• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 19:15
CET 01:15
KST 09:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Rongyi Cup S3 - RO16 Preview3herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational10SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)20Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft 2 not at the Esports World Cup 2026 [Short Story] The Last GSL Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued Stellar Fest "01" Jersey Charity Auction PhD study /w SC2 - help with a survey!
Tourneys
$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) OSC Season 13 World Championship $70 Prize Pool Ladder Legends Academy Weekly Open! SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone
Brood War
General
Fantasy's Q&A video BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates BW General Discussion Gypsy to Korea
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2 Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Awesome Games Done Quick 2026!
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread NASA and the Private Sector Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Esports Advertising Shap…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1436 users

Why 1/1/1 is considered to be imbalanced in Korea - Page 62

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 60 61 62 63 64 143 Next
Can we stop talking about nerfing things please? - 9:10 KST
Condor Hero
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States2931 Posts
August 22 2011 18:01 GMT
#1221
On August 22 2011 15:57 papaz wrote:
Where is the show "imbalanced" when you need one.

No offense to TL discussions, they are definetely the best out of all forums/communities out there. But I would love to listen to some pros discussing this, maybe taking a look at some replays and showing us the imbalancies .


they wont discuss this.
theyll do stuff important to zerg first, like ghost mech and blue flame hellions.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
August 22 2011 18:05 GMT
#1222
On August 23 2011 03:00 DertoQq wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2011 02:58 Validity wrote:
Can someone tell me why the Koreans aren't getting a fast forge to get +1 armor against 1-1-1? Especially with a 1 gate fe build where you have to mostly rely on gateway units?


I'm not sure, I never tried it, but I don't think it does a big enough difference on such a low unit count.


It doesn't really help against banshees and tanks. Thats 2 less stalkers and they are the only thing thats going to down the banshees. The timing on this one is so tight, 100 gas is a huge loss for the protoss player.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Telcontar
Profile Joined May 2010
United Kingdom16710 Posts
August 22 2011 18:06 GMT
#1223
On August 23 2011 03:01 Condor Hero wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 22 2011 15:57 papaz wrote:
Where is the show "imbalanced" when you need one.

No offense to TL discussions, they are definetely the best out of all forums/communities out there. But I would love to listen to some pros discussing this, maybe taking a look at some replays and showing us the imbalancies .


they wont discuss this.
theyll do stuff important to zerg first, like ghost mech and blue flame hellions.

Don't count it out just yet. Artosis is at least 1/2 a protoss now, and the korean community is very convinced that the 1/1/1 (or 3/1/1) is imba. They'll probably invite HuK onto the show to discusss it. Then again, IdrA's not going back to korea until october/november, so who knows if it gets figured out/nerfed before then.
Et Eärello Endorenna utúlien. Sinome maruvan ar Hildinyar tenn' Ambar-metta.
Xahhk
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada540 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-22 18:13:39
August 22 2011 18:11 GMT
#1224
On August 23 2011 02:35 roymarthyup wrote:
The discussion is whether or not a safe build exists for protoss that is safe against 1-1-1 and 2rax expand builds.

If the only builds that counter a 1-1-1 are builds that are auto-lose to 2rax expand, and the protoss must commit to that build before he is able to scout and know which is coming, then that means the protoss must coinflip every game with his builds.

Terran has several safe expansion builds that are safe against pretty much every protoss all-in and are equal with protoss expansion builds. So terran has the option of using a safe build OR using 1-1-1 and instant winning if the protoss got his coinflip wrong and decided the terran wanst going 1-1-1

Zergs used to complain about this, and multiple buffs and nerfs were thrown around and zergs didnt "magically start playing better", instead many balance patches were used to fix the situation zergs were having with these problems.

Now back to TvP, i am a diamond protoss and i am practicing with master terran players and im trying to find a safe build. so far this is the a safe build i think might show some promise

I admit that i am not a great player, and the only reason this build may be winning may be because my practice partners are bad. I fully admit that until this safe build is tested between two players with the highest mechanics, it cannot be said whether its viable or not.

