• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:05
CEST 17:05
KST 00:05
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins Maestros of the Game 226ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 29-July 5): Solar Doubles0MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon415.0.16 Hotfix (June 30) - Balance + Bug Fixes40Weekly Cups (June 22-28): Zergs thrive in new patch5[TLMC] Summer 2026 Ladder Map Rotation0
StarCraft 2
General
Is the larve respawn broken? 5.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start) 5.0.16 Hotfix (June 30) - Balance + Bug Fixes Weekly Cups (June 29-July 5): Solar Doubles MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon
Tourneys
HomeStory Cup 29 GSL CK #5 Race War RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Vespene Cup #1 — $300+ USD, July 10 Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28)
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
Mutation # 533 Die Together The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 532 Nuclear Family Mutation # 531 Experimental Artillery
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Starcraft vs Retro Category on Twitch Data needed Snow On New ASL S22 Map, Zerg Nerf
Tourneys
CSLAN 4 is Coming! Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 The Casual Games of the Week Thread [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Relatively freeroll strategies Why doesn't anyone use restoration?
Other Games
General Games
Dawn of War IV Summer Games Done Quick 2026! Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Power Rank Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion McBoner: A hockey love story TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard? Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Major Shifts in the Gaming I…
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6204 users

'TSL expelled from SC2 Conference' - Page 36

Forum Index > SC2 General
1124 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 34 35 36 37 38 57 Next
windsupernova
Profile Joined October 2010
Mexico5280 Posts
August 04 2011 19:38 GMT
#701
On August 05 2011 04:20 IMABUNNEH wrote:
I think this indirectly gives credibility to EG as well, though this thread isn't about them. They make it SOUND as though (and I understand TSL have rebutted against such a thing) Coach Lee has been pretty underhanded. Perhaps in more than just this issue... if you get me


Eh? How does this give any credibility to EG? While I never got all the people upset at them signing Puma its not like EG did that for some kind of humanitarian reason by "saving" Puma. All the sensible arguments that were made against EG(mainly them being kinda disrespectful by not contacting the coach but that was not really that bad) still hold.

"Its easy, just trust your CPU".-Boxer on being good at games
tl55555
Profile Joined July 2011
31 Posts
August 04 2011 19:38 GMT
#702
On August 05 2011 04:31 farnham wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2011 04:27 Grimsong wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:22 Chargelot wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:18 wolfe wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:07 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:02 wolfe wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:00 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:49 FairForever wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:45 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:35 FairForever wrote:
[quote]

Read above. I never said that I agree with what FD and Trickster did. But that's not the point. While FD and Trickster may have been morally wrong in not practicing hard to really fully commit to their duties, TSL was legally wrong in refusing to pay them. I'm not sure how it's comparable.

EDIT: I forgot to mention again, you keep saying they violated their contract. Again, stop spewing bullshit out of your mouth.


To clear up your confusion, TSL was not legally wrong if the contract was ambiguous, that's how its comparable.



Actually TSL is still legally wrong. Exemption of a clause does not allow for open interpretation. In fact, it would be construed against the drafter of the contract, presumably TSL (contra preferentem).

Again though, stop spewing bullshit, you're trying to defend a position that is clearly indefensible and it is recognized by most of the people here. I'm not going to bother repeating my arguments again...


Me stop spewing bullshit? How about you stop spewing mumbo jumbo legal speak. People who try to impress by using legal speak and can't communicate a point in english -> unemployed

I don't give a shit what the book says, what REALITY says is ambiguous contract + better lawyer wins.

Please don't bother repeating your incorrect arguments again, you will be saving TL valuable bytes.






How is that wrong or difficult to understand?

"A contract is ambiguous when it is uncertain what the intent of the parties was and the contract is capable of more than one reasonable interpretation. Sometimes ambiguous terms can be explained by the admission of parol evidence. Also, Courts abide by the rule that an ambiguous contract is interpreted against the party who drafted it. In other words, the party who did not draft the contract will be given the benefit of the doubt so to speak. " -USLegal


You know what else USLegal says? People are entitled to a fair trial. The person with more money who can hire better lawyers wins.



Korea has more or less the same contract laws as the US and I was only using that as reference. Ironically, you contradict yourself with your 2nd and 3rd sentences a feat that is quite impressive given you have only written three sentences.

Fair trial =/= more money, better lawyer, wins

Not only are you a cynical person who seems to have no respect for our legal systems you also are quite poor at doing research. Give me a single example in which the courts ruled in favor of the author of an ambiguous contract.

Side note, the more money argument doesn't really have that much to do with better lawyers it has more to do with that a protracted legal battle can last years costing upwards of millions of dollars. The party with the smaller bank is more likely to withdraw and settle rather than waste years in court.


You're on trial for murder. It doesn't matter if you did it or not, but it looks really bad for you.
You have an option:

The one million dollar a day legal team of the best 8 lawyers in the country

or

A court appointed lawyer, who costs nothing to you, and has ~30 cases he is working on at the same time.

Money means a lot.


You realize those same court appointed lawyers are the ones who know the ins and outs of the courthouse, know the judges, know the district attorney, know the assistant district attorneys, and work just as hard as any other attorney because they also take on private clients and probably DONT want the public to feel they are terrible attorneys? Or that they dont want those same courthouses to think that they aren't professional? I'll take on one of the court appointed attorneys here who I know absolutely know this court houses ways, over someone who has no idea how it works and comes off as an asshat (All the out of county Dallas attorneys who dont even know how to file basic processes at the courthouse I'm at). Also, there's a thing called a jury. And just because a lawyer has 30 cases, doesn't mean he isn't taking the time to handle the case he is given. You don't think those same attorneys dont enjoy winning? Come on.


yeah i find this hilarious too. i know some defense attorneys and they usually dont want to conclude contracts with criminals because they dont know where the money comes from and they might get in jail themselves if it was for example drug money. getting the money from the state might not be much and might take a long time but it usually is safe and clean money so they rather take that money.


clean lawyers? What planet do you live on?
moonmeh
Profile Joined July 2011
Korea (South)105 Posts
August 04 2011 19:40 GMT
#703
On August 05 2011 04:34 babylon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2011 04:33 moonmeh wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:28 Masil wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:20 Sein wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
Translation of the Startale manager's response:

Hello,

This is Startale's manager, Won Jong-Wook.
First of all, I would like to apologize for having to greet you all with this uncomfortable situation and I would like to explain everything from the perspective of a team manager,

First of all, it is true that Fruitdealer and Trickster's lack of professional attitude was wrong, and both players are admitting and regretting that fact that they were overly lazy.

However, Fruitdealer and Trickster's free practice schedule/lifestyle was something that was agreed upon with TSL's manager Mr. Lee at TSL's creation, and it is petty to bring this up as a problem after all this time. If the two players' behavior really was that problematic, then the manager shares a part of the blame for not getting them under control over the past year. Otherwise, the promise of free practice schedule would only have been a lie to sign these two players.

Next, I will talk about the issue of TSL not giving out salaries to their players.
TSL is the only team that was sponsored by multiple companies from the beginning. To be honest, compare to other teams that are run on money out of the managers' own pockets, TSL's manager Mr. Lee is financially very well off. FD and T received their salaries for only April and May, but a part of FD's May salary, about 500,000 WON ($500) was delayed to June after the manager cited TSL's financial difficulties. TSL have received their appropriate sponsor money including FD and T's wages since March, so I don't understand why Lee lied about not receiving their sponsor money. Lee has said that their sponsor money was reduced, but this is only since July, so it is irrelevant to FD and T's circumstances.

Can you imagine how much FD and T blamed their sponsors because of Lee's lies? There should be no blame placed on those several companies including TIMU that have sponsored TSL from the early days of SC2. It would have been a strange situation in which those companies are badmouthed by the very players they sponsor. Can you imagine the sense of betrayal FD and T must have felt when there is no other conclusion than that the manager they have trusted has been pocketing the sponsor money for himself? When FD and T found out that the sponsor money has been coming in, they approached Lee about it, but Lee continued to lie and made up an excuse that the sponsor money came in very late and was reduced. I was disappointed to observe how this situation was folding out. I don't understand how TSL is in trouble financially when their sponsor money was increased this year, which led them to giving their players salaries in the first place. At the time [of FD and T's departure?] TSL was one of the smallest teams and their maid only came by briefly 3 times a week to make their food [presumably talking about how TSL's expenditure was probably low].

I am still trying to understand how they don't have enough money to run their team. Manager Lee said that they give out 1,000,000 WON ($1000) to their players as snack money each month, and that money is enough to pay for their monthly utility fee and car maintenance. He also claimed their their food expenses are over 5,000,000 WON ($5000) each month, but our team only spends 2,000,000 - 2,500,000 WON for 15 player, and that's including feeding them weekly beef/chicken/fish, so I don't understand why TSL needs that much money for only 8-9 players. I would like to ask TSL's manager if he thinks spending that much on food is wise, and you would have to question if he has the right qualities as a manager. I would like to ask him if thinks withholding player salaries to run his team is the correct decision.

The sponsor money is a very important part of running a team. [Blah, blah, blah, then he further talks about the importance of money in life. Not gonna bother to translate all that] There is an old saying that a lie will lead to another lie. I sincerely hope that TSL's manager will become more honest in the future.

The following section is summarizing F and TD's point of view:

We left oGs when they were becoming more organized as a team, because we preferred a flexible practice scheduling. There are various reasons for us joining up with manager Lee and forming TSL.

At first, we started TSL with our relationship with Manager Lee being that of business partners rather than a manager and a player. He promised us free practice schedule, compensation for the starcraft 2 guide [Not sure what this is about], and salaries. At first, Lee was someone in charge of the sponsors, but he eventually became more of a coach. However, he did not keep his promises with us.

Problems with how Lee was running TSL

1. Lack of involvement
There was a time when Lee would visit the teamhouse 1-2 times during 2 months. No matter how busy he was with his sponsors and running his PC Cafe, he should always put his team as his No.1 priority. I don't understand why we had to check our schedule that Lee never told us about on our own. There were occasions when Lee couldn't be contacted, so the outsiders contacted Trickster instead. This was stressful and we asked the manager to improve this, but nothing was done.

