• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 17:16
CEST 23:16
KST 06:16
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202534Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder9EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced50BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Serral wins EWC 2025 Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 Classic: "It's a thick wall to break through to become world champ" Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup Weeklies and Monthlies Info Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) TaeJa vs Creator Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Scmdraft 2 - 0.9.0 Preview [BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder BW General Discussion Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Which top zerg/toss will fail in qualifiers?
Tourneys
[ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2 [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 1 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 669 users

Ministry of Win - Statement - Page 9

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 29 Next All
Godwrath
Profile Joined August 2012
Spain10126 Posts
September 13 2012 17:39 GMT
#161
On September 14 2012 02:33 bonifaceviii wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2012 02:25 s00s wrote:
nobody wonders why Fuzer didn't provide his lawer licence. i think he should claryfie this issue.
maybe there was no lawer?

Considering there had already been revisions made to the contract that would heavily lean toward there being a lawyer involved, but we don't know that. Fuzer could have proposed revisions himself, and then wanted to get a look-see by his lawyer after he got the final version on September 8th.

As noted above, trying to get any documentation from a lawyer in such an aggressive time frame is quite difficult. But let's just assume that MoW got tired of Fuzer stonewalling them and kicked him out of the house out of frustration; the correct way of doing so is to refund the money. Hell, there may have been a "if you're an asshole we can kick you out and keep your deposit" clause in the contract but Fuzer hadn't signed it!


Finally someone with alive brain cells.

If you want to kick the guy out of the house because he is a prick, always remember it is a business, and YOU took the risk bringing him to the house withouth signing anything. Do the right thing, pay the guy, say him goodbye, wish him the best of lucks, and GG. Noone can ever say some shit about you because you are on the right.
ragz_gt
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
9172 Posts
September 13 2012 17:39 GMT
#162
On September 14 2012 02:35 saksy2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2012 02:27 Salazarz wrote:
On September 14 2012 02:00 Noobity wrote:
On September 14 2012 01:56 Salazarz wrote:
So, if the streaming thing is 'for the benefit of players' and is 'totally negotiable', why do you have a written contract specifically addressing the exact amount of hours each player is required to stream? It's not something Fuzer alone said, other players mentioned it in passing as well.

And why are you saying that 'a refund was offered, which Fuzer refused'? You make it sound like it was a genuine, unconditional offer of a refund - but previous posts already confirmed that you put it forward as another demand - 'either take the cash and shut up, or you aren't getting the money', essentially.

Last but not least, how does it make sense to give the player an ultimatum of either signing a contract that he is unhappy with, or leaving the house into which he had already settled, without giving him the opportunity of having the contract examined by someone more qualified of appraising it?

You try to sound nice and professional here, but all I'm seeing is a lot of really poor damage control and fluffy words that contradict reality. You'd be better off simply saying, 'Yeah, we fucked up with Fuzer. We'll try to do better in future' instead of this. Also, kittens? Seriously?


If fuzer doesn't read the contract, or have a professional look at the contract over the course of a month then he can't negotiate it.

What was the purpose of fuzer's post if not to attack MoW? Upon being attacked they decided that they would offer to unconditionally rectify the reason the attack took place, Fuzer declined. This is what attacks are supposed to do, create some sort of response. Fuzer got a response both out of the community and the MoW. Might not have been the correct response entirely, but it was a positive attempt.

When the person being offered the ultimatum has had over a month to make adjustments to a part of that ultimatum then it makes complete sense.

If you notice, they also didn't say "Yeah, we fucked up with fuzer" they say "We made mistakes handling the fuzer situation and offer our sincere apologies to him as well as the entire community" which is a huge difference. I wonder how many of you would care if we found out that Fuzer was back there next week and all was forgiven. I bet all the esports dollars there would be grudges held over issues that didn't have anything to do with us in the least.


He couldn't have a professional look at the contract over the course of a month because MoW refused to provide a copy of the contract for anyone but himself to look at. How exactly is that his fault?

Also, however critical Fuzer is, he is hardly 'attacking' MoW. He gave his recollection of the events, and provided ample evidence supporting his side of the story. It's not an attack, it's an explanation of the situation from his point of view; the fact that it puts MoW in bad light is hardly his fault if the stuff is actually true.
It's just very hard to take any of their statements seriously.

But several of his main arguments: (starving, not being part of another team house for 10 years, everyone having to stream 150 hours a month) were simply not true at all.


Food problem is verified by MoW and other players. Did he exagerate? Probably. But it still an issue.
The 10 year can't create own house thing was confirmed by others.
150 hour stream was also confirmed by multiple players.