I cannot say this build is viable, because this build hasnt seen any use at the highest levels of play and franky i believe if it doesnt work at the highest levels of play that it isnt "viable" in a game balance sense. blizzard wants to balance the game for the highest levels of play so e-sports fans who watch tournaments get to see great tactical matches in tournament finals instead of coinflip BO wins





now with that said.... onto the build....

first i must reiterate that everything im about to say about this build may be completely 100% wrong. maybe this build ISNT safe against 2rax expand, maybe my practice partners are making mistakes in their 2rax expands and maybe puma would crush this safe build idea with a 2rax expand even if MC was using it. I dont know for sure, im just throwing out what ive been working on and maybe a good toss player might think theres something to it


So far my testing shows this build is safe to use against 1rax fe, 2rax expand, 3rax expand, 1-1-1 banshee marine tank raven, thor allin, cloak rushes, CC first, and gasless expand builds.

this safe build idea is also safe against the very fast 2rax marine/scv allin that hits at 4:00 gametime, or the 3rax marine/scv allin that hits at 4:30 gametime, or the 6rax marine allin that hits at 5:20 gametime, or relatively standard marine/scv/marauder pressure that hits at 6:00 gametime, or relatively standard heavy marine/marauder attacks with stim that come at 7-8 minutes


here is the build. The thing about this build is it is completely 100% scoutable by your terran opponent the moment his scv enters your base, however i feel any reaction the terran does to it doesnt give him a insane advantage, only maybe a slight advantage or it makes it a fairly even game

this build gets 2 fast gasses, clearly scoutable by the enemy scv

this build skips making a zealot, clearly scoutable by the enemy scv

this build uses constant chronoboost on the nexus and it doesnt cut probes, clearly scoutable by the enemy SCV (it will notice your nexus has no energy and the gateway isnt making a zealot)

this build gets 200 gas by the time cybercore is done and it makes a stalker+stargate immediately after the cyber finishes. this is completely scoutable by your enemy because it makes a stargate before you can get out a stalker, but the advantage to this is it gets your tech out so much faster



your first stalker pokes your enemies ramp at about 5:00 gametime. if you see a marauder and no expansion building at his natural, you throw down a robo (because it gets no sentries it has enough gas for the robo). this means you are going 1gate/star/robo against a terran build that 100% includes marauders and isnt building a expansion at the natural before 5 minutes

your first voidray comes out at about 5:30 gametime. fly your voidray directly to your enemies base and scout with it. because unstimmed marines and voidrays both have the same movement speed, your voidray is able to fly everywhere around the terran base/natural without risk and give you 100% absolute scouting information.

also, keep a scouting probe between your enemies base and yours in order to see if 6 minute marauder pressure is coming. many terrans will pressure with some scv/marine/marauder at 6 minutes to kill greedy tosses. as your voidray is moving out to scout, if you see this marauder pressure coming you can kill it with voidray+stalkers (voidrays have some movement speed as the marauder) and then scout afterwards

the reason you have to make a voidray first instead of a pheonix is because if the terran went 3rax expand + 6 minute marauder pressure and you opened pheonix, by the time he reaches you with the 6 minute pressure he will notice you are going pheonix and you will most likely die. the voidray is much stronger against the 6 minute pressure than 1-2 pheonix

assuming your terran opponent does not do this 6 minute pressure, you scout with your voidray. with your voidray scout.... if you see your enemy doesnt have a expansion, make the robo support bay before expanding, this means you are going fast 1base collossi against a terran build that isnt expanding fast (which is good for you)

if you see your enemy has a expansion (meaning he most likely went 2rax expand), drop your expansion right away. THIS RIGHT HERE IS THE MAIN WEAKNESS OF THE BUILD. The terran can expand before 6:30 and have a economic advantage over you. This toss 6:30 expansion i believe is slightly weaker in economy to a 2rax expand, however i feel its not that bad because you know your enemy expanded and you can chronoboost out tons of probes nonstop so by the time your nexus is finished you should have okay saturation and the terran shouldnt be too ahead of you in terms of economy. the terran cannot cancel the toss nexus because the will will have stalkers/immortals and will soon have out a collossi. Then the toss should be able to take 3 bases and use defenders advantage and eventually take the game to a 3base vs 3base lategame scenario where lategame decisions decide who wins