2. Withholding salaries
[This part basically says the same thing ST's manager said above about Lee withholding FD and T's salaries and lying to them about how the sponsor money wasn't coming in]

3. Imagerights
Lee did not take down various ads containing our images and when we asked him for a fee for continuing to use our image, he refused. These ads are still on and I hope they are taken care of ASAP.

4. Trust
FD never informed the team that he was leaving. Lee assumed after his phonecall with T that FD was also leaving and it is unbelievable from FD's perspective. He told us that the team's main sponsor is looking to depart during the team meetings and I remember that we (FD and T) even encouraged the other team members to work harder because the income from prize money is a better way to earn money than through salaries.

We are exhausted physically and mentally from Manager Lee's continuous lies. If what he said about the team's financial circumstances was true, then we would've waited for our salaries. After all, we had been waiting since last August, so there is no reason we can't wait more. If it really was becoming difficult to run the team, he should have just told us the truth and we would have willingly not received our salaries.

From what we understand, our sponsor money has increased since March, but nothing in our food menu has changed, so we don't see how the team was short on money.

[The next two sentences are something about their sponsored equipments, but I don't really understand it, so I'll let someone else do it] (그리고 후원사가 선수들에게 지급한 부품중 교체 이후 반납하지 않는 물품을 우리에게는 반납해야 한다며 부품을 가져갔다.
(확인 결과 후원사에 반납하지 않았다)

In any case, Lee is running a team as its manager as well as a PC cafe. Things have gotten better for him since TSL's creation. However, the same cannot be said for us players who have much spent time and passion. We also need to do our military duty soon. It is frustrating to think that only us players have been taking losses from this. I know that his PC cafe has greatly profited from using TSL's name.

It's true that each team should ultimately aim for profit, but there should be an initial investment. That investment includes money, time, and passion, but Manager Lee only follows money.

We admit that we partially share the blame in this incident. We met up with our personal friends and others more than we did with our teammates and there were drinking occasions. Manager Lee probably didn't like us in that aspect.

Some will say that we were unprofessional in our conduct, but we don't agree with that. We are old enough to take responsibilities for ourselves and we put in efforts that we wouldn't be ashamed of. The current situation is regrettable and I don't know how it got to here. I would just like to tell the truth and hope that there are no more unfortunate victims like us from TSL or other teams.

Finally, we would like to apologize for this incident and will try to become better gamers.


You're fast! I'll stop translating. :D


T.T I finished translating it and posted and found out Sein did it. The emptiness of my work... it burrrns

Hey! We appreciate you guys! Thanks for all your hard work. I'm actually reading through your translation now to get a better look at the issue.

Any idea how the Korean community has been receiving this, by the way?


Well the original article breaking this news has 242 comments despite it being 4:30 am here just to show how much discussion there is. Then there is the ST article which has over 50 comments despite it being posted at 2:00am. Right anger, a lot of disappointment and shock really. Pity on the players too.
farnham
Profile Joined January 2011
1378 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-04 19:41:38
August 04 2011 19:40 GMT
#704
tl555555 you clearly have no knowledge about the legal system in america or in korea. it doesnt really help if you explain your own thoughts about each legal system if you have no actual experience or at least theoretical knowledge about them. its pretty much just your fantasy.

also i still want to know why you are bringing up examples of criminal law if this is clearly a case of civil law (although i do see some criminal behavior of mr. lee as fraud or 배임 (disloyalty)

On August 05 2011 04:38 tl55555 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2011 04:31 farnham wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:27 Grimsong wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:22 Chargelot wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:18 wolfe wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:07 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:02 wolfe wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:00 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:49 FairForever wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:45 tl55555 wrote:
[quote]

To clear up your confusion, TSL was not legally wrong if the contract was ambiguous, that's how its comparable.



Actually TSL is still legally wrong. Exemption of a clause does not allow for open interpretation. In fact, it would be construed against the drafter of the contract, presumably TSL (contra preferentem).

Again though, stop spewing bullshit, you're trying to defend a position that is clearly indefensible and it is recognized by most of the people here. I'm not going to bother repeating my arguments again...


Me stop spewing bullshit? How about you stop spewing mumbo jumbo legal speak. People who try to impress by using legal speak and can't communicate a point in english -> unemployed

I don't give a shit what the book says, what REALITY says is ambiguous contract + better lawyer wins.

Please don't bother repeating your incorrect arguments again, you will be saving TL valuable bytes.






How is that wrong or difficult to understand?

"A contract is ambiguous when it is uncertain what the intent of the parties was and the contract is capable of more than one reasonable interpretation. Sometimes ambiguous terms can be explained by the admission of parol evidence. Also, Courts abide by the rule that an ambiguous contract is interpreted against the party who drafted it. In other words, the party who did not draft the contract will be given the benefit of the doubt so to speak. " -USLegal


You know what else USLegal says? People are entitled to a fair trial. The person with more money who can hire better lawyers wins.



Korea has more or less the same contract laws as the US and I was only using that as reference. Ironically, you contradict yourself with your 2nd and 3rd sentences a feat that is quite impressive given you have only written three sentences.

Fair trial =/= more money, better lawyer, wins

Not only are you a cynical person who seems to have no respect for our legal systems you also are quite poor at doing research. Give me a single example in which the courts ruled in favor of the author of an ambiguous contract.

Side note, the more money argument doesn't really have that much to do with better lawyers it has more to do with that a protracted legal battle can last years costing upwards of millions of dollars. The party with the smaller bank is more likely to withdraw and settle rather than waste years in court.


You're on trial for murder. It doesn't matter if you did it or not, but it looks really bad for you.
You have an option:

The one million dollar a day legal team of the best 8 lawyers in the country

or

A court appointed lawyer, who costs nothing to you, and has ~30 cases he is working on at the same time.

Money means a lot.


You realize those same court appointed lawyers are the ones who know the ins and outs of the courthouse, know the judges, know the district attorney, know the assistant district attorneys, and work just as hard as any other attorney because they also take on private clients and probably DONT want the public to feel they are terrible attorneys? Or that they dont want those same courthouses to think that they aren't professional? I'll take on one of the court appointed attorneys here who I know absolutely know this court houses ways, over someone who has no idea how it works and comes off as an asshat (All the out of county Dallas attorneys who dont even know how to file basic processes at the courthouse I'm at). Also, there's a thing called a jury. And just because a lawyer has 30 cases, doesn't mean he isn't taking the time to handle the case he is given. You don't think those same attorneys dont enjoy winning? Come on.


yeah i find this hilarious too. i know some defense attorneys and they usually dont want to conclude contracts with criminals because they dont know where the money comes from and they might get in jail themselves if it was for example drug money. getting the money from the state might not be much and might take a long time but it usually is safe and clean money so they rather take that money.


clean lawyers? What planet do you live on?

im a lawyer myself and i met a lot of honest people that are lawyers that i do respect. shocking i know
Masil
Profile Joined July 2011
United States60 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-04 19:44:43
August 04 2011 19:40 GMT
#705
On August 05 2011 04:33 moonmeh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2011 04:28 Masil wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:20 Sein wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
Translation of the Startale manager's response:

Hello,

This is Startale's manager, Won Jong-Wook.
First of all, I would like to apologize for having to greet you all with this uncomfortable situation and I would like to explain everything from the perspective of a team manager,

First of all, it is true that Fruitdealer and Trickster's lack of professional attitude was wrong, and both players are admitting and regretting that fact that they were overly lazy.

However, Fruitdealer and Trickster's free practice schedule/lifestyle was something that was agreed upon with TSL's manager Mr. Lee at TSL's creation, and it is petty to bring this up as a problem after all this time. If the two players' behavior really was that problematic, then the manager shares a part of the blame for not getting them under control over the past year. Otherwise, the promise of free practice schedule would only have been a lie to sign these two players.

Next, I will talk about the issue of TSL not giving out salaries to their players.
TSL is the only team that was sponsored by multiple companies from the beginning. To be honest, compare to other teams that are run on money out of the managers' own pockets, TSL's manager Mr. Lee is financially very well off. FD and T received their salaries for only April and May, but a part of FD's May salary, about 500,000 WON ($500) was delayed to June after the manager cited TSL's financial difficulties. TSL have received their appropriate sponsor money including FD and T's wages since March, so I don't understand why Lee lied about not receiving their sponsor money. Lee has said that their sponsor money was reduced, but this is only since July, so it is irrelevant to FD and T's circumstances.

Can you imagine how much FD and T blamed their sponsors because of Lee's lies? There should be no blame placed on those several companies including TIMU that have sponsored TSL from the early days of SC2. It would have been a strange situation in which those companies are badmouthed by the very players they sponsor. Can you imagine the sense of betrayal FD and T must have felt when there is no other conclusion than that the manager they have trusted has been pocketing the sponsor money for himself? When FD and T found out that the sponsor money has been coming in, they approached Lee about it, but Lee continued to lie and made up an excuse that the sponsor money came in very late and was reduced. I was disappointed to observe how this situation was folding out. I don't understand how TSL is in trouble financially when their sponsor money was increased this year, which led them to giving their players salaries in the first place. At the time [of FD and T's departure?] TSL was one of the smallest teams and their maid only came by briefly 3 times a week to make their food [presumably talking about how TSL's expenditure was probably low].

I am still trying to understand how they don't have enough money to run their team. Manager Lee said that they give out 1,000,000 WON ($1000) to their players as snack money each month, and that money is enough to pay for their monthly utility fee and car maintenance. He also claimed their their food expenses are over 5,000,000 WON ($5000) each month, but our team only spends 2,000,000 - 2,500,000 WON for 15 player, and that's including feeding them weekly beef/chicken/fish, so I don't understand why TSL needs that much money for only 8-9 players. I would like to ask TSL's manager if he thinks spending that much on food is wise, and you would have to question if he has the right qualities as a manager. I would like to ask him if thinks withholding player salaries to run his team is the correct decision.

