• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 03:31
CET 09:31
KST 17:31
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13
Community News
[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation12Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA8StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!45$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship7
StarCraft 2
General
RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview [TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle BW General Discussion What happened to TvZ on Retro? Brood War web app to calculate unit interactions [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] RO32 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers PvZ map balance How to stay on top of macro?
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Artificial Intelligence Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Gospel – a Pulp No…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2005 users

Feb 10: Balance Test Map Coming - Page 40

Forum Index > SC2 General
992 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 38 39 40 41 42 50 Next All
zelderan
Profile Joined May 2013
United States163 Posts
February 11 2014 15:17 GMT
#781
On February 11 2014 23:56 darkness wrote:


Blizzard doesn't want to buff hydralisks because of PvZ. Their focus is hydralisks in ZvZ and ZvT in case you've missed.



Apparently I did miss that. I thought that the whole idea of having 100/25 Hydras was to fix the problem of Zerg not having enough AA early to mid game ZvP. My fault then.
"Pumpkin mut-muts!" ~ Tasteless
Pirfiktshon
Profile Joined June 2013
United States1072 Posts
February 11 2014 15:19 GMT
#782
With the New change it would be worth to reactor out WMs which would mean its 20 Second a WM lol yes they take 40 seconds out of Tech Lab or just out of Factory but Reactored you can pump out wms pretty quickly.....
Deleted User 261926
Profile Joined April 2012
960 Posts
February 11 2014 15:22 GMT
#783
On February 11 2014 21:19 shin_toss wrote:
Lol you realize that Hydra also attacks on ground, and Karpfen fail to comprehend, I'm not even saying to balance it on once particular level, my point is the word balance should apply to "all' skill level. If blink plays are easy, how much more roach/hyrdra plays that most of the time only involved attack-ground command.

yeah sure Roach/Hydra is fine vs their protoss counter parts. Jeez )


We should also ride rainbow unicorns and be immortal and eternally happy but it is impossible. It's normal and good that some units require more micro/game sense to make them effective. It's like this in pretty much every RTS...heck, even in mobas it's the exact same. Take dota for example: earth spirit (who got heavily nerfed the last patch), had about 40% win rate including all skill levels but it went as high as 65-70% in very high level brackets because he was pretty hard for low skilled people but it became very fucking good once the players had a bit of skill.
Nimix
Profile Joined October 2011
France1809 Posts
February 11 2014 15:25 GMT
#784
Would be cool to have a clear notice for when this actually goes live, tried both NA and EU test mods and both were the previous one..
Pirfiktshon
Profile Joined June 2013
United States1072 Posts
February 11 2014 15:34 GMT
#785
You can't Balance a Game off of Bottom Tier brackets.... as many times as ppl say that it makes me cringe and puts a pit in my stomach thinking is the general populace this dull?

You can't balance a game off of someone with 20 apm and just clicks on stuff and watches fights LOL Trust me I used to be one of those in BW when i was like 9 LOL You can only balance a game off of those that can use units to their maximum efficiency but the way Blizzard made SC2 is that alot of times you can't as a human perform what blizzard has set out for maximum efficiency for units.... IE the Automation 2000 marines vs Banes not a single marine dies and kills like 40 banes LOL or where a relatively small group of lings massacres like 40 tanks... as a human you can only do so much so fast even if you are korean..... So balancing really should only come into play when a certain strategy is used with complete ease and the counterpart that is reacting is facing an EXTREME unsurmountable task that can only be accomplished if the otherside makes a mistake.... LOL which TvP feels like that ALOT especially with blink stalker.... I don't know if you watch many T players stream but most of the time when terran defend blink all in at high GM level its because Protoss MADE HUGE HUGE HUGE mistakes....
digmouse
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
China6330 Posts
February 11 2014 15:35 GMT
#786
On February 11 2014 23:50 Kipsate wrote:
IIRC maps and Immortal range buff(?) destroyed 1-1-1?

1-1-1 remains viable till the end of WoL on smaller maps and maps that have hard to defend natural choke, Protoss learnt how to defend it by refining the 1-Gate expand build to gain bigger econ advantage combined with the Immortal range buff, even before that there were pros successfully defended it with said opening refining and sometimes counter tech like Stargate. The Immortal change is a good example of how a small change can truly impact a matchup in a positive way without completely destroying a build.

