|
On November 15 2011 15:14 Diamond wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2011 15:13 qwazar wrote: What baffles me is how ESV allowed this to air before sorting it out properly (casted from replays) and where was the referee in all this? Allowing this to happen shows how unprofessional the organization is. No weekly tournament in the planet has refs in every match.
Also Orb will admit to not previewing matches beforehand to prevent himself from accidentally spoilering a series. Even if he has guessed the outcome a couple of times.
|
On November 15 2011 15:16 anrimayu wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2011 15:13 qwazar wrote: R1CH is correct.
This is not match fixing. Match fixing is when the outcome of the match is determined BEFORE the match starts. This is not technically what happened. Both players went into the game wanting victory. It was only when Byan asked for Coca to forfeit was then the match decided in Byun's favor. Byun (and Coca as an accomplice) is guilty of winning a match through nontraditional and unsportsmanlike means.
What baffles me is how ESV allowed this to air before sorting it out properly (casted from replays) and where was the referee in all this? Allowing this to happen shows how unprofessional the organization is.
People are wound up too tight about this in the wrong way. This is not the BW match fixing situation. It's an isolated incident, and the first where such a punishment has been enforced, where a kid mad a terrible mistake in which the repercussions were obviously not outlined to him. Obviously punishment is in order, but nothing more than a message which says that things like this are not acceptable. The fact that Coca's GSL career has been damaged is far too harsh.
The irony of the situation is that people are so divided on this issue its doing far more damage than the actual incident itself. I personally, will not give a cent to any eSports organization until Coca receives his Codes S spot back. Nope, you're wrong. At the start of game 2, Coca told Byun that he can have the game. If you don't know, don't assume things. Right, but at the start of game 2 is still relatively DURING the game, hence the decision was made on the spot during the game, as oppose to actual match fixing where the outcome was already determined between the two players (and possibly other parties) before the whole match even happened. Also, there is next to none benefit for either parties as oppose to real match fixings where money is actually involved. Finally, they actually played the game for real, all the way till the end; If the match was to be fixed, Coca would of made it a lot closer than it looked like. They just literally wanted to play a 3rd game, that is all. Is it still wrong? Definitely, but it is not match-fixing, and not a mistake that deserve this harsh of a punishment that can ruin a promising young player's career.
|
mad props to diamond and to slayers team for making the right decision here, the right thing to do is not always the easiest. We cannot have match-fixing even mentioned in esports and the sooner we hit this nail, the better off we will be in the long run. It is unfortunate that this had to happen to coca and byun, but they are both relatively young players and WILL be back in gsl, what's more important here is that we completely separate match-fixing from esports.
|
How stupid can someone be ROFL. Fix in front of thousands of viewers..... Sad because I think coca is amazing player!
|
On November 15 2011 14:51 Corrosive wrote: Would you ban a team from the NHL/NBA/NFL if they messed around during an exhibition game? No, 100% for sure not.
Obviously this game was part of a tournament, and wasn't an exhibition game, but it's similar as it has no effect on any important, serious games. How can you compare a team and a player?... If a professional NBA/NHL/NFL player jacked off in the corner for half a game would you not change him for another player and tell him to straighten his act up or he won't play the next game or any game afterwards? I think so, actually i'm 100% sure.
This makes more sense than what you were trying to say.
|
On November 15 2011 15:17 blacksheepwall wrote: Not to beat a dead horse here, but I think that their openness about it in the in-game chat demonstrates that they didn't really understand the seriousness of the situation.
I'm not saying that what they did was appropriate, or that ignorance is a valid excuse, but if they were actually attempting to fix the match they probably wouldn't have openly talked about it in-game.
I think it was just a couple friends fucking around and not realizing the consequences.
pretty much this. let's be honest, there wasn't much money on the line either, "only" 200$ distributed amongst the top 4 with 100$ for the winner, so they probably treated it more like a casual event.
|
On November 15 2011 15:20 Sabu113 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2011 15:12 mcmartini wrote:On November 15 2011 15:09 Sabu113 wrote:On November 15 2011 14:41 mango_destroyer wrote:On November 15 2011 14:39 Sabu113 wrote: Can't have this be so blatant.
Ban them for life.
