of this idea of rating, it feels weird calling someone who puts in that much effort "bad" or "average", but not everybody can be remembered as a good sc2 progamer.

Show nested quote +
Above "good" is very good, excellent, incredible, amazing, outstanding, exceptional, Mvpesque...

what is the difference between amazing, outstanding, incredible and exceptional?
If you wanna rate it should be as clear as possible, that's why there is something under "good", average, bad for example

To be fair trying to rate players makes little sense to me. I guess I'll leave it there, I just completely disagree with the idea that casters should tone down everything because foreigner pros aren't the same class as korean pros and that you can't call a WCS Premier player good.
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
February 20 2015 17:56 GMT
#188
On February 21 2015 02:52 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2015 02:50 The_Red_Viper wrote:
On February 21 2015 02:42 [PkF] Wire wrote:
On February 21 2015 02:29 The_Red_Viper wrote:
It is really simple tbh. If you wanna rate progamers you will encounter a point where you just can't call player X good anymore.
He's maybe average or something like that, but if all progamers are "good" (remember, we rate progamers only here), then what about the absolute best and the tiers (slightly) under it?
It simply makes no sense if you wanna rate them to call every single one of them at least good in the context of professional players.
"Good" loses its meaning completely.
That doesn't mean that you can't say Mana (cause it was brought up here) played well or anything like that obviously.
So it really just depends, what does "good" in this context mean? Do you have to be in the top 50? Do you have to be in the top 100? How many professional players do we even have to compare them?
It's not that anybody thinks an average professional (or even "bad" one) is bad in comparison to the entire playerbase. Or that he has to be bad in comparison to the competition he faces in his region. But if you wanna talk about actuall skill compared to the very best you also have to be more drastic to value these players, otherwise it doesn't mean anything anymore.

All progamers are good. Above "good" is very good, excellent, incredible, amazing, outstanding, exceptional, Mvpesque... It's not like we'll run out of adjectives. On the other hand, calling a pro "bad" sounds just wrong to me.

All progamers are good in comparison to normal people. But not all progamers are good in comparison to progamers.
Take all progamers, rate their skill. Take the average and look which progamers are around that (arbitrary, but just as an example) number. These are the average ones, etc.
Let's take terror for example, is he really good? No absolutely not, he isn't a good progamer.
I totally understand why people make fun of this idea of rating, it feels weird calling someone who puts in that much effort "bad" or "average", but not everybody can be remembered as a good sc2 progamer.

Above "good" is very good, excellent, incredible, amazing, outstanding, exceptional, Mvpesque...

what is the difference between amazing, outstanding, incredible and exceptional?
If you wanna rate it should be as clear as possible, that's why there is something under "good", average, bad for example

To be fair trying to rate players makes little sense to me. I guess I'll leave it there, I just completely disagree with the idea that casters should tone down everything because foreigner pros aren't the same class as korean pros and that you can't call a WCS Premier player good.

I don't agree with that radical notion either tbh, i am not sure where the line is. But i am sure there is one, where calling player x "good" is just not true anymore. I am not saying this is the case at wcs level or anything.
The only case where i get annoyed is when casters tell me foreigner X is "one of the best players in the world", no he is not!
I am just arguing the general idea here, not really where to draw the line.
But just looking at Pig vs Happy right now, there was a clear skill gap, people shouldn't be afraid to acknowledge that AND also name it.
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
WGT-Baal
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
France3489 Posts
February 20 2015 17:57 GMT
#189
casters are here to hype the game they are casting OP, simple as that. It is like when you hear "oh my god nice move, but it s not over yet" whereas it s clear to everyone that it s over. would you watch a game where the casters would be "this game is terribad, seriously, so bad"?

Yes some players in NA and EU are not as skilled as some players from KR. It doesn't mean they are bad though.

Perhaps you are having issues differentiating good from better/best ?
Horang2 fan
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-20 18:05:16
February 20 2015 18:02 GMT
#190
On February 21 2015 02:57 WGT-Baal wrote:
casters are here to hype the game they are casting OP, simple as that. It is like when you hear "oh my god nice move, but it s not over yet" whereas it s clear to everyone that it s over. would you watch a game where the casters would be "this game is terribad, seriously, so bad"?

Yes some players in NA and EU are not as skilled as some players from KR. It doesn't mean they are bad though.

Perhaps you are having issues differentiating good from better/best ?

Yes they are here to make the game interesting through their casting, that doesn't mean they have to do it in these silly ways.
If everybody knows it's over, there is no point to not call it over. You don't have to be that extreme as your example either, but pls don't think the viewers are stupid :/
If you don't have the ability to cast games with more nuance than your two examples, maybe you are just not a good caster at the end of the day? (nah every caster is good, that's why they are casting there and not me, bla bla )
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
Cheerio
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
Ukraine3178 Posts
February 20 2015 18:12 GMT
#191
Yes they are good. Stop being elitist pricks please.
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19366 Posts
February 20 2015 18:15 GMT
#192
Is anyone going to discuss the point that he finds that caster's stating that a player is good as offensive to Koreans? I struggle to think of any Korean pro who is going to make a fuss over the positive observation of a foreign players skill. If this were the case, the when a Korean player does lose to a foreigner it'd by like the world is coming to an end for them.
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Profile Blog Joined March 2013
Netherlands30548 Posts
February 20 2015 18:38 GMT
#193
Seriously? All of the good foreigners can take games off top korean players and win matches against average koreans. So yes they are in fact good, very good at Starcraft.

