• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:03
CEST 13:03
KST 20:03
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL50Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?12FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event16Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster16Weekly Cups (June 16-22): Clem strikes back1
StarCraft 2
General
How does the number of casters affect your enjoyment of esports? The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series https://www.facebook.com/MiracleSheetsOnline/ [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Semi Finals & Finals $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady
Brood War
General
Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL Unit and Spell Similarities Help: rep cant save Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 717 users

a really specific Ninja ZvP nerf (1.4.0 PTR)

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 18 19 20 Next All
arbitrageur
Profile Joined December 2010
Australia1202 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-14 23:21:56
September 12 2011 16:55 GMT
#1
===============MODEDIT: ================

Well according to the first youtube quoted video below, there IS in fact a minor change/nerf to how units drop in PTR, but it's unlikely to realistically effect gameplay very much. The first youtube video below (in the quote) demonstrates the change. The first segment in the video with the reapers obv has no realistic application in-game, and the 2nd segment with the marauders demonstrates that there is NO change to how units drop over any sort of clumped army of that nature. The final segment with force fields demonstrates the only practical application of this change. You'd just better hope they don't fungal that..

This thread was based off failed testing. There is no ninja ZvP nerf. Further testing shows that the PTR seems to change nothing about how banelings drop on top of tightly clumped units. Leaving this open so people won't remain having misconceptions about the patch.

See the following by the tester in case and question:

Hi, sorry to trouble you all again. It would appear that in previous submissions I have only sensationalised and confused the general public on this matter. I now hope to put that right by releasing a new video about the changes.

Here it is:



Simple rule for viewing:

* Red is 1.3
* Yellow is 1.4

Summary: Yes the code has changed, however in the vast majority of use cases it will make little to no difference in your gaming experience... unless you like disrupting reaper parties that is....
In practice it is very hard and very situational to abuse the new logic to make the drops fail.

Its worth noting that there is one quite relatively interesting use-case at the end of the video (although its practicality is debateable).

ENJOY!

p.s. I hope this doesn't cause any further confusion.
p.p.s. Please don't comment on balance. Just ask Blizzard (nicely) to _consider_ reviewing this code if you take issue with it.


the following quote is referring to the video in the playxp.com article below:
On September 13 2011 05:06 rale wrote:
A close look at the 1.3 video is very revealing. The 2nd baneling dropped gets deflected to the edge just like all of the ones in the 1.4 video. The 3rd and 4th manage to find a hole in the center, and the zealots dying makes enough room to allow all others to drop.

In other words, the deflection isn't a change on the PTR. The zealots in the 1.3 video just weren't in perfect enough formation to prevent dropping entirely.

[image loading]

Several other people have tested this and have been unable to find any changes or nerfs to how banelings drop over units.
===============END of MODEDIT ================

EDIT: Read end of this post to see information on semi-failed replication attempts as well as semi-successfull ones. The overall message from TLers who are properly testing it is that it's been nerfed but it's not as bad as the video in my OP... the extent of the nerf to this strategy is unclear as of now. In my experience against very good protosses, ling baneling drop infestor is pretty marginal in massive fights vs GM level toss, depending on the context of the game of course. The remaining viability of this strategy is pending further research into the extent of this nerf (also NP nerf may kill it more but time will tell whether the double nerf will completely remove this strategy). .
----

According to a PlayXP post if current 1.4.0 PTR goes through, it seems Zerg can no longer use baneling drops against Protoss (see end of post for for ppl that semi-dispute this claim as well as others that endorse it in tests). You can still technically do it (if the video I've linked is an accurate representation of the change) but the tech isn't going to be worth it because the damage output in a big fight is significantly less.

The change, under bug-fixes:
Transports can no longer unload units into a dense area if the original order was issued on a fogged location.


The video:
http://www.playxp.com/sc2/news/view.php?article_id=3383490

In my experience the only things that dealt with ~8+ sentry armies in a straight up fight pre-hive were either baneling drops and/or a lot of infestors with NP - assuming Protoss is competent with FF and doesn't do stupid things like run onto creep at 160/200 without a big advnatage. I am so concerned with this as bane drops added a huge micro and multi-tasking element to ZvP.