No tolerance. No Forgiveness. Sure we knew this was happenign but to be so blatant about this is unforgivable. You can`t be serious. That is way too harsh. This is their career and life, you want to end that because of one thrown game in some ESV tournament? They aren`t even adults. I've seen posts that this was a joke match. ESV doesn't matter. We shouldn't take it seriously. I mean it's pretty apparent now that ESV is a joke. This is about setting the right incentives. We're so paranoid about match fixing that to even sniff that behavior is to risk annihilation. Though I suppose being kicked off slayers for a good while is adequate. How is ESV a joke because of this? One of the arguments against harsh punishment is that it's "just a show match" or less than that. So one of the arguments for gentler treatment is that these matches don't matter. Two. These games are important enough for a player with a significant lead to drop a game just for the hell of it. These aren't the vaunted great games of code b. Edit: The foreign scene because it was much smaller and less serious has a long history of repeatedly allowing cheaters back in. Admittedly there were fewer good/competitive players so I suppose they were forced, though I am sure some sort of an old boys network might have come into play. ESV isn't a joke, if you don't watch the games so don't say bad things about it. Very good tourney and I prefer it 10x more than NASL.
|
On November 15 2011 15:21 McFeser wrote: They should do an emergancy vote on who should fill Coca's code S spot. This really messes up the bracket (Maybe even giving the spot back to IdrA).
While giving the spot back to Idra is a bit far fetch. I do agree/can see how this messes up the bracket especially when you consider the new system having to play both Code S and Code A (if they loose in the group matches before ro8). Giving a free win will prolly be the outcome but having to fix the brackets up afterwards might be a pain.
|
On November 15 2011 14:19 VPCursed wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2011 14:14 Hattori_Hanzo wrote:On November 15 2011 13:51 SniXSniPe wrote: Honestly the punishments seem over the top. The BW scandal, was entirely different and involved vast sums of money and much more important matches.
Plus CoCa and Byun are both still quite young to make stupid mistakes--- they obviously didn't realize how big an issue it was, chatting in game about it. Nobody would chat about it if they didn't think it was a big deal... that's not even attempting to hide it. Right, so if Tiger Woods walked out of a Satellite tournamentto give his spot to his friend (since he's already) qualified, announcing it on live television in the same manner as in this case, he should have no consequences at all? My pro-golfer friend would totally have a screaming fit... seriously. What they did was so fucking disrespectful it is not even funny. At the very least, forfeit to some shit excuse, at least show you respect the tournament and the work to organise it. I mean, can you imagine all that work of running and organising a contest and a contestant mid-event announces, "I'm going to forfeit so my friend here can advance. I'm going to go now, Peace y'all". Their stunt was a huge slap in the face of the organisers and the sponsors. Any wonder Boxer was mad. Well for starters, Tiger woods wouldn't compete in a tournament that didn't offer him a fucking thing. I'm sure the players didn't think what they were doing through. It wasn't some elaborate conspiracy that they thought about, They announced it in chat thinking it was no big deal.. they felt it was just a friendly tournament and they felt the tournament wasn't very serious at all, ESL weekly isn't the GSL or the MLG and im sure any player that plays in it is not taking it very serious at all. The punishment is extremely harsh.
A Code S player playing in a tournament that is "beneath" him is the same analogy as Tiger Woods in a minor tournament. So tournaments should be treated lightly if they don't have a prize? That they can come and go as they please? That they can announce in-game that they can just quit because the other guy said so? Either you are a major tool or you really have no idea the amount of work and preparation it takes to organise a broadcasted event.
|
In my opinion, if Coca won the third set this wouldn't have happened.
|
On November 15 2011 15:14 NMx.StyX wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2011 15:08 Dodgin wrote:On November 15 2011 15:06 setzer wrote:On November 15 2011 15:00 NMx.StyX wrote:On November 15 2011 14:57 setzer wrote:On November 15 2011 14:52 windsupernova wrote:On November 15 2011 14:47 setzer wrote:On November 15 2011 14:42 windsupernova wrote:On November 15 2011 14:38 setzer wrote:On November 15 2011 14:32 JunkkaGom wrote: [quote]
Let me say this to people who say that since this isn't as big deal as Savior incident because Coca dind't gain anything and hasn't caused as huge scandal as then, he should be forgiven :
Killing some owner of rich company to steal money is just as bad as killing homeless guy for fun. Small or big, match fixing is killing esports Any consequence should be enforced by ESV, the party that is involved in this. If they determine that what CoCa did was unfair to the integrity of the tournament they should ban him for any duration they choose. What is a clear overreaction however is to deny CoCa the opportunity to compete in ALL tournaments, such as MLG and GSL. I won't speak for CoCa but if I did this and the entire team sat down and explained to me what I did was wrong I would realize my mistake. SlayerS and GOM doesn't need to make life-changing decisions to get a point across any more clear than a sit-down and penalty from ESV would have done. And really? comparing a juvenile mistake to planned murder is quite extreme. Gom didn´t enforce anything. It was the teams. The teams themeselves decided the punishment. Last time I checked GSL isn't a team league and has nothing to do with this particular ESV. If I was causing disruptive behavior in the local supermarket I wouldn't get a ban from all the restaurants in the city. Why should CoCa be removed from a party with no affiliation to this incident? Because it reflects negatively on GSL? No, that is silly. Ummm, Gom didn´t enforce anything? This is like you causing disruptive behavior in the local supermarket and your parents finding out and grounding you for a month. I'm not entirely convinced this wasn't a mutual decision between SlayerS and GOM, not am I convinced CoCa, on his own accord, forfeited his Code-S spot. Or think for a minute, and maybe it was slayersboxer, the owner of slayers, and the iconic figure from bw that probably should keep his players intact with appropriate punishments regardless of age? Or maybe the punishment is an overreaction and we should all hold hands and sing kumbaya. If true, why is Boxer allowed to choose which of his players can play in Code-S and who can't? Regardless of any behavior, GSL isn't a team league and there is no requirement to be on a team in order to participate in GSL. Last I checked it was CoCa who earned that spot and any decision to leave should be made only by him or the league. Sure, CoCa could have defied the Emperor and his team, destroyed his reputation in the korean scene and became teamless and continued to play in the GSL. He choose to save what honor he had left and take the high road with his punishment. You don't understand korean culture so you have no reason to comment on it. ^this. Setzer, read what you wrote and think for a minute before you click on post. No really... you don't even need to be in korean culture to understand this, its just common sense. Do you not know who slayersboxer is? Would this behavior been allowed in broodwar even for b teamers? no, and where did slayersboxer come from? I think the word started with brood and ended with war.
