| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
scsnow
Slovenia515 Posts
i believe a map pool and veto system for the first map and afterwards loser picks next map is a good system. bo5 up to semifinal and bo7 from that point onwards. and make that double elimination. not only in order to make it a more fair system, but also to provide more games. white-ra vs boxer anyone? | ||
|
GenesisX
Canada4267 Posts
| ||
|
RaiKageRyu
Canada4773 Posts
The main prob is def audio. Starting on time would be nice to rectify. | ||
|
Rabbitmaster
1357 Posts
This could also just be solved with a simple limiter on the audio levels. The camera i use at work even have this sort of function in the built-in sound recorder (~$10000 Camera). I dont think it unreasonable to have that function somewhere in all that sound equipment they showed pictures of tbh... Also, after 8+ weeks of finding the best, most qualified players. It would be nice to have Bo5 even from Ro16 imo. This is, imo, what made TSL3 so epic. | ||
|
tsularesque
Canada226 Posts
Yeah, it takes some getting used to when you're doing it. But then it doesn't look like the player just happens to stand there. Think of when Artosis interviewed people with Jon translating. | ||
|
Adzigari
United States44 Posts
Let's stick with the constructive deal - Definitely should be BO5 instead of BO3 - The sound issues were mostly fixed by the end, but it was all fluctuating for some reason - The intro videos were cool, but a little too long. - Hopefully things will be streamlined for next time so there isn't ~30 minutes between matches (again, like showing the intro videos while the players setup their booth, and having 5 minute breaks in between instead of 10+) - The booths could be a little bigger and look better (they don't look terrible by any means) - Not sure what was up with the cameras, but they were really shaky - Random shots of the crowd would be cool Despite all of the problems, the enthusiasm everyone had more than made up for it. Even watching it on the stream I felt really engaged, like I was there (even more than MLG). The storytelling was done really well, and I think it would only get better as time goes on. | ||
|
Marl
United States694 Posts
-Needs shorter hype videos -Needs consistent audio -Needs casters not named Gretorp -Needs day9 to no scream into the mic -Needs to not average less than 2 games per hour | ||
|
Karakaxe
Sweden585 Posts
| ||
|
phiinix
United States1169 Posts
I only caught a few games, but it definitely felt like the wait time in between was way too long | ||
|
dagene
United States75 Posts
also they have these long breaks between series but players don't start up set up until after the lights dim and then we gotta wait even longer while the casters try to entertain. why can''t they get the setup going during the breaks?? | ||
|
Voltus
Australia30 Posts
Maybe the event was a little bit Disorganised but most big events start out this way. I'm sure you will see improvement in the next season. My Complaint, apart from the Obvious teething Bugs, was that people complained too much in the chat. Poor NASL workers were trying top do their best and the chat was giving hell. the chat was off putting and distracting from the games. even when the games were on the chat complained on and on and on. | ||
|
DeckOneBell
United States526 Posts
Number 1 seed vs. winner of the open bracket was a terrible idea, because a Korean who didn't get into league play won the open bracket. I'd even go as far as to say it's very much a possibility he's in the top 3 or 4 in terms of skill here. Bad matchup. Dunno an easy solution for this. Today: Gretorp and InControl aren't bad casters, buuut... Day9, Tasteless and Artosis are PHENOMENAL casters. There's a reason every major event tries to get them to cast for them. When it's something like MC vs. BoxeR... we need to have Day9, Tasteless and Artosis, or some permutation of the three casting. Hopefully this won't be an issue further in the tournament. I'm honestly a little sad that the GSTL threads barely break 150 pages, while NASL goes past 1000. The GSTL games are fairly well-casted, feature a great team format, and have DRG being awesome. With the standard TSL, IGN PL and MLG Columbus set, it's gonna take a lot more than this, NASL. | ||
|
FallDownMarigold
United States3710 Posts
On July 09 2011 17:00 Voltus wrote: Maybe the event was a little bit Disorganised but most big events start out this way. I'm sure you will see improvement in the next season. My Complaint, apart from the Obvious teething Bugs, was that people complained too much in the chat. Poor NASL workers were trying top do their best and the chat was giving hell. the chat was off putting and distracting from the games. even when the games were on the chat complained on and on and on. There are only a few people in the chat compared to the multiple thousands watching the game. Even less actually chat within the chat. To address your complaint, simply ignore the chat. Stream chatters are pretty much entirely trolls anyway. Just close it, or better yet, don't open it to begin with. If you watch via TL and not on the JTV page it does not auto open. | ||
|
StutteR
United States1903 Posts
On July 09 2011 16:52 Teogamer wrote: -Needs group play -Needs shorter hype videos -Needs consistent audio -Needs casters not named Gretorp -Needs day9 to no scream into the mic -Needs to not average less than 2 games per hour They had months of group play and play-offs... edit: My main criticism is also only having one best of 3 every hour. Maybe use the 4 booth system that GSL has? | ||
|
Ultimate Weapon
United States132 Posts
(Ro8 onward would ideally be Ro5 and finals would be Ro7)
Poll: For future reference, what format should they use for Ro16? 4 Groups (4 each ranked by seed) Bo3 round robin (362) Bo3/Bo5 Double Elimination (212) Bo5 Single Elimination (56) Bo3 Single Elimination (27) 657 total votes Your vote: For future reference, what format should they use for Ro16? (Vote): Bo3 Single Elimination | ||
|
Dark Stalker
102 Posts
| ||
|
Darkybald
46 Posts
| ||
|
Dark Stalker
102 Posts
On July 09 2011 17:17 Darkybald wrote: #1 Follow Sundance's example and fucking admit that you screwed up big time and offer the people their money back or give them free passes for next season. Retweeting the few positiv tweets of how you are improving and "this is just ok for your first try", is just pathetic. This. I'm definitely not going to be an idiot next season and purchase the tickets ASAP... I'll definitely wait and see what the feedback is next time. Nobody would have expected, with the amount of hype InControl had put in, how incredibly shit the quality of this tournament was going to be. My biggest complaint has always been waiting two whole fucking days after the rebroadcasts before VODs were put up whereas in the GSL you get them literally within the hour. | ||
|
AngryFarmer
United States560 Posts
On July 09 2011 17:16 Dark Stalker wrote: For those arguing for a BO5... I disagree. The only thing it would have done was extent the beatings that the foreigners received by about five minutes (considering how quickly their asses were kicked in most of the games), or alternatively allowed Alicia to come back. BO3 matches were the quickest way to weed out the crappy foreign players so the real games can start tomorrow when its Koreans versus Koreans. Given that we had three hour long delays fucked if I was going to wait for BO5 matches - I had my whole Saturday free expecting NASL to only take up a few hours in the morning but ended up waiting all day for Sen's game. I feel the same way. A BO5 or double elimination won't change the results that much. The other thing is if they did any more than BO3s the tournament would last for over 12 hours. I also mainly saw BO3 complaints only when the fan favorite gets knocked out so there is probably a degree of bias when people are asking for BO5s or double elimination. | ||
|
kalany
United States149 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
The PondCast
WardiTV Team League
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
RSL Revival
WardiTV Team League
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Patches Events
BSL
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
