EPTI'm not angry but very disapointed. Will not pay, will watch assembly instead.
MLG Winter Arena to be PPV - Page 103
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
Criticism is allowed. Undue flaming is not. Take a second to think your post through before you submit. Bans will be handed out. Should go without saying, but don't link restreams here either. | ||
|
Crushinator
Netherlands2138 Posts
I'm not angry but very disapointed. Will not pay, will watch assembly instead. | ||
|
Miscellany
Wales125 Posts
But I'm glad the main tournament weekends will still be free. If MLG wants to introduce a few new pay-only tournaments then that's fine with me. I just think $20 is a bit too much to ask for. | ||
|
StoRm_res
Switzerland891 Posts
| ||
|
Stropheum
United States1124 Posts
| ||
|
krisss
Luxembourg305 Posts
On February 14 2012 19:04 Ouga wrote: Doubt they had options there, sponsors probably forced to try this. But indeed this has to fail hard considering how the other big event is scheduled at same time, which doesn't cost anything. sponors want as much exposure as possible. Cutting the viewercount by 80% cannot be in the interest of any of their sponsors. | ||
|
Bulkers
Poland509 Posts
On February 14 2012 19:00 Muffel wrote: I dont understand the people who say "Well i think its to much but i will buy it anyways" Everyone who buys the 20dollar pass is just telling mlg indirectly "Hey guys you can do that. you can take 20 bucks for a qualifier. " they dont care if you dont like it as long as you pay. so if you dont want the future with every big event (not just MLG) beeing 20dollar PPV, than buy it. if this mlg arena with 20dollar is a success then every other major event will think about making their event ppv aswell. well i think the idea of this was: now nobody will complain about the extended series anymore! :D I agree, if MLG succeed with PPV, we will see Dreamhack, IPL, ESL, GSL and others going for the same business model. I would react to this differently, but MLG tactics and marketing tricks are abusive. They announced Winter Arena like 3 weeks ago and there was nothing about PPV nor that Arena events will NOT BE part of pro circuit, now right before tournament they announced this. Misleading and keeping vital information from customers, all of a sudden people that bought MLG GOLD are getting info that their pass doesn't include 7 big events in 2012. I got NBA League Pass, 6 months of content, 10h+ of matches a day for 140$... Starcraft 2 is way to small to pay 20$ for 2 days, and not allowing free lq stream with ads. | ||
|
zaii
Guam2611 Posts
On February 14 2012 19:03 Velr wrote: Actually your supporting extended series by paying this. THINK ABOUT IT! :D well shit looks like I'm buying | ||
|
Spitmode
Germany1510 Posts
 but whatever, lets go for it! | ||
|
Velr
Switzerland10836 Posts
On February 14 2012 19:17 Stropheum wrote: I'm down with this. People should see that this isn't about MLG being greedy but finally trying to turn a profit instead, along with making itself grow. The added income for ppv should allow them to make some pretty intense changes by 2013 Or we just all watch Assembly, which tells Asus that SC2 is awesome which will lead to making their tournament even bigger. One of the 2 things costs 20$, the other one is free. | ||
ImbaTosS
United Kingdom1704 Posts
Everyone complaining in this thread should be ashamed of yourselves- organisations need money to survive. Why shouldn't you, the consumer, give them some? I agree, they should offer low-quality with ads, but at the end of the day paying $20 isn't going to kill you, and if everyone did it then there would certainly be many more events to come. | ||
|
zaii
Guam2611 Posts
On February 14 2012 19:18 Velr wrote: Or we just all watch Assembly, which tells Asus that SC2 is awesome which will lead to making their tournament even bigger. One of the 2 things costs 20$, the other one is free. or watch both? | ||
|
Salteador Neo
Andorra5591 Posts
There's so many good sc2 tournaments that I can't even watch all of them anyway. | ||
|
Velr
Switzerland10836 Posts
| ||
|
ImbaTosS
United Kingdom1704 Posts
| ||
|
krisss
Luxembourg305 Posts
On February 14 2012 19:20 ImbaTosS wrote: Everyone complaining in this thread should be ashamed of yourselves- organisations need money to survive. Why shouldn't you, the consumer, give them some? some is the right word. 20 bucks for a few BO3s that a guy from Europe can watch is not some.. | ||
|
makk
United Kingdom132 Posts
On February 14 2012 19:17 krisss wrote: sponors want as much exposure as possible. Cutting the viewercount by 80% cannot be in the interest of any of their sponsors. Well at least their ads will be targeted at people with disposable income. Which would probably be good for the sponsors because their ads will be more targeted so they would have to pay less but that would also mean less money for MLG... | ||
|
Witten
United States2094 Posts
| ||
|
zaii
Guam2611 Posts
On February 14 2012 19:21 Velr wrote: Because we don't care enough and there are other alternatives? Some ppl care and Some ppl dont. There may be alternatives but they don't have the same hype/casters and player pool as MLG. | ||
|
Necca
Germany43 Posts
| ||
|
krisss
Luxembourg305 Posts
On February 14 2012 19:22 ImbaTosS wrote: Don't care enough to support the game and therefore the gamers whom you claim you're interested in? Wow, selfish... Have u seen the prizemoney? 20 bucks per viewer for this prize money? rofl. even the players themselves seem to get treated like slaves by MLG. | ||
| ||