It is not until HotS with Photon Overcharge 1-1-1 was given a nail in the coffin.
TranslatorIf you want to ask anything about Chinese esports, send me a PM or follow me @nerddigmouse.
nimdil
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Poland3751 Posts
February 11 2014 15:37 GMT
#787
How many years do they need to balance this game...
zelderan
Profile Joined May 2013
United States163 Posts
February 11 2014 15:40 GMT
#788
On February 12 2014 00:34 Pirfiktshon wrote:
You can't Balance a Game off of Bottom Tier brackets.... as many times as ppl say that it makes me cringe and puts a pit in my stomach thinking is the general populace this dull?

You can't balance a game off of someone with 20 apm and just clicks on stuff and watches fights LOL Trust me I used to be one of those in BW when i was like 9 LOL You can only balance a game off of those that can use units to their maximum efficiency but the way Blizzard made SC2 is that alot of times you can't as a human perform what blizzard has set out for maximum efficiency for units.... IE the Automation 2000 marines vs Banes not a single marine dies and kills like 40 banes LOL or where a relatively small group of lings massacres like 40 tanks... as a human you can only do so much so fast even if you are korean..... So balancing really should only come into play when a certain strategy is used with complete ease and the counterpart that is reacting is facing an EXTREME unsurmountable task that can only be accomplished if the otherside makes a mistake.... LOL which TvP feels like that ALOT especially with blink stalker.... I don't know if you watch many T players stream but most of the time when terran defend blink all in at high GM level its because Protoss MADE HUGE HUGE HUGE mistakes....


Dude I really can't take you seriously with all those "LOL"'s
"Pumpkin mut-muts!" ~ Tasteless
zelderan
Profile Joined May 2013
United States163 Posts
February 11 2014 15:41 GMT
#789
On February 12 2014 00:37 nimdil wrote:
How many years do they need to balance this game...


The game is balanced. There are minor things here and there but overall Blizzard has the balance thing figured out. Most of these changes are in response to the Korean meta (msc+blink allins, wm not being strong enough, zerg AA bad etc.)
"Pumpkin mut-muts!" ~ Tasteless
Snusmumriken
Profile Joined April 2012
Sweden1717 Posts
February 11 2014 15:55 GMT
#790
On February 12 2014 00:41 zelderan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2014 00:37 nimdil wrote:
How many years do they need to balance this game...


The game is balanced. There are minor things here and there but overall Blizzard has the balance thing figured out. Most of these changes are in response to the Korean meta (msc+blink allins, wm not being strong enough, zerg AA bad etc.)


Im sorry but how can you say the game is balanced when all we see is pvp finals with the ocasional zerg? No, the game is not balanced and thats why protoss is getting a well overdue nerf. Now all we need is a fix for swarmhosts vipers and ravens and the game will be good again.
Amove for Aiur
zelderan
Profile Joined May 2013
United States163 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-02-11 16:01:34
February 11 2014 16:01 GMT
#791
On February 12 2014 00:55 Snusmumriken wrote:


Im sorry but how can you say the game is balanced when all we see is pvp finals with the ocasional zerg? No, the game is not balanced and thats why protoss is getting a well overdue nerf. Now all we need is a fix for swarmhosts vipers and ravens and the game will be good again.


When I say the game is balanced, I say that the overall race win-rate on the ladder, which is very very close, probably as close as you can even get to being balanced. I do agree that SH's need a fix, and toss definitely needs a nerf, but the game is pretty balanced outside of the pro scene.
"Pumpkin mut-muts!" ~ Tasteless
Pirfiktshon
Profile Joined June 2013
United States1072 Posts
February 11 2014 16:01 GMT
#792
Dude I really can't take you seriously with all those "LOL"'s
The game is balanced. There are minor things here and there but overall Blizzard has the balance thing figured out. Most of these changes are in response to the Korean meta (msc+blink allins, wm not being strong enough, zerg AA bad etc.)


And I can't take you serious because there is no way you can believe this and not be mentally challenged.....
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
February 11 2014 16:06 GMT
#793
On February 12 2014 01:01 zelderan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2014 00:55 Snusmumriken wrote:


Show nested quote +
Im sorry but how can you say the game is balanced when all we see is pvp finals with the ocasional zerg? No, the game is not balanced and thats why protoss is getting a well overdue nerf. Now all we need is a fix for swarmhosts vipers and ravens and the game will be good again.


