• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:39
CEST 16:39
KST 23:39
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202537RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 703 users

Designated Balance Discussion Thread - Page 1115

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1266 Next
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
September 27 2014 18:39 GMT
#22281
On September 28 2014 02:19 Pursuit_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2014 00:28 Big J wrote:
On September 28 2014 00:07 Pursuit_ wrote:
On September 27 2014 22:42 Kuchikikun wrote:
On September 27 2014 22:31 johnbongham wrote:
Wait, only forgg left in the top 8 at dreamhack? I thought T was imba now?


The terran lineup was the weakest by far and the strongest one were elimiated by Soo or in TvTs...


Oh no, other races using Terran's own argument against them!

Maybe there's some truth to it?

I agree, weak-ish Terran player pool this tournament compared to Z representation, and Z's doing surprisingly well vP this tournament.


It's the same Terran bonjwa's as always. MMA, jjakji, Polt all were there (Taeja not, but one is always missing). The only outstanding non-regular tournament attandees here are Classic, herO and soO. And nearly every tournament has some of those.
The situation at this tournament is not that different to the other ones


Terrans won those tournaments because someone wins when good players play against each other. But it was neither to expected, nor unexpected (judging by playerquality). If we went through each tournament in detail, there'd be some where a Terran won and Terran had the best lineup, and some where a Terran won but some other race had a better lineup. And some where no Terran won to begin with.


Bomber, Flash, Innovation are also missing and often travel (although maybe Innovation wont be travelling as much now?). So are Maru, Cure and Reality but they don't travel outside of Korea often (I think?).

And in the past Terran's were arguing that when Taeja (the best Terran at the time aside from possibly Maru) won a tournament (such as HSC IX) with low Z / P representation (MC, Patience, Stork, Jaedong, Scarlett, Snute being the 3 best of their respective races at the tournament), it wasn't that Terran was suddenly doing well, it was that Taeja was just outplaying his opponents. In a tournament with Zest / Rain / herO / soO / Soulkey / Solar, Terran's were arguing Taeja's chances of winning would have been much worse.

Now I'm just saying that a tournament with normal Terran representation missing a lot of the big name Terrans with top Z/P representation doesn't mean Terran isn't too strong atm, it just means the Top Z/P players are capable of winning vs MMA / ForGG / Jjakji / Polt (and especially with Polt and MMA, the two I would say are potentially in the Top5 of Terran players atm, falling out in TvT).


My point is that Taeja won a tournament with: Zest, INnoVation, TRUE, Solar, Life in it. Amongst many other players that could surprise. You wouldn't say before the tournament you expect Taeja to take it, right?
My point is that Flash won a tournament with: Zest, Life, sOs, Taeja in it. Amongst many other players that might upset him. You wouldn't say that the chances that a Terran wins that tournament are bigger than a non-Terran, right?
My point is that Bomber won Red Bull and the other two Terrans placed 2nd and 3rd. With 4 non-Terran Code S players like Parting, sOs or DRG in it. Would you really say it was more probable for a Terran to win, than for a non-Terran?

My point is in good half of the tournaments won by a Terran the argument that the Terran who won was the outstanding favorite is wrong to begin with and in the other half of the tournaments the non-Terrans were not so shabby (and still outnumbering the Terran players), that it would again be foolish to say that those Terrans obviously had much better chances to begin with.
Thus dismissing these tournaments, pretending they were cakewalks for the winners, is just not right when talking about balance.
Pursuit_
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States1330 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-27 18:58:35
September 27 2014 18:56 GMT
#22282
On September 28 2014 03:39 Big J wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2014 02:19 Pursuit_ wrote:
On September 28 2014 00:28 Big J wrote:
On September 28 2014 00:07 Pursuit_ wrote:
On September 27 2014 22:42 Kuchikikun wrote:
On September 27 2014 22:31 johnbongham wrote:
Wait, only forgg left in the top 8 at dreamhack? I thought T was imba now?


The terran lineup was the weakest by far and the strongest one were elimiated by Soo or in TvTs...