With the 5:00 robo, i can have out 2 immortals and 1 collossi by 9:00. combined with some stalkers and zealots and a voidray. with a 3rax expand, by 9:00 the terran can attack you with a big handful of marauders and marines with stim, but i find with good micro that attack is very possible to defend against. i find the best thing to do is keep your collossi above your ramp and hidden. for 10 seconds play cat/mouse with your terran opponent with your immortals/stalkers/zealots and he will stim once or twice while you dance around your expansion taking some damage on your units. you should have 1 collossi, 2 immortals, 1 voidray, some 4stalkers and 6zealots by the time the attack hits at 9:00. keep your collossi hidden above your ramp or back behind your nexus. if your enemy focuses your expansion, you attack him with that force. he shouldnt be able to kill the nexus without losing like his entire army. your goal is to dance and buy time for about 10 seconds and after the first stim then you send in your collossi and your enemy has to stim again to try and kill it, pretty much i find the 3rax attack at 9 minutes is very easy to hold with this 9:00 army i have

normally the terran enemy tries to dance kite which gives you these 10 seconds. if your enemy stims and directly 100% engages your army without trying to dance, you must bring in the collossi asap because in those 10 seconds your entire army could die, because of this you should not hide your collossi if your army is too far away from the ramp or nexus. if your enemy does this direct engagement you can bring in the collossi and normally win since he isnt kiting your zealots and your zealots are getting in hits. its very hard to explain how to micro this situation but its not that hard i find it very easy and i dont think this build should lose to a 3rax marine/marauder pressure as long as the toss is halfway decent


after this, it is 2base VS 2base and i find the game pretty equal.


You can defend against 2 rax with 1 gate FE then 2 gateways (Huk PvT), and you chronoboost warpgate. You pull probes if you need to and you'll be fine since you have 2 nexus. This also beats stupid 6 rax scv all ins, since you are able to pump out 5 stalkers to kite his marine scvs all the way to your base.

It's also smart to build a robo like MC did after 3 gates in game 1... you can always cancel it if you see terran moving at you with bio pressure.

So yeah 1 gate FE pretty safe.. it's also supposed to hold 3 rax with sentries and stalkers.. but that's a 2 gas variant with a later nexus.
TrickyGilligan
Profile Joined September 2010
United States641 Posts
August 22 2011 18:12 GMT
#1225
I really feel like this relates back to the complete lack of effective Protoss harass.

So if Protoss expands, they die to the 1 base all in. Ok, I can see that being kind of fair.

If Protoss doesn't expand, Terran sieges outside their base and builds bunkers, and Protoss has very little chance of taking the contain on head-on.

Can you imagine if a 1 base Protoss parked their entire army outside of the base of a 1 base Terran? And then started dropping pylons and cannons outside their opponent's base? Terran would laugh, send 2 full medevacs to the Protoss main and win instantly.

Without the risk of a counter attack, contains are too good against Protoss. Sure, you'll never run up their ramp due to force fields, but they're sure as hell never getting down in either. Something that can be dropped out of a Warp Prisim that can actually be effective would be a great start.

Still not going to be happy if we don't get a fix before HotS though, but I'm sure HotS will help a ton.
"I've had a perfectly wonderful evening. But this wasn't it." -Groucho Marx
MrCon
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
France29748 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-22 18:19:23
August 22 2011 18:12 GMT
#1226
MC did repel the first push, losing his nexus. This push was well executed, no flaw, so no "but the terran screwed up when the protoss crushed that push" excuse.
Too bad the replays aren't up, but could MC have crushed the 2nd push ? Intuitively I'd say yes, as he totally screwed up. Imo what happened is that he thought that he would crush it easily (as I thought myself) so he just didn't engage it properly.
Didn't waited for his charge.
Engaged in a choke point.
Sent his stalkers first who got stomped by siege fire, no answer to the banshee after that.