Just because MoW said they didn't enforce it (that's a bunch of BS, you don't put it in contract just for shits and giggles) doesn't mean it was not in the contract and was expected.
I'm not an otaku, I'm a specialist.
soiii
Profile Joined July 2011
Germany266 Posts
September 13 2012 17:40 GMT
#163
On September 14 2012 02:12 syriuszonito wrote:
Try to steal someones money -> shit gots revealed -> post kittens

Seriously?

Yes, seriously.. The staff always seemed quite cold and not carrying in the videos. And now you know why. The whole MoW is there for the money and nothing more.
Cheerio
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
Ukraine3178 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-13 17:42:25
September 13 2012 17:40 GMT
#164
You guys at MoW still need to understand that after you accepted the payment you have to deliver the services. He payed for the month let him live to the end and then kick him out, NOT BEFORE THAT. There was no stupid contract signed where a stupid clause like
If MoW decides to kick the player out before his stay expires, the player is not entitled for a refund on the remaining days

could be inserted. So pretty fucking please give him the damn money.
FlamingTurd
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1059 Posts
September 13 2012 17:40 GMT
#165
Your kittens are great, your reimbursement policies are not however.
Nerf MMMT!!! Liquid`Ret Hwaiting!!!
gawk
Profile Joined February 2010
Germany310 Posts
September 13 2012 17:41 GMT
#166
Samuli expressed his interest in joining the Ministry of Win. In order to meet his expectations we decided to invite him in and let him experience the house-life first hand, so that he could make a more educated decision with regards to the contract. A monthly fee of 2 500 PLN has been established, paid up front each month, which has been delivered in cash by Samuli on arrival to the house.

So until he signs the contract you established he would pay 2500 PLN per month. Then when both of you are working out the details of the contract you tell him to sign until 22:00 or leave the house?
It was the 8th of the month for which he already payed you, so what was your reason to throw him out so early? Especially because fuzers native language is not english and he wanted to let a lawyer check the contract, which is completely reasonable.
Did you ask fuzer to send some qualifications of his lawyer?

At least you admit that you did not handle the situation correctly, but you don't really go into detail to make me understand why you acted the way you did.


Also I think adding kittens in this situation is not appropriate.
MiQ
Profile Joined August 2012
Canada312 Posts
September 13 2012 17:41 GMT
#167
On September 14 2012 02:28 pallad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2012 02:25 MiQ wrote:
On September 14 2012 02:23 m0ck wrote:
So much uninformed reflexive stupid in this thread. Taking fuzers part is not cheering on david versus goliath. It's urging on a trollish idiot who spends his time 2-raxing on ladder.


Because the builds he chooses to use during ladder play OBVIOUSLY has something to do with the whole thing.

And you talk about stupid...


Looks like everyone know that Fuzer is BM/chesser and cant be taking seriously , but only you no..
Did you watch Fuzer strem just once.. ? What he was doing on stream.. ? I think no..


I wish I could understand a word of your gibberish but I honestly can't. You're not even trying to be understood. Not that there is anything to understand, just saying your posts look like shit.
Tons of damage
saksy2
Profile Joined May 2011
Norway520 Posts
September 13 2012 17:41 GMT
#168
On September 14 2012 02:39 ragz_gt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2012 02:35 saksy2 wrote:
On September 14 2012 02:27 Salazarz wrote:
On September 14 2012 02:00 Noobity wrote:
On September 14 2012 01:56 Salazarz wrote:
So, if the streaming thing is 'for the benefit of players' and is 'totally negotiable', why do you have a written contract specifically addressing the exact amount of hours each player is required to stream? It's not something Fuzer alone said, other players mentioned it in passing as well.

And why are you saying that 'a refund was offered, which Fuzer refused'? You make it sound like it was a genuine, unconditional offer of a refund - but previous posts already confirmed that you put it forward as another demand - 'either take the cash and shut up, or you aren't getting the money', essentially.

Last but not least, how does it make sense to give the player an ultimatum of either signing a contract that he is unhappy with, or leaving the house into which he had already settled, without giving him the opportunity of having the contract examined by someone more qualified of appraising it?

You try to sound nice and professional here, but all I'm seeing is a lot of really poor damage control and fluffy words that contradict reality. You'd be better off simply saying, 'Yeah, we fucked up with Fuzer. We'll try to do better in future' instead of this. Also, kittens? Seriously?


If fuzer doesn't read the contract, or have a professional look at the contract over the course of a month then he can't negotiate it.

What was the purpose of fuzer's post if not to attack MoW? Upon being attacked they decided that they would offer to unconditionally rectify the reason the attack took place, Fuzer declined. This is what attacks are supposed to do, create some sort of response. Fuzer got a response both out of the community and the MoW. Might not have been the correct response entirely, but it was a positive attempt.