Oh no, other races using Terran's own argument against them!

Maybe there's some truth to it?

I agree, weak-ish Terran player pool this tournament compared to Z representation, and Z's doing surprisingly well vP this tournament.


It's the same Terran bonjwa's as always. MMA, jjakji, Polt all were there (Taeja not, but one is always missing). The only outstanding non-regular tournament attandees here are Classic, herO and soO. And nearly every tournament has some of those.
The situation at this tournament is not that different to the other ones


Terrans won those tournaments because someone wins when good players play against each other. But it was neither to expected, nor unexpected (judging by playerquality). If we went through each tournament in detail, there'd be some where a Terran won and Terran had the best lineup, and some where a Terran won but some other race had a better lineup. And some where no Terran won to begin with.


Bomber, Flash, Innovation are also missing and often travel (although maybe Innovation wont be travelling as much now?). So are Maru, Cure and Reality but they don't travel outside of Korea often (I think?).

And in the past Terran's were arguing that when Taeja (the best Terran at the time aside from possibly Maru) won a tournament (such as HSC IX) with low Z / P representation (MC, Patience, Stork, Jaedong, Scarlett, Snute being the 3 best of their respective races at the tournament), it wasn't that Terran was suddenly doing well, it was that Taeja was just outplaying his opponents. In a tournament with Zest / Rain / herO / soO / Soulkey / Solar, Terran's were arguing Taeja's chances of winning would have been much worse.

Now I'm just saying that a tournament with normal Terran representation missing a lot of the big name Terrans with top Z/P representation doesn't mean Terran isn't too strong atm, it just means the Top Z/P players are capable of winning vs MMA / ForGG / Jjakji / Polt (and especially with Polt and MMA, the two I would say are potentially in the Top5 of Terran players atm, falling out in TvT).


My point is that Taeja won a tournament with: Zest, INnoVation, TRUE, Solar, Life in it. Amongst many other players that could surprise. You wouldn't say before the tournament you expect Taeja to take it, right?
My point is that Flash won a tournament with: Zest, Life, sOs, Taeja in it. Amongst many other players that might upset him. You wouldn't say that the chances that a Terran wins that tournament are bigger than a non-Terran, right?
My point is that Bomber won Red Bull and the other two Terrans placed 2nd and 3rd. With 4 non-Terran Code S players like Parting, sOs or DRG in it. Would you really say it was more probable for a Terran to win, than for a non-Terran?

My point is in good half of the tournaments won by a Terran the argument that the Terran who won was the outstanding favorite is wrong to begin with and in the other half of the tournaments the non-Terrans were not so shabby (and still outnumbering the Terran players), that it would again be foolish to say that those Terrans obviously had much better chances to begin with.
Thus dismissing these tournaments, pretending they were cakewalks for the winners, is just not right when talking about balance.


You mean all of the post patch tournaments? (Taeja's win in IEM IX Shenzen was post patch, same with Flash's win in IEM Toronto IX) I'm talking about Terran arguments for Terran being underpowered prior to the patch when Taeja was the only Terran winning anything. Terran players were saying even Taeja wouldn't be winning, or at least not as convincingly, if those tournaments had had top Z / P representation.

I'm actually saying this tournament does not prove that Terran is not too strong / overpowered atm, because Z/P representation is stronger than T representation.

If you mean the RBBG prior to the patch, where Bomber/Polt got 1st / 2nd- The best Protoss was HuK and the best Zerg was violet, who lost in a very close 3-2 against Bomber in the semis.

A better argument would be for Dreamhack Summer Open 2014, which had a lot more KR P's and Z's and Taeja won without dropping a map. But still no Zest / Rain / herO / sOs, still no soO / Soulkey / Solar / TRUE, and no other Terran did well.

