EPTNASL Event Discussion Thread - Page 8
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
HeIios
Sweden2523 Posts
| ||
|
johnnyspazz
Taiwan1470 Posts
On July 09 2011 16:32 Bengui wrote: So you're telling us there was never one occasion in the history of Starcraft where a player who was down 1-2 after the third game of a Bo5 came back to win 3-2 ? It's just basic logic : the more games you play, the less chances the inferior player has of creating an upset. i understand this, but my argument is more like this: a progamer will never lose a bo3 and then say, "if this was a bo5, i would've definitely won." it's stupid to think that players who got eliminated in a bo3 deserve a bo5 just because they lost in a disappointing 0-2 manner. a bo3 in no way, shape or form is unfair to either competitor. | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
| ||
|
SovSov
United States755 Posts
| ||
|
FinBenton
Finland870 Posts
| ||
|
Lorizean
Germany1330 Posts
On July 09 2011 18:54 Jibba wrote: [...] When you're a business, it being your first time is not a valid excuse. [...] This I find very important to note. As I said before, nobody actually expects a perfect product, but this isn't just not perfect, there are a large number of amateur-ish problems. There was enough time during the 10 weeks of NASL to hire somebody who knows what they're doing. You are charging the same/more than all the other (more professional) events, yet you do not deliver similarly. The only reason why people are defending this is that eSports as a business model is relatively young (at least outside of Korea), yet I don't think it's the right attitude to allow these problems to happen just because "well, it's the first time". | ||
|
Lava
Germany32 Posts
| ||
|
KillAudio
1364 Posts
| ||
|
Hardigan
Switzerland1297 Posts
| ||
|
petu
Finland81 Posts
On July 09 2011 19:12 FinBenton wrote: So I have 25 dollar nasl pass, do I have to pay for the vods on this final? It's 10$ for this weekend even if the nasl page says different. | ||
|
Moai
Italy47 Posts
| ||
|
Skydancer
Italy249 Posts
See all game 1 and 2 on the same map is so boring. Let the loser pick the map and random select the first map or choose the first map in some way for every match. | ||
|
Chaosvuistje
Netherlands2581 Posts
On July 09 2011 20:37 Skydancer wrote: One of the big fault imo that's not yet posted is the map selection. See all game 1 and 2 on the same map is so boring. Let the loser pick the map and random select the first map or choose the first map in some way for every match. I have to agree with this guy. Xelnaga, then cross fire got a little boring for all the matches in my humble opinion. | ||
|
homer001
493 Posts
every match was xelnaga caverns, crossfire and shattered | ||
|
AmericanUmlaut
Germany2587 Posts
On July 09 2011 20:27 petu wrote: It's 10$ for this weekend even if the nasl page says different. Wait, what? I'm pretty sure this isn't true. The $25 pass is for the entire season, there's no way they're charging extra to get access to the finals. There isn't even such a subscription option on the NASL site. Edit to add: I can confirm that the season pass gives you access to the VODs. I'm watching them right now. | ||
|
pieman819
Australia457 Posts
On July 09 2011 19:33 Lorizean wrote: This I find very important to note. As I said before, nobody actually expects a perfect product, but this isn't just not perfect, there are a large number of amateur-ish problems. There was enough time during the 10 weeks of NASL to hire somebody who knows what they're doing. You are charging the same/more than all the other (more professional) events, yet you do not deliver similarly. The only reason why people are defending this is that eSports as a business model is relatively young (at least outside of Korea), yet I don't think it's the right attitude to allow these problems to happen just because "well, it's the first time". great post, I couldn't agree more there was slow progress made throughout the regular season but even by the end there was still a noticeable lack of polish. I hope they give their whole production gets a good look at in the offseason to work on improving the quality of their product. | ||
|
Nuttyguy
United Kingdom1526 Posts
Protip : get one dude to test the stream as an audience before going live, and we would of have known the sound was imba | ||
|
andytb
United Kingdom180 Posts
| ||
|
Phaded
Australia579 Posts
On July 09 2011 20:58 andytb wrote: Could we have an option in the poll for GSL groups in the Ro16? It's more exciting because every game matters and less time consuming than a full round robin! It also means there's never going to be a need for tiebreakers. GSL groups only appears to take less time because GSL has 4 booths, so 2 players are always ready to go. It wouldn't work with 2 booths, it would take forever to play all the games with all the switching in and out | ||
|
Condor Hero
United States2931 Posts
| ||
| ||
