• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:45
CEST 12:45
KST 19:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent9Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway13
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues22LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?39Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris76
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon What happened to Singapore/Brazil servers? Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy
Tourneys
LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast
Brood War
General
The Korean Terminology Thread Recommended FPV games (post-KeSPA) [ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent FlaSh on ACS Winners being in ASL ASL20 General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group B [ASL20] Ro16 Group A Is there English video for group selection for ASL BWCL Season 63 Announcement
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Iron Harvest: 1920+ Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Diablo IV S10 Infernal Tides Guide Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Collective Intelligence: Tea…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1259 users

"True Mechanics" = The Korean Gap, Low level myths - Page 5

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Tobberoth
Profile Joined August 2010
Sweden6375 Posts
April 10 2012 09:12 GMT
#81
It's sad that every time APM and mechanics are discussed the discussion leans toward whether or not mechanics and APM are what makes good players, as in the higher APM = the better player, when this isn't what's important. What should be emphasized is that high APM ENABLES a player to play good, it raises the players potential, which leads to better play. A player can be amazing at 100 APM, but he would probably be a complete beast with 200 APM.

I have about 100 APM on average, high platinum. My friend who is borderline masters has 50-100 APM more than me, and while his strategy is worse when he plays my main race because he doesn't have the experience nor knows any good gameplans, he still plays at a higher level than me with his offrace and my mainrace because he can easily keep up with the macro and also has APM over to do better scouting and has time over to think about his next moves etc.
Neurosis
Profile Joined October 2010
United States893 Posts
April 10 2012 09:13 GMT
#82
APM does NOT necessarily directly relate to better mechanics. I've seen plenty of people that just spam 123 on their keyboards and they get 300ish apm. That said, you know all of drgs insane apm is going to good use and thats one of the main reasons he is the best zerg in sc2. The main thing to take away from this is you can always play faster and be doing more stuff at once/better.
DemigodcelpH
Profile Joined August 2011
1138 Posts
April 10 2012 09:17 GMT
#83
On April 10 2012 18:13 Neurosis wrote:
APM does NOT necessarily directly relate to better mechanics. I've seen plenty of people that just spam 123 on their keyboards and they get 300ish apm. That said, you know all of drgs insane apm is going to good use and thats one of the main reasons he is the best zerg in sc2. The main thing to take away from this is you can always play faster and be doing more stuff at once/better.


eAPM, which OP also outlines as koreans having significantly more of if you look at the chart, does not count spamming 123 and such. As such your post is essentially useless. Please read up more on the subject matter before you try to contribute to the discussion if you don't even know the difference between APM and eAPM.
JustPassingBy
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
10776 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-10 09:28:30
April 10 2012 09:25 GMT
#84
Just for clarification, LiquidRet #1 is the keyboard and LiquidRet #2 is the mouse.

And I agree with some previous posters eAPM does not capture your mechanics as a whole (as they, despite their name, does not capture how effective your actions are), but they are a good hint to start with considering they are something (with that I mean hard data) that you can put your hands on.
Swift118
Profile Joined January 2012
United Kingdom335 Posts
April 10 2012 09:30 GMT
#85
I say let people continue the way they are, if you personally want to improve your mechanics then the time you wasted writing this thread could have been spent improving your own game.
Deleted User 137586
Profile Joined January 2011
7859 Posts
April 10 2012 09:31 GMT
#86
The data already shows that EAPM is not a good measure of multitasking. People that are known as great multitaskers are MMA and MKP, both seem to be able to control more battles, while expanding, making supply, and producing units. Yet, their EAPM is lower than TAKiii - whoever that is and not at the top of the list.
Cry 'havoc' and let slip the dogs of war
Drake
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany6146 Posts
April 10 2012 09:34 GMT
#87
"Korean's own white dudes" -Moon at IEM
that was a joke ... he said it when carmac was next and carmac said that before so it was kind of trolling and EVERYONE take him by words ... guys please
Nb.Drake / CoL_Drake / Original Joined TL.net Tuesday, 15th of March 2005
Neurosis
Profile Joined October 2010
United States893 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-10 09:39:33
April 10 2012 09:38 GMT
#88
On April 10 2012 18:17 DemigodcelpH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2012 18:13 Neurosis wrote:
APM does NOT necessarily directly relate to better mechanics. I've seen plenty of people that just spam 123 on their keyboards and they get 300ish apm. That said, you know all of drgs insane apm is going to good use and thats one of the main reasons he is the best zerg in sc2. The main thing to take away from this is you can always play faster and be doing more stuff at once/better.