The sponsor money is a very important part of running a team. [Blah, blah, blah, then he further talks about the importance of money in life. Not gonna bother to translate all that] There is an old saying that a lie will lead to another lie. I sincerely hope that TSL's manager will become more honest in the future.

The following section is summarizing F and TD's point of view:

We left oGs when they were becoming more organized as a team, because we preferred a flexible practice scheduling. There are various reasons for us joining up with manager Lee and forming TSL.

At first, we started TSL with our relationship with Manager Lee being that of business partners rather than a manager and a player. He promised us free practice schedule, compensation for the starcraft 2 guide [Not sure what this is about], and salaries. At first, Lee was someone in charge of the sponsors, but he eventually became more of a coach. However, he did not keep his promises with us.

Problems with how Lee was running TSL

1. Lack of involvement
There was a time when Lee would visit the teamhouse 1-2 times during 2 months. No matter how busy he was with his sponsors and running his PC Cafe, he should always put his team as his No.1 priority. I don't understand why we had to check our schedule that Lee never told us about on our own. There were occasions when Lee couldn't be contacted, so the outsiders contacted Trickster instead. This was stressful and we asked the manager to improve this, but nothing was done.

2. Withholding salaries
[This part basically says the same thing ST's manager said above about Lee withholding FD and T's salaries and lying to them about how the sponsor money wasn't coming in]

3. Imagerights
Lee did not take down various ads containing our images and when we asked him for a fee for continuing to use our image, he refused. These ads are still on and I hope they are taken care of ASAP.

4. Trust
FD never informed the team that he was leaving. Lee assumed after his phonecall with T that FD was also leaving and it is unbelievable from FD's perspective. He told us that the team's main sponsor is looking to depart during the team meetings and I remember that we (FD and T) even encouraged the other team members to work harder because the income from prize money is a better way to earn money than through salaries.

We are exhausted physically and mentally from Manager Lee's continuous lies. If what he said about the team's financial circumstances was true, then we would've waited for our salaries. After all, we had been waiting since last August, so there is no reason we can't wait more. If it really was becoming difficult to run the team, he should have just told us the truth and we would have willingly not received our salaries.

From what we understand, our sponsor money has increased since March, but nothing in our food menu has changed, so we don't see how the team was short on money.

[The next two sentences are something about their sponsored equipments, but I don't really understand it, so I'll let someone else do it] (그리고 후원사가 선수들에게 지급한 부품중 교체 이후 반납하지 않는 물품을 우리에게는 반납해야 한다며 부품을 가져갔다.
(확인 결과 후원사에 반납하지 않았다)

In any case, Lee is running a team as its manager as well as a PC cafe. Things have gotten better for him since TSL's creation. However, the same cannot be said for us players who have much spent time and passion. We also need to do our military duty soon. It is frustrating to think that only us players have been taking losses from this. I know that his PC cafe has greatly profited from using TSL's name.

It's true that each team should ultimately aim for profit, but there should be an initial investment. That investment includes money, time, and passion, but Manager Lee only follows money.

We admit that we partially share the blame in this incident. We met up with our personal friends and others more than we did with our teammates and there were drinking occasions. Manager Lee probably didn't like us in that aspect.

Some will say that we were unprofessional in our conduct, but we don't agree with that. We are old enough to take responsibilities for ourselves and we put in efforts that we wouldn't be ashamed of. The current situation is regrettable and I don't know how it got to here. I would just like to tell the truth and hope that there are no more unfortunate victims like us from TSL or other teams.

Finally, we would like to apologize for this incident and will try to become better gamers.


You're fast! I'll stop translating. :D


T.T I finished translating it and posted and found out Sein did it. The emptiness of my work... it burrrns


It applies to me, I guess. I knew someone might work on it but well, yeah.

But who knows, maybe your translation is more accurate than his or mine (just for ST manager part). I will read them all. :D

Anyway, it appears that Mr.Lee has a lot of problem with the team management.
I pity the players in TSL, especially Clide..
Be honest, be yourself.
Ownos
Profile Joined July 2010
United States2147 Posts
August 04 2011 19:41 GMT
#706
On August 05 2011 04:20 Sein wrote:
Translation of the Startale manager's response:

Hello,

This is Startale's manager, Won Jong-Wook.
First of all, I would like to apologize for having to greet you all with this uncomfortable situation and I would like to explain everything from the perspective of a team manager,

First of all, it is true that Fruitdealer and Trickster's lack of professional attitude was wrong, and both players are admitting and regretting that fact that they were overly lazy.

However, Fruitdealer and Trickster's free practice schedule/lifestyle was something that was agreed upon with TSL's manager Mr. Lee at TSL's creation, and it is petty to bring this up as a problem after all this time. If the two players' behavior really was that problematic, then the manager shares a part of the blame for not getting them under control over the past year. Otherwise, the promise of free practice schedule would only have been a lie to sign these two players.

Next, I will talk about the issue of TSL not giving out salaries to their players.
TSL is the only team that was sponsored by multiple companies from the beginning. To be honest, compare to other teams that are run on money out of the managers' own pockets, TSL's manager Mr. Lee is financially very well off. FD and T received their salaries for only April and May, but a part of FD's May salary, about 500,000 WON ($500) was delayed to June after the manager cited TSL's financial difficulties. TSL have received their appropriate sponsor money including FD and T's wages since March, so I don't understand why Lee lied about not receiving their sponsor money. Lee has said that their sponsor money was reduced, but this is only since July, so it is irrelevant to FD and T's circumstances.

Can you imagine how much FD and T blamed their sponsors because of Lee's lies? There should be no blame placed on those several companies including TIMU that have sponsored TSL from the early days of SC2. It would have been a strange situation in which those companies are badmouthed by the very players they sponsor. Can you imagine the sense of betrayal FD and T must have felt when there is no other conclusion than that the manager they have trusted has been pocketing the sponsor money for himself? When FD and T found out that the sponsor money has been coming in, they approached Lee about it, but Lee continued to lie and made up an excuse that the sponsor money came in very late and was reduced. I was disappointed to observe how this situation was folding out. I don't understand how TSL is in trouble financially when their sponsor money was increased this year, which led them to giving their players salaries in the first place. At the time [of FD and T's departure?] TSL was one of the smallest teams and their maid only came by briefly 3 times a week to make their food [presumably talking about how TSL's expenditure was probably low].

I am still trying to understand how they don't have enough money to run their team. Manager Lee said that they give out 1,000,000 WON ($1000) to their players as snack money each month, and that money is enough to pay for their monthly utility fee and car maintenance. He also claimed their their food expenses are over 5,000,000 WON ($5000) each month, but our team only spends 2,000,000 - 2,500,000 WON for 15 player, and that's including feeding them weekly beef/chicken/fish, so I don't understand why TSL needs that much money for only 8-9 players. I would like to ask TSL's manager if he thinks spending that much on food is wise, and you would have to question if he has the right qualities as a manager. I would like to ask him if thinks withholding player salaries to run his team is the correct decision.

The sponsor money is a very important part of running a team. [Blah, blah, blah, then he further talks about the importance of money in life. Not gonna bother to translate all that] There is an old saying that a lie will lead to another lie. I sincerely hope that TSL's manager will become more honest in the future.

The following section is summarizing F and TD's point of view:

We left oGs when they were becoming more organized as a team, because we preferred a flexible practice scheduling. There are various reasons for us joining up with manager Lee and forming TSL.

At first, we started TSL with our relationship with Manager Lee being that of business partners rather than a manager and a player. He promised us free practice schedule, compensation for the starcraft 2 guide [Not sure what this is about], and salaries. At first, Lee was someone in charge of the sponsors, but he eventually became more of a coach. However, he did not keep his promises with us.

Problems with how Lee was running TSL

1. Lack of involvement
There was a time when Lee would visit the teamhouse 1-2 times during 2 months. No matter how busy he was with his sponsors and running his PC Cafe, he should always put his team as his No.1 priority. I don't understand why we had to check our schedule that Lee never told us about on our own. There were occasions when Lee couldn't be contacted, so the outsiders contacted Trickster instead. This was stressful and we asked the manager to improve this, but nothing was done.

2. Withholding salaries
[This part basically says the same thing ST's manager said above about Lee withholding FD and T's salaries and lying to them about how the sponsor money wasn't coming in]

3. Imagerights
Lee did not take down various ads containing our images and when we asked him for a fee for continuing to use our image, he refused. These ads are still on and I hope they are taken care of ASAP.

4. Trust
FD never informed the team that he was leaving. Lee assumed after his phonecall with T that FD was also leaving and it is unbelievable from FD's perspective. He told us that the team's main sponsor is looking to depart during the team meetings and I remember that we (FD and T) even encouraged the other team members to work harder because the income from prize money is a better way to earn money than through salaries.

We are exhausted physically and mentally from Manager Lee's continuous lies. If what he said about the team's financial circumstances was true, then we would've waited for our salaries. After all, we had been waiting since last August, so there is no reason we can't wait more. If it really was becoming difficult to run the team, he should have just told us the truth and we would have willingly not received our salaries.

From what we understand, our sponsor money has increased since March, but nothing in our food menu has changed, so we don't see how the team was short on money.

[The next two sentences are something about their sponsored equipments, but I don't really understand it, so I'll let someone else do it] (그리고 후원사가 선수들에게 지급한 부품중 교체 이후 반납하지 않는 물품을 우리에게는 반납해야 한다며 부품을 가져갔다.
(확인 결과 후원사에 반납하지 않았다)

In any case, Lee is running a team as its manager as well as a PC cafe. Things have gotten better for him since TSL's creation. However, the same cannot be said for us players who have much spent time and passion. We also need to do our military duty soon. It is frustrating to think that only us players have been taking losses from this. I know that his PC cafe has greatly profited from using TSL's name.

It's true that each team should ultimately aim for profit, but there should be an initial investment. That investment includes money, time, and passion, but Manager Lee only follows money.

We admit that we partially share the blame in this incident. We met up with our personal friends and others more than we did with our teammates and there were drinking occasions. Manager Lee probably didn't like us in that aspect.