I'm not saying those tournaments should be dismissed either. Taeja proved that Terran can win. He just didn't prove Terran can win vs the very top P/Z players.
In Somnis Veritas
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
September 27 2014 19:34 GMT
#22283
On September 28 2014 03:56 Pursuit_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2014 03:39 Big J wrote:
On September 28 2014 02:19 Pursuit_ wrote:
On September 28 2014 00:28 Big J wrote:
On September 28 2014 00:07 Pursuit_ wrote:
On September 27 2014 22:42 Kuchikikun wrote:
On September 27 2014 22:31 johnbongham wrote:
Wait, only forgg left in the top 8 at dreamhack? I thought T was imba now?


The terran lineup was the weakest by far and the strongest one were elimiated by Soo or in TvTs...


Oh no, other races using Terran's own argument against them!

Maybe there's some truth to it?

I agree, weak-ish Terran player pool this tournament compared to Z representation, and Z's doing surprisingly well vP this tournament.


It's the same Terran bonjwa's as always. MMA, jjakji, Polt all were there (Taeja not, but one is always missing). The only outstanding non-regular tournament attandees here are Classic, herO and soO. And nearly every tournament has some of those.
The situation at this tournament is not that different to the other ones


Terrans won those tournaments because someone wins when good players play against each other. But it was neither to expected, nor unexpected (judging by playerquality). If we went through each tournament in detail, there'd be some where a Terran won and Terran had the best lineup, and some where a Terran won but some other race had a better lineup. And some where no Terran won to begin with.


Bomber, Flash, Innovation are also missing and often travel (although maybe Innovation wont be travelling as much now?). So are Maru, Cure and Reality but they don't travel outside of Korea often (I think?).

And in the past Terran's were arguing that when Taeja (the best Terran at the time aside from possibly Maru) won a tournament (such as HSC IX) with low Z / P representation (MC, Patience, Stork, Jaedong, Scarlett, Snute being the 3 best of their respective races at the tournament), it wasn't that Terran was suddenly doing well, it was that Taeja was just outplaying his opponents. In a tournament with Zest / Rain / herO / soO / Soulkey / Solar, Terran's were arguing Taeja's chances of winning would have been much worse.

Now I'm just saying that a tournament with normal Terran representation missing a lot of the big name Terrans with top Z/P representation doesn't mean Terran isn't too strong atm, it just means the Top Z/P players are capable of winning vs MMA / ForGG / Jjakji / Polt (and especially with Polt and MMA, the two I would say are potentially in the Top5 of Terran players atm, falling out in TvT).


My point is that Taeja won a tournament with: Zest, INnoVation, TRUE, Solar, Life in it. Amongst many other players that could surprise. You wouldn't say before the tournament you expect Taeja to take it, right?
My point is that Flash won a tournament with: Zest, Life, sOs, Taeja in it. Amongst many other players that might upset him. You wouldn't say that the chances that a Terran wins that tournament are bigger than a non-Terran, right?
My point is that Bomber won Red Bull and the other two Terrans placed 2nd and 3rd. With 4 non-Terran Code S players like Parting, sOs or DRG in it. Would you really say it was more probable for a Terran to win, than for a non-Terran?

My point is in good half of the tournaments won by a Terran the argument that the Terran who won was the outstanding favorite is wrong to begin with and in the other half of the tournaments the non-Terrans were not so shabby (and still outnumbering the Terran players), that it would again be foolish to say that those Terrans obviously had much better chances to begin with.
Thus dismissing these tournaments, pretending they were cakewalks for the winners, is just not right when talking about balance.


You mean all of the post patch tournaments? (Taeja's win in IEM IX Shenzen was post patch, same with Flash's win in IEM Toronto IX) I'm talking about Terran arguments for Terran being underpowered prior to the patch when Taeja was the only Terran winning anything. Terran players were saying even Taeja wouldn't be winning, or at least not as convincingly, if those tournaments had had top Z / P representation.

I'm actually saying this tournament does not prove that Terran is not too strong / overpowered atm, because Z/P representation is stronger than T representation.

If you mean the RBBG prior to the patch, where Bomber/Polt got 1st / 2nd- The best Protoss was HuK and the best Zerg was violet, who lost in a very close 3-2 against Bomber in the semis.

