• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 16:21
CET 22:21
KST 06:21
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2
Community News
BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion6Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)16Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7[BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 105
StarCraft 2
General
Stellar Fest "01" Jersey Charity Auction SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets When will we find out if there are more tournament SC2 Spotted on the EWC 2026 list?
Tourneys
SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC2 AI Tournament 2026 $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) OSC Season 13 World Championship
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone
Brood War
General
[ASL21] Potential Map Candidates BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Video Footage from 2005: The Birth of G2 in Spain BW General Discussion BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 Small VOD Thread 2.0 Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Awesome Games Done Quick 2026! Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Physical Exercise (HIIT) Bef…
TrAiDoS
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1398 users

WCS Premier Players Cannot Be Considered Good - Page 10

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next All
eeZe
Profile Joined April 2011
United States54 Posts
February 20 2015 17:26 GMT
#181
On February 21 2015 02:12 Zealously wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2015 02:09 Deathstar wrote:
You guys are being too silly.


Agreed. Please keep the discussion (however flawed it may have been from the start) on topic.


I'm struggling with what the OP topic even is.

Casters should make disparaging remarks about non-KR players to keep the universally known "skill standard" in context? Is the OP really Artosis?
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-20 17:30:52
February 20 2015 17:29 GMT
#182
It is really simple tbh. If you wanna rate progamers you will encounter a point where you just can't call player X good anymore.
He's maybe average or something like that, but if all progamers are "good" (remember, we rate progamers only here), then what about the absolute best and the tiers (slightly) under it?
It simply makes no sense if you wanna rate them to call every single one of them at least good in the context of professional players.
"Good" loses its meaning completely.
That doesn't mean that you can't say Mana (cause it was brought up here) played well or anything like that obviously.
So it really just depends, what does "good" in this context mean? Do you have to be in the top 50? Do you have to be in the top 100? How many professional players do we even have to compare them?
It's not that anybody thinks an average professional (or even "bad" one) is bad in comparison to the entire playerbase. Or that he has to be bad in comparison to the competition he faces in his region. But if you wanna talk about actuall skill compared to the very best you also have to be more drastic to value these players, otherwise it doesn't mean anything anymore.
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24238 Posts
February 20 2015 17:42 GMT
#183
On February 21 2015 02:29 The_Red_Viper wrote:
It is really simple tbh. If you wanna rate progamers you will encounter a point where you just can't call player X good anymore.
He's maybe average or something like that, but if all progamers are "good" (remember, we rate progamers only here), then what about the absolute best and the tiers (slightly) under it?
It simply makes no sense if you wanna rate them to call every single one of them at least good in the context of professional players.
"Good" loses its meaning completely.
That doesn't mean that you can't say Mana (cause it was brought up here) played well or anything like that obviously.
So it really just depends, what does "good" in this context mean? Do you have to be in the top 50? Do you have to be in the top 100? How many professional players do we even have to compare them?
It's not that anybody thinks an average professional (or even "bad" one) is bad in comparison to the entire playerbase. Or that he has to be bad in comparison to the competition he faces in his region. But if you wanna talk about actuall skill compared to the very best you also have to be more drastic to value these players, otherwise it doesn't mean anything anymore.

All progamers are good. Above "good" is very good, excellent, incredible, amazing, outstanding, exceptional, Mvpesque... It's not like we'll run out of adjectives. On the other hand, calling a pro "bad" sounds just wrong to me.
Yorbon
Profile Joined December 2011
Netherlands4272 Posts
February 20 2015 17:47 GMT
#184
Someone's 'goodness' is only useful compared to someone else's or some expectation or something like that. So if some foreigner owns a group, he's good (compared to the others/compared to someone's expectations). Effectively the op is mistaking good for best.
I'm really annoyed by the notion that someone's skills apparently may not be praised if they're not world class.

I can understand criticisms about the current system, but that's a different matter alltogether.
Darthsanta13
Profile Joined July 2011
United States564 Posts
February 20 2015 17:49 GMT
#185
I'm not sure why this is a topic. Superlatives casters use are always based on the talent pool of all of the players playing. Are casters for sub-pro level tournaments supposed to preface every comment with "Amazing splits!.. for a gold player."
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-20 17:51:52
February 20 2015 17:50 GMT
#186
On February 21 2015 02:42 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2015 02:29 The_Red_Viper wrote:
It is really simple tbh. If you wanna rate progamers you will encounter a point where you just can't call player X good anymore.
He's maybe average or something like that, but if all progamers are "good" (remember, we rate progamers only here), then what about the absolute best and the tiers (slightly) under it?
It simply makes no sense if you wanna rate them to call every single one of them at least good in the context of professional players.
"Good" loses its meaning completely.
That doesn't mean that you can't say Mana (cause it was brought up here) played well or anything like that obviously.
So it really just depends, what does "good" in this context mean? Do you have to be in the top 50? Do you have to be in the top 100? How many professional players do we even have to compare them?
It's not that anybody thinks an average professional (or even "bad" one) is bad in comparison to the entire playerbase. Or that he has to be bad in comparison to the competition he faces in his region. But if you wanna talk about actuall skill compared to the very best you also have to be more drastic to value these players, otherwise it doesn't mean anything anymore.