Some will say that we were unprofessional in our conduct, but we don't agree with that. We are old enough to take responsibilities for ourselves and we put in efforts that we wouldn't be ashamed of. The current situation is regrettable and I don't know how it got to here. I would just like to tell the truth and hope that there are no more unfortunate victims like us from TSL or other teams.

Finally, we would like to apologize for this incident and will try to become better gamers.


If this is true, that sounds awful. -_-
...deeper and deeper into the bowels of El Diablo
wolfe
Profile Joined March 2010
United States761 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-04 19:45:24
August 04 2011 19:42 GMT
#707
On August 05 2011 04:36 tl55555 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2011 04:17 Grimsong wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:14 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:10 Grimsong wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:07 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:02 wolfe wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:00 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:49 FairForever wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:45 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:35 FairForever wrote:
[quote]

Read above. I never said that I agree with what FD and Trickster did. But that's not the point. While FD and Trickster may have been morally wrong in not practicing hard to really fully commit to their duties, TSL was legally wrong in refusing to pay them. I'm not sure how it's comparable.

EDIT: I forgot to mention again, you keep saying they violated their contract. Again, stop spewing bullshit out of your mouth.


To clear up your confusion, TSL was not legally wrong if the contract was ambiguous, that's how its comparable.



Actually TSL is still legally wrong. Exemption of a clause does not allow for open interpretation. In fact, it would be construed against the drafter of the contract, presumably TSL (contra preferentem).

Again though, stop spewing bullshit, you're trying to defend a position that is clearly indefensible and it is recognized by most of the people here. I'm not going to bother repeating my arguments again...


Me stop spewing bullshit? How about you stop spewing mumbo jumbo legal speak. People who try to impress by using legal speak and can't communicate a point in english -> unemployed

I don't give a shit what the book says, what REALITY says is ambiguous contract + better lawyer wins.

Please don't bother repeating your incorrect arguments again, you will be saving TL valuable bytes.






How is that wrong or difficult to understand?

"A contract is ambiguous when it is uncertain what the intent of the parties was and the contract is capable of more than one reasonable interpretation. Sometimes ambiguous terms can be explained by the admission of parol evidence. Also, Courts abide by the rule that an ambiguous contract is interpreted against the party who drafted it. In other words, the party who did not draft the contract will be given the benefit of the doubt so to speak. " -USLegal


You know what else USLegal says? People are entitled to a fair trial. The person with more money who can hire better lawyers wins.


That's not even remotely true, don't speak on trials and the US legal system on such a blanket statement, when you likely have no idea about what goes on at the court houses.

It's not even about legality at this point. Logically you can't stop paying someone their money due unless they are no longer employed. Both players were still employed under the TSL flag.


You must live under a rock on the moon, or definitely not in the united states, or you definitely don't pay attention to legal cases.


Or I work in a courthouse, talk to attorneys all day, and know for a fact that the higher paid lawyer doesn't always win? Are you serious right now? I'm completely baffled right now and quite frankly I can't put together a statement to express how ignorant the things you are saying in regards to law are.


Some small town courthouse where both parties have such little money it doesn't matter. Cause those are the cases that matter in America. Not surprised someone from a small town is "baffled" at what really goes on in the American legal system and can't wrap their head around it. Stick to smallville where things make sense for you.

Show nested quote +
On August 05 2011 04:18 wolfe wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:07 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:02 wolfe wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:00 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:49 FairForever wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:45 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:35 FairForever wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:27 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:16 FairForever wrote:
[quote]

So at least we agree now that what Lee did was wrong and unethical? I personally don't care what you think about business law and whether you feel it means very little. The fact is what Lee did was wrong.


Not anymore wrong and unethical than what FruitDealer and Trickster did, which was violate their contract by not practicing. Don't flaunt your business law when you have no idea wtf is going on, just makes you look like a pompous arrogant child.


Read above. I never said that I agree with what FD and Trickster did. But that's not the point. While FD and Trickster may have been morally wrong in not practicing hard to really fully commit to their duties, TSL was legally wrong in refusing to pay them. I'm not sure how it's comparable.

EDIT: I forgot to mention again, you keep saying they violated their contract. Again, stop spewing bullshit out of your mouth.


To clear up your confusion, TSL was not legally wrong if the contract was ambiguous, that's how its comparable.



Actually TSL is still legally wrong. Exemption of a clause does not allow for open interpretation. In fact, it would be construed against the drafter of the contract, presumably TSL (contra preferentem).

Again though, stop spewing bullshit, you're trying to defend a position that is clearly indefensible and it is recognized by most of the people here. I'm not going to bother repeating my arguments again...


Me stop spewing bullshit? How about you stop spewing mumbo jumbo legal speak. People who try to impress by using legal speak and can't communicate a point in english -> unemployed

I don't give a shit what the book says, what REALITY says is ambiguous contract + better lawyer wins.

Please don't bother repeating your incorrect arguments again, you will be saving TL valuable bytes.






How is that wrong or difficult to understand?

"A contract is ambiguous when it is uncertain what the intent of the parties was and the contract is capable of more than one reasonable interpretation. Sometimes ambiguous terms can be explained by the admission of parol evidence. Also, Courts abide by the rule that an ambiguous contract is interpreted against the party who drafted it. In other words, the party who did not draft the contract will be given the benefit of the doubt so to speak. " -USLegal


You know what else USLegal says? People are entitled to a fair trial. The person with more money who can hire better lawyers wins.



Korea has more or less the same contract laws as the US and I was only using that as reference. Ironically, you contradict yourself with your 2nd and 3rd sentences a feat that is quite impressive given you have only written three sentences.

Fair trial =/= more money, better lawyer, wins

Not only are you a cynical person who seems to have no respect for our legal systems you also are quite poor at doing research. Give me a single example in which the courts ruled in favor of the author of an ambiguous contract.

Side note, the more money argument doesn't really have that much to do with better lawyers it has more to do with that a protracted legal battle can last years costing upwards of millions of dollars. The party with the smaller bank is more likely to withdraw and settle rather than waste years in court.


Money gives a huge advantage which goes against a fair trial. Simple point, difficult for you to understand.







How does this even relate to the thread again? I'm not going to try to argue with the internet it's pointless really.

Back to the thread. TSL/Lee is in the fault for an ambiguous contract. The Players are fulfilling the contract, but still being punished for agreements that lie outside of the contract.

edit: Here's a fun idea for you. If you really want to settle this the old school way lets play 1s. The winner is right and the loser is wrong :D. Bo3 you can pick the 1st map.
Swift as the wind, felt before noticed.
Grimsong
Profile Joined August 2010
United States252 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-04 19:45:59
August 04 2011 19:42 GMT
#708
On August 05 2011 04:36 tl55555 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2011 04:17 Grimsong wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:14 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:10 Grimsong wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:07 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:02 wolfe wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:00 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:49 FairForever wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:45 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:35 FairForever wrote:
[quote]

Read above. I never said that I agree with what FD and Trickster did. But that's not the point. While FD and Trickster may have been morally wrong in not practicing hard to really fully commit to their duties, TSL was legally wrong in refusing to pay them. I'm not sure how it's comparable.

EDIT: I forgot to mention again, you keep saying they violated their contract. Again, stop spewing bullshit out of your mouth.


To clear up your confusion, TSL was not legally wrong if the contract was ambiguous, that's how its comparable.



Actually TSL is still legally wrong. Exemption of a clause does not allow for open interpretation. In fact, it would be construed against the drafter of the contract, presumably TSL (contra preferentem).

Again though, stop spewing bullshit, you're trying to defend a position that is clearly indefensible and it is recognized by most of the people here. I'm not going to bother repeating my arguments again...


Me stop spewing bullshit? How about you stop spewing mumbo jumbo legal speak. People who try to impress by using legal speak and can't communicate a point in english -> unemployed

I don't give a shit what the book says, what REALITY says is ambiguous contract + better lawyer wins.

Please don't bother repeating your incorrect arguments again, you will be saving TL valuable bytes.






How is that wrong or difficult to understand?

"A contract is ambiguous when it is uncertain what the intent of the parties was and the contract is capable of more than one reasonable interpretation. Sometimes ambiguous terms can be explained by the admission of parol evidence. Also, Courts abide by the rule that an ambiguous contract is interpreted against the party who drafted it. In other words, the party who did not draft the contract will be given the benefit of the doubt so to speak. " -USLegal


You know what else USLegal says? People are entitled to a fair trial. The person with more money who can hire better lawyers wins.


That's not even remotely true, don't speak on trials and the US legal system on such a blanket statement, when you likely have no idea about what goes on at the court houses.

It's not even about legality at this point. Logically you can't stop paying someone their money due unless they are no longer employed. Both players were still employed under the TSL flag.


You must live under a rock on the moon, or definitely not in the united states, or you definitely don't pay attention to legal cases.


Or I work in a courthouse, talk to attorneys all day, and know for a fact that the higher paid lawyer doesn't always win? Are you serious right now? I'm completely baffled right now and quite frankly I can't put together a statement to express how ignorant the things you are saying in regards to law are.


Some small town courthouse where both parties have such little money it doesn't matter. Cause those are the cases that matter in America. Not surprised someone from a small town is "baffled" at what really goes on in the American legal system and can't wrap their head around it. Stick to smallville where things make sense for you.

Show nested quote +
On August 05 2011 04:18 wolfe wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:07 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:02 wolfe wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:00 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:49 FairForever wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:45 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:35 FairForever wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:27 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:16 FairForever wrote:
[quote]

So at least we agree now that what Lee did was wrong and unethical? I personally don't care what you think about business law and whether you feel it means very little. The fact is what Lee did was wrong.


Not anymore wrong and unethical than what FruitDealer and Trickster did, which was violate their contract by not practicing. Don't flaunt your business law when you have no idea wtf is going on, just makes you look like a pompous arrogant child.


Read above. I never said that I agree with what FD and Trickster did. But that's not the point. While FD and Trickster may have been morally wrong in not practicing hard to really fully commit to their duties, TSL was legally wrong in refusing to pay them. I'm not sure how it's comparable.