Well if you read my previous post you would see I express my doubts CoCa made the decision of his own volition and not without internal pressure from SlayerS. Any respectable sports league in the world would have a players union immediately filing a complaint with the league and a lengthy review handed. What happens in SC2? A spontaneous reaction only hours after that is imo a huge overreaction probably made because the Korean public wants nothing less than a beheading for anyone that conspires in "match-fixing" (even though this wasn't technically match-fixing, at least not like the BW scandal).
In the end CoCa made a bad decision but his decision should be met with equal enforcement. I don't find it acceptable to cut off a person's hand when they steal and I don't find it acceptable for SlayerS to force (and imo they did force) CoCa to remove himself from participation of all tournaments.
The penalty enforced by ESV should be more than enough.
|
On November 15 2011 14:16 Redmark wrote:. It's entirely the same. What if Byun fucks up his build because his dog licked his face?
Oh my god that would be so adorable.
|
Incredibly dumb and naive move on the part of Coca. Despite playing his friend and former team mate this goes to show that when you are a professional this is no longer just a game.
I'm glad to see that this has been handled in an appropriate way and they haven't gone too far in their punishments... yet (we'll have to see what happens come Jan. 1st). But so far i agree with the consequences and it sends a very loud message to all the other players.
|
|
On November 15 2011 15:21 Diamond wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2011 15:20 HeroHenry wrote: Shouldn't ESV review the replay to make sure something like this isn't shown? We broadcast roughly 50+ games a week. We would not only have to pre scan them but send them to a translator to get screened. I'm working very hard to learn Korean but I am having a lot of difficulty. Pre scanning is really not an option for us at this point. You can use sc2gears for that if you didn't know. It would be a quick way to check in the future. Best option would be to just not allow chatting tho.
|
Weird. There's a really interesting analysis of this sort of match fixing in Sumo wrestling in the first Freakonomics book. Basically since Coca had nothing to lose and Byun had a lot to gain, they said "fuck it, let's just play this one out." If Byun hadn't won the series, I would say, "well that's stupid," and that they should at least both be forfeit from the ESV tournament, but since Byun did win, it seems more likely that they had his whole win planned out, not just an extra game for buddy's sake. I'm sure this sort of stuff happens a lot more than we realize.
|
On November 15 2011 15:26 tuho12345 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2011 15:20 Sabu113 wrote:On November 15 2011 15:12 mcmartini wrote:On November 15 2011 15:09 Sabu113 wrote:On November 15 2011 14:41 mango_destroyer wrote:On November 15 2011 14:39 Sabu113 wrote: Can't have this be so blatant.
Ban them for life.
No tolerance. No Forgiveness. Sure we knew this was happenign but to be so blatant about this is unforgivable. You can`t be serious. That is way too harsh. This is their career and life, you want to end that because of one thrown game in some ESV tournament? They aren`t even adults. I've seen posts that this was a joke match. ESV doesn't matter. We shouldn't take it seriously. I mean it's pretty apparent now that ESV is a joke. This is about setting the right incentives. We're so paranoid about match fixing that to even sniff that behavior is to risk annihilation. Though I suppose being kicked off slayers for a good while is adequate. How is ESV a joke because of this? One of the arguments against harsh punishment is that it's "just a show match" or less than that. So one of the arguments for gentler treatment is that these matches don't matter. Two. These games are important enough for a player with a significant lead to drop a game just for the hell of it. These aren't the vaunted great games of code b. Edit: The foreign scene because it was much smaller and less serious has a long history of repeatedly allowing cheaters back in. Admittedly there were fewer good/competitive players so I suppose they were forced, though I am sure some sort of an old boys network might have come into play. ESV isn't a joke, if you don't watch the games so don't say bad things about it. Very good tourney and I prefer it 10x more than NASL.