All progamers are good. Above "good" is very good, excellent, incredible, amazing, outstanding, exceptional, Mvpesque... It's not like we'll run out of adjectives. On the other hand, calling a pro "bad" sounds just wrong to me.

All progamers are good in comparison to normal people. But not all progamers are good in comparison to progamers.
Take all progamers, rate their skill. Take the average and look which progamers are around that (arbitrary, but just as an example) number. These are the average ones, etc.
Let's take terror for example, is he really good? No absolutely not, he isn't a good progamer.
I totally understand why people make fun of this idea of rating, it feels weird calling someone who puts in that much effort "bad" or "average", but not everybody can be remembered as a good sc2 progamer.

Above "good" is very good, excellent, incredible, amazing, outstanding, exceptional, Mvpesque...

what is the difference between amazing, outstanding, incredible and exceptional?
If you wanna rate it should be as clear as possible, that's why there is something below "good", "average" and "bad" for example
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24238 Posts
February 20 2015 17:52 GMT
#187
On February 21 2015 02:50 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2015 02:42 [PkF] Wire wrote:
On February 21 2015 02:29 The_Red_Viper wrote:
It is really simple tbh. If you wanna rate progamers you will encounter a point where you just can't call player X good anymore.
He's maybe average or something like that, but if all progamers are "good" (remember, we rate progamers only here), then what about the absolute best and the tiers (slightly) under it?
It simply makes no sense if you wanna rate them to call every single one of them at least good in the context of professional players.
"Good" loses its meaning completely.
That doesn't mean that you can't say Mana (cause it was brought up here) played well or anything like that obviously.
So it really just depends, what does "good" in this context mean? Do you have to be in the top 50? Do you have to be in the top 100? How many professional players do we even have to compare them?
It's not that anybody thinks an average professional (or even "bad" one) is bad in comparison to the entire playerbase. Or that he has to be bad in comparison to the competition he faces in his region. But if you wanna talk about actuall skill compared to the very best you also have to be more drastic to value these players, otherwise it doesn't mean anything anymore.

All progamers are good. Above "good" is very good, excellent, incredible, amazing, outstanding, exceptional, Mvpesque... It's not like we'll run out of adjectives. On the other hand, calling a pro "bad" sounds just wrong to me.

All progamers are good in comparison to normal people. But not all progamers are good in comparison to progamers.
Take all progamers, rate their skill. Take the average and look which progamers are around that (arbitrary, but just as an example) number. These are the average ones, etc.
Let's take terror for example, is he really good? No absolutely not, he isn't a good progamer.
I totally understand why people make fun of this idea of rating, it feels weird calling someone who puts in that much effort "bad" or "average", but not everybody can be remembered as a good sc2 progamer.

Show nested quote +
Above "good" is very good, excellent, incredible, amazing, outstanding, exceptional, Mvpesque...

what is the difference between amazing, outstanding, incredible and exceptional?
If you wanna rate it should be as clear as possible, that's why there is something under "good", average, bad for example

To be fair trying to rate players makes little sense to me. I guess I'll leave it there, I just completely disagree with the idea that casters should tone down everything because foreigner pros aren't the same class as korean pros and that you can't call a WCS Premier player good.
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
February 20 2015 17:56 GMT
#188
On February 21 2015 02:52 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2015 02:50 The_Red_Viper wrote:
On February 21 2015 02:42 [PkF] Wire wrote:
On February 21 2015 02:29 The_Red_Viper wrote:
It is really simple tbh. If you wanna rate progamers you will encounter a point where you just can't call player X good anymore.
He's maybe average or something like that, but if all progamers are "good" (remember, we rate progamers only here), then what about the absolute best and the tiers (slightly) under it?
It simply makes no sense if you wanna rate them to call every single one of them at least good in the context of professional players.
"Good" loses its meaning completely.
That doesn't mean that you can't say Mana (cause it was brought up here) played well or anything like that obviously.
So it really just depends, what does "good" in this context mean? Do you have to be in the top 50? Do you have to be in the top 100? How many professional players do we even have to compare them?
It's not that anybody thinks an average professional (or even "bad" one) is bad in comparison to the entire playerbase. Or that he has to be bad in comparison to the competition he faces in his region. But if you wanna talk about actuall skill compared to the very best you also have to be more drastic to value these players, otherwise it doesn't mean anything anymore.