When the person being offered the ultimatum has had over a month to make adjustments to a part of that ultimatum then it makes complete sense.

If you notice, they also didn't say "Yeah, we fucked up with fuzer" they say "We made mistakes handling the fuzer situation and offer our sincere apologies to him as well as the entire community" which is a huge difference. I wonder how many of you would care if we found out that Fuzer was back there next week and all was forgiven. I bet all the esports dollars there would be grudges held over issues that didn't have anything to do with us in the least.


He couldn't have a professional look at the contract over the course of a month because MoW refused to provide a copy of the contract for anyone but himself to look at. How exactly is that his fault?

Also, however critical Fuzer is, he is hardly 'attacking' MoW. He gave his recollection of the events, and provided ample evidence supporting his side of the story. It's not an attack, it's an explanation of the situation from his point of view; the fact that it puts MoW in bad light is hardly his fault if the stuff is actually true.
It's just very hard to take any of their statements seriously.

But several of his main arguments: (starving, not being part of another team house for 10 years, everyone having to stream 150 hours a month) were simply not true at all.


Food problem is verified by MoW and other players. Did he exagerate? Probably. But it still an issue.
The 10 year can't create own house thing was confirmed by others.
150 hour stream was also confirmed by multiple players.

Just because MoW said they didn't enforce it (that's a bunch of BS, you don't put it in contract just for shits and giggles) doesn't mean it was not in the contract and was expected.

Fuzer claimed you couldn't join another gaming house, which is pretty different from creating one. Other players also confirmed streaming hours were negotiable and not at all "forced to stream 150 hours"
Dexington
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Canada7276 Posts
September 13 2012 17:41 GMT
#169
On September 14 2012 01:28 ROOTT1 wrote:
lol felines are so noobie, theyre too unloyal
this is where its at
[image loading]


You've owned the wrong felines then.
"Man you guys are missing out waving your stats dicks about instead of watching this pvp" - bbm
ragz_gt
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
9172 Posts
September 13 2012 17:44 GMT
#170
On September 14 2012 02:41 saksy2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2012 02:39 ragz_gt wrote:
On September 14 2012 02:35 saksy2 wrote:
On September 14 2012 02:27 Salazarz wrote:
On September 14 2012 02:00 Noobity wrote:
On September 14 2012 01:56 Salazarz wrote:
So, if the streaming thing is 'for the benefit of players' and is 'totally negotiable', why do you have a written contract specifically addressing the exact amount of hours each player is required to stream? It's not something Fuzer alone said, other players mentioned it in passing as well.

And why are you saying that 'a refund was offered, which Fuzer refused'? You make it sound like it was a genuine, unconditional offer of a refund - but previous posts already confirmed that you put it forward as another demand - 'either take the cash and shut up, or you aren't getting the money', essentially.

Last but not least, how does it make sense to give the player an ultimatum of either signing a contract that he is unhappy with, or leaving the house into which he had already settled, without giving him the opportunity of having the contract examined by someone more qualified of appraising it?

You try to sound nice and professional here, but all I'm seeing is a lot of really poor damage control and fluffy words that contradict reality. You'd be better off simply saying, 'Yeah, we fucked up with Fuzer. We'll try to do better in future' instead of this. Also, kittens? Seriously?


If fuzer doesn't read the contract, or have a professional look at the contract over the course of a month then he can't negotiate it.

What was the purpose of fuzer's post if not to attack MoW? Upon being attacked they decided that they would offer to unconditionally rectify the reason the attack took place, Fuzer declined. This is what attacks are supposed to do, create some sort of response. Fuzer got a response both out of the community and the MoW. Might not have been the correct response entirely, but it was a positive attempt.

When the person being offered the ultimatum has had over a month to make adjustments to a part of that ultimatum then it makes complete sense.

If you notice, they also didn't say "Yeah, we fucked up with fuzer" they say "We made mistakes handling the fuzer situation and offer our sincere apologies to him as well as the entire community" which is a huge difference. I wonder how many of you would care if we found out that Fuzer was back there next week and all was forgiven. I bet all the esports dollars there would be grudges held over issues that didn't have anything to do with us in the least.


He couldn't have a professional look at the contract over the course of a month because MoW refused to provide a copy of the contract for anyone but himself to look at. How exactly is that his fault?

Also, however critical Fuzer is, he is hardly 'attacking' MoW. He gave his recollection of the events, and provided ample evidence supporting his side of the story. It's not an attack, it's an explanation of the situation from his point of view; the fact that it puts MoW in bad light is hardly his fault if the stuff is actually true.
It's just very hard to take any of their statements seriously.