When I say the game is balanced, I say that the overall race win-rate on the ladder, which is very very close, probably as close as you can even get to being balanced. I do agree that SH's need a fix, and toss definitely needs a nerf, but the game is pretty balanced outside of the pro scene.

The ladder is built to have balanced winrates, so it means nothing.
Squat
Profile Joined September 2013
Sweden7978 Posts
February 11 2014 16:06 GMT
#794
On February 12 2014 01:01 zelderan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2014 00:55 Snusmumriken wrote:


Show nested quote +
Im sorry but how can you say the game is balanced when all we see is pvp finals with the ocasional zerg? No, the game is not balanced and thats why protoss is getting a well overdue nerf. Now all we need is a fix for swarmhosts vipers and ravens and the game will be good again.


When I say the game is balanced, I say that the overall race win-rate on the ladder, which is very very close, probably as close as you can even get to being balanced. I do agree that SH's need a fix, and toss definitely needs a nerf, but the game is pretty balanced outside of the pro scene.

If you are taking win rates on ladder as evidence for balance, you don't understand how the ladder system works. You could give marines 15 damage and the ladder would eventually have a 50/50 win rate.
"Digital. They have digital. What is digital?" - Donald J Trump
TeeTS
Profile Joined June 2011
Germany2762 Posts
February 11 2014 16:06 GMT
#795
On February 12 2014 01:01 zelderan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2014 00:55 Snusmumriken wrote:


Show nested quote +
Im sorry but how can you say the game is balanced when all we see is pvp finals with the ocasional zerg? No, the game is not balanced and thats why protoss is getting a well overdue nerf. Now all we need is a fix for swarmhosts vipers and ravens and the game will be good again.


When I say the game is balanced, I say that the overall race win-rate on the ladder, which is very very close, probably as close as you can even get to being balanced. I do agree that SH's need a fix, and toss definitely needs a nerf, but the game is pretty balanced outside of the pro scene.


rofl ofc the overall race winrate on the ladder is close to 50%, that´s what the ladder system doesn, unless you are at the very ends of the skill spectrum. But that way fewer terrans than protoss or zerg are reaching GM and Master in every region, is no indicator for you?
Dingodile
Profile Joined December 2011
4137 Posts
February 11 2014 16:09 GMT
#796
On February 12 2014 00:37 nimdil wrote:
How many years do they need to balance this game...

It has nothing to do with balance. Even if it is perfectly balanced, we are going to be incredibly bored in 6 months, so that we need a new balance patch again . Every race has 2 OP units is alot more interesting to play and watch than every unit (and the game) is perfectly balanced.
Grubby | ToD | Moon | Lyn | Sky
pali_
Profile Joined February 2011
Germany48 Posts
February 11 2014 16:30 GMT
#797
On February 11 2014 18:21 pali_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 11 2014 17:46 Torte de Lini wrote:
On February 11 2014 06:08 Existor wrote:
And here is a banner!

[image loading]


God that's freakin' cool! I wish I had this as 1920 x 1080


You ain't getting that in 1920x1080, because the aspect ratio does not fit More like 1920x600

I like most of the changes btw. Especially mama-core vision and WM shield dmg buff. I agree though that the Blink nerf might be too harsh, 50% cooldown nerf is too much imo, it is not the blink itself that makes the blink-all-ins so tough to hold, it's the mothershipcore, its maphack-vision + timewarp PLUS the fact that you don't require a tech building to get it (meaning like robo or stargate for instance, I know that the cybernetics core is required) and that it's not much of an investment, so basically it's a nobrainer for P to get it. (Maybe increasing the cost a bit - escpecially the gas cost - would make it more of a decision for P to get it? I mean, this should be a game of choices and each choice should have its pros and cons. And given the fact that the core is a damn strong defensive - and offensive - see below - unit, I don't see why it shouldn't be more expensive)