eAPM, which OP also outlines as koreans having significantly more of if you look at the chart, does not count spamming 123 and such. As such your post is essentially useless. Please read up more on the subject matter before you try to contribute to the discussion if you don't even know the difference between APM and eAPM.


APM , eapm, whatever you want to call it (or whatever blizzard wants to call it), my point still stands. Extremely high apm does not necessarily mean you have great mechanics. Did you sit on a stick recently or...?
StevieWonder333
Profile Joined December 2011
55 Posts
April 10 2012 09:46 GMT
#89
APM is a measurement of how quickly a player is remembering to do everything they think they need to do. However they think the picture of the game should be drawn and how quickly they can draw it. So, you think players should get better mechanically? It's a manifestation of one's understanding of the game.
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-10 09:50:40
April 10 2012 09:47 GMT
#90
Looking at EAPM is bad. It's honestly better to look at raw APM first, then make conjectures with EAPM.

In any case, APM is a good signifier of mechanics, but it's not the end-all. In BW, you needed a BARE MINIMUM of 200APM to make it as a progamer, and the best were usually between 250 (Stork, Savior on the low end), and 350. Nal_rA was really the last progamer to make it with extremely low APM (he was between 150-200 most games iirc). You had exceptions like Jaedong, Nada and Really who pushed 400 regularly, and I don't think anyone can forget July's 900 APM spikes during furious moments.

On the other end, I remember regularly playing against players on iccup in the D level with APM approaching 300 while I barely managed a meager 130-180. Being comfortable smashing out more actions will make it easier to eventually develop that into stronger gameplay/mechanics overall, but no, it's not the end-all.

Mechanics are equally important to strategy to be successful at a high level. At lower levels (anywhere below progamer-level), mechanics are more important. You can emulate build orders and strategies, but you can't emulate good unit control and macro.

All that said, though, yes, Koreans do generally have superior mechanics to their foreign counterparts.
Hello
pdd
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Australia9933 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-10 10:23:48
April 10 2012 10:22 GMT
#91
On April 10 2012 18:31 Ghanburighan wrote:
The data already shows that EAPM is not a good measure of multitasking. People that are known as great multitaskers are MMA and MKP, both seem to be able to control more battles, while expanding, making supply, and producing units. Yet, their EAPM is lower than TAKiii - whoever that is and not at the top of the list.

I think the point is to show that, in general, higher APM and EAPM = better mechanics = better likelihood to win.

Obviously more APM/EAPM does not automatically mean instant win and there will be some statistical anomalies + other factors to consider. But the data seems to suggest that some of the very top players have really high APM/EAPM compared to everyone else, and it does suggest that to be part of that group of elite Code A-Code S level players, you have to have APM/EAPM around that level.

I guess to clarify, think about what Sjow could do with his measly 90-150 APM. Now think about how much more he can do with 200-300 APM.
TI4 Champions: EE-Sama | B7-God | A-God_2000 | Kappa Lord | pieliedie
SC2ShoWTimE
Profile Joined April 2011
Germany722 Posts
April 10 2012 10:25 GMT
#92
On April 10 2012 18:38 Neurosis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2012 18:17 DemigodcelpH wrote:
On April 10 2012 18:13 Neurosis wrote:
APM does NOT necessarily directly relate to better mechanics. I've seen plenty of people that just spam 123 on their keyboards and they get 300ish apm. That said, you know all of drgs insane apm is going to good use and thats one of the main reasons he is the best zerg in sc2. The main thing to take away from this is you can always play faster and be doing more stuff at once/better.


eAPM, which OP also outlines as koreans having significantly more of if you look at the chart, does not count spamming 123 and such. As such your post is essentially useless. Please read up more on the subject matter before you try to contribute to the discussion if you don't even know the difference between APM and eAPM.