It's not even a balance change... "bug fix". Lol.

Thanks to nGenjazbas for the find.

This also stops zergs queuing up 2+ overlords to drop probe lines simultaneously. Which is O.K. I guess, but I really don't like this being patched as 1 stalker in hold position crushes this strategy (as each INDIVIDUAL baneling needs to be microd and X'd into the probes. 3 overlords at a time is impossible. 1 max). But you can't trust a small balance team to know technicalities like this. If they stop this (i.e. if they stop Protoss's losing who don't put 1 stalker behind mineral line on hold), then they should also stop Terrans from being able to run 10 blue flame into the main in midgame and GGing zergs who don't have 3 roaches on hold on the ramp. Same same.
----

EDIT: A TL user claims that a replication attempt has semi-failed.

On September 13 2011 03:08 EmilA wrote:
Tested this out a bit on EU PTR server: Here are my conclusions:


There is an issue with dropping on deathballs:

- If you issue a drop command on a huge and tight ball, then banelings will temporarily cease dropping when around the middle of the ball. It won't "stop" the drop command, as it will automatically resume towards the outskirts of the ball again.

[image loading]
4 banelings attempted dropped on top of a super-tight ball. 3 banelings dropped at beginning, all hit on the outskirt. Last baneling was dropped towards the other end of the ball.

[image loading]
Banelings dropped without problems on a not-super tight ball.

- Banelings are now "displaced" a little bit when dropped around the outskirts of the ball. A guess, which is my own rough estimate, would be that banelings can be displaced about 3 units range before the drop command temporarily ceases. Bear in mind that even small holes in the clump are potential dropsites, so these "halts" in drops would probably be very very uncommon.

- I recreated what I thought was a typical 1-a deathball vs ultra-ling-banelingbombs scenario, the protoss ball spread out in a concave that was thin enough to apparently not stop the drops from occuring.

- Usually, you can move a transport unit around freely after initiating a "drop while moving" command, but if you reissue a move command while under the "drop while moving command" over undroppable space, the drop command will be halted. Bear in mind the drop command would otherwise automatically resume when reaching the outskirts of the ball.


TLDR: Bug is there, but it probably requires unrealistic conditions to take full effect, though it may reduce overall damage capabilities of the baneling drops.


Person #2:
On September 13 2011 03:36 Soluhwin wrote:
EmilA is correct, according to my tests, baneling bombs are still possible but it will always hit the outskirts of a deathball. This means the overall DPS of banelings have been slaughtered in this matchup, because instead of a the full 360 degree splash on top of units, the splash will hit around 180 degrees of units. This distributes baneling splash without any effort from the protoss, I'd have to disagree with this change.

MS paint added for further explanation:
[image loading]


On September 13 2011 03:37 Clbull wrote:
Tested it. I'm having mixed results replicating the bug.


This one makes me happy:
On September 13 2011 04:13 Zelniq wrote:
i was bored just now and just tested this in unit tester and it's basically bullshit. Currently (before patch), you can't unload banelings on top of a clumped up army with no gaps, moving drop or no moving drop. the only way it works is if there are tiny gaps in the army. which is why it works in the 'pre-patch 1.4' video.

i need further testing for 100% confidence in this but it seems all this talk is just for nothing..PTR does nothing


Montana[TK]
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
1624 Posts
September 12 2011 16:56 GMT
#2
This doesn't affect ZvP because you unload banelings onto "dense areas" when you are already over the army.
Plexa: "It's not [caster] bashing when its the truth."
L3g3nd_
Profile Joined July 2010
New Zealand10461 Posts
September 12 2011 16:57 GMT
#3
i guess it was this or stopping infestors from stunning. the combination was just too strong
https://twitter.com/#!/IrisAnother
Legend`
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada381 Posts
September 12 2011 16:57 GMT
#4
Wow, that is actually pretty huge lol. That pretty much negates most if not all of the damage that baneling drops will do

