EPTMy only gripe is that they don't tell us our actual mmr...
[Part 3] Matchmaking Changes - Page 14
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
boxman22
Canada430 Posts
My only gripe is that they don't tell us our actual mmr... | ||
|
Poisonblack
452 Posts
not sure how much time i'm gonna spend laddering after this change, can't see the point as getting practice partners is now by far better not only for practice but for closer, and thus more fun games as well! | ||
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On April 25 2012 18:18 Odal wrote: guys it's cool ladder totally works 1st game vs GM: http://sc2ranks.com/us/310525/SinFeo http://i.imgur.com/IPjDl.jpg 2nd game vs diamond: http://sc2ranks.com/us/2677659/Protech http://i.imgur.com/z2ipS.jpg Played in that order. my account for reference: http://sc2ranks.com/us/2661006/Glurkenspurk To be fair, protech is now a top8 masters player so.. | ||
|
imre
France9263 Posts
On April 25 2012 20:59 Plexa wrote: To be fair, protech is now a top8 masters player so.. which is like 10time more skilled than any high diamond... | ||
|
ensign_lee
United States1178 Posts
I really did not like the variability of playing my games. Even matches were a friggin' godsend. I don't mind waitign slightly longer Low Masters here (I think? I dunno. I've been playing diamonds and top 10 masters everywhere lolol) | ||
|
[RS]Fuchs
76 Posts
After my games today i had a winrate of 40% and i'm quite unhappy with this change. I suppose it's not that big of an issue for the like plat+ players because they have a chance to win against a masters player. But i personaly think that there is no way a semi good silver player or mid-low gold player can beat a top 8 ranked plat or diamond player. If they manage to beat them (in like one of 10-20 games) the other player messed up terribly and nothing is won experiencewise for the lower players. In my opinion nobody is able to learn anyting from these games and it makes it way harder to get into a higher league. Overall it makes the game on my lvl just quite frustrating *sigh* | ||
|
Glurkenspurk
United States1915 Posts
On April 25 2012 20:59 Plexa wrote: To be fair, protech is now a top8 masters player so.. different protech. This guy just cannon rushed and called me a faggot. I don't think it's the same one. | ||
|
CarlosOmse
Germany507 Posts
On April 24 2012 11:14 CajunMan wrote: So what is the Highest and Lowest? I am top 8 masters in my division and still getting diamonds yay I am favored they cheese me and I love 30 points to some scrub love this game. <-- is raging really hard right now. So GM's and Bronzers only play even games and for the rest its pretty much mixed up or how can i understand this? | ||
|
Lorch
Germany3692 Posts
Instead they force it upon us and ruin the only thing that was actually good about battle.net 02. : it (was) really good at matching you against people that are exactly as good as you are. | ||
|
Name Lips
United States7 Posts
I don't mind golds... but plats seems a bit excessive for my (low) skill level... | ||
|
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On April 25 2012 22:36 Odal wrote: different protech. This guy just cannon rushed and called me a faggot. I don't think it's the same one. Yes, but check the profile you linked  | ||
|
CaptainCrush
United States785 Posts
| ||
|
RoyW
Ireland270 Posts
People moaned about match-making before this was in place, moaned at the change, and are now moaning at this improvement attempt. Maybe give it a couple of weeks, get a decent sample size and report back on your experiences then? Could that be more productive? | ||
|
CakeSauc3
United States1437 Posts
On April 25 2012 23:30 CaptainCrush wrote: I didnt realize how much I liked always having even matchups until the last couple days... this system sucks. I HATE playing people far below my skill level and I nearly hate playing pros just as much. Sure I probably had some complaints about the previous matchmaking system but I will gladly take it back after having this new one for a few days... Haha, I get it Blizzard! You're sick of hearing us complain about battle.net 0.2, so you're trying to make us grateful for what we had by letting us have a taste of a terrible matchmaking system! Problem is... I think we're just going to complain about both now! :p Please revert changes T_T AND please give us LAN (g-_-)-o and then we'll <3 u! | ||
|
scotth85
United Kingdom6 Posts
For example I play protoss and the mid/low platinum terrans I was getting matched against normally are starting to do quite a few more 1/1/1 and all in builds that gold terans dont do. I have trouble against them but I accept that i need to learn and I was slowly learning from them. The thing is they dont execute these builds so well but I havent faced them much so I was slowly learning them - but still losing most of them. Then suddenly I face diamond terrans who pull the builds of so much better that I feel as though its pointless even trying. I can't learn much at all from a game like that because there are all sorts of issues, micro issues, build issues, reaction problems, etc etc. All of these build up a huge amount more when I'm faced against much better players. I don't learn anything from it and it isn't "fun" at all. Losing isn't fun, I accept I am going to lose sometimes and that's fine, but losing in games where it feels like I don't have a chance at all is far from fun and far from an acceptable loss, it just feels like a waste of my time and probably a waste of the favoured players time who gets very few points and also learns nothing. Also, it's not like I play perfectly every game, although I do win most games when I'm favoured, I do lose a few as well and that is irritating - not fun, just irritating. As I say, people who find it fun could just switch the option to be mismatched on and people who don't like it (which I honestly think would be the majority of ladder players) can switch it off and learn the get better at a steady manageable pace. | ||
|
oxxo
988 Posts
On April 25 2012 23:36 RoyW wrote: The amount of whining in this thread is ridiculous. People are over-reacting, using 4 game sample sizes, and blaming the slightest change for their match results. People moaned about match-making before this was in place, moaned at the change, and are now moaning at this improvement attempt. Maybe give it a couple of weeks, get a decent sample size and report back on your experiences then? Could that be more productive? No they aren't. The 4 game samples are just examples. The matchmaking has been completely stupid since the very start of the season even during their 'reverted' period. Many of us have extremely stable MMR and it's very obvious what the changes have done to our matches. And almost no one complained about matchmaking before. People complained about pretty much everything in B.NET 2.0 (much of it unwarranted IMO), but not matchmaking. | ||
|
KaiserCommander
Mexico290 Posts
| ||
|
tehemperorer
United States2183 Posts
| ||
|
CaptainCrush
United States785 Posts
On April 26 2012 01:04 oxxo wrote: No they aren't. The 4 game samples are just examples. The matchmaking has been completely stupid since the very start of the season even during their 'reverted' period. Many of us have extremely stable MMR and it's very obvious what the changes have done to our matches. And almost no one complained about matchmaking before. People complained about pretty much everything in B.NET 2.0 (much of it unwarranted IMO), but not matchmaking. I fully agree, I dont need to play 50 or even 100 games before I can realize that this new system sucks... I am a borderline gold/ plat player and I got paired up against a diamond yesterday. Well, I got stomped and lost 2 points... he gained one single whopping ladder point. Where's the sense in that? Thanks Blizz... | ||
|
NeMeSiS3
Canada2972 Posts
On April 24 2012 10:40 felisconcolori wrote: I dunno. I've been playing bronze, bronze, silver, gold, repeat the past two days. I'm not quite sure what exactly is going on with the matchmaking system, but I would like to get off this rollercoaster =) (I'm Silver.) Ranking from bronze to platinum is really not very suggestive of skill, well bronze to gold anyway... A high bronze can easily be skill wise equal to a low gold. The difference isn't comparable to plat > diamond or diamond > masters skill gaps. so that isn't very strange at all | ||
| ||
