EPTKeSPA 2012 Free Agency Period - Page 5
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
LuckyMacro
United States1482 Posts
| ||
|
Talin
Montenegro10532 Posts
On September 07 2012 04:31 Medrea wrote: Also, its still bad practice that the player doesnt get to choose what team they go to. Bad for whom? If they're not being silly, the players will still gets paid a very decent salary proportional to their skill level whichever team they sign for. More importantly, that practice prevents the creation of superteams and keeps the teams as balanced as possible by encouraging the players to stay with their teams (with ACE being the obvious exception). If there wasn't some structure in place to prevent a full-on competition between the teams for signing players, we would have seen more teams fold much faster than they did over the years and it would have been bad for everyone. | ||
|
Aerisky
United States12129 Posts
roro, too good. Sort of funny that it's the first time he's really been seen as dominant. Now people REALLY won't want to put him on their anti, if we can get fpl started again. | ||
|
Djagulingu
Germany3605 Posts
On September 07 2012 12:58 FabledIntegral wrote: So there's not that retarded "pay double the original salary" or whatever it was rule? Stats showed an amazing performance in the last year of his contract and his salary got doubled. Why not the same thing for RorO? | ||
|
Aerisky
United States12129 Posts
On September 07 2012 15:18 Djagulingu wrote: Stats showed an amazing performance in the last year of his contract and his salary got doubled. Why not the same thing for RorO? No doubt he deserves a big pay raise. What he means (I think) is that there is a rule that any other team that wants to buy roro has to pay double his original salary at the minimum, which they may not really want to do in the first place (so it sort of favors Khan). The fact that he probably does deserve a doubling of his pay sort of mitigates that problem though, yeah  | ||
|
elagrion
Ukraine422 Posts
| ||
|
glzElectromaster
Japan2474 Posts
| ||
|
CV-Mackh
France102 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
|
FabledIntegral
United States9232 Posts
On September 07 2012 15:18 Djagulingu wrote: Stats showed an amazing performance in the last year of his contract and his salary got doubled. Why not the same thing for RorO? Because that isn't even remotely relevant to what I said. | ||
|
zala2023
United States228 Posts
perfect timing i say | ||
|
endy
Switzerland8970 Posts
| ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
On September 07 2012 15:08 Talin wrote: Bad for whom? If they're not being silly, the players will still gets paid a very decent salary proportional to their skill level whichever team they sign for. More importantly, that practice prevents the creation of superteams and keeps the teams as balanced as possible by encouraging the players to stay with their teams (with ACE being the obvious exception). If there wasn't some structure in place to prevent a full-on competition between the teams for signing players, we would have seen more teams fold much faster than they did over the years and it would have been bad for everyone. I think this post deserves to be highlighted for those who don't like the current system. | ||
|
PH
United States6173 Posts
I don't know if the qualifications are simpler this time around, but seeing the few number of players up for it, I'd say they're still quite restricting. | ||
|
CV-Mackh
France102 Posts
| ||
rotinegg
United States1719 Posts
On September 06 2012 21:02 GTR wrote: From 9/7 to 9/10 begins the contract offer period from the players original team. If there is no contract accepted during this time, other teams are allowed to offer a contract to the player (from 9/11 to 9/20). If in this period there is once again no contract offer/acceptance of contract, the player will once again renegotiate with their original team (9/21 to 9/24). Source: http://esports.dailygame.co.kr/news/read.php?id=66316 T/N: The wording of the final paragraph had really formal language which was somewhat difficult to grasp, so if a native Korean speaker could correct me on it, it would be appreciated. + Show Spoiler + 9월 7일(금) 오후 3시 협회에서 진행되는 FA 대상자 교육을 시작으로 본격적인 FA 일정이 진행된다. 9월 7일(금)부터 9월 10일(월)까지 원소속 게임단과의 우선협상이 진행되고, 협상이 결렬되어 FA 선언을 한 선수는 9월 11일(화)부터 9월 20일(목) 기간 동안 영입의향 게임단과의 이적협상이 진행된다. 입찰이 되지 않은 선수는 최종적으로 9월 21일(금) 부터 9월 24일(월) 기간 동안 원소속 게임단과 재협상을 실시하는 것으로 FA 일정이 마무리 된다. you got it right, any corrections made would be nitpicking. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18564 Posts
On September 07 2012 16:27 CV-Mackh wrote: Couldn't we simply go over there and burn the Kespa office with flamethrowers, then simply broadcast GSL on Korean TV ? if you want the players get less money go ahead | ||
|
CV-Mackh
France102 Posts
On September 07 2012 16:27 CV-Mackh wrote: Couldn't we simply go over there and burn the Kespa office with flamethrowers, then simply broadcast GSL on Korean TV ? if you want the players get less money go ahead They can join ESF  They'll be protected, earn a decent money, and won't be representing the Evil Kespa so the sponsors might even be happier. And I am not even mentioning the quality of Kespa's events on the international side, that hurts the sponsors as well. Plus as I said, I think Samsung is a good company and I have one of their product in my possession, but I hate the fact that they support Kespa, and will consider switching to another mobile phone brand because of that, I think I am not alone. So I say, money is not the point, Kespa totally locked the BW scene, destroying any chance for the game to develop anywhere and also blocking huge money opportunities for the players by doing so, and they are gonna try again with sc2, be sure. So let's just burn them down | ||
|
jinorazi
Korea (South)4948 Posts
On September 07 2012 17:29 CV-Mackh wrote: They can join ESF They'll be protected, earn a decent money, and won't be representing the Evil Kespa so the sponsors might even be happier. And I am not even mentioning the quality of Kespa's events on the international side, that hurts the sponsors as well. Plus as I said, I think Samsung is a good company and I have one of their product in my possession, but I hate the fact that they support Kespa, and will consider switching to another mobile phone brand because of they support to Kespa. So I say, money is not the point, Kespa totally locked the BW scene, destroying any chance for the game to develop anywhere also blocking huge money opportunity, and they are gonna try again with sc2, be sure. So let's just burn them down did kespa...murder your parents? o.O my condolences | ||
|
CV-Mackh
France102 Posts
On September 07 2012 17:33 jinorazi wrote: did kespa...murder your parents? o.O my condolences That sums it up quite a bit : http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=168895 | ||
|
rebdomine
6040 Posts
On September 07 2012 17:29 CV-Mackh wrote: They can join ESF They'll be protected, earn a decent money, and won't be representing the Evil Kespa so the sponsors might even be happier. And I am not even mentioning the quality of Kespa's events on the international side, that hurts the sponsors as well. Plus as I said, I think Samsung is a good company and I have one of their product in my possession, but I hate the fact that they support Kespa, and will consider switching to another mobile phone brand because of that, I think I am not alone. So I say, money is not the point, Kespa totally locked the BW scene, destroying any chance for the game to develop anywhere and also blocking huge money opportunities for the players by doing so, and they are gonna try again with sc2, be sure. So let's just burn them down I don't think it's KeSPA's fault that there wasn't much of a BW scene outside of Korea... | ||
| ||
