| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
tnud
Sweden2233 Posts
On October 19 2011 21:25 HaXXspetten wrote: how did such a huge part of this thread turn into a debate about SC2 carriers? -.- I don't know but I added some red text to the op. It's very unlikely it's a new interceptor, way too detailed! Stop talking about Carriers | ||
|
MaXn00bPwNeR
Denmark12 Posts
We will need the "Disruption Web" spell back then. Where can you get this spell from? Well well, look what we have here for a new unit! | ||
|
cilinder007
Slovenia7251 Posts
| ||
|
sOvrn
United States678 Posts
| ||
|
J.E.G.
United States389 Posts
| ||
|
soullogik
United States1171 Posts
that shoots disc's that do aoe dmg you have to aim them yourself & they take scarab like shots where u have to build them same range as tank | ||
|
Bobster
Germany3075 Posts
It's clearly a flying unit. | ||
|
TheAntZ
Israel6248 Posts
On October 19 2011 18:58 NicolBolas wrote: Also, you seem to be under some delusion that Blizzard buffing one unit somehow prevents them from buffing another. If they wanted to buff Carriers, their buffing Motherships would not prevent that. You really shouldnt call others delusional when you seem pretty damn clueless. Blizzard said in the situation report that carriers got the middle finger because the mothership was chosen instead. | ||
|
Michaels
419 Posts
| ||
|
Alejandro
Argentina6 Posts
Did anyone from Blizzard hinted that some units might be gone for the new ones to appear? Or is it just guessing? Not trying to troll, it´s a serious question. | ||
|
BarbieHsu
574 Posts
| ||
|
chambertin
United States1704 Posts
On October 19 2011 21:50 BarbieHsu wrote: A fathership? lol. Personally I'm really hoping for the flying shield battery, I think it would make for some interesting gameplay challenges and also allow for some sort of buffed ground defense without requiring gas heavy sentries or statics like the photocannons. | ||
|
HavokTheorem
New Zealand250 Posts
| ||
|
VTPerfect
United States487 Posts
| ||
|
TheAntZ
Israel6248 Posts
On October 19 2011 21:50 Alejandro wrote: Why is everyone talking about removing a unit from the game? Did anyone from Blizzard hinted that some units might be gone for the new ones to appear? Or is it just guessing? Not trying to troll, it´s a serious question. Blizzard has already said units will be removed. They havent specified which ones | ||
|
nam nam
Sweden4672 Posts
On October 19 2011 21:50 BarbieHsu wrote: A fathership? It doesn't have enough balls. | ||
|
BeeNu
615 Posts
Oooooh I know, maybe it's a ground-version of the Corsair. | ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
On October 19 2011 21:50 Alejandro wrote: Why is everyone talking about removing a unit from the game? Did anyone from Blizzard hinted that some units might be gone for the new ones to appear? Or is it just guessing? Not trying to troll, it´s a serious question. I don't remember the exact phrasing Blizzard used, but they have stated they will or at least that it's good possibility that units will be removed. | ||
|
Zorkmid
4410 Posts
On October 19 2011 21:52 chambertin wrote: lol. Personally I'm really hoping for the flying shield battery, I think it would make for some interesting gameplay challenges and also allow for some sort of buffed ground defense without requiring gas heavy sentries or statics like the photocannons. I don't think that the game's balance could handle a race getting something like that, that buffs an entire army (plus sentry guardian shield is a bit like this already). I think it's more likely to be a unit that stands on it's own. | ||
|
NukeD
Croatia1612 Posts
On October 19 2011 19:50 coko wrote: Has no one considered it might be a hover craft? Produced from a Robo? Maybe something fast and able to hop over small cliffs. Could almost be a phoenix on the ground? But what about big cliffs? | ||
| ||
|
|
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
The PondCast
KCM Race Survival
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