A better argument would be for Dreamhack Summer Open 2014, which had a lot more KR P's and Z's and Taeja won without dropping a map. But still no Zest / Rain / herO / sOs, still no soO / Soulkey / Solar / TRUE, and no other Terran did well.

I'm not saying those tournaments should be dismissed either. Taeja proved that Terran can win. He just didn't prove Terran can win vs the very top P/Z players.

IEM Shenzhen was pre-patch.
Pursuit_
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States1330 Posts
September 27 2014 20:57 GMT
#22284
On September 28 2014 04:34 TheDwf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2014 03:56 Pursuit_ wrote:
On September 28 2014 03:39 Big J wrote:
On September 28 2014 02:19 Pursuit_ wrote:
On September 28 2014 00:28 Big J wrote:
On September 28 2014 00:07 Pursuit_ wrote:
On September 27 2014 22:42 Kuchikikun wrote:
On September 27 2014 22:31 johnbongham wrote:
Wait, only forgg left in the top 8 at dreamhack? I thought T was imba now?


The terran lineup was the weakest by far and the strongest one were elimiated by Soo or in TvTs...


Oh no, other races using Terran's own argument against them!

Maybe there's some truth to it?

I agree, weak-ish Terran player pool this tournament compared to Z representation, and Z's doing surprisingly well vP this tournament.


It's the same Terran bonjwa's as always. MMA, jjakji, Polt all were there (Taeja not, but one is always missing). The only outstanding non-regular tournament attandees here are Classic, herO and soO. And nearly every tournament has some of those.
The situation at this tournament is not that different to the other ones


Terrans won those tournaments because someone wins when good players play against each other. But it was neither to expected, nor unexpected (judging by playerquality). If we went through each tournament in detail, there'd be some where a Terran won and Terran had the best lineup, and some where a Terran won but some other race had a better lineup. And some where no Terran won to begin with.


Bomber, Flash, Innovation are also missing and often travel (although maybe Innovation wont be travelling as much now?). So are Maru, Cure and Reality but they don't travel outside of Korea often (I think?).

And in the past Terran's were arguing that when Taeja (the best Terran at the time aside from possibly Maru) won a tournament (such as HSC IX) with low Z / P representation (MC, Patience, Stork, Jaedong, Scarlett, Snute being the 3 best of their respective races at the tournament), it wasn't that Terran was suddenly doing well, it was that Taeja was just outplaying his opponents. In a tournament with Zest / Rain / herO / soO / Soulkey / Solar, Terran's were arguing Taeja's chances of winning would have been much worse.

Now I'm just saying that a tournament with normal Terran representation missing a lot of the big name Terrans with top Z/P representation doesn't mean Terran isn't too strong atm, it just means the Top Z/P players are capable of winning vs MMA / ForGG / Jjakji / Polt (and especially with Polt and MMA, the two I would say are potentially in the Top5 of Terran players atm, falling out in TvT).


My point is that Taeja won a tournament with: Zest, INnoVation, TRUE, Solar, Life in it. Amongst many other players that could surprise. You wouldn't say before the tournament you expect Taeja to take it, right?
My point is that Flash won a tournament with: Zest, Life, sOs, Taeja in it. Amongst many other players that might upset him. You wouldn't say that the chances that a Terran wins that tournament are bigger than a non-Terran, right?
My point is that Bomber won Red Bull and the other two Terrans placed 2nd and 3rd. With 4 non-Terran Code S players like Parting, sOs or DRG in it. Would you really say it was more probable for a Terran to win, than for a non-Terran?

My point is in good half of the tournaments won by a Terran the argument that the Terran who won was the outstanding favorite is wrong to begin with and in the other half of the tournaments the non-Terrans were not so shabby (and still outnumbering the Terran players), that it would again be foolish to say that those Terrans obviously had much better chances to begin with.
Thus dismissing these tournaments, pretending they were cakewalks for the winners, is just not right when talking about balance.


