EPTOn November 05 2014 04:59 ineversmile wrote:
Could that robot be...a reaver?!?!?!
(So much wishful thinking.)
Could that robot be...a reaver?!?!?!
(So much wishful thinking.)
Reaver and Goliath should return!
Blizzard shares a new SC II sound file. Part 2. - Page 10
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
rotta
5598 Posts
Reaver and Goliath should return! | ||
|
ChosenBrad1322
United States562 Posts
| ||
Xxio
Canada5565 Posts
| ||
|
architecture
United States643 Posts
That's part of the process, but basically all their original ideas sucked really bad. | ||
|
Phaenoman
568 Posts
| ||
|
Svizcy
Slovenia300 Posts
| ||
|
albis
United States652 Posts
| ||
|
Liliputin
Czech Republic458 Posts
| ||
|
Meavis
Netherlands1300 Posts
On November 05 2014 06:16 Shousan wrote: What I'm most hyped about is the whole process from alpha to release date, it's really funny to watch videos like the 2011 presentation of HOTS with quotes like "The Oracle is veeery worker friendly, no workers will ever be harmed by the Oracle. There are 55 ways to lose workers in Starcraft II, but thankfully the Oracle will not be one of them..." with the end result being the complete opposite... New Protoss Units Blizzcon 2011 Something to consider is that WoL was in a way worse state than HoTS is right now, so the new units and modifications' priority was more of a "quick fix" than to really expand gameplay and even then it happened to some extent. Nowadays HoTS might feel a little bit stale but is way more balanced and it's more enjoyable to watch, so I'm hoping the new units priority now is to expand gameplay and maybe fix a couple of things that are wrong with the current expansion. Can't wait to see what Blizzard has prepared for us. :D or the warhound being intended to break siegelines, countering anything with its only counter being siegelines. or the swarmhost, being intended to break turtlestyles, and instead is used for turtle styles or forces them on the other end. you so silly blizzard | ||
|
brickrd
United States4894 Posts
On November 05 2014 16:56 albis wrote: grappling hook. marines or other infantry unit and scale cliffs a couple of people have said grappling hook, but i don't really understand the point of adding infantry with cliff hopping/mobility skills to a race with speedvacs and reapers... | ||
|
SheaR619
United States2399 Posts
On November 05 2014 17:13 brickrd wrote: a couple of people have said grappling hook, but i don't really understand the point of adding infantry with cliff hopping/mobility skills to a race with speedvacs and reapers... Attack on Titan would differ!!! I want me a hero unit Mikasa and Levy sempai!!! | ||
|
Sapphire.lux
Romania2620 Posts
| ||
|
sashkata
Bulgaria3241 Posts
| ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On November 05 2014 18:30 Sapphire.lux wrote: If it's another mech unit for Terran i hope it's a replacement for an existing one. The Factory is already full of under performing crap. Please replace the Hellbat with an actual mech unit and add the Firebat to the Barracks. And make the Medivac a simple Dropship with an 300/300 upgrade to upgrade it to a Medivac, and add the Medic to the Barracks as well. Now that would make me happy. | ||
|
Meavis
Netherlands1300 Posts
| ||
|
SC2Toastie
Netherlands5725 Posts
| ||
|
Lexender
Mexico2656 Posts
On November 05 2014 20:20 SC2Toastie wrote: How epic would SC2 be if this sound is the Goliath (byebye Thor), the previous one actually is the Reaver (byebye Colossus) and the next one will be the Lurker (byebye Swarm Host) 0_0? Noo, there is only so much my hearth can take, damn Blizzard getting my hopes up ;_; | ||
|
Grumbels
Netherlands7031 Posts
On November 05 2014 20:44 Lexender wrote: Noo, there is only so much my hearth can take, damn Blizzard getting my hopes up ;_; If you lower your expectations then Blizzcon can only pleasantly surprise you. Tbh, I think there are enough alternatives to SC2 around these days that if you don't like the game you can find enjoyment elsewhere and this naturally results in a community that's happier with the game (since those who hate the game will start to move on). At this point it's not certain why Blizzard would even need to take risks by radically altering the game, and you might even say it's unfair to the players and fanbase. | ||
|
BoX
United States214 Posts
| ||
|
SC2Toastie
Netherlands5725 Posts
On November 05 2014 20:52 Grumbels wrote: If you lower your expectations then Blizzcon can only pleasantly surprise you. Tbh, I think there are enough alternatives to SC2 around these days that if you don't like the game you can find enjoyment elsewhere and this naturally results in a community that's happier with the game (since those who hate the game will start to move on). At this point it's not certain why Blizzard would even need to take risks by radically altering the game, and you might even say it's unfair to the players and fanbase. There's no RTSes. Only MOBA and shooters filled with sexually frustrated 12-year-olds... | ||
| ||
