What should we call the "perfect" Terran army comp - Page 5

On August 19 2011 01:09 MrCon wrote:
I'm not sure the deathball concept exist for terran, as it's too dependant of what the opponent has, it doesn't kills everything like the protoss and zerg deathball (but it's more effective when the units are right)
I can't find a comp that wouldn't have some terrible flaws, unless I put some tanks, some vikings, some ghosts, some marines, some marauders, some hellions, a pair of ravens, perhaps some banshees...
When the end result is "make everything", not sure the deathball concept can apply.
The only deatball I can imagine is mass air (BC/vikings/banhees/ravens), but that would be a terrible deathball vs zerg. Perhaps could work vs toss.

On August 18 2011 23:11 saritenite wrote:


The original "deathball" in SC was coined during the BW days, referring to Terran Mech vs Protoss at 140-200 supply and 2/2 mech upgrades.

Hence, we shall retain "deathball" for Terran and find a new name for the Protoss "perfect" composition.

On August 19 2011 01:32 Tag wrote:
Terran are a race that excels at engagments in small numbers, 2 medevac full of units can destry base's, so typically we should not be naming the terran death ball, but naming the terran style of droping or engaging in small numbers.

On August 19 2011 01:04 SLTR.Maverick wrote:


O.o Dragonforce isn't heavy or all that hard. If you want heavy look up Oceano or Chelsea Grin or The Acacia Strain. If you want hard metal look up Protest The Hero.

On August 19 2011 01:40 turdburgler wrote:


you havent been on the internet very long have you

On August 19 2011 01:53 HaXXspetten wrote:
I'm not even gonna vote, all the options sounds horrible >.>

Is it really that weird to just call it Zerg/Terran/Protoss DeathBall? It's what I've always done, and it makes perfect sense...

On August 19 2011 01:51 SpoR wrote:
200 supply of ravens can handle almost anything lol. so you can just call it death