You mean all of the post patch tournaments? (Taeja's win in IEM IX Shenzen was post patch, same with Flash's win in IEM Toronto IX) I'm talking about Terran arguments for Terran being underpowered prior to the patch when Taeja was the only Terran winning anything. Terran players were saying even Taeja wouldn't be winning, or at least not as convincingly, if those tournaments had had top Z / P representation.

I'm actually saying this tournament does not prove that Terran is not too strong / overpowered atm, because Z/P representation is stronger than T representation.

If you mean the RBBG prior to the patch, where Bomber/Polt got 1st / 2nd- The best Protoss was HuK and the best Zerg was violet, who lost in a very close 3-2 against Bomber in the semis.

A better argument would be for Dreamhack Summer Open 2014, which had a lot more KR P's and Z's and Taeja won without dropping a map. But still no Zest / Rain / herO / sOs, still no soO / Soulkey / Solar / TRUE, and no other Terran did well.

I'm not saying those tournaments should be dismissed either. Taeja proved that Terran can win. He just didn't prove Terran can win vs the very top P/Z players.

IEM Shenzhen was pre-patch.


Was it? My bad then. Makes Taeja's run even more impressive though :D
In Somnis Veritas
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-27 21:18:09
September 27 2014 21:14 GMT
#22285
Did soO actually get better than other zergs or is this a case of him being the only zerg player whose circumstances were suited to playing sc2 at a high level?

Life is known for playing a stubborn style and not practicing. Effort retired just after he started to become a very good sc2 player. Jaedong left the kespa environment that made him thrive. Soulkey seemed to have burned out in 2014 or something. Players like Solar, TRUE, Hydra and Rogue were worse than soO to begin with.

It reminds me of Cadel Evans who, after a decade of competing in cycling, finally won the Tour de France only because all his competitors happened to have bad form that year. Evans himself just gave the usual excellent performance.

I'm just curious why Soulkey is so much worse than soO now. I don't know if it's personal factors or if the game changed to suit one player's style more. There was the argument that DRG's bad performance during the patchzerg era was because the game was more strategical, while his resurgence in 2013 was because of the mechanical demands placed on facing the widow mine bio style.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
bo1b
Profile Blog Joined August 2012
Australia12814 Posts
September 27 2014 21:22 GMT
#22286


As an example of zerg players (an exceptionally good one) in 2013.

I compare soO's gameplay to that and he comes up short. To be honest, so do pretty much all terrans in tvz. Just need time for players to get used to the builds again, and we should see a resurgence of amazing mechanics.
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
September 27 2014 21:29 GMT
#22287
On September 28 2014 06:22 bo1b wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBknxElVM8Y

As an example of zerg players (an exceptionally good one) in 2013.

I compare soO's gameplay to that and he comes up short. To be honest, so do pretty much all terrans in tvz. Just need time for players to get used to the builds again, and we should see a resurgence of amazing mechanics.

Zergs dont get in this economical position these days as far as I have seen.
I think between reaper openings, banshees, 2base hellbat timings and the first Terran push being way better due to hellbats it has become incredible hard to get the creep spread going and a fourth base up.
I really hope soO can showcase some macro play with 80 fast drones against Innovation. I'm just not getting there these days, nor have I seen cases of this in proplay - as was pretty standard before the first WM nerf.
bo1b
Profile Blog Joined August 2012
Australia12814 Posts
September 27 2014 21:38 GMT
#22288
If innovation plays like he has displayed before soo will get 4:0d even if he plays his absolute best imo.
bo1b
Profile Blog Joined August 2012
Australia12814 Posts
September 27 2014 21:42 GMT
#22289
On September 28 2014 06:29 Big J wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2014 06:22 bo1b wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBknxElVM8Y

As an example of zerg players (an exceptionally good one) in 2013.

I compare soO's gameplay to that and he comes up short. To be honest, so do pretty much all terrans in tvz. Just need time for players to get used to the builds again, and we should see a resurgence of amazing mechanics.