EDIT: I forgot to mention again, you keep saying they violated their contract. Again, stop spewing bullshit out of your mouth.


To clear up your confusion, TSL was not legally wrong if the contract was ambiguous, that's how its comparable.



Actually TSL is still legally wrong. Exemption of a clause does not allow for open interpretation. In fact, it would be construed against the drafter of the contract, presumably TSL (contra preferentem).

Again though, stop spewing bullshit, you're trying to defend a position that is clearly indefensible and it is recognized by most of the people here. I'm not going to bother repeating my arguments again...


Me stop spewing bullshit? How about you stop spewing mumbo jumbo legal speak. People who try to impress by using legal speak and can't communicate a point in english -> unemployed

I don't give a shit what the book says, what REALITY says is ambiguous contract + better lawyer wins.

Please don't bother repeating your incorrect arguments again, you will be saving TL valuable bytes.






How is that wrong or difficult to understand?

"A contract is ambiguous when it is uncertain what the intent of the parties was and the contract is capable of more than one reasonable interpretation. Sometimes ambiguous terms can be explained by the admission of parol evidence. Also, Courts abide by the rule that an ambiguous contract is interpreted against the party who drafted it. In other words, the party who did not draft the contract will be given the benefit of the doubt so to speak. " -USLegal


You know what else USLegal says? People are entitled to a fair trial. The person with more money who can hire better lawyers wins.



Korea has more or less the same contract laws as the US and I was only using that as reference. Ironically, you contradict yourself with your 2nd and 3rd sentences a feat that is quite impressive given you have only written three sentences.

Fair trial =/= more money, better lawyer, wins

Not only are you a cynical person who seems to have no respect for our legal systems you also are quite poor at doing research. Give me a single example in which the courts ruled in favor of the author of an ambiguous contract.

Side note, the more money argument doesn't really have that much to do with better lawyers it has more to do with that a protracted legal battle can last years costing upwards of millions of dollars. The party with the smaller bank is more likely to withdraw and settle rather than waste years in court.


Money gives a huge advantage which goes against a fair trial. Simple point, difficult for you to understand.







You have no idea what I can or can' t wrap my head around, where I'm from, or where I've been. I'd appreciate if you kept your personal attacks to yourself because it's becoming more and more difficult to stay civil as you continue to say things about me that you simply have no idea about.

Money doesn't have anything to do with a fair trial either, because a fair trial involves a jury that is very meticulously selected. You think those million dollar lawyers are getting paid a million dollars simply because they are getting paid a million dollars? They're solid lawyers and have found a platform from which they can demand that type of payment. Who's to say that other "small pay" lawyer simply hasnt found that same opportunity, yet is still just as skilled if not more knowledgable since he has taken on so many cases?

PS. Court appointed lawyers also take on private clients. That million dollar lawyer you hired? Likely has court appointed cases.
moonmeh
Profile Joined July 2011
Korea (South)105 Posts
August 04 2011 19:42 GMT
#709
On August 05 2011 04:40 Masil wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2011 04:33 moonmeh wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:28 Masil wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:20 Sein wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
Translation of the Startale manager's response:

Hello,

This is Startale's manager, Won Jong-Wook.
First of all, I would like to apologize for having to greet you all with this uncomfortable situation and I would like to explain everything from the perspective of a team manager,

First of all, it is true that Fruitdealer and Trickster's lack of professional attitude was wrong, and both players are admitting and regretting that fact that they were overly lazy.

However, Fruitdealer and Trickster's free practice schedule/lifestyle was something that was agreed upon with TSL's manager Mr. Lee at TSL's creation, and it is petty to bring this up as a problem after all this time. If the two players' behavior really was that problematic, then the manager shares a part of the blame for not getting them under control over the past year. Otherwise, the promise of free practice schedule would only have been a lie to sign these two players.

Next, I will talk about the issue of TSL not giving out salaries to their players.
TSL is the only team that was sponsored by multiple companies from the beginning. To be honest, compare to other teams that are run on money out of the managers' own pockets, TSL's manager Mr. Lee is financially very well off. FD and T received their salaries for only April and May, but a part of FD's May salary, about 500,000 WON ($500) was delayed to June after the manager cited TSL's financial difficulties. TSL have received their appropriate sponsor money including FD and T's wages since March, so I don't understand why Lee lied about not receiving their sponsor money. Lee has said that their sponsor money was reduced, but this is only since July, so it is irrelevant to FD and T's circumstances.

Can you imagine how much FD and T blamed their sponsors because of Lee's lies? There should be no blame placed on those several companies including TIMU that have sponsored TSL from the early days of SC2. It would have been a strange situation in which those companies are badmouthed by the very players they sponsor. Can you imagine the sense of betrayal FD and T must have felt when there is no other conclusion than that the manager they have trusted has been pocketing the sponsor money for himself? When FD and T found out that the sponsor money has been coming in, they approached Lee about it, but Lee continued to lie and made up an excuse that the sponsor money came in very late and was reduced. I was disappointed to observe how this situation was folding out. I don't understand how TSL is in trouble financially when their sponsor money was increased this year, which led them to giving their players salaries in the first place. At the time [of FD and T's departure?] TSL was one of the smallest teams and their maid only came by briefly 3 times a week to make their food [presumably talking about how TSL's expenditure was probably low].

I am still trying to understand how they don't have enough money to run their team. Manager Lee said that they give out 1,000,000 WON ($1000) to their players as snack money each month, and that money is enough to pay for their monthly utility fee and car maintenance. He also claimed their their food expenses are over 5,000,000 WON ($5000) each month, but our team only spends 2,000,000 - 2,500,000 WON for 15 player, and that's including feeding them weekly beef/chicken/fish, so I don't understand why TSL needs that much money for only 8-9 players. I would like to ask TSL's manager if he thinks spending that much on food is wise, and you would have to question if he has the right qualities as a manager. I would like to ask him if thinks withholding player salaries to run his team is the correct decision.

The sponsor money is a very important part of running a team. [Blah, blah, blah, then he further talks about the importance of money in life. Not gonna bother to translate all that] There is an old saying that a lie will lead to another lie. I sincerely hope that TSL's manager will become more honest in the future.

The following section is summarizing F and TD's point of view:

We left oGs when they were becoming more organized as a team, because we preferred a flexible practice scheduling. There are various reasons for us joining up with manager Lee and forming TSL.

At first, we started TSL with our relationship with Manager Lee being that of business partners rather than a manager and a player. He promised us free practice schedule, compensation for the starcraft 2 guide [Not sure what this is about], and salaries. At first, Lee was someone in charge of the sponsors, but he eventually became more of a coach. However, he did not keep his promises with us.

Problems with how Lee was running TSL

1. Lack of involvement
There was a time when Lee would visit the teamhouse 1-2 times during 2 months. No matter how busy he was with his sponsors and running his PC Cafe, he should always put his team as his No.1 priority. I don't understand why we had to check our schedule that Lee never told us about on our own. There were occasions when Lee couldn't be contacted, so the outsiders contacted Trickster instead. This was stressful and we asked the manager to improve this, but nothing was done.

2. Withholding salaries
[This part basically says the same thing ST's manager said above about Lee withholding FD and T's salaries and lying to them about how the sponsor money wasn't coming in]

3. Imagerights
Lee did not take down various ads containing our images and when we asked him for a fee for continuing to use our image, he refused. These ads are still on and I hope they are taken care of ASAP.

4. Trust
FD never informed the team that he was leaving. Lee assumed after his phonecall with T that FD was also leaving and it is unbelievable from FD's perspective. He told us that the team's main sponsor is looking to depart during the team meetings and I remember that we (FD and T) even encouraged the other team members to work harder because the income from prize money is a better way to earn money than through salaries.

We are exhausted physically and mentally from Manager Lee's continuous lies. If what he said about the team's financial circumstances was true, then we would've waited for our salaries. After all, we had been waiting since last August, so there is no reason we can't wait more. If it really was becoming difficult to run the team, he should have just told us the truth and we would have willingly not received our salaries.

From what we understand, our sponsor money has increased since March, but nothing in our food menu has changed, so we don't see how the team was short on money.

[The next two sentences are something about their sponsored equipments, but I don't really understand it, so I'll let someone else do it] (그리고 후원사가 선수들에게 지급한 부품중 교체 이후 반납하지 않는 물품을 우리에게는 반납해야 한다며 부품을 가져갔다.
(확인 결과 후원사에 반납하지 않았다)

In any case, Lee is running a team as its manager as well as a PC cafe. Things have gotten better for him since TSL's creation. However, the same cannot be said for us players who have much spent time and passion. We also need to do our military duty soon. It is frustrating to think that only us players have been taking losses from this. I know that his PC cafe has greatly profited from using TSL's name.

It's true that each team should ultimately aim for profit, but there should be an initial investment. That investment includes money, time, and passion, but Manager Lee only follows money.

We admit that we partially share the blame in this incident. We met up with our personal friends and others more than we did with our teammates and there were drinking occasions. Manager Lee probably didn't like us in that aspect.

Some will say that we were unprofessional in our conduct, but we don't agree with that. We are old enough to take responsibilities for ourselves and we put in efforts that we wouldn't be ashamed of. The current situation is regrettable and I don't know how it got to here. I would just like to tell the truth and hope that there are no more unfortunate victims like us from TSL or other teams.

Finally, we would like to apologize for this incident and will try to become better gamers.


You're fast! I'll stop translating. :D


T.T I finished translating it and posted and found out Sein did it. The emptiness of my work... it burrrns


It applies to me, I guess. I knew someone might work on it but well, yeah.

But who knows, maybe your translation is more accurate then his or mine (just for ST manager part). I will read them all. :D

Anyway, it appears that Mr.Lee has a lot of problem with the team management.
I pity the players in TSL, especially Clide..


There is just something that makes you feel really good about translating stuf so that other people can read it. I'm finding it to be a very good experience. Thanks for reading them all, makes me feel much better that my work isn't in vain.