All progamers are good. Above "good" is very good, excellent, incredible, amazing, outstanding, exceptional, Mvpesque... It's not like we'll run out of adjectives. On the other hand, calling a pro "bad" sounds just wrong to me.

All progamers are good in comparison to normal people. But not all progamers are good in comparison to progamers.
Take all progamers, rate their skill. Take the average and look which progamers are around that (arbitrary, but just as an example) number. These are the average ones, etc.
Let's take terror for example, is he really good? No absolutely not, he isn't a good progamer.
I totally understand why people make fun of this idea of rating, it feels weird calling someone who puts in that much effort "bad" or "average", but not everybody can be remembered as a good sc2 progamer.

Above "good" is very good, excellent, incredible, amazing, outstanding, exceptional, Mvpesque...

what is the difference between amazing, outstanding, incredible and exceptional?
If you wanna rate it should be as clear as possible, that's why there is something under "good", average, bad for example

To be fair trying to rate players makes little sense to me. I guess I'll leave it there, I just completely disagree with the idea that casters should tone down everything because foreigner pros aren't the same class as korean pros and that you can't call a WCS Premier player good.

I don't agree with that radical notion either tbh, i am not sure where the line is. But i am sure there is one, where calling player x "good" is just not true anymore. I am not saying this is the case at wcs level or anything.
The only case where i get annoyed is when casters tell me foreigner X is "one of the best players in the world", no he is not!
I am just arguing the general idea here, not really where to draw the line.
But just looking at Pig vs Happy right now, there was a clear skill gap, people shouldn't be afraid to acknowledge that AND also name it.
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
WGT-Baal
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
France3428 Posts
February 20 2015 17:57 GMT
#189
casters are here to hype the game they are casting OP, simple as that. It is like when you hear "oh my god nice move, but it s not over yet" whereas it s clear to everyone that it s over. would you watch a game where the casters would be "this game is terribad, seriously, so bad"?

Yes some players in NA and EU are not as skilled as some players from KR. It doesn't mean they are bad though.

Perhaps you are having issues differentiating good from better/best ?
Horang2 fan
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-20 18:05:16
February 20 2015 18:02 GMT
#190
On February 21 2015 02:57 WGT-Baal wrote:
casters are here to hype the game they are casting OP, simple as that. It is like when you hear "oh my god nice move, but it s not over yet" whereas it s clear to everyone that it s over. would you watch a game where the casters would be "this game is terribad, seriously, so bad"?

Yes some players in NA and EU are not as skilled as some players from KR. It doesn't mean they are bad though.

Perhaps you are having issues differentiating good from better/best ?

Yes they are here to make the game interesting through their casting, that doesn't mean they have to do it in these silly ways.
If everybody knows it's over, there is no point to not call it over. You don't have to be that extreme as your example either, but pls don't think the viewers are stupid :/
If you don't have the ability to cast games with more nuance than your two examples, maybe you are just not a good caster at the end of the day? (nah every caster is good, that's why they are casting there and not me, bla bla )
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
Cheerio
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
Ukraine3178 Posts
February 20 2015 18:12 GMT
#191
Yes they are good. Stop being elitist pricks please.
BisuDagger
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
Bisutopia19300 Posts
February 20 2015 18:15 GMT
#192
Is anyone going to discuss the point that he finds that caster's stating that a player is good as offensive to Koreans? I struggle to think of any Korean pro who is going to make a fuss over the positive observation of a foreign players skill. If this were the case, the when a Korean player does lose to a foreigner it'd by like the world is coming to an end for them.
ModeratorFormer Afreeca Starleague Caster: http://afreeca.tv/ASL2ENG2
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Profile Blog Joined March 2013
Netherlands30548 Posts
February 20 2015 18:38 GMT
#193
Seriously? All of the good foreigners can take games off top korean players and win matches against average koreans. So yes they are in fact good, very good at Starcraft.

The 'one of the best X in the world' title is how english casters usually refer to the top koreans, which is a level above 'good'.
Neosteel Enthusiast
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-20 18:47:23
February 20 2015 18:40 GMT
#194
lol
wrong thread
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
February 20 2015 18:44 GMT
#195
Love how the OP comes right out with an insinuation of racism by talking about white people in WCS.