Zergs dont get in this economical position these days as far as I have seen.
I think between reaper openings, banshees, 2base hellbat timings and the first Terran push being way better due to hellbats it has become incredible hard to get the creep spread going and a fourth base up.
I really hope soO can showcase some macro play with 80 fast drones against Innovation. I'm just not getting there these days, nor have I seen cases of this in proplay - as was pretty standard before the first WM nerf.

Zergs have gotten lazy tbh, they couldn't get away with half the shit they do now 1 year ago in zvt.
plogamer
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
Canada3132 Posts
September 27 2014 21:44 GMT
#22290
On September 28 2014 06:29 Big J wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2014 06:22 bo1b wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBknxElVM8Y

As an example of zerg players (an exceptionally good one) in 2013.

I compare soO's gameplay to that and he comes up short. To be honest, so do pretty much all terrans in tvz. Just need time for players to get used to the builds again, and we should see a resurgence of amazing mechanics.

Zergs dont get in this economical position these days as far as I have seen.
I think between reaper openings, banshees, 2base hellbat timings and the first Terran push being way better due to hellbats it has become incredible hard to get the creep spread going and a fourth base up.
I really hope soO can showcase some macro play with 80 fast drones against Innovation. I'm just not getting there these days, nor have I seen cases of this in proplay - as was pretty standard before the first WM nerf.


The hellbat push can be scouted by looking for an early armory. If a Terran player doesn't do damage with that push, the player falls behind on tech due to delayed engineering bays.

Same with banshees, and reaper openers are both handled by making extra queens, and both put the Terran player behind if it fails to get any results.

Given the nature of the larvae mechanic, which allows Zergs to boost their income exponentially without any pressure, this relationship is acceptable. The onus is on the Terran to inflict damage on the Zerg.
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
September 27 2014 21:57 GMT
#22291
On September 28 2014 06:44 plogamer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2014 06:29 Big J wrote:
On September 28 2014 06:22 bo1b wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBknxElVM8Y

As an example of zerg players (an exceptionally good one) in 2013.

I compare soO's gameplay to that and he comes up short. To be honest, so do pretty much all terrans in tvz. Just need time for players to get used to the builds again, and we should see a resurgence of amazing mechanics.

Zergs dont get in this economical position these days as far as I have seen.
I think between reaper openings, banshees, 2base hellbat timings and the first Terran push being way better due to hellbats it has become incredible hard to get the creep spread going and a fourth base up.
I really hope soO can showcase some macro play with 80 fast drones against Innovation. I'm just not getting there these days, nor have I seen cases of this in proplay - as was pretty standard before the first WM nerf.


The hellbat push can be scouted by looking for an early armory. If a Terran player doesn't do damage with that push, the player falls behind on tech due to delayed engineering bays.

Same with banshees, and reaper openers are both handled by making extra queens, and both put the Terran player behind if it fails to get any results.

Given the nature of the larvae mechanic, which allows Zergs to boost their income exponentially without any pressure, this relationship is acceptable. The onus is on the Terran to inflict damage on the Zerg.


Reapers is not true. There is hardly any reason not to go reapers, the delay on the third alone is worth it for Terrans. Not to mention all the extra greed if you have full information.
Hellbat push is obviously semiallin, but these extra aggressive capabilities cost zerg extra overlord sacrifices compared to pre-WM nerfs. Hellbats in the initial medivac/hellion/marine push are the one really big change. E.g. look at the first map in the curious video above. If that first push has 6hellbats instead of 6hellions, curious zerglings instadie and do not keep fighting while the marines kite back against the banelings. You need quite a more defensive setup at that poimt now.
bo1b
Profile Blog Joined August 2012
Australia12814 Posts
September 27 2014 22:14 GMT
#22292
On September 28 2014 06:57 Big J wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2014 06:44 plogamer wrote:
On September 28 2014 06:29 Big J wrote:
On September 28 2014 06:22 bo1b wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBknxElVM8Y

As an example of zerg players (an exceptionally good one) in 2013.

I compare soO's gameplay to that and he comes up short. To be honest, so do pretty much all terrans in tvz. Just need time for players to get used to the builds again, and we should see a resurgence of amazing mechanics.