Now, I don't want to whine too much, but a few thoughts on the mothership core. Correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I got it, this unit was introduced to the game so that P become safer against all-ins / so that expand builds (especially in PvZ and PvP) become more viable. I think that is correct? Now, I would be totally OK with that, an easy to get defensive unit which allows you to play macro-focused. Totally fine with me. The fact which is totally breaking my balls is that this unit is not only defensive, but it can be used in a crapton of various all-ins as well, making them VERY strong. Now, from my perspective, designing a unit like that is just plain wrong, especially due to the fact that it is so low in the tech tree and so easy to get.
So, why not try to change sth so that the mama-core becomes a pure defensive unit? For example, change its movement speed? P still could use defensive timewarps and PO and still could use recall by splitting a part of its army and recalling it to the 3rd nexus in a split-push situation, for example. This would especially nerf the mama-core's offensive ability in TvP and weaken the 2base immortal based PvZ all-ins without affecting the mama-core's defensive abilities.
I would love to hear your thoughts on that.

Another suggestion I read a few pages back was reducing stim research time by a few seconds. Thinking back, the research time was mainly increased in order to help P hold the medivac stim / stim only pushes. I think that's about right? Now, P have the mothership core / the maps are much bigger, so why not revert this change? In TvP, P is pretty much untouchable within the first 7-8-9 minutes thanks to the mothership core, so why not making T's life a bit easier and helping them hold the plethora of P all-ins by reducing the stim research time a bit? Or would this affect TvZ too much? I honestly don't think so.
Again, thoughts would be appreciated.


Not a single comment guys? Oo
ㅈㅈ
Pirfiktshon
Profile Joined June 2013
United States1072 Posts
February 11 2014 16:31 GMT
#798
The ladder is built to have balanced winrates, so it means nothing.


rofl ofc the overall race winrate on the ladder is close to 50%, that´s what the ladder system doesn, unless you are at the very ends of the skill spectrum. But that way fewer terrans than protoss or zerg are reaching GM and Master in every region, is no indicator for you?


This is exactly why you can't just look at oh its 50% winrate on ladder give or take a few points in protoss favor LOL Racial distribution is more of a factor than anything if you have the same amount of Terrans as you do protoss and zergs in total of players yet you have 50% protoss in GM 35 % zerg in gm and 15% Terran that has to ring some bells and shoot off some buzzers....

It has nothing to do with balance. Even if it is perfectly balanced, we are going to be incredibly bored in 6 months, so that we need a new balance patch again . Every race has 2 OP units is alot more interesting to play and watch than every unit (and the game) is perfectly balanced.


The problem with doing this is that the race that suffers feels cheated and stops playing / watching so you start to decline in viewership and popularity of the game as a whole.... SC2 has been plagued with this metric since 2010 when it came out LOL Blizzard does things in the name of "Being Interesting to watch" but when you skew a match up hardcore in favor of one race when it was already slightly favored to them then you start getting what we have now CONSTANT decline and no increase of players / viewers..... it truly breaks my heart even though BW had small broken things players / maps could over come them with new strategies and better control / macro / micro but the way blizzard made sc2 they are in control of the meta and when players figure something out the Nerf guns come out instead of making things reasonable in the first place then just leaving the core alone and just build other things around it IE MAPS that change things......
Pirfiktshon
Profile Joined June 2013
United States1072 Posts
February 11 2014 16:34 GMT
#799
You ain't getting that in 1920x1080, because the aspect ratio does not fit More like 1920x600

I like most of the changes btw. Especially mama-core vision and WM shield dmg buff. I agree though that the Blink nerf might be too harsh, 50% cooldown nerf is too much imo, it is not the blink itself that makes the blink-all-ins so tough to hold, it's the mothershipcore, its maphack-vision + timewarp PLUS the fact that you don't require a tech building to get it (meaning like robo or stargate for instance, I know that the cybernetics core is required) and that it's not much of an investment, so basically it's a nobrainer for P to get it. (Maybe increasing the cost a bit - escpecially the gas cost - would make it more of a decision for P to get it? I mean, this should be a game of choices and each choice should have its pros and cons. And given the fact that the core is a damn strong defensive - and offensive - see below - unit, I don't see why it shouldn't be more expensive)