Not sure why that was "fixed" though, wasn't really a glitch in the first place ;/
NME.352 GM NA Protoss
Kinky
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States4126 Posts
September 12 2011 16:58 GMT
#5
There's a comparison video here http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/kcfkr/ptr_ninja_nerf_baneling_drops_less_effective_13/
atmuh
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States246 Posts
September 12 2011 16:58 GMT
#6
baneling drops were very exciting to watch
will be missed if they really arent useful anymore
pksens
Profile Joined July 2010
United Kingdom156 Posts
September 12 2011 16:58 GMT
#7
Fogged location? The videos not in a fog of war, assuming this is a bug then that's not dropping regardless of the fog or not? If so, WHAT THE FUCK! :|
arbitrageur
Profile Joined December 2010
Australia1202 Posts
September 12 2011 16:59 GMT
#8
On September 13 2011 01:56 Montana[TK] wrote:
This doesn't affect ZvP because you unload banelings onto "dense areas" when you are already over the army.


I am very happy to hear this, if it's true. can someone clarify Blizzard's definition of fogged.
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-12 17:00:58
September 12 2011 16:59 GMT
#9
On September 13 2011 01:56 Montana[TK] wrote:
This doesn't affect ZvP because you unload banelings onto "dense areas" when you are already over the army.


The sight range of overlords isn't huge, and a lot of the time you have to make the command partially in the fog-- if you're close enough to have good sight of his army, you've already engaged him, and his army is a dense area. Also, from these videos it looks like this DOES effect ZvP-- in the playxp article it looks like the overlord has sight to the zealots (since it's the 2nd overlord, the first one is over the ball when the command is issued) and the drops are still ineffective.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Benjef
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United Kingdom6921 Posts
September 12 2011 16:59 GMT
#10
On September 13 2011 01:58 Kinky wrote:
There's a comparison video here http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/kcfkr/ptr_ninja_nerf_baneling_drops_less_effective_13/

There was a comparison vid in the OP oO.

Seems pretty big. Mind this is only PTR there just testing things doesn't mean its gonna go live. This imo seems like too big of a nerf.
<3 | Dota 2 | DayZ | <3
Jumbled
Profile Joined September 2010
1543 Posts
September 12 2011 17:01 GMT
#11
I thought this might happen when I saw that in the patch notes. Seems disappointing to me - baneling drops are an entertaining tactic, and while strong, I don't think there's any reason to cripple them.
Chicane
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7875 Posts
September 12 2011 17:01 GMT
#12
Transports can no longer unload units into a dense area if the original order was issued on a fogged location.


Okay... then don't order your banelings to be dropped in the fog of war and nothing has changed......................

I don't see what the problem is here. How often have you blindly told your overlords to drop banelings in the fog of war anyway?

Also where are your numbers coming from? ~30%? Where are you getting that from?
Perfect
Profile Joined August 2010
United States322 Posts
September 12 2011 17:02 GMT
#13
I love seeing the devs expriment with some of these changes. These changes are the things that will define the game for years to come.
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
September 12 2011 17:03 GMT
#14
On September 13 2011 02:01 Chicane wrote:
Show nested quote +
Transports can no longer unload units into a dense area if the original order was issued on a fogged location.


Okay... then don't order your banelings to be dropped in the fog of war and nothing has changed......................

I don't see what the problem is here. How often have you blindly told your overlords to drop banelings in the fog of war anyway?

Also where are your numbers coming from? ~30%? Where are you getting that from?


From the looks of the comparison video, "fog" is pretty loosely defined and it seems to happen when in regular vision as well.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
demonik187
Profile Joined August 2010
United States575 Posts
September 12 2011 17:03 GMT
#15
As much as I hate to say it, Banelings drops in a dense area actually make more sense because they never technically should touch the ground as they explode on impact. Other units I could see not being able to drop if the area is too packed with units/stuff.
We march to victory!
tkRage
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
225 Posts
September 12 2011 17:03 GMT
#16
On September 13 2011 02:01 Chicane wrote:
Show nested quote +
Transports can no longer unload units into a dense area if the original order was issued on a fogged location.