But several of his main arguments: (starving, not being part of another team house for 10 years, everyone having to stream 150 hours a month) were simply not true at all.


Food problem is verified by MoW and other players. Did he exagerate? Probably. But it still an issue.
The 10 year can't create own house thing was confirmed by others.
150 hour stream was also confirmed by multiple players.

Just because MoW said they didn't enforce it (that's a bunch of BS, you don't put it in contract just for shits and giggles) doesn't mean it was not in the contract and was expected.

Fuzer claimed you couldn't join another gaming house, which is pretty different from creating one. Other players also confirmed streaming hours were negotiable and not at all "forced to stream 150 hours"


His claim was that he couldn't understand that part well (not native speaker) thus said what he thought it meant. It is a valid point and why he want his lawyer to look at it. If people give you a contract that says "150 hour streaming" how do you know it is negotiable and why does that make a difference anyway?
I'm not an otaku, I'm a specialist.
ibo422
Profile Joined April 2012
Belgium2844 Posts
September 13 2012 17:44 GMT
#171
on the bright side of the story.. the players might get healthy food now..
Kergy
Profile Joined December 2010
Peru2011 Posts
September 13 2012 17:44 GMT
#172
What drama?

+ Show Spoiler +
yes, the kitties bought me
Everyday Girl's Day~!
Cheerio
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
Ukraine3178 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-13 17:51:08
September 13 2012 17:45 GMT
#173
The worst part is the ultimatum to leave the house before 22.00. Nice way to throw a guy out in the night in the foreign country.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
September 13 2012 17:46 GMT
#174
On September 14 2012 02:30 TheHansBecker wrote:
"Sorry, you caught us forcing players to agree to an unconscionable contract.... We sincerely apologize."


More like, sorry you got caught and exposed...


Except the contract was negotiated with the original guests after they specifically set aside time to do so, and it was agreeable to those players. Surprise surprise, a pitchfork wielder hurled accusations of malicious intent despite not being informed. LOL this particular drama episode is especially pathetic. I hopeyou realize its people like you that Tasteless was shitting on when he said it's embarrassing to go on community sites and see the drama threads. As with him I truly feel embarrassed for the community right now.
KadaverBB
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany25657 Posts
September 13 2012 17:47 GMT
#175
Ugh, now we have 2 threads where people can shittalk
Can't you (Fuzer and MoW) deal with this privately instead of making statements blaming the other?

MoW will never win this argument anyway, fuzer (obviously) posted his accusations first and people had about 3 hours (60 pages) of time to make up their minds that Mow is the bad guy.
Anything that is posted is of course a lie, misinformation and what not -.-
AdministratorLaws change depending on who's making them, but justice is justice
dsll
Profile Joined March 2011
United Kingdom143 Posts
September 13 2012 17:47 GMT
#176
Fuck you guys, You can't just add some bs pictures and expect everything to be hunky dory - Don't insult our intelligence.
scypio
Profile Joined December 2011
Poland2127 Posts
September 13 2012 17:47 GMT
#177
On September 14 2012 02:45 Cheerio wrote:
The worst part is the ultimatum to leave the house before 22.00. Nice way to through a guy out in the night in the foreign country.


Hey, it's before 22:00 not at 22:00 sharp. So he could just catch direct flight to Helsinki at 19:45
I play random | I like Hots | INnoVation | sOs | Tefel TOP1!
jinorazi
Profile Joined October 2004
Korea (South)4948 Posts
September 13 2012 17:47 GMT
#178
obvious pr is obvious, lol
age: 84 | location: california | sex: 잘함
saksy2
Profile Joined May 2011
Norway520 Posts
September 13 2012 17:48 GMT
#179
On September 14 2012 02:44 ragz_gt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2012 02:41 saksy2 wrote:
On September 14 2012 02:39 ragz_gt wrote:
On September 14 2012 02:35 saksy2 wrote:
On September 14 2012 02:27 Salazarz wrote:
On September 14 2012 02:00 Noobity wrote:
On September 14 2012 01:56 Salazarz wrote:
So, if the streaming thing is 'for the benefit of players' and is 'totally negotiable', why do you have a written contract specifically addressing the exact amount of hours each player is required to stream? It's not something Fuzer alone said, other players mentioned it in passing as well.

And why are you saying that 'a refund was offered, which Fuzer refused'? You make it sound like it was a genuine, unconditional offer of a refund - but previous posts already confirmed that you put it forward as another demand - 'either take the cash and shut up, or you aren't getting the money', essentially.