Zergs dont get in this economical position these days as far as I have seen.
I think between reaper openings, banshees, 2base hellbat timings and the first Terran push being way better due to hellbats it has become incredible hard to get the creep spread going and a fourth base up.
I really hope soO can showcase some macro play with 80 fast drones against Innovation. I'm just not getting there these days, nor have I seen cases of this in proplay - as was pretty standard before the first WM nerf.


The hellbat push can be scouted by looking for an early armory. If a Terran player doesn't do damage with that push, the player falls behind on tech due to delayed engineering bays.

Same with banshees, and reaper openers are both handled by making extra queens, and both put the Terran player behind if it fails to get any results.

Given the nature of the larvae mechanic, which allows Zergs to boost their income exponentially without any pressure, this relationship is acceptable. The onus is on the Terran to inflict damage on the Zerg.


Reapers is not true. There is hardly any reason not to go reapers, the delay on the third alone is worth it for Terrans. Not to mention all the extra greed if you have full information.
Hellbat push is obviously semiallin, but these extra aggressive capabilities cost zerg extra overlord sacrifices compared to pre-WM nerfs. Hellbats in the initial medivac/hellion/marine push are the one really big change. E.g. look at the first map in the curious video above. If that first push has 6hellbats instead of 6hellions, curious zerglings instadie and do not keep fighting while the marines kite back against the banelings. You need quite a more defensive setup at that poimt now.

The 21 3cc parade push doesn't get an armory that early, more over, it can't get an armory that early and be the same effective style.
Pursuit_
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States1330 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-28 00:24:58
September 27 2014 22:19 GMT
#22293
On September 28 2014 07:14 bo1b wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 28 2014 06:57 Big J wrote:
On September 28 2014 06:44 plogamer wrote:
On September 28 2014 06:29 Big J wrote:
On September 28 2014 06:22 bo1b wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBknxElVM8Y

As an example of zerg players (an exceptionally good one) in 2013.

I compare soO's gameplay to that and he comes up short. To be honest, so do pretty much all terrans in tvz. Just need time for players to get used to the builds again, and we should see a resurgence of amazing mechanics.

Zergs dont get in this economical position these days as far as I have seen.
I think between reaper openings, banshees, 2base hellbat timings and the first Terran push being way better due to hellbats it has become incredible hard to get the creep spread going and a fourth base up.
I really hope soO can showcase some macro play with 80 fast drones against Innovation. I'm just not getting there these days, nor have I seen cases of this in proplay - as was pretty standard before the first WM nerf.


The hellbat push can be scouted by looking for an early armory. If a Terran player doesn't do damage with that push, the player falls behind on tech due to delayed engineering bays.

Same with banshees, and reaper openers are both handled by making extra queens, and both put the Terran player behind if it fails to get any results.

Given the nature of the larvae mechanic, which allows Zergs to boost their income exponentially without any pressure, this relationship is acceptable. The onus is on the Terran to inflict damage on the Zerg.


Reapers is not true. There is hardly any reason not to go reapers, the delay on the third alone is worth it for Terrans. Not to mention all the extra greed if you have full information.
Hellbat push is obviously semiallin, but these extra aggressive capabilities cost zerg extra overlord sacrifices compared to pre-WM nerfs. Hellbats in the initial medivac/hellion/marine push are the one really big change. E.g. look at the first map in the curious video above. If that first push has 6hellbats instead of 6hellions, curious zerglings instadie and do not keep fighting while the marines kite back against the banelings. You need quite a more defensive setup at that poimt now.

The 21 3cc parade push doesn't get an armory that early, more over, it can't get an armory that early and be the same effective style.


Yes it does... 11 minute 1/1 stim / CS Medivac push invcludes an armory as a standard part of the build, because that's when you're starting 2/2.