This is a dumb thread.
Caihead
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada8550 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-02-20 18:50:29
February 20 2015 18:49 GMT
#196
On February 21 2015 02:57 WGT-Baal wrote:
casters are here to hype the game they are casting OP, simple as that. It is like when you hear "oh my god nice move, but it s not over yet" whereas it s clear to everyone that it s over. would you watch a game where the casters would be "this game is terribad, seriously, so bad"?

Yes some players in NA and EU are not as skilled as some players from KR. It doesn't mean they are bad though.

Perhaps you are having issues differentiating good from better/best ?


I remember years ago when artosis / tasteless casted that set of forgg vs zerg (leenock?) when forgg (who was way hyped at the time) did a really bad marine push that failed miserably. And all the commentary was "wow I can't believe how BAD that was" or "im sorry you guys had to watch that" in an unironic way.

And they were absolutely right.
"If you're not living in the US or are a US Citizen, please do not tell us how to vote or how you want our country to be governed." - Serpest, American Hero
Moonsalt
Profile Joined May 2011
267 Posts
February 20 2015 18:50 GMT
#197
It doesn't matter, Blizzcon will still be won by a korean.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
February 20 2015 18:52 GMT
#198
On February 21 2015 03:49 Caihead wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2015 02:57 WGT-Baal wrote:
casters are here to hype the game they are casting OP, simple as that. It is like when you hear "oh my god nice move, but it s not over yet" whereas it s clear to everyone that it s over. would you watch a game where the casters would be "this game is terribad, seriously, so bad"?

Yes some players in NA and EU are not as skilled as some players from KR. It doesn't mean they are bad though.

Perhaps you are having issues differentiating good from better/best ?


I remember years ago when artosis / tasteless casted that set of forgg vs zerg (leenock?) when forgg (who was way hyped at the time) did a really bad marine push that failed miserably. And all the commentary was "wow I can't believe how BAD that was" or "im sorry you guys had to watch that" in an unironic way.

And they were absolutely right.


Therefore casters should always castigate the players in foreigner vs foreigner games? No.
Caihead
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada8550 Posts
February 20 2015 18:53 GMT
#199
On February 21 2015 03:52 Doodsmack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2015 03:49 Caihead wrote:
On February 21 2015 02:57 WGT-Baal wrote:
casters are here to hype the game they are casting OP, simple as that. It is like when you hear "oh my god nice move, but it s not over yet" whereas it s clear to everyone that it s over. would you watch a game where the casters would be "this game is terribad, seriously, so bad"?

Yes some players in NA and EU are not as skilled as some players from KR. It doesn't mean they are bad though.

Perhaps you are having issues differentiating good from better/best ?


I remember years ago when artosis / tasteless casted that set of forgg vs zerg (leenock?) when forgg (who was way hyped at the time) did a really bad marine push that failed miserably. And all the commentary was "wow I can't believe how BAD that was" or "im sorry you guys had to watch that" in an unironic way.

And they were absolutely right.


Therefore casters should always castigate the players in foreigner vs foreigner games? No.


No. Point being it's okay to say a player is bad or played bad and no one should be beyond reproach. Saying every one is good loses meaning.
"If you're not living in the US or are a US Citizen, please do not tell us how to vote or how you want our country to be governed." - Serpest, American Hero
boxerfred
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Germany8360 Posts
February 20 2015 18:55 GMT
#200
I think WCS Premier players are good players.
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
IPSL
20:00
Grand Finals
Dewalt vs Sziky
Airneanach111
Liquipedia
BSL 21
20:00
Non-Korean Championship - D4
Bonyth vs Sziky
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs XuanXuan
eOnzErG vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs DuGu
Dewalt vs Bonyth
ZZZero.O264
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 635
IndyStarCraft 245
JuggernautJason108
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 1999
Shuttle 532
ZZZero.O 264
Mini 211
Dota 2
Gorgc7037
Pyrionflax221
Other Games
summit1g6456
FrodaN5633
Grubby3203
Liquid`RaSZi3109
fl0m2366
Fnx 1123
B2W.Neo980
crisheroes407
Liquid`Hasu322
ToD195
XaKoH 166
ArmadaUGS154
KnowMe95
Railgan1
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2102
EGCTV1172
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HeavenSC 29
• Reevou 8
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2449
• TFBlade1180
Other Games
• imaqtpie2760
• Scarra643
• Shiphtur276
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
11h 39m
Wardi Open
14h 39m
Monday Night Weeklies
19h 39m
OSC
1d 13h
The PondCast
2 days
OSC
2 days
Big Brain Bouts
4 days
Serral vs TBD
BSL 21
5 days
BSL 21
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S1: W4
Big Gabe Cup #3
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Proleague 2026-01-18
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W5
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Rongyi Cup S3
Nations Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.