I don't remember how much time he had between the 2 pushes, what I remember is he had enough time to complete a nexus, build a council and research 75% of charge. Could he had not expanded (or even expanded), build a robobay, one colo and thermal lance ? Not sure, I have to see the replay.
One sure thing is that he could have waited for charge before engaging, iirc he had enough to crush the push, he had a ton of stalkers and zealots, at least 2 observers, perhaps some immortals I don't remember.

I won't even talk about the last game, MC screwed this one so much that it can't be used for balance talk. (the 1st one shouldn't be used either, but it was so...)
SorYu
Profile Joined May 2011
Netherlands75 Posts
August 22 2011 18:13 GMT
#1227
On August 23 2011 02:36 Topdoller wrote:
These AOE units are OP in every way


AOE is always pretty impossible to balance in any game, emp/fungal in their current state is quite a bit too much "free" damage/effective aswell imo..
MC - Ret (no terran love right now sry)
Condor Hero
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States2931 Posts
August 22 2011 18:19 GMT
#1228
On August 23 2011 01:18 CCAA wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2011 01:14 Chronald wrote:

Look at MC v PuMa finals, 2/3 games PuMa did this all-in and MC had no hope, none. You can try to say he made mistakes, which is partially true, but what did PuMa have to do to force those mistakes? A-move across map, siege at natural, A-move into base. That's it.

The honest truth is that it is imbalanced, and there isn't any math that can refute this. The Korean Win-Rates prove this point. Blizzard will fix this unless they want to see a lot of professional players stop playing.


you have to mention that MC failed hard

Yeah he shouldn't have picked Protoss.
MC didn't play perfect, no one's denying that.
NO ONE can play perfect, not even vs easy AI.

Puma didn't do anything extraordinary to really "deserve" the win anyways.
The winner should outplay the loser. I don't really care about small imbalances (BW was full of small imbalances) but the audience should always get the feeling that the winner outplayed the loser and I didn't get that feeling watching this series. It makes for poor spectator experience.
Feel free to disagree with my assessment.
navara
Profile Joined September 2010
France95 Posts
August 22 2011 18:19 GMT
#1229
On August 23 2011 03:13 SorYu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2011 02:36 Topdoller wrote:
These AOE units are OP in every way


AOE is always pretty impossible to balance in any game, emp/fungal in their current state is quite a bit too much "free" damage/effective aswell imo..


while storm and colossus are perfectly fine
rpgalon
Profile Joined April 2011
Brazil1069 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-22 18:22:11
August 22 2011 18:20 GMT
#1230
On August 23 2011 03:12 MrCon wrote:
MC did repel the first push, losing his nexus. This push was well executed, no flaw, so no "but the terran screwed up when the protoss crushed that push" excuse.


actually, Puma researched cloak, but MC is so good that he was able to lose 0 probes, I would call that a flaw since cloak research = 1 more banshee in the push
badog
Tweleve
Profile Joined March 2011
United States644 Posts
August 22 2011 18:28 GMT
#1231
On August 23 2011 03:19 navara wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2011 03:13 SorYu wrote:
On August 23 2011 02:36 Topdoller wrote:
These AOE units are OP in every way


AOE is always pretty impossible to balance in any game, emp/fungal in their current state is quite a bit too much "free" damage/effective aswell imo..


while storm and colossus are perfectly fine


you can dodge storms, you can't dodge emp and fungal
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
TheWalls
Profile Joined August 2011
United States15 Posts
August 22 2011 18:29 GMT
#1232
On August 23 2011 02:42 Carmine wrote:
People are forgetting the downside to mules. They deplete your minerals faster. at the time when Terran is floating his CC down to his natural, the protoss should still be mining. During this period of 15 seconds that Terran is not mining should be about 200 minerals or so that he doesn't have and protoss will.

