EPTTips you would give to help improve the NASL - Page 26
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Cofo
United States1388 Posts
| ||
|
leviathan400
United Kingdom393 Posts
| ||
|
DrBoo
Canada1177 Posts
| ||
|
gogogadgetflow
United States2583 Posts
| ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
By casting live and broadcasting delayed, you are gaining all of the disadvantages of a live cast with none of the advantages. By broadcasting delayed, you are gaining a slight advantage in production time, and nothing else. Beyond that, the EG Master's production was equal to, if not better than this, and it was done live. This July/White_ra preview is the exact problem. It's hilarious, but there are other problems to come. | ||
|
Yamulo
United States2096 Posts
| ||
|
BeMannerDuPenner
Germany5638 Posts
dont get me wrong, i really like how they discuss players,matchup etc. i just think its very badly timed. 30 minutes of just talk get boring esp when you know most of the stuff already. it would be way better if it would be just before the match the talk is about. when the match they talk about happens 2 1/2 hours later you forget most oif it anyways and later the matches start so fast without any brake. guess its also related to their recording style but imo it would be much better if they could work that out. | ||
|
Phaded
Australia579 Posts
On April 14 2011 11:30 Jibba wrote: I'm going to be blunt, and hopefully someone at NASL reads this and considers it. By casting live and broadcasting delayed, you are gaining all of the disadvantages of a live cast with none of the advantages. By broadcasting delayed, you are gaining a slight advantage in production time, and nothing else. Beyond that, the EG Master's production was equal to, if not better than this, and it was done live. This July/White_ra preview is the exact problem. It's hilarious, but there are other problems to come. Sure they do, they gain scheduling advantages (within foreseeable reason). They are able the schedule 5 x 1-1.5 hour games over a 24 hour period to accommodate for differing schedules of players. The individual games may not be contiguous, but by broadcasting delayed they are able to combine them into one broadcast. | ||
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
| ||
|
Fede
Uruguay114 Posts
| ||
|
Panzamelano
Colombia248 Posts
and as everyone have said please put the ingame music on to have a better atmosphere. | ||
|
Everhate
United States640 Posts
Excited states are one of the more difficult things to control, just something he could work on to improve as a caster, he does have a lot of potential, not deserving of all the hate i've been seeing (It's a tougher job than most people seem to believe). Keep working to improve things and I look forward to seeing the amazing things that can come out of this format. | ||
|
coolpants
United Kingdom29 Posts
| ||
|
FatkiddsLag
United States413 Posts
| ||
|
HEROwithNOlegacy
United States850 Posts
| ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On April 14 2011 11:37 Phaded wrote: Sure they do, they gain scheduling advantages (within foreseeable reason). They are able the schedule 5 x 1-1.5 hour games over a 24 hour period to accommodate for differing schedules of players. The individual games may not be contiguous, but by broadcasting delayed they are able to combine them into one broadcast. Then cast replays, don't cast live. Casting replays provides more flexibility to the players, and allows them to settle controversies like lag/disconnects ahead of time. I agree that the things you mentioned are good, but they're still there with replay casting, and they wouldn't have the disadvantages of the live cast. | ||
|
euroboy
Sweden536 Posts
- Casters are kinda overexposed. - Backdrop isnt a backdrop but a wall with visible joints and blisters and shadows from casters are visible. ^^ - Interviews are made with a phonecamera/webcam? Bad framing and bad mic-levels. And where are their supposed big sponsors? | ||
|
Geniuszerg
Canada454 Posts
| ||
|
IShowUMagic
United States104 Posts
| ||
|
HEROwithNOlegacy
United States850 Posts
On April 14 2011 11:30 Jibba wrote: If you watch State of the Game you will understand why streaming cannot be live for online events, people who you would never think to cheat, cheat because of the temptation and the money. (This was said by liquid Tyler and agreed on by everyone on SotG) Casting the games live allows them to get it back to us as soon as possible, waiting to cast off replays would be much worse in my opinion.I'm going to be blunt, and hopefully someone at NASL reads this and considers it. By casting live and broadcasting delayed, you are gaining all of the disadvantages of a live cast with none of the advantages. By broadcasting delayed, you are gaining a slight advantage in production time, and nothing else. Beyond that, the EG Master's production was equal to, if not better than this, and it was done live. This July/White_ra preview is the exact problem. It's hilarious, but there are other problems to come. | ||
| ||