Didn't Killer and Clide give a lot of their money for the team? It's really is tragic.
farnham
Profile Joined January 2011
1378 Posts
August 04 2011 19:44 GMT
#710
On August 05 2011 04:42 wolfe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2011 04:36 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:17 Grimsong wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:14 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:10 Grimsong wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:07 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:02 wolfe wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:00 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:49 FairForever wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:45 tl55555 wrote:
[quote]

To clear up your confusion, TSL was not legally wrong if the contract was ambiguous, that's how its comparable.



Actually TSL is still legally wrong. Exemption of a clause does not allow for open interpretation. In fact, it would be construed against the drafter of the contract, presumably TSL (contra preferentem).

Again though, stop spewing bullshit, you're trying to defend a position that is clearly indefensible and it is recognized by most of the people here. I'm not going to bother repeating my arguments again...


Me stop spewing bullshit? How about you stop spewing mumbo jumbo legal speak. People who try to impress by using legal speak and can't communicate a point in english -> unemployed

I don't give a shit what the book says, what REALITY says is ambiguous contract + better lawyer wins.

Please don't bother repeating your incorrect arguments again, you will be saving TL valuable bytes.






How is that wrong or difficult to understand?

"A contract is ambiguous when it is uncertain what the intent of the parties was and the contract is capable of more than one reasonable interpretation. Sometimes ambiguous terms can be explained by the admission of parol evidence. Also, Courts abide by the rule that an ambiguous contract is interpreted against the party who drafted it. In other words, the party who did not draft the contract will be given the benefit of the doubt so to speak. " -USLegal


You know what else USLegal says? People are entitled to a fair trial. The person with more money who can hire better lawyers wins.


That's not even remotely true, don't speak on trials and the US legal system on such a blanket statement, when you likely have no idea about what goes on at the court houses.

It's not even about legality at this point. Logically you can't stop paying someone their money due unless they are no longer employed. Both players were still employed under the TSL flag.


You must live under a rock on the moon, or definitely not in the united states, or you definitely don't pay attention to legal cases.


Or I work in a courthouse, talk to attorneys all day, and know for a fact that the higher paid lawyer doesn't always win? Are you serious right now? I'm completely baffled right now and quite frankly I can't put together a statement to express how ignorant the things you are saying in regards to law are.


Some small town courthouse where both parties have such little money it doesn't matter. Cause those are the cases that matter in America. Not surprised someone from a small town is "baffled" at what really goes on in the American legal system and can't wrap their head around it. Stick to smallville where things make sense for you.

On August 05 2011 04:18 wolfe wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:07 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:02 wolfe wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:00 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:49 FairForever wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:45 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:35 FairForever wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:27 tl55555 wrote:
[quote]

Not anymore wrong and unethical than what FruitDealer and Trickster did, which was violate their contract by not practicing. Don't flaunt your business law when you have no idea wtf is going on, just makes you look like a pompous arrogant child.


Read above. I never said that I agree with what FD and Trickster did. But that's not the point. While FD and Trickster may have been morally wrong in not practicing hard to really fully commit to their duties, TSL was legally wrong in refusing to pay them. I'm not sure how it's comparable.

EDIT: I forgot to mention again, you keep saying they violated their contract. Again, stop spewing bullshit out of your mouth.


To clear up your confusion, TSL was not legally wrong if the contract was ambiguous, that's how its comparable.



Actually TSL is still legally wrong. Exemption of a clause does not allow for open interpretation. In fact, it would be construed against the drafter of the contract, presumably TSL (contra preferentem).

Again though, stop spewing bullshit, you're trying to defend a position that is clearly indefensible and it is recognized by most of the people here. I'm not going to bother repeating my arguments again...


Me stop spewing bullshit? How about you stop spewing mumbo jumbo legal speak. People who try to impress by using legal speak and can't communicate a point in english -> unemployed

I don't give a shit what the book says, what REALITY says is ambiguous contract + better lawyer wins.

Please don't bother repeating your incorrect arguments again, you will be saving TL valuable bytes.






How is that wrong or difficult to understand?

"A contract is ambiguous when it is uncertain what the intent of the parties was and the contract is capable of more than one reasonable interpretation. Sometimes ambiguous terms can be explained by the admission of parol evidence. Also, Courts abide by the rule that an ambiguous contract is interpreted against the party who drafted it. In other words, the party who did not draft the contract will be given the benefit of the doubt so to speak. " -USLegal


You know what else USLegal says? People are entitled to a fair trial. The person with more money who can hire better lawyers wins.



Korea has more or less the same contract laws as the US and I was only using that as reference. Ironically, you contradict yourself with your 2nd and 3rd sentences a feat that is quite impressive given you have only written three sentences.

Fair trial =/= more money, better lawyer, wins

Not only are you a cynical person who seems to have no respect for our legal systems you also are quite poor at doing research. Give me a single example in which the courts ruled in favor of the author of an ambiguous contract.

Side note, the more money argument doesn't really have that much to do with better lawyers it has more to do with that a protracted legal battle can last years costing upwards of millions of dollars. The party with the smaller bank is more likely to withdraw and settle rather than waste years in court.


Money gives a huge advantage which goes against a fair trial. Simple point, difficult for you to understand.







How does this even relate to the thread again? I'm not going to try to argue with the internet it's pointless really.

Back to the thread. TSL/Lee is in the fault for an ambiguous contract. The Players are fulfilling the contract, but still being punished for agreements that lie outside of the contract.


i suspect that he didnt even use the money properly on the team. spending 5 million won a month for food and additional 1 million won for convenience stores is ridiculous. note that he released that information after fd and trickster left the team too. when fd and trickster demanded the information mr. lee refused to disclose.
ThinJ
Profile Joined April 2011
United States58 Posts
August 04 2011 19:45 GMT
#711
It's sort of amusing that this comes so close following all that righteous indignation over the thing with Puma.
Mostly a lurker.
babylon
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
8765 Posts
August 04 2011 19:46 GMT
#712
On August 05 2011 04:37 farnham wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2011 04:34 babylon wrote:
Hey! We appreciate you guys! Thanks for all your hard work. I'm actually reading through your translation now to get a better look at the issue.

Any idea how the Korean community has been receiving this, by the way?

most of em say that mr. lee is at fault. a few say mr. lee did it right. but after the statement of the startale headcoach came out pretty much everyone agrees that mr. lee is shady as hell

On August 05 2011 04:40 moonmeh wrote:
Well the original article breaking this news has 242 comments despite it being 4:30 am here just to show how much discussion there is. Then there is the ST article which has over 50 comments despite it being posted at 2:00am. Right anger, a lot of disappointment and shock really. Pity on the players too.

Thanks for the replies!

How are Trickster and FruitDealer in particular being received, do you know? I'm kind of worried about them, to be honest. (Not sure if "players" you mentioned = TSL players or FD/Trickster or all of them.)
wolfe
Profile Joined March 2010
United States761 Posts
August 04 2011 19:46 GMT
#713
On August 05 2011 04:44 farnham wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2011 04:42 wolfe wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:36 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:17 Grimsong wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:14 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:10 Grimsong wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:07 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:02 wolfe wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:00 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:49 FairForever wrote:
[quote]

Actually TSL is still legally wrong. Exemption of a clause does not allow for open interpretation. In fact, it would be construed against the drafter of the contract, presumably TSL (contra preferentem).

Again though, stop spewing bullshit, you're trying to defend a position that is clearly indefensible and it is recognized by most of the people here. I'm not going to bother repeating my arguments again...


Me stop spewing bullshit? How about you stop spewing mumbo jumbo legal speak. People who try to impress by using legal speak and can't communicate a point in english -> unemployed

I don't give a shit what the book says, what REALITY says is ambiguous contract + better lawyer wins.

Please don't bother repeating your incorrect arguments again, you will be saving TL valuable bytes.






How is that wrong or difficult to understand?

"A contract is ambiguous when it is uncertain what the intent of the parties was and the contract is capable of more than one reasonable interpretation. Sometimes ambiguous terms can be explained by the admission of parol evidence. Also, Courts abide by the rule that an ambiguous contract is interpreted against the party who drafted it. In other words, the party who did not draft the contract will be given the benefit of the doubt so to speak. " -USLegal


You know what else USLegal says? People are entitled to a fair trial. The person with more money who can hire better lawyers wins.


That's not even remotely true, don't speak on trials and the US legal system on such a blanket statement, when you likely have no idea about what goes on at the court houses.

It's not even about legality at this point. Logically you can't stop paying someone their money due unless they are no longer employed. Both players were still employed under the TSL flag.


You must live under a rock on the moon, or definitely not in the united states, or you definitely don't pay attention to legal cases.


Or I work in a courthouse, talk to attorneys all day, and know for a fact that the higher paid lawyer doesn't always win? Are you serious right now? I'm completely baffled right now and quite frankly I can't put together a statement to express how ignorant the things you are saying in regards to law are.


Some small town courthouse where both parties have such little money it doesn't matter. Cause those are the cases that matter in America. Not surprised someone from a small town is "baffled" at what really goes on in the American legal system and can't wrap their head around it. Stick to smallville where things make sense for you.

On August 05 2011 04:18 wolfe wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:07 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:02 wolfe wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:00 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:49 FairForever wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:45 tl55555 wrote:
On August 05 2011 03:35 FairForever wrote:
[quote]

Read above. I never said that I agree with what FD and Trickster did. But that's not the point. While FD and Trickster may have been morally wrong in not practicing hard to really fully commit to their duties, TSL was legally wrong in refusing to pay them. I'm not sure how it's comparable.

EDIT: I forgot to mention again, you keep saying they violated their contract. Again, stop spewing bullshit out of your mouth.


To clear up your confusion, TSL was not legally wrong if the contract was ambiguous, that's how its comparable.



Actually TSL is still legally wrong. Exemption of a clause does not allow for open interpretation. In fact, it would be construed against the drafter of the contract, presumably TSL (contra preferentem).

Again though, stop spewing bullshit, you're trying to defend a position that is clearly indefensible and it is recognized by most of the people here. I'm not going to bother repeating my arguments again...


Me stop spewing bullshit? How about you stop spewing mumbo jumbo legal speak. People who try to impress by using legal speak and can't communicate a point in english -> unemployed

I don't give a shit what the book says, what REALITY says is ambiguous contract + better lawyer wins.

