I understand this short clip as a hard QQ against SC2, and i totally agree. Here comes the new gamer generation guys!!!
![[image loading]](http://www.growingyourbaby.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/3207291_s-300x200.jpg)
Starcraft 3, soon in all your schools!
Forum Index > SC2 General |
parn
France296 Posts
I understand this short clip as a hard QQ against SC2, and i totally agree. Here comes the new gamer generation guys!!! ![]() Starcraft 3, soon in all your schools! | ||
iSTime
1579 Posts
On March 08 2011 19:03 TheBlueMeaner wrote: People can keep holding on to the naive idea that practice will make you a pro, there is a reason why there are a few select players at the pro level out of the millions of players that comprise the player base... Just have fun, stop the competitive crap specially if you are diamond or below, just have fun and if you make it to masters league having fun so be it... What makes you think that the difference is anything other than practice and dedication? Obviously some level of mental and physical ability is required, but anyone intelligent enough to get into college and not physically disabled in some way had plenty of "natural aptitude" or whatever else you want to call it. | ||
Eeryck
United States184 Posts
On March 08 2011 19:30 Axeinst wrote: Show nested quote + On March 08 2011 19:03 TheBlueMeaner wrote: People can keep holding on to the naive idea that practice will make you a pro, there is a reason why there are a few select players at the pro level out of the millions of players that comprise the player base... Just have fun, stop the competitive crap specially if you are diamond or below, just have fun and if you make it to masters league having fun so be it... Argh people like this attitude so make me mad. I am honest, it is fucking stupid to think like that because there is absolutely no reasoning or evidence. Your though process goes like this: There is few people at the top -> not everybody cannot become top because there is only few people at the top. The fact is, that to become top of starcraft you need only normal intelligence and body with no disabilities. There is no known natural born factors that makes those gsl-players apart from others. If you are going to claim that in order to become gsl material you need to have some special and natural things that others dont have, you need to have evidence for that. In basketball, there is clear evidence of those kind of factors, like tallness. In fact there are exceptions to every rule. Look at Spud Webb and Muggsy Bogues amongst others. In support of your point: People who claim genetics are a factor in success lack the imagination, work effort and ingenuity to break through their own barriers. Even the psudo-science of fast and slow twitch muscles is bogus. They have never tracked and tested anyone from birth to determine if their muscle composition is a function of genetics or the obscenely long hours they have spent training. They have only tested after the people have become top caliber athletes. On the other hand: Becoming obscenely good at something does come at a cost. Since you will be spending the vast majority of your time on one thing you will tend towards uber-specialized and will most likely be lacking in other areas. | ||
SugarBear
United States842 Posts
| ||
Candles
United Kingdom103 Posts
That's insane. Look at sports players, musicians, writers. The successful ones are the ones that practice the most. The beauty of E Sports is that you can never get told you have the wrong body type, or you're too fat or injury prone. Anyone can be a great Professional Gamer if they put the time in and there is something great about that. ![]() Obviously when you get very near the top there is a creative part and some natural aptitude for thinking differently in certain situations, but we're talking right at the top (Like the top 20). A player with amazing mechanics will beat a naturally creatively gifted player with average mechanics everytime. | ||
derpzzz
20 Posts
| ||
BetterFasterStronger
United States604 Posts
| ||
Candles
United Kingdom103 Posts
On March 08 2011 23:49 derpzzz wrote: he has the point with the shitty games producers are feeding us nowadays I'd personally argue that we're in a golden age of games. I adore the following franchises: - Mass Effect - Assassin's Creed - Halo - Gears of War - Dead Space I'd wager most people here are RTS players though (obviously) and in a world where Strategy games are also been pushed forwards in interesting new dynamics. Strategy games had evolved so much that people were initially turned off by the idea that Starcraft relied on resource collection. People are trying new things and generally getting good critical and fan based response: - Homeworld - Dawn of War anyone? I think it's kind of ridiculous to complain about games being too focused on the story as well. The story and canon of the games I play is a huge part of the appeal. I read massive amounts of classic Sci-Fi and I can tell you that the world created by Epic for Mass Effect is as brilliant as any created by Clarke, Dick or Asimov. If you don't want the canon, story or graphics then you may as well go and play Chess or a similar game (which has had much more time to develop strategy) and is surely a much more pure experience. | ||
dudeman001
United States2412 Posts
| ||
Kleinmuuhg
Vanuatu4091 Posts
| ||
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
| ||
optical630
United Kingdom768 Posts
| ||
decaf
Austria1797 Posts