APM , eapm, whatever you want to call it (or whatever blizzard wants to call it), my point still stands. Extremely high apm does not necessarily mean you have great mechanics. Did you sit on a stick recently or...?


true, apm/eapm does not necessarily equal good mechanics. it basically tells how fast someone can hit keys but not how good someone can multitask/macro/micro. just as an example: many players have high apm but how many of them can micro like mkp or place force fields like mc?
Progamer
Vul
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States685 Posts
April 10 2012 10:31 GMT
#93
How many platinum players cant keep their money low after 2 bases because they don't know how to tap to check their production?


I just wanted to ask the OP for clarification, I thought that "tapping" or "cycling," or whatever you want to call it when you continuously check your hotkeyed units and structures, isn't counted by EAPM? My understanding is that that's one of the biggest problems with using EAPM as a measure of strong mechanics.

If that's not, or no longer true, (or if it's only true in Blizz UI's EAPM, but not in SC2 gears, as I also use SC2 gears for my replay analysis) then that's awesome

If that is still a problem though, do you think it affects your analysis? To me it seems that it wouldn't matter too much if we just evaluate APM. And overall I still agree with your main premise, that mechanics are the primary source of the skill gap in SC2.

The only difference in thought and approach between us is I just don't usually pay much attention to EAPM, and have only really cared about increasing my APM stats in legitimate ways, as in playing faster rather than spamming more. But maybe EAPM really is the better number to evaluate? I'd like to hear you weigh in on the difference between them, and specifically why you prefer EAPM over APM.
Tobberoth
Profile Joined August 2010
Sweden6375 Posts
April 10 2012 10:32 GMT
#94
On April 10 2012 19:25 ShoWTimE94 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2012 18:38 Neurosis wrote:
On April 10 2012 18:17 DemigodcelpH wrote:
On April 10 2012 18:13 Neurosis wrote:
APM does NOT necessarily directly relate to better mechanics. I've seen plenty of people that just spam 123 on their keyboards and they get 300ish apm. That said, you know all of drgs insane apm is going to good use and thats one of the main reasons he is the best zerg in sc2. The main thing to take away from this is you can always play faster and be doing more stuff at once/better.


eAPM, which OP also outlines as koreans having significantly more of if you look at the chart, does not count spamming 123 and such. As such your post is essentially useless. Please read up more on the subject matter before you try to contribute to the discussion if you don't even know the difference between APM and eAPM.


APM , eapm, whatever you want to call it (or whatever blizzard wants to call it), my point still stands. Extremely high apm does not necessarily mean you have great mechanics. Did you sit on a stick recently or...?


true, apm/eapm does not necessarily equal good mechanics. it basically tells how fast someone can hit keys but not how good someone can multitask/macro/micro. just as an example: many players have high apm but how many of them can micro like mkp or place force fields like mc?

Having good mechanics =/= having good micro. Having good mechanics = Having potential to micro well.
elagrion
Profile Joined April 2010
Ukraine422 Posts
April 10 2012 10:46 GMT
#95
Does somebody already get that you can force opponent to click fast and multitask (faster than he actually can), and abuse this, even if your own apm is relatively slow?
Cos like, Savior used this trick back in 2006.
Everything is a remix.
Shibbxyz
Profile Joined March 2011
United Kingdom94 Posts
April 10 2012 10:47 GMT
#96
You don't need high apm to do well, you can macro and micro with low actions. The problem with having low apm though is the error in decisions becomes greater and you will have less refined mechanics because of this
Having 200 apm is great for controlling your macro on your bases but you can't have full control on your army or scouting and so one will suffer when you try to control the other.

And this is generally why koreans with high APM are so much better. When it comes down to it there controlling more of there stuff efficiently over you and will gain advantage much more easily.
This comes more into effect when decision making has to be done under pressure, with more APM you can effectively make more decisions in a smaller time frame and so more likely to make the right one
CutieBK
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Sweden227 Posts
April 10 2012 10:47 GMT
#97
I can't believe people are actually arguing that EAPM isn't an indication of real skill. Noone is saying that EAPM is the only way to measure it, but there is obviously a correlation between high EAPM and success within the game. Just as previous threads have shown that macro-managing is also one of things that differ between "normal" high level players and pro's.