Also, People keep talking about the 2nd and third waves of units, but in MC v Puma on Xelnaga, Puma brought so many SCVs that I imagine that MC's income was higher over the next period of time. He really didn't need to expand as early the 2nd time because

A) he would still be mining during the time that Terran was floating his CC

B) He would (probably) be mining more than or equal to the Terran at all times after the initial push (because of pulling SCVs).

After the first push he was in an excellent position, he should have moved out and delayed Pumas 2nd push by forcing seiges, all the while milking his small econ advantage for warpins or teching instead of expanding.


Im new to posting so i dont know how to quote certain parts of a quote, but terran isnt behind when not mining ebcause they have the base already mined out while protoss doest. Technically they have more mineral mined in the situation so terran would be ahead econmically if this happens.

Secondly, why is a way of dealing with this build "forcing seiges?" Ok most builds can be combated by unitc compostions, but the counter this build is delyaing it meaning there is no viable counter to it.... that is not how starcraft ever was and hopefully will never be
rdr
Profile Joined June 2011
Sweden48 Posts
August 22 2011 18:29 GMT
#1233
On August 22 2011 06:12 Lordwar wrote:
Why all this fuzz about this build now? this build has been around like forever?

probably becouse its crazy strong and crazy boring to watch. ont i would say that if you use a build and you do nothing wrong and your opponent does nothing wrong and you have ha 100% winrate then that build is very overpowered clearly.
Linwelin
Profile Joined March 2011
Ireland7554 Posts
August 22 2011 18:30 GMT
#1234
On August 23 2011 03:28 SentinelSC2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2011 03:19 navara wrote:
On August 23 2011 03:13 SorYu wrote:
On August 23 2011 02:36 Topdoller wrote:
These AOE units are OP in every way


AOE is always pretty impossible to balance in any game, emp/fungal in their current state is quite a bit too much "free" damage/effective aswell imo..


while storm and colossus are perfectly fine


you can dodge storms, you can't dodge emp and fungal


Let's not start that
Fuck Razor and Death Prophet
Aletheia27
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States267 Posts
August 22 2011 18:32 GMT
#1235
On August 23 2011 03:29 TheWalls wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2011 02:42 Carmine wrote:
People are forgetting the downside to mules. They deplete your minerals faster. at the time when Terran is floating his CC down to his natural, the protoss should still be mining. During this period of 15 seconds that Terran is not mining should be about 200 minerals or so that he doesn't have and protoss will.

Also, People keep talking about the 2nd and third waves of units, but in MC v Puma on Xelnaga, Puma brought so many SCVs that I imagine that MC's income was higher over the next period of time. He really didn't need to expand as early the 2nd time because

A) he would still be mining during the time that Terran was floating his CC

B) He would (probably) be mining more than or equal to the Terran at all times after the initial push (because of pulling SCVs).

After the first push he was in an excellent position, he should have moved out and delayed Pumas 2nd push by forcing seiges, all the while milking his small econ advantage for warpins or teching instead of expanding.


Im new to posting so i dont know how to quote certain parts of a quote, but terran isnt behind when not mining ebcause they have the base already mined out while protoss doest. Technically they have more mineral mined in the situation so terran would be ahead econmically if this happens.

Secondly, why is a way of dealing with this build "forcing seiges?" Ok most builds can be combated by unitc compostions, but the counter this build is delyaing it meaning there is no viable counter to it.... that is not how starcraft ever was and hopefully will never be


I agree with the resource part of this post.