But 6 Hellbats instead of 6 Hellions would not have let innovation crush that, and in no way would the hellbats have killed all the lings...
In Somnis Veritas
bo1b
Profile Blog Joined August 2012
Australia12814 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-27 22:26:19
September 27 2014 22:25 GMT
#22294
If you watch the vod all the hellions are dead by the time the armory is complete. The first push out occurs before 11 minutes.

A ton of the strength of the parade push was because it hit before zergs could get to x amount of drones and still have an army, waiting another 30-40 seconds would be disastrous to the first push, and even if it was possible you're right - 6 hellbats instead of hellions would make almost no difference.
xelnaga_empire
Profile Joined March 2012
627 Posts
September 28 2014 03:39 GMT
#22295
Another ZvsZ finals. Zerg looked very strong at Dreamhack. All the Terran in the Ro16 that met a Zerg just got annihilated.
RaFox17
Profile Joined May 2013
Finland4581 Posts
September 28 2014 05:34 GMT
#22296
On September 28 2014 12:39 xelnaga_empire wrote:
Another ZvsZ finals. Zerg looked very strong at Dreamhack. All the Terran in the Ro16 that met a Zerg just got annihilated.

Yes. Bunny got 2-1 annihilated by the winner of the tournament and Ryung lost to SoO which was a total surprise to everyone. How can a korean terran lose if not because imba?!?!!?!
sibs
Profile Joined July 2012
635 Posts
September 28 2014 16:22 GMT
#22297
I think xelnaga_empire is trolling.
RaFox17
Profile Joined May 2013
Finland4581 Posts
September 28 2014 16:23 GMT
#22298
On September 29 2014 01:22 sibs wrote:
I think xelnaga_empire is trolling.

Certainly hope so.
Scrubwave
Profile Joined July 2010
Poland1786 Posts
September 28 2014 18:08 GMT
#22299
--- Nuked ---
starslayer
Profile Joined August 2011
United States696 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-28 18:17:14
September 28 2014 18:16 GMT
#22300
On September 29 2014 03:08 Scrubwave wrote:
The fact that something like the scv pull in tvp is something "normal" and not cheese crap done only by Bitbybits is sad.



i think both terrans and protoss agrees with you but sadly its the best way to win before late game for terrans. so your going to have to deal with it till terrans figure something else out or toss late game gets a nerf (which wont happen).. maybe try mech out and hope they dont scout lol. unless your toss then just scout a lot and chrono that storm lol.
i came here to kickass and chew bubblegum and i'm all out of bubble gum
Prev 1 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1266 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Esports World Cup
10:00
2025 - Day 2
Reynor vs MaruLIVE!
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
EWC_Arena11596
ComeBackTV 2569
TaKeTV 637
Hui .571
3DClanTV 385
Rex258
EnkiAlexander 237
CranKy Ducklings175
mcanning171
Reynor149
UpATreeSC121
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena11596
Hui .571
Rex 258
mcanning 171
Reynor 149
UpATreeSC 121
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 4343
Barracks 1887
Flash 1877
BeSt 1527
Jaedong 1498
EffOrt 1056
Mini 582
Stork 496
ggaemo 377
Snow 357
[ Show more ]
Soma 272
GuemChi 266
ZerO 253
Soulkey 252
ToSsGirL 188
Rush 132
Hyun 107
TY 57
soO 55
Sacsri 38
Sea.KH 35
scan(afreeca) 26
Terrorterran 14
Movie 14
Yoon 11
ivOry 9
Bale 7
Britney 0
Dota 2
syndereN412
XcaliburYe295
420jenkins289
Counter-Strike
sgares671
flusha135
edward65
Super Smash Bros
Westballz40
Other Games
singsing2040
hiko1301
B2W.Neo1057
crisheroes444
Fuzer 168
ArmadaUGS108
KnowMe50
QueenE49
ZerO(Twitch)20
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 4
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH281
• Adnapsc2 3
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1624
• WagamamaTV564
League of Legends
• Nemesis4058
• TFBlade799
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
19h 21m
TBD vs Zoun
TBD vs SHIN
TBD vs ShoWTimE
TBD vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 20h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.