Last but not least, how does it make sense to give the player an ultimatum of either signing a contract that he is unhappy with, or leaving the house into which he had already settled, without giving him the opportunity of having the contract examined by someone more qualified of appraising it?

You try to sound nice and professional here, but all I'm seeing is a lot of really poor damage control and fluffy words that contradict reality. You'd be better off simply saying, 'Yeah, we fucked up with Fuzer. We'll try to do better in future' instead of this. Also, kittens? Seriously?


If fuzer doesn't read the contract, or have a professional look at the contract over the course of a month then he can't negotiate it.

What was the purpose of fuzer's post if not to attack MoW? Upon being attacked they decided that they would offer to unconditionally rectify the reason the attack took place, Fuzer declined. This is what attacks are supposed to do, create some sort of response. Fuzer got a response both out of the community and the MoW. Might not have been the correct response entirely, but it was a positive attempt.

When the person being offered the ultimatum has had over a month to make adjustments to a part of that ultimatum then it makes complete sense.

If you notice, they also didn't say "Yeah, we fucked up with fuzer" they say "We made mistakes handling the fuzer situation and offer our sincere apologies to him as well as the entire community" which is a huge difference. I wonder how many of you would care if we found out that Fuzer was back there next week and all was forgiven. I bet all the esports dollars there would be grudges held over issues that didn't have anything to do with us in the least.


He couldn't have a professional look at the contract over the course of a month because MoW refused to provide a copy of the contract for anyone but himself to look at. How exactly is that his fault?

Also, however critical Fuzer is, he is hardly 'attacking' MoW. He gave his recollection of the events, and provided ample evidence supporting his side of the story. It's not an attack, it's an explanation of the situation from his point of view; the fact that it puts MoW in bad light is hardly his fault if the stuff is actually true.
It's just very hard to take any of their statements seriously.

But several of his main arguments: (starving, not being part of another team house for 10 years, everyone having to stream 150 hours a month) were simply not true at all.


Food problem is verified by MoW and other players. Did he exagerate? Probably. But it still an issue.
The 10 year can't create own house thing was confirmed by others.
150 hour stream was also confirmed by multiple players.

Just because MoW said they didn't enforce it (that's a bunch of BS, you don't put it in contract just for shits and giggles) doesn't mean it was not in the contract and was expected.

Fuzer claimed you couldn't join another gaming house, which is pretty different from creating one. Other players also confirmed streaming hours were negotiable and not at all "forced to stream 150 hours"


His claim was that he couldn't understand that part well (not native speaker) thus said what he thought it meant. It is a valid point and why he want his lawyer to look at it. If people give you a contract that says "150 hour streaming" how do you know it is negotiable and why does that make a difference anyway?

Read the OP:

2. Ministry of Win does not enforce on players the amount of hours they have to stream. It is a part of a business contract and both parties negotiate an agreement.

It obviously makes a difference as probably 20 pages of the last thread was devoted to complain how unhumane and counter-productive being forced to stream 150 hours a month is.
ragz_gt
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
9172 Posts
September 13 2012 17:48 GMT
#180
On September 14 2012 02:47 KadaverBB wrote:
Ugh, now we have 2 threads where people can shittalk
Can't you (Fuzer and MoW) deal with this privately instead of making statements blaming the other?

MoW will never win this argument anyway, fuzer (obviously) posted his accusations first and people had about 3 hours (60 pages) of time to make up their minds that Mow is the bad guy.
Anything that is posted is of course a lie, misinformation and what not -.-


Problem is MoW did not refute any of Fuzer's claims. They posted a alternative point of view of the same claim but with no detail.
I'm not an otaku, I'm a specialist.
Prev 1 7 8 9 10 11 29 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 12h 45m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 377
BRAT_OK 130
ProTech34
NeuroSwarm 2
StarCraft: Brood War
ggaemo 179
firebathero 170
Zeus 161
Dota 2
syndereN510
LuMiX2
League of Legends
Grubby4215
JimRising 271
Reynor94
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K565
flusha408
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor335
Other Games
tarik_tv20698
gofns6944
summit1g6635
fl0m1402
Dendi462
shahzam350
Sick26
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1304
StarCraft 2
angryscii 30
Other Games
BasetradeTV8
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH180
• davetesta46
• tFFMrPink 29
• iHatsuTV 15
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 40
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21867
Other Games
• imaqtpie1399
• Shiphtur200
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
12h 45m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
16h 45m
Bonyth vs TBD
WardiTV European League
18h 45m
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
HeRoMaRinE vs MaxPax
Wardi Open
1d 13h
OSC
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
6 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
FEL Cracow 2025
Underdog Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
HCC Europe
CC Div. A S7
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CAC 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.