The 'one of the best X in the world' title is how english casters usually refer to the top koreans, which is a level above 'good'.
Neosteel Enthusiast
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-20 18:47:23
February 20 2015 18:40 GMT
#194
lol
wrong thread
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
February 20 2015 18:44 GMT
#195
Love how the OP comes right out with an insinuation of racism by talking about white people in WCS.

This is a dumb thread.
Caihead
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada8550 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-20 18:50:29
February 20 2015 18:49 GMT
#196
On February 21 2015 02:57 WGT-Baal wrote:
casters are here to hype the game they are casting OP, simple as that. It is like when you hear "oh my god nice move, but it s not over yet" whereas it s clear to everyone that it s over. would you watch a game where the casters would be "this game is terribad, seriously, so bad"?

Yes some players in NA and EU are not as skilled as some players from KR. It doesn't mean they are bad though.

Perhaps you are having issues differentiating good from better/best ?


I remember years ago when artosis / tasteless casted that set of forgg vs zerg (leenock?) when forgg (who was way hyped at the time) did a really bad marine push that failed miserably. And all the commentary was "wow I can't believe how BAD that was" or "im sorry you guys had to watch that" in an unironic way.

And they were absolutely right.
"If you're not living in the US or are a US Citizen, please do not tell us how to vote or how you want our country to be governed." - Serpest, American Hero
Moonsalt
Profile Joined May 2011
267 Posts
February 20 2015 18:50 GMT
#197
It doesn't matter, Blizzcon will still be won by a korean.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
February 20 2015 18:52 GMT
#198
On February 21 2015 03:49 Caihead wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2015 02:57 WGT-Baal wrote:
casters are here to hype the game they are casting OP, simple as that. It is like when you hear "oh my god nice move, but it s not over yet" whereas it s clear to everyone that it s over. would you watch a game where the casters would be "this game is terribad, seriously, so bad"?

Yes some players in NA and EU are not as skilled as some players from KR. It doesn't mean they are bad though.

Perhaps you are having issues differentiating good from better/best ?


I remember years ago when artosis / tasteless casted that set of forgg vs zerg (leenock?) when forgg (who was way hyped at the time) did a really bad marine push that failed miserably. And all the commentary was "wow I can't believe how BAD that was" or "im sorry you guys had to watch that" in an unironic way.

And they were absolutely right.


Therefore casters should always castigate the players in foreigner vs foreigner games? No.
Caihead
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada8550 Posts
February 20 2015 18:53 GMT
#199
On February 21 2015 03:52 Doodsmack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2015 03:49 Caihead wrote:
On February 21 2015 02:57 WGT-Baal wrote:
casters are here to hype the game they are casting OP, simple as that. It is like when you hear "oh my god nice move, but it s not over yet" whereas it s clear to everyone that it s over. would you watch a game where the casters would be "this game is terribad, seriously, so bad"?

Yes some players in NA and EU are not as skilled as some players from KR. It doesn't mean they are bad though.

Perhaps you are having issues differentiating good from better/best ?


I remember years ago when artosis / tasteless casted that set of forgg vs zerg (leenock?) when forgg (who was way hyped at the time) did a really bad marine push that failed miserably. And all the commentary was "wow I can't believe how BAD that was" or "im sorry you guys had to watch that" in an unironic way.

And they were absolutely right.


Therefore casters should always castigate the players in foreigner vs foreigner games? No.


No. Point being it's okay to say a player is bad or played bad and no one should be beyond reproach. Saying every one is good loses meaning.
"If you're not living in the US or are a US Citizen, please do not tell us how to vote or how you want our country to be governed." - Serpest, American Hero
boxerfred
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Germany8360 Posts
February 20 2015 18:55 GMT
#200
I think WCS Premier players are good players.
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
15:00
Season Finals: Group Stage 1
uThermal1843
SteadfastSC271
IndyStarCraft 188
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
uThermal 1843
SteadfastSC 271
IndyStarCraft 188
BRAT_OK 58
Railgan 53
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 19353
Calm 5562
Hyuk 334
Sexy 51
Rock 26
NaDa 12
League of Legends
Doublelift1414
JimRising 16
Counter-Strike
fl0m9728
zeus293
xp34
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King99
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor272
MindelVK12
Other Games
Grubby3775
FrodaN2923
summit1g2880
Mlord698
B2W.Neo504
Pyrionflax132
UpATreeSC38
KnowMe36
OptimusSC212
Organizations
Other Games
EGCTV898
gamesdonequick781
BasetradeTV158
StarCraft 2
angryscii 36
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• printf 30
• Reevou 7
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• mYiSmile10
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 39
• FirePhoenix3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota285
Other Games
• Shiphtur218
• tFFMrPink 14
Upcoming Events
OSC
49m
MaxPax vs YoungYakov
Krystianer vs Shameless
GgMaChine vs Creature
LetaleX vs MiniZergUA
ReBellioN vs TBD
ArT vs HiGhDrA
Nicoract vs Azura
GSL
11h 49m
herO vs Rogue
Maru vs Cure
Patches Events
16h 49m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
18h 49m
BSL
22h 49m
Bonyth vs Dewalt
OSC
1d 3h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 19h
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
Maestros of the Game
3 days
Classic vs Lambo
Clem vs Maru
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
Maestros of the Game
4 days
Serral vs Rogue
herO vs SHIN
Replay Cast
5 days
Maestros of the Game
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KK 2v2 League Season 1
RSL Revival: Season 5
Heroes Pulsing #1

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
YSL S3
SCTL 2026 Spring
WardiTV Spring 2026
Maestros of the Game 2
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
2026 GSL S2
Murky Cup 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026

Upcoming

BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Heroes Pulsing #3
Heroes Pulsing #2
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.