| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
emythrel
United Kingdom2599 Posts
On October 13 2012 08:13 Liquid`NonY wrote: You are right no one has asked Blizzard for LAN yet. Someone get on that! Holy trolling batman! Nice to see you Nony, your response should have ended this thread but instead it will keep it going much longer ;p | ||
|
Jojo131
Brazil1631 Posts
On October 13 2012 10:43 NovaTheFeared wrote: Blizzard has shown that they care much less about their brand quality than they used to. SC2's battle net a step backward from SC and lack of LAN play. D3 release, infinite problems. MoP? Sells less in a week than Cata in a day. So even though you're being sarcastic, you're actually correct. I'm currently playing MoP actually, and I can definitely put my word out there to say that it's a big improvement from the disappointment of Cataclysm, and definitely one of the best expansions once you get your nostalgia out of the way. Especially in WoW's case, first week sales dont reflect anything other than the hype surrounding the upcoming product. Cata was puffed up and supposed to be the best thing to ever hit WoW, while Blizz kept their head tucked down for MoP in terms of advertising. D3 has been bagged on for all the problems during release, and thats all that will be remembered by people who left after the first few months. I've never played it personally, but I'm pretty sure we've had quite a number of people from TL say that the game is much better now as well. You're not really making any sense by saying they dont care about their reputation, especially considering that Blizzard is also working on an entirely new franchise-- whose sales will probably be determined mostly by the current reputation of their other games right now. | ||
|
Skullflower
United States3779 Posts
On October 13 2012 08:24 Zato-1 wrote: @OP: Did you see the massive shitfest that was the Season 2 League of Legends World Series? One quarter-finals game (between CLG.eu and World Elite) had to be replayed like 3 times until eventually they gave up and had to postpone the match for another day. That? That's inexcusable. SC2 has had some hiccups, but overall the lack of LAN hasn't been catastrophic for tournament and league experience. You should've mentioned the somewhat totally obvious cheating that took place too but it's cool. | ||
|
MasterCynical
505 Posts
Why is Dota2 getting lan? Valve has a completely different stance on piracy, they view it as a service issue. If their service was good enough, the pirates would convert to steam. Activion has a completely different view on piracy, they view it as if their product was impossible to pirate, then all the pirates would suddenly have buy their game. Ingenious | ||
|
Excludos
Norway8236 Posts
On October 13 2012 11:02 TheWorldToCome wrote: Having to play through battle.net is the only leverage that blizz or GOM has of kespa becoming what is was in sc1. That doesn't make any sense, as Blizzard will still "own" the lanbox, and they could simply refuse to lend one out to kespa. The software on those boxes arent anything you can "copy". Which is why excuses like "piracy" and what you just posted doesn't hold up in the slightest. | ||
|
AssyrianKing
Australia2116 Posts
Blizzards Response: Ohhhh myyyyyy.... OH WELL REGAME! | ||
|
Zrana
United Kingdom698 Posts
Seems like they are worried a bunch of guys working for free could make a better matchmaking system than BNet 2.0. Well, that's understandable. | ||
|
Seraphic
United States3849 Posts
SC2 hasn't had that happen yet, and until something huge like that happens for SC2, Blizz won't budge. | ||
|
S:klogW
Austria657 Posts
| ||
|
NeutraLiTe
United States49 Posts
On October 13 2012 09:16 Shiori wrote: I don't think you understand what competition actually is. So what you're saying is things would be more competitive if KeSPA singlehandedly segregated the two leagues like they wanted to and have done before in BW. Gotcha. | ||
|
GinDo
3327 Posts
All while we bitch about SC3 ruining ESports. | ||
|
OblivionMage
Canada377 Posts
| ||
|
InfectedGoat
Canada444 Posts
| ||
|
QuackPocketDuck
410 Posts
every time broadband goes down at an event they actually wait for it to be fixed so they can play, instead of playing it out on lan and showing you a vod the next day... | ||
tree.hugger
Philadelphia, PA10406 Posts
| ||
|
Sophia
Germany115 Posts
| ||
|
kiy0
Portugal593 Posts
| ||
|
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10366 Posts
On October 13 2012 08:08 ExPresident wrote: Blizzard likes to operate on a 1 step forward, 3 steps back tempo. What was possible 10 years ago just isn't now you know. Good for LoL Edit - To the person above me, people have complained to blizzard, didn't do any good. Soo how is complaining to TL better? | ||
|
MetalPanda
Canada1152 Posts
| ||
|
zhurai
United States5660 Posts
On October 13 2012 12:13 Yoshi Kirishima wrote: Soo how is complaining to TL better? that's what I've been asking this whole thread really but nobody has answered any good reasons >> | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
The PondCast
WardiTV Team League
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
RSL Revival
WardiTV Team League
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
BSL
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