Please don't bother repeating your incorrect arguments again, you will be saving TL valuable bytes.






How is that wrong or difficult to understand?

"A contract is ambiguous when it is uncertain what the intent of the parties was and the contract is capable of more than one reasonable interpretation. Sometimes ambiguous terms can be explained by the admission of parol evidence. Also, Courts abide by the rule that an ambiguous contract is interpreted against the party who drafted it. In other words, the party who did not draft the contract will be given the benefit of the doubt so to speak. " -USLegal


You know what else USLegal says? People are entitled to a fair trial. The person with more money who can hire better lawyers wins.



Korea has more or less the same contract laws as the US and I was only using that as reference. Ironically, you contradict yourself with your 2nd and 3rd sentences a feat that is quite impressive given you have only written three sentences.

Fair trial =/= more money, better lawyer, wins

Not only are you a cynical person who seems to have no respect for our legal systems you also are quite poor at doing research. Give me a single example in which the courts ruled in favor of the author of an ambiguous contract.

Side note, the more money argument doesn't really have that much to do with better lawyers it has more to do with that a protracted legal battle can last years costing upwards of millions of dollars. The party with the smaller bank is more likely to withdraw and settle rather than waste years in court.


Money gives a huge advantage which goes against a fair trial. Simple point, difficult for you to understand.







How does this even relate to the thread again? I'm not going to try to argue with the internet it's pointless really.

Back to the thread. TSL/Lee is in the fault for an ambiguous contract. The Players are fulfilling the contract, but still being punished for agreements that lie outside of the contract.


i suspect that he didnt even use the money properly on the team. spending 5 million won a month for food and additional 1 million won for convenience stores is ridiculous. note that he released that information after fd and trickster left the team too. when fd and trickster demanded the information mr. lee refused to disclose.


Yeah its the numbers that bother me. A lot of the other stuff I can ignore because its biased opinions, but it's hard to lie about numbers or facts like non-disclosure or lying about sponsors.
Swift as the wind, felt before noticed.
farnham
Profile Joined January 2011
1378 Posts
August 04 2011 19:47 GMT
#714
On August 05 2011 04:42 moonmeh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2011 04:40 Masil wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:33 moonmeh wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:28 Masil wrote:
On August 05 2011 04:20 Sein wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
Translation of the Startale manager's response:

Hello,

This is Startale's manager, Won Jong-Wook.
First of all, I would like to apologize for having to greet you all with this uncomfortable situation and I would like to explain everything from the perspective of a team manager,

First of all, it is true that Fruitdealer and Trickster's lack of professional attitude was wrong, and both players are admitting and regretting that fact that they were overly lazy.

However, Fruitdealer and Trickster's free practice schedule/lifestyle was something that was agreed upon with TSL's manager Mr. Lee at TSL's creation, and it is petty to bring this up as a problem after all this time. If the two players' behavior really was that problematic, then the manager shares a part of the blame for not getting them under control over the past year. Otherwise, the promise of free practice schedule would only have been a lie to sign these two players.

Next, I will talk about the issue of TSL not giving out salaries to their players.
TSL is the only team that was sponsored by multiple companies from the beginning. To be honest, compare to other teams that are run on money out of the managers' own pockets, TSL's manager Mr. Lee is financially very well off. FD and T received their salaries for only April and May, but a part of FD's May salary, about 500,000 WON ($500) was delayed to June after the manager cited TSL's financial difficulties. TSL have received their appropriate sponsor money including FD and T's wages since March, so I don't understand why Lee lied about not receiving their sponsor money. Lee has said that their sponsor money was reduced, but this is only since July, so it is irrelevant to FD and T's circumstances.

Can you imagine how much FD and T blamed their sponsors because of Lee's lies? There should be no blame placed on those several companies including TIMU that have sponsored TSL from the early days of SC2. It would have been a strange situation in which those companies are badmouthed by the very players they sponsor. Can you imagine the sense of betrayal FD and T must have felt when there is no other conclusion than that the manager they have trusted has been pocketing the sponsor money for himself? When FD and T found out that the sponsor money has been coming in, they approached Lee about it, but Lee continued to lie and made up an excuse that the sponsor money came in very late and was reduced. I was disappointed to observe how this situation was folding out. I don't understand how TSL is in trouble financially when their sponsor money was increased this year, which led them to giving their players salaries in the first place. At the time [of FD and T's departure?] TSL was one of the smallest teams and their maid only came by briefly 3 times a week to make their food [presumably talking about how TSL's expenditure was probably low].

I am still trying to understand how they don't have enough money to run their team. Manager Lee said that they give out 1,000,000 WON ($1000) to their players as snack money each month, and that money is enough to pay for their monthly utility fee and car maintenance. He also claimed their their food expenses are over 5,000,000 WON ($5000) each month, but our team only spends 2,000,000 - 2,500,000 WON for 15 player, and that's including feeding them weekly beef/chicken/fish, so I don't understand why TSL needs that much money for only 8-9 players. I would like to ask TSL's manager if he thinks spending that much on food is wise, and you would have to question if he has the right qualities as a manager. I would like to ask him if thinks withholding player salaries to run his team is the correct decision.

The sponsor money is a very important part of running a team. [Blah, blah, blah, then he further talks about the importance of money in life. Not gonna bother to translate all that] There is an old saying that a lie will lead to another lie. I sincerely hope that TSL's manager will become more honest in the future.

The following section is summarizing F and TD's point of view:

We left oGs when they were becoming more organized as a team, because we preferred a flexible practice scheduling. There are various reasons for us joining up with manager Lee and forming TSL.

At first, we started TSL with our relationship with Manager Lee being that of business partners rather than a manager and a player. He promised us free practice schedule, compensation for the starcraft 2 guide [Not sure what this is about], and salaries. At first, Lee was someone in charge of the sponsors, but he eventually became more of a coach. However, he did not keep his promises with us.

Problems with how Lee was running TSL

1. Lack of involvement
There was a time when Lee would visit the teamhouse 1-2 times during 2 months. No matter how busy he was with his sponsors and running his PC Cafe, he should always put his team as his No.1 priority. I don't understand why we had to check our schedule that Lee never told us about on our own. There were occasions when Lee couldn't be contacted, so the outsiders contacted Trickster instead. This was stressful and we asked the manager to improve this, but nothing was done.

2. Withholding salaries
[This part basically says the same thing ST's manager said above about Lee withholding FD and T's salaries and lying to them about how the sponsor money wasn't coming in]

3. Imagerights
Lee did not take down various ads containing our images and when we asked him for a fee for continuing to use our image, he refused. These ads are still on and I hope they are taken care of ASAP.

4. Trust
FD never informed the team that he was leaving. Lee assumed after his phonecall with T that FD was also leaving and it is unbelievable from FD's perspective. He told us that the team's main sponsor is looking to depart during the team meetings and I remember that we (FD and T) even encouraged the other team members to work harder because the income from prize money is a better way to earn money than through salaries.

We are exhausted physically and mentally from Manager Lee's continuous lies. If what he said about the team's financial circumstances was true, then we would've waited for our salaries. After all, we had been waiting since last August, so there is no reason we can't wait more. If it really was becoming difficult to run the team, he should have just told us the truth and we would have willingly not received our salaries.

From what we understand, our sponsor money has increased since March, but nothing in our food menu has changed, so we don't see how the team was short on money.

[The next two sentences are something about their sponsored equipments, but I don't really understand it, so I'll let someone else do it] (그리고 후원사가 선수들에게 지급한 부품중 교체 이후 반납하지 않는 물품을 우리에게는 반납해야 한다며 부품을 가져갔다.
(확인 결과 후원사에 반납하지 않았다)

In any case, Lee is running a team as its manager as well as a PC cafe. Things have gotten better for him since TSL's creation. However, the same cannot be said for us players who have much spent time and passion. We also need to do our military duty soon. It is frustrating to think that only us players have been taking losses from this. I know that his PC cafe has greatly profited from using TSL's name.

It's true that each team should ultimately aim for profit, but there should be an initial investment. That investment includes money, time, and passion, but Manager Lee only follows money.

We admit that we partially share the blame in this incident. We met up with our personal friends and others more than we did with our teammates and there were drinking occasions. Manager Lee probably didn't like us in that aspect.

Some will say that we were unprofessional in our conduct, but we don't agree with that. We are old enough to take responsibilities for ourselves and we put in efforts that we wouldn't be ashamed of. The current situation is regrettable and I don't know how it got to here. I would just like to tell the truth and hope that there are no more unfortunate victims like us from TSL or other teams.

Finally, we would like to apologize for this incident and will try to become better gamers.


You're fast! I'll stop translating. :D


T.T I finished translating it and posted and found out Sein did it. The emptiness of my work... it burrrns


It applies to me, I guess. I knew someone might work on it but well, yeah.

But who knows, maybe your translation is more accurate then his or mine (just for ST manager part). I will read them all. :D

Anyway, it appears that Mr.Lee has a lot of problem with the team management.
I pity the players in TSL, especially Clide..


There is just something that makes you feel really good about translating stuf so that other people can read it. I'm finding it to be a very good experience. Thanks for reading them all, makes me feel much better that my work isn't in vain.

Didn't Killer and Clide give a lot of their money for the team? It's really is tragic.


i understand that mr. lee also sold the whole concept of tsl to be some kind of joint venture in which the players and the coach would all benefit from by working together
Yang Wenli
Profile Joined November 2010
United States2283 Posts
August 04 2011 19:47 GMT
#715
After reading responses from TSL and ST, is do written over verbal contracts because it's going to be a he said/she said argument, and we get a mess like this. The only thing known to be true is FD and Tester were lazy and weren't putting their best effort. Based on verbal agreement and you can argue that FD and Tester were owed money after they left because they were salaried and due to sponsorship agreement.

