EPTLow graphics looks significantly different now. The textures are way different. I don't know if I like it.
Patch 1.5 Arcade Beta. - Page 8
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Ben...
Canada3485 Posts
Low graphics looks significantly different now. The textures are way different. I don't know if I like it. | ||
|
zhurai
United States5660 Posts
| ||
|
NukeD
Croatia1612 Posts
Because i made some custom games when the game came out naively thinking they will get played. I want to make some more now. | ||
|
NukeD
Croatia1612 Posts
On June 02 2012 09:27 Ben... wrote: I really like the new creep look, though it threw me off at first because I didn't notice my natural expansion had finished because I didn't notice the difference on the minimap. Low graphics looks significantly different now. The textures are way different. I don't know if I like it. Could you post a few pics of those if its not too much to ask? | ||
|
Kaladin
United States88 Posts
| ||
|
larse
1611 Posts
On June 02 2012 07:04 eviltomahawk wrote: Interesting. I didn't notice that small balance hiccup. The Alpha version of this interface patch was basically a frankenstein version of all the balance patches, with Zerg retaining some of their old beta values while Terran and Protoss had changes from the most recent patches. It was really weird to look at. But I don't think these balance changes are of any importance. It's probably just a bad merge of different patches, as someone speculated in the Alpha thread. edit: And it definitely looks like this Beta has the same merge problems. A lot of the old Zerg upgrades that were removed in the WoL Beta seem to be back. Flux Veins is back lol. But this is just going through the hotkey lists. It could be different in-game. In my beta, stim and concusive researches are 100/100 and 50/50. With the queen buff and overlord buff, this is the newest build | ||
|
SpecFire
United States1681 Posts
| ||
|
larse
1611 Posts
On June 02 2012 09:27 Ben... wrote: I really like the new creep look, though it threw me off at first because I didn't notice my natural expansion had finished because I didn't notice the difference on the minimap. Low graphics looks significantly different now. The textures are way different. I don't know if I like it. They said that in Blizzcon 2011 that they will improve the look of the lowest settings in HOTS. Since like they are going to do it in 1.5 | ||
|
AsymptoticClimax
United Kingdom249 Posts
On June 02 2012 08:37 pallad wrote: Get job at blizzard and make things faster , but now just stfu What I said may have seemed like I've taken blizzards time and effort for granted but ffs this should of been the final released version not introduced two years later.. | ||
|
Chargelot
2275 Posts
On June 02 2012 09:32 NukeD wrote: Could you post a few pics of those if its not too much to ask? ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/icFEf.png) The creep is a more faded purple, and it's also transparent, allowing you to vaguely see the terrain below it. Click for gallery (4 pictures) ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/yktPeh.jpg) I'm not Zerg, so I'm not really sure what's changed. | ||
|
SpecFire
United States1681 Posts
| ||
|
Chargelot
2275 Posts
On June 02 2012 10:02 SpecFire wrote: Is it Validating Cache for a long ass time for anyoen else? Only the first time I logged on. | ||
|
zeden
18 Posts
| ||
|
GeedrAhsc
United States97 Posts
Been googling for an hour to no avail =/ | ||
|
InfCereal
Canada1759 Posts
On June 02 2012 10:10 GeedrAhsc wrote: Anyone else getting the "failed to download a required instillation file" upon trying to install the patch? Been googling for an hour to no avail =/ Close anything that might be using SC2. I closed everything and it worked. | ||
|
larse
1611 Posts
| ||
|
Gl!tch
United States573 Posts
| ||
|
emc
United States3088 Posts
| ||
|
Highways
Australia6098 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/qi5cT.png) | ||
|
pallad
Poland1958 Posts
On June 02 2012 10:21 Gl!tch wrote: Is anybody with a low end computer (like mine) having any troubles or noticing slightly lower fps with the graphics changes? Was reading post of many people with low spec cpu .. that they have less fps. Was playing some games today and i see no diffrence with fps . I have Athlon x2 240 2.8 ghz , 3 gb ram , geforce 9500 GT 1 Gb , using windows 7 32 bit. | ||
| ||