Okay... then don't order your banelings to be dropped in the fog of war and nothing has changed......................

I don't see what the problem is here. How often have you blindly told your overlords to drop banelings in the fog of war anyway?

Also where are your numbers coming from? ~30%? Where are you getting that from?

watch.... the damn..... video.
Chicane
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7875 Posts
September 12 2011 17:04 GMT
#17
On September 13 2011 02:03 tkRage wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 02:01 Chicane wrote:
Transports can no longer unload units into a dense area if the original order was issued on a fogged location.


Okay... then don't order your banelings to be dropped in the fog of war and nothing has changed......................

I don't see what the problem is here. How often have you blindly told your overlords to drop banelings in the fog of war anyway?

Also where are your numbers coming from? ~30%? Where are you getting that from?

watch.... the damn..... video.


I did... and I don't see the problem. You can just reclick d for the front most overlord... the other ones will have vision. This is not a big deal at all.
TheKefka
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Croatia11752 Posts
September 12 2011 17:04 GMT
#18
On September 13 2011 01:58 atmuh wrote:
baneling drops were very exciting to watch
will be missed if they really arent useful anymore

If it only prevents unloading units onto a dense area when you issue the order in the fog than all they did was nerf a-moving bane drops.If anything they added more difficulty to executing the bane drop(which was pretty easy to pull off and stupidly good almost always with infestors).It's quite a intelligent nerf.
Cackle™
eScaper-tsunami
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Canada313 Posts
September 12 2011 17:05 GMT
#19
On September 13 2011 01:58 pksens wrote:
Fogged location? The videos not in a fog of war, assuming this is a bug then that's not dropping regardless of the fog or not? If so, WHAT THE FUCK! :|

Actually it is suppose to be fogged, but you get both player's vision in that map. If you limit vision to 1 player, I suspect that the baneling drop was performed in fog of war.
RuhRoh is my herO
Olsson
Profile Joined April 2011
Sweden931 Posts
September 12 2011 17:05 GMT
#20
Great. Two things viable against protoss deathball:

Fungal: Nerfed but will still be decent.

Baneling Rain: Completely nullified and worthless now.
Naniwa <3
1 2 3 4 5 18 19 20 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RSL Revival
10:00
Season 1: Playoffs Day 2
Reynor vs CureLIVE!
Crank 1443
ComeBackTV 614
IndyStarCraft 138
3DClanTV 138
Rex111
IntoTheiNu 36
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Crank 1443
Harstem 205
IndyStarCraft 138
Rex 111
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 9050
Rain 6832
firebathero 5571
Horang2 1630
Jaedong 1600
Larva 614
Pusan 503
actioN 405
BeSt 318
Leta 259
[ Show more ]
EffOrt 166
Mini 144
Rush 140
ToSsGirL 137
Light 136
Hyun 112
PianO 80
Mind 51
JYJ45
JulyZerg 40
Killer 38
Snow 25
Mong 24
Backho 24
sSak 21
NaDa 20
hero 19
HiyA 18
Sacsri 14
Shinee 14
zelot 10
Movie 9
IntoTheRainbow 8
SilentControl 6
Bale 5
Barracks 3
Icarus 1
Dota 2
XcaliburYe826
XaKoH 513
420jenkins183
League of Legends
JimRising 319
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss728
Stewie2K428
allub291
Other Games
DeMusliM391
Pyrionflax234
ArmadaUGS84
Lowko68
rGuardiaN48
B2W.Neo34
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH257
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt419
Upcoming Events
OSC
1h 57m
WardiTV European League
4h 57m
Scarlett vs Percival
Jumy vs ArT
YoungYakov vs Shameless
uThermal vs Fjant
Nicoract vs goblin
Harstem vs Gerald
FEL
4h 57m
Big Brain Bouts
4h 57m
Korean StarCraft League
15h 57m
CranKy Ducklings
22h 57m
RSL Revival
22h 57m
FEL
1d 4h
RSL Revival
1d 22h
FEL
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
Dewalt vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-06-28
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.