Anything else about free time, Tester managing the team as an assistant, Coach Lee not showing up is subjective based on testimonial. I'm however quite surprised that there should have been a conflict of interest with StarTale president presiding over the meeting. It could have affected the overall decision and might have properly resolve the issue instead of TSL leaving the SC2 con.
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
August 04 2011 19:48 GMT
#716
On August 05 2011 04:30 moonmeh wrote:
Fuck I was translating for so long and find out someone did it before me FUCKITTY FUCK FUCK aw well here's the link

UGGGHH SO FRUSTRATED, what did I spend my time doing? HWAUIDhuaiw Missed it by 8 posts.... Sorry mods, just venting frustration here. So this is what it feels like....

If it helps console you, I prefer this translation
wolfe
Profile Joined March 2010
United States761 Posts
August 04 2011 19:48 GMT
#717
Sidenote question.

If FD and SKS are/were notoriously lazy why did ST pick them up. Have they decided to reform or something? If so, I'm happy for them my roommate cries himself to sleep after watching FD's games.
Swift as the wind, felt before noticed.
Invoker
Profile Joined October 2010
Belgium686 Posts
August 04 2011 19:49 GMT
#718
This also explains the puma matter.
There is no fate, but what we make.
spybreak
Profile Joined October 2010
United States684 Posts
August 04 2011 19:50 GMT
#719
On August 05 2011 04:20 Sein wrote:
Translation of the Startale manager's response:

Hello,

This is Startale's manager, Won Jong-Wook.
First of all, I would like to apologize for having to greet you all with this uncomfortable situation and I would like to explain everything from the perspective of a team manager,

First of all, it is true that Fruitdealer and Trickster's lack of professional attitude was wrong, and both players are admitting and regretting that fact that they were overly lazy.

However, Fruitdealer and Trickster's free practice schedule/lifestyle was something that was agreed upon with TSL's manager Mr. Lee at TSL's creation, and it is petty to bring this up as a problem after all this time. If the two players' behavior really was that problematic, then the manager shares a part of the blame for not getting them under control over the past year. Otherwise, the promise of free practice schedule would only have been a lie to sign these two players.

Next, I will talk about the issue of TSL not giving out salaries to their players.
TSL is the only team that was sponsored by multiple companies from the beginning. To be honest, compare to other teams that are run on money out of the managers' own pockets, TSL's manager Mr. Lee is financially very well off. FD and T received their salaries for only April and May, but a part of FD's May salary, about 500,000 WON ($500) was delayed to June after the manager cited TSL's financial difficulties. TSL have received their appropriate sponsor money including FD and T's wages since March, so I don't understand why Lee lied about not receiving their sponsor money. Lee has said that their sponsor money was reduced, but this is only since July, so it is irrelevant to FD and T's circumstances.

Can you imagine how much FD and T blamed their sponsors because of Lee's lies? There should be no blame placed on those several companies including TIMU that have sponsored TSL from the early days of SC2. It would have been a strange situation in which those companies are badmouthed by the very players they sponsor. Can you imagine the sense of betrayal FD and T must have felt when there is no other conclusion than that the manager they have trusted has been pocketing the sponsor money for himself? When FD and T found out that the sponsor money has been coming in, they approached Lee about it, but Lee continued to lie and made up an excuse that the sponsor money came in very late and was reduced. I was disappointed to observe how this situation was folding out. I don't understand how TSL is in trouble financially when their sponsor money was increased this year, which led them to giving their players salaries in the first place. At the time [of FD and T's departure?] TSL was one of the smallest teams and their maid only came by briefly 3 times a week to make their food [presumably talking about how TSL's expenditure was probably low].

I am still trying to understand how they don't have enough money to run their team. Manager Lee said that they give out 1,000,000 WON ($1000) to their players as snack money each month, and that money is enough to pay for their monthly utility fee and car maintenance. He also claimed their their food expenses are over 5,000,000 WON ($5000) each month, but our team only spends 2,000,000 - 2,500,000 WON for 15 player, and that's including feeding them weekly beef/chicken/fish, so I don't understand why TSL needs that much money for only 8-9 players. I would like to ask TSL's manager if he thinks spending that much on food is wise, and you would have to question if he has the right qualities as a manager. I would like to ask him if thinks withholding player salaries to run his team is the correct decision.

The sponsor money is a very important part of running a team. [Blah, blah, blah, then he further talks about the importance of money in life. Not gonna bother to translate all that] There is an old saying that a lie will lead to another lie. I sincerely hope that TSL's manager will become more honest in the future.

The following section is summarizing F and TD's point of view:

We left oGs when they were becoming more organized as a team, because we preferred a flexible practice scheduling. There are various reasons for us joining up with manager Lee and forming TSL.

At first, we started TSL with our relationship with Manager Lee being that of business partners rather than a manager and a player. He promised us free practice schedule, compensation for the starcraft 2 guide [Not sure what this is about], and salaries. At first, Lee was someone in charge of the sponsors, but he eventually became more of a coach. However, he did not keep his promises with us.

Problems with how Lee was running TSL

1. Lack of involvement
There was a time when Lee would visit the teamhouse 1-2 times during 2 months. No matter how busy he was with his sponsors and running his PC Cafe, he should always put his team as his No.1 priority. I don't understand why we had to check our schedule that Lee never told us about on our own. There were occasions when Lee couldn't be contacted, so the outsiders contacted Trickster instead. This was stressful and we asked the manager to improve this, but nothing was done.

2. Withholding salaries
[This part basically says the same thing ST's manager said above about Lee withholding FD and T's salaries and lying to them about how the sponsor money wasn't coming in]

3. Imagerights
Lee did not take down various ads containing our images and when we asked him for a fee for continuing to use our image, he refused. These ads are still on and I hope they are taken care of ASAP.

4. Trust
FD never informed the team that he was leaving. Lee assumed after his phonecall with T that FD was also leaving and it is unbelievable from FD's perspective. He told us that the team's main sponsor is looking to depart during the team meetings and I remember that we (FD and T) even encouraged the other team members to work harder because the income from prize money is a better way to earn money than through salaries.

We are exhausted physically and mentally from Manager Lee's continuous lies. If what he said about the team's financial circumstances was true, then we would've waited for our salaries. After all, we had been waiting since last August, so there is no reason we can't wait more. If it really was becoming difficult to run the team, he should have just told us the truth and we would have willingly not received our salaries.

From what we understand, our sponsor money has increased since March, but nothing in our food menu has changed, so we don't see how the team was short on money.

[The next two sentences are something about their sponsored equipments, but I don't really understand it, so I'll let someone else do it] (그리고 후원사가 선수들에게 지급한 부품중 교체 이후 반납하지 않는 물품을 우리에게는 반납해야 한다며 부품을 가져갔다.
(확인 결과 후원사에 반납하지 않았다)

In any case, Lee is running a team as its manager as well as a PC cafe. Things have gotten better for him since TSL's creation. However, the same cannot be said for us players who have much spent time and passion. We also need to do our military duty soon. It is frustrating to think that only us players have been taking losses from this. I know that his PC cafe has greatly profited from using TSL's name.

It's true that each team should ultimately aim for profit, but there should be an initial investment. That investment includes money, time, and passion, but Manager Lee only follows money.

We admit that we partially share the blame in this incident. We met up with our personal friends and others more than we did with our teammates and there were drinking occasions. Manager Lee probably didn't like us in that aspect.

Some will say that we were unprofessional in our conduct, but we don't agree with that. We are old enough to take responsibilities for ourselves and we put in efforts that we wouldn't be ashamed of. The current situation is regrettable and I don't know how it got to here. I would just like to tell the truth and hope that there are no more unfortunate victims like us from TSL or other teams.

Finally, we would like to apologize for this incident and will try to become better gamers.


Thanks for the translation
babylon
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
8765 Posts
August 04 2011 19:50 GMT
#720
On August 05 2011 04:48 wolfe wrote:
Sidenote question.

If FD and SKS are/were notoriously lazy why did ST pick them up. Have they decided to reform or something? If so, I'm happy for them my roommate cries himself to sleep after watching FD's games.

LOL, I do the same. Maybe I'm your roommate.
Prev 1 34 35 36 37 38 57 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Kung Fu Cup
11:00
#14
IntoTheiNu 1631
RotterdaM751
TKL 325
Ryung 185
SteadfastSC176
IndyStarCraft 174
Rex138
CosmosSc2 52
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Serral 2200
RotterdaM 751
Lowko413
TKL 325
Ryung 185
SteadfastSC 176
IndyStarCraft 174
Rex 138
CosmosSc2 52
RushiSC 36
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 45743
Calm 4683
Jaedong 2570
Shuttle 1442
Mini 926
Soma 609
EffOrt 584
actioN 419
BeSt 309
Larva 244
[ Show more ]
Snow 241
Stork 221
ggaemo 193
Soulkey 188
Rush 145
Mong 118
Dewaltoss 113
hero 112
Hyun 74
sorry 55
Free 42
Movie 37
Shine 31
ToSsGirL 29
Sharp 24
Bale 19
scan(afreeca) 19
Barracks 19
Rock 19
HiyA 16
Yoon 16
zelot 13
Sacsri 11
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
Purpose 8
Terrorterran 7
Dota 2
Gorgc10366
qojqva950
Dendi928
XaKoH 529
LuMiX2
Counter-Strike
x6flipin610
byalli520
edward76
Other Games
hiko881
B2W.Neo520
DeMusliM290
Hui .200
Mew2King93
FrodaN0
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick30726
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 8
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 17
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis3065
• TFBlade854
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
17h 55m
CrankTV Team League
19h 55m
OSC
1d 1h
Replay Cast
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 17h
CrankTV Team League
1d 19h
OSC
1d 21h
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Serral vs Bunny
ByuN vs GgMaChine
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Snow vs Jaedong
YSC vs hero
RSL Revival
3 days
Solar vs Rogue
Maru vs NightMare
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
GSL
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 21: Qualifier 2
HSC XXIX
Eternal Conflict S2 E1

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
YSL S3
CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
SCTL 2026 Spring
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W2
ASL Season 22: Wild Card Qualifier
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Eternal Conflict S2 E3
Eternal Conflict S2 E2
Heroes Pulsing #3
Logitech G Connect 2026
StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.