I prefer listening to Nickelback 10x more than NASL. And Nickelback killed my fucking family.
|
What about my liquibet!?
Though this is not as huge as the BW match fixing scandal which included illegal gambling and lots of money, it shouldn't be treated lightly. I just hope this doesn't become career defining for both these players are it was just a lapse of judgement on both players parts.
|
On November 15 2011 15:27 setzer wrote:Show nested quote +On November 15 2011 15:14 NMx.StyX wrote:On November 15 2011 15:08 Dodgin wrote:On November 15 2011 15:06 setzer wrote:On November 15 2011 15:00 NMx.StyX wrote:On November 15 2011 14:57 setzer wrote:On November 15 2011 14:52 windsupernova wrote:On November 15 2011 14:47 setzer wrote:On November 15 2011 14:42 windsupernova wrote:On November 15 2011 14:38 setzer wrote: [quote]
Any consequence should be enforced by ESV, the party that is involved in this. If they determine that what CoCa did was unfair to the integrity of the tournament they should ban him for any duration they choose. What is a clear overreaction however is to deny CoCa the opportunity to compete in ALL tournaments, such as MLG and GSL.
I won't speak for CoCa but if I did this and the entire team sat down and explained to me what I did was wrong I would realize my mistake. SlayerS and GOM doesn't need to make life-changing decisions to get a point across any more clear than a sit-down and penalty from ESV would have done.
And really? comparing a juvenile mistake to planned murder is quite extreme. Gom didn´t enforce anything. It was the teams. The teams themeselves decided the punishment. Last time I checked GSL isn't a team league and has nothing to do with this particular ESV. If I was causing disruptive behavior in the local supermarket I wouldn't get a ban from all the restaurants in the city. Why should CoCa be removed from a party with no affiliation to this incident? Because it reflects negatively on GSL? No, that is silly. Ummm, Gom didn´t enforce anything? This is like you causing disruptive behavior in the local supermarket and your parents finding out and grounding you for a month. I'm not entirely convinced this wasn't a mutual decision between SlayerS and GOM, not am I convinced CoCa, on his own accord, forfeited his Code-S spot. Or think for a minute, and maybe it was slayersboxer, the owner of slayers, and the iconic figure from bw that probably should keep his players intact with appropriate punishments regardless of age? Or maybe the punishment is an overreaction and we should all hold hands and sing kumbaya. If true, why is Boxer allowed to choose which of his players can play in Code-S and who can't? Regardless of any behavior, GSL isn't a team league and there is no requirement to be on a team in order to participate in GSL. Last I checked it was CoCa who earned that spot and any decision to leave should be made only by him or the league. Sure, CoCa could have defied the Emperor and his team, destroyed his reputation in the korean scene and became teamless and continued to play in the GSL. He choose to save what honor he had left and take the high road with his punishment. You don't understand korean culture so you have no reason to comment on it. ^this. Setzer, read what you wrote and think for a minute before you click on post. No really... you don't even need to be in korean culture to understand this, its just common sense. Do you not know who slayersboxer is? Would this behavior been allowed in broodwar even for b teamers? no, and where did slayersboxer come from? I think the word started with brood and ended with war. Well if you read my previous post you would see I express my doubts CoCa made the decision of his own volition and not without internal pressure from SlayerS. Any respectable sports league in the world would have a players union immediately filing a complaint with the league and a lengthy review handed. What happens in SC2? A spontaneous reaction only hours after that is imo a huge overreaction probably made because the Korean public wants nothing less than a beheading for anyone that conspires in "match-fixing" (even though this wasn't technically match-fixing, at least not like the BW scandal). In the end CoCa made a bad decision but his decision should be met with equal enforcement. I don't find it acceptable to cut off a person's hand when they steal and I don't find it acceptable for SlayerS to force (and imo they did force) CoCa to remove himself from participation of all tournaments. The penalty enforced by ESV should be more than enough.
If Coca wasn't happy with what Slayers was telling him to do, he could always leave the team voluntarily. I guess he treasured staying on the team more than his Code S spot.
Furthermore, even if Slayers didn't tell him to drop it, GSL could always take it away from him, sort of like how they barred Choya from taking part in the teamleague when he was involved in the ladder incident.
|
forfeit code S cause of a game that not even give code a slot ... come on guys ...
|
|
|
|