But with regard to the second half, I must disagree. Starcraft 2 is to an extent more "counter" biased than BW, but it should NEVER be that unit compositions dictate the victors of battles. As positioning, strategy, and timing (in this case I mean delay tactics) play infinitely more important roles and create more depth to the game.
I am that I am
dNsIMonTy
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom26 Posts
August 22 2011 18:35 GMT
#1236
i dont get it if you 15 nexus why would he continue to 1/1/1 all in you why not just CC rush you or do a 3 Rax?
Trying to get to diamond
rdr
Profile Joined June 2011
Sweden48 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-22 18:36:31
August 22 2011 18:36 GMT
#1237
I dont like games when some races or characters only can win when another makes mistakes it happend in wow and its boring.
Asmodeusz
Profile Joined August 2011
193 Posts
August 22 2011 18:37 GMT
#1238
On August 23 2011 03:20 rpgalon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2011 03:12 MrCon wrote:
MC did repel the first push, losing his nexus. This push was well executed, no flaw, so no "but the terran screwed up when the protoss crushed that push" excuse.


actually, Puma researched cloak, but MC is so good that he was able to lose 0 probes, I would call that a flaw since cloak research = 1 more banshee in the push


With raven, Puma was killing observers, forcing MC to waste gas and robo production time on more observers. The cloak wasn't a waste at all.
Jimmy Raynor
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
902 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-22 18:49:24
August 22 2011 18:37 GMT
#1239
Funny thing is that every time that a protoss holds the 1/1/1 protoss players start saying how "wrong" was the build executed. Also the 2nd attack of Puma was just a desperate move but MC's greediness made him lose the game. Also why is no one discussing how socke hold Select's 1/1/1 with colossus or was it executed "wrong" because the terran lost?
Aui_2000
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada435 Posts
August 22 2011 18:41 GMT
#1240
On August 23 2011 03:05 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2011 03:00 DertoQq wrote:
On August 23 2011 02:58 Validity wrote:
Can someone tell me why the Koreans aren't getting a fast forge to get +1 armor against 1-1-1? Especially with a 1 gate fe build where you have to mostly rely on gateway units?


I'm not sure, I never tried it, but I don't think it does a big enough difference on such a low unit count.


It doesn't really help against banshees and tanks. Thats 2 less stalkers and they are the only thing thats going to down the banshees. The timing on this one is so tight, 100 gas is a huge loss for the protoss player.


It helps a lot against banshees (reduces 2 damage). Tanks aren't the ones really doing damage because they are only really there so you can't FF the terran out/to punish retreating. So why is an upgrade that reduces marine damage by a third ignored. Aren't marines what make this push so strong due to their dps? The +1 armor also carries over to defending the next waves better than getting more units because of how heavier they are on marines in subsequent waves.

I don't know what you mean by the timing is tight. Because the hit timing of 1/1/1 is definitely past the timing where the 1 armor upgrade is more than worth its cost.

I've only really played protoss against 1/1/1 from high level players before it became so refined, but I would always get a +1 armor and I would roflstomp any sort of 3/1/1 play with a zealot heavy army.
follow @aui_2000 // www.twitch.tv/aui_2000
Prev 1 60 61 62 63 64 143 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
Rongyi Cup S3 - Group A
CranKy Ducklings47
Liquipedia
The PiG Daily
21:20
Best Games of SC
ByuN vs Solar
herO vs Classic
Reynor vs Cure
Solar vs herO
PiGStarcraft715
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft715
Nathanias 140
CosmosSc2 100
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 100
Dota 2
syndereN509
League of Legends
C9.Mang0217
Counter-Strike
taco 168
minikerr24
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe62
Mew2King54
Other Games
tarik_tv14704
gofns10575
summit1g3125
DeMusliM456
shahzam355
ToD166
ViBE124
KnowMe77
Liquid`Ken4
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick550
BasetradeTV8
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• musti20045 42
• davetesta25
• RyuSc2 20
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 36
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift4586
Other Games
• imaqtpie1891
• Scarra679
Upcoming Events
RongYI Cup
10h 45m
SHIN vs Creator
Classic vs Percival
OSC
12h 45m
BSL 21
14h 45m
RongYI Cup
1d 10h
Maru vs Cyan
Solar vs Krystianer
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 11h
BSL 21
1d 14h
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
OSC
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S1: W5
OSC Championship Season 13
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Rongyi Cup S3
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025

Upcoming

Acropolis #4 - TS4
Escore Tournament S1: W6
Escore Tournament S1: W7
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Nations Cup 2026
Tektek Cup #1
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.