No it isn't the whole story, and no you shouldn't judge a player based on his EAPM if he is still destroying in tournaments(obviously). But the fact remains, and this is why this is a really good post, that having a high EAPM is a huge step towards becoming a better SC2 player.
HappyShepard
Profile Joined July 2011
Germany41 Posts
April 10 2012 11:11 GMT
#98
Of course APM is somewhat important. But I think if you have reached a certain amount of average APM (like most pros have)
it becomes less important. Take Savior as an example. He always had rather low APM compared to other Brood War players, but nonetheless he was one of the best players to ever have played the game. I would describe APM rather as a tool for your mechanics, not mechanics per se.
Akta
Profile Joined February 2011
447 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-10 11:45:34
April 10 2012 11:44 GMT
#99
A lot of the debates about APM is about causation and correlation and much of the bickering could be avoided if people were more familiar with that correlation does not imply causation. It doesn't mean causes can not be found in correlating facts, don't have time to elaborate more but the relevant information is in the linked article.
Bojas
Profile Joined December 2010
Netherlands2397 Posts
April 10 2012 13:15 GMT
#100
If you take that little apm list as a list of skill then I should sign up for the MLG qualifier, I might actually qualify. While I notice I can outmultitask my opponent most of the time that doesn't neccesarily say my macro, micro or decision making is better.

Is that list eapm or apm??? I assume apm since Select's 374 eapm isn't humanly possible.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
10:05
Maestros of the Game Ro24 B
Serral vs RyungLIVE!
ByuN vs Zoun
CranKy Ducklings140
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech79
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 10077
Shuttle 1631
Flash 607
Larva 490
BeSt 482
EffOrt 333
sSak 238
actioN 226
Soma 162
Light 154
[ Show more ]
Mong 132
Pusan 126
Rush 110
Dewaltoss 109
TY 108
Last 99
Mini 92
Mind 78
ToSsGirL 71
PianO 68
zelot 64
ZerO 59
hero 58
Barracks 55
Nal_rA 48
Backho 48
Liquid`Ret 45
Movie 37
Sharp 18
sorry 16
Noble 16
Bale 15
scan(afreeca) 15
yabsab 14
Sacsri 10
Hm[arnc] 9
HiyA 7
Dota 2
XaKoH 521
BananaSlamJamma211
Counter-Strike
olofmeister982
shoxiejesuss528
x6flipin333
allub32
Other Games
singsing1307
ceh9782
crisheroes288
Happy269
Mew2King49
DeMusliM18
ZerO(Twitch)2
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 945
Other Games
gamesdonequick768
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 19
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 41
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV326
League of Legends
• Jankos923
Upcoming Events
Kung Fu Cup
1h 15m
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
MaxPax vs Creator
TBD vs Classic
OSC
5h 15m
Moja vs Babymarine
Solar vs TBD
sOs vs goblin
Nice vs INexorable
sebesdes vs Iba
Nicoract vs TBD
NightMare vs TBD
OSC
13h 15m
ReBellioN vs PAPI
Spirit vs TBD
Percival vs TBD
TriGGeR vs TBD
Shameless vs UedSoldier
Cham vs TBD
Harstem vs TBD
RSL Revival
23h 15m
Cure vs SHIN
Reynor vs Zoun
Kung Fu Cup
1d 1h
The PondCast
1d 2h
RSL Revival
1d 23h
Classic vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs Maru
Online Event
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
BSL Team Wars
2 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Dewalt
[ Show More ]
BSL Team Wars
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Maestros of the Game
3 days
ShoWTimE vs Classic
Clem vs herO
Serral vs Bunny
Reynor vs Zoun
Cosmonarchy
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
[BSL 2025] Weekly
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Maestros of the Game
4 days
BSL Team Wars
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Snow vs Sharp
Jaedong vs Mini
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Copa Latinoamericana 4
SEL Season 2 Championship
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
EC S1
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.