Now, I don't want to whine too much, but a few thoughts on the mothership core. Correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I got it, this unit was introduced to the game so that P become safer against all-ins / so that expand builds (especially in PvZ and PvP) become more viable. I think that is correct? Now, I would be totally OK with that, an easy to get defensive unit which allows you to play macro-focused. Totally fine with me. The fact which is totally breaking my balls is that this unit is not only defensive, but it can be used in a crapton of various all-ins as well, making them VERY strong. Now, from my perspective, designing a unit like that is just plain wrong, especially due to the fact that it is so low in the tech tree and so easy to get.
So, why not try to change sth so that the mama-core becomes a pure defensive unit? For example, change its movement speed? P still could use defensive timewarps and PO and still could use recall by splitting a part of its army and recalling it to the 3rd nexus in a split-push situation, for example. This would especially nerf the mama-core's offensive ability in TvP and weaken the 2base immortal based PvZ all-ins without affecting the mama-core's defensive abilities.
I would love to hear your thoughts on that.

Another suggestion I read a few pages back was reducing stim research time by a few seconds. Thinking back, the research time was mainly increased in order to help P hold the medivac stim / stim only pushes. I think that's about right? Now, P have the mothership core / the maps are much bigger, so why not revert this change? In TvP, P is pretty much untouchable within the first 7-8-9 minutes thanks to the mothership core, so why not making T's life a bit easier and helping them hold the plethora of P all-ins by reducing the stim research time a bit? Or would this affect TvZ too much? I honestly don't think so.
Again, thoughts would be appreciated.


Honestly this analysis is well thought out the major problem is that DK LOVES the offensive aspect of the MSC and I was the one who suggested Reverting the STim reserach timing back because of the many things that have evolved in the game so yea DEFLY agree with that.... LOL
RampancyTW
Profile Joined August 2010
United States577 Posts
February 11 2014 16:36 GMT
#800
On February 12 2014 01:06 TheDwf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 12 2014 01:01 zelderan wrote:
On February 12 2014 00:55 Snusmumriken wrote:


Im sorry but how can you say the game is balanced when all we see is pvp finals with the ocasional zerg? No, the game is not balanced and thats why protoss is getting a well overdue nerf. Now all we need is a fix for swarmhosts vipers and ravens and the game will be good again.


When I say the game is balanced, I say that the overall race win-rate on the ladder, which is very very close, probably as close as you can even get to being balanced. I do agree that SH's need a fix, and toss definitely needs a nerf, but the game is pretty balanced outside of the pro scene.

The ladder is built to have balanced winrates, so it means nothing.
...Yes, but because it's built to have balanced winrates, any racial imbalances will be clearly displayed because one race being overpowered or underpowered with respect to (an)other race(s) will be reflected in the matchup winrates. If the matchup-wide winrates are all close to 50% (which they are), then the game is pretty damn balanced.
Prev 1 38 39 40 41 42 50 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 29m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 230
StarCraft: Brood War
Zeus 655
Shuttle 557
Jaedong 373
Leta 350
Stork 284
PianO 205
Dewaltoss 55
Shinee 35
Bale 25
NotJumperer 20
[ Show more ]
Hm[arnc] 19
soO 17
Dota 2
XaKoH 469
NeuroSwarm101
League of Legends
JimRising 585
Counter-Strike
fl0m1553
Other Games
summit1g16302
FrodaN1662
WinterStarcraft527
C9.Mang0279
mouzStarbuck121
KnowMe45
Mew2King39
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream7480
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream1265
Other Games
gamesdonequick630
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH171
• LUISG 19
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt1533
• Lourlo1005
• HappyZerGling130
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
1h 29m
RSL Revival
1h 29m
herO vs Gerald
ByuN vs SHIN
Kung Fu Cup
3h 29m
Cure vs Reynor
Classic vs herO
IPSL
8h 29m
ZZZero vs rasowy
Napoleon vs KameZerg
OSC
10h 29m
BSL 21
11h 29m
Tarson vs Julia
Doodle vs OldBoy
eOnzErG vs WolFix
StRyKeR vs Aeternum
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 1h
RSL Revival
1d 1h
Reynor vs sOs
Maru vs Ryung
Kung Fu Cup
1d 3h
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 3h
[ Show More ]
BSL 21
1d 11h
JDConan vs Semih
Dragon vs Dienmax
Tech vs NewOcean
TerrOr vs Artosis
IPSL
1d 11h
Dewalt vs WolFix
eOnzErG vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
1d 14h
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
3 days
BSL: GosuLeague
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
BSL: GosuLeague
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-07
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.