On March 08 2011 15:20 Torte de Lini wrote: Cool, a video with a bright yellow backdrop and uses imagery to comedically display his fast-spoken narration and downplays all factors that makes a "good game". Cool, a topic that has no opinion but rather tells us to watch the 3 minute and 50 seconds of an opinion they needed to be developed in order to justify why other topics of balance and gameplay flood our forums. I'd voice an opinion but this guy has lead his opinion onto insulting me because we have different views of good gameplay and a good game. tl:dr The video attempts to tell us that no matter how much we practice we cannot be a pro-gamer or those who are on the competitive scene despite numerous professionals claiming otherwise by their own persoanl experience that the video-creator has none of. Through the insults and the attempt to be vastly witty while also side-stepping an actual point, the video lends itself to be redundantly bad with its sub-par attempt of analogies to today's pop culture and its references. To conclude, practice does make perfect and just because this guy has a laissez-faire attitude doesn't mean I will equally give up playing a game and striving to be better that goes in conjunction with the uber-gamers that enjoy a challenge. A comment has never been so true. | ||
XsebT
Denmark2980 Posts
Something to think about. ![]() | ||
Duban
United States548 Posts
The game is set in a post apocolyptic world where sentient robots called reploids are being "retired" without reason by the last city left on earth, Neo Arcadia. The gameplay is very... harsh, to say the least. It's brutal, yet awesome. The following series Megaman ZX is also excellent. It's similar but offers multiple biometals and each one plays and fights differently in the platform enviroment. Which one you pick is left to personal taste. | ||
Phenny
Australia1435 Posts
| ||
Sanguinarius
United States3427 Posts
But what he is saying is true. Its sad, but true. | ||
snow2.0
Germany2073 Posts
On March 09 2011 00:03 Candles wrote: Show nested quote + On March 08 2011 23:49 derpzzz wrote: he has the point with the shitty games producers are feeding us nowadays I'd personally argue that we're in a golden age of games. I adore the following franchises: - Mass Effect - Assassin's Creed - Halo - Gears of War - Dead Space I'd wager most people here are RTS players though (obviously) and in a world where Strategy games are also been pushed forwards in interesting new dynamics. Strategy games had evolved so much that people were initially turned off by the idea that Starcraft relied on resource collection. People are trying new things and generally getting good critical and fan based response: - Homeworld - Dawn of War anyone? I think it's kind of ridiculous to complain about games being too focused on the story as well. The story and canon of the games I play is a huge part of the appeal. I read massive amounts of classic Sci-Fi and I can tell you that the world created by Epic for Mass Effect is as brilliant as any created by Clarke, Dick or Asimov. If you don't want the canon, story or graphics then you may as well go and play Chess or a similar game (which has had much more time to develop strategy) and is surely a much more pure experience. Most of these fit the general definition of easy, nice graphics and low skill cap (or no competitive gaming at all), which is the whole point of the gaming growth vs gaming quality. Homeworld is old anyway. Halo counts, i guess :E Havn't actually played Mass Effect 1, but the second installation - are you serious? the Story doesn't even make sense, everything is obviously marked as "go here to be good/evil", missions are completely repetitive, even the very combat they made so shiny is boring repetition of covered fighting with completely useless AI companions. Maybe the backstory is nice, but you're not the backstory, you're playing some cookie-cutter 0815 save the universe story. Oh, and you can grow scars, look! The most competitive game of the world are what, Starcraft 1 (korea) and Counter Strike (other)? Those are AGES old, people could've stopped making games 1999 and we'd have missed out on very little. I enjoy SC2, but i can't say its anywhere near as hard or rewarding as old games. Same for all other newer games i've played with the exception of Roguelikes (which, again, could've been made anno 1995) | ||
simme123
Sweden810 Posts
On March 08 2011 15:20 Torte de Lini wrote: Cool, a video with a bright yellow backdrop and uses imagery to comedically display his fast-spoken narration and downplays all factors that makes a "good game". Cool, a topic that has no opinion but rather tells us to watch the 3 minute and 50 seconds of an opinion they needed to be developed in order to justify why other topics of balance and gameplay flood our forums. I'd voice an opinion but this guy has lead his opinion onto insulting me because we have different views of good gameplay and a good game. tl:dr The video attempts to tell us that no matter how much we practice we cannot be a pro-gamer or those who are on the competitive scene despite numerous professionals claiming otherwise by their own persoanl experience that the video-creator has none of. Through the insults and the attempt to be vastly witty while also side-stepping an actual point, the video lends itself to be redundantly bad with its sub-par attempt of analogies to today's pop culture and its references. To conclude, practice does make perfect and just because this guy has a laissez-faire attitude doesn't mean I will equally give up playing a game and striving to be better that goes in conjunction with the uber-gamers that enjoy a challenge. The video is funny and though u can overcome through sheer willpoer some will naturally be better. Seriously why be so serious. | ||
gogogadgetflow
United States2583 Posts
| ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games Grubby4264 ScreaM2886 summit1g2140 FrodaN1941 Beastyqt1211 B2W.Neo270 elazer250 C9.Mang0139 shahzam130 ZombieGrub76 Trikslyr40 trigger2 Organizations StarCraft 2 Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH74 StarCraft: Brood War• Reevou ![]() ![]() • musti20045 ![]() • IndyKCrew ![]() • sooper7s • Migwel ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • Laughngamez YouTube • intothetv ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Kozan Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Replay Cast
ReBellioN vs HonMonO
The PondCast
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
OSC
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Replay Cast
[ Show More ] Sparkling Tuna Cup
Replay Cast
Clem vs Zoun
|
|