• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 05:19
CET 11:19
KST 19:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT24Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book16Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up2ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/0238LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16)46Weekly Cups (Feb 2-8): Classic, Solar, MaxPax win2Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker16
StarCraft 2
General
Liquipedia WCS Portal Launched ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT Kaelaris on the futue of SC2 and much more... How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker
Tourneys
StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) How do the "codes" work in GSL? Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ? [A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 513 Attrition Warfare The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 512 Overclocked Mutation # 511 Temple of Rebirth
Brood War
General
[LIVE] [S:21] ASL Season Open Day 1 Gypsy to Korea BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/02 A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 1 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Fighting Spirit mining rates Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
ZeroSpace Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Diablo 2 thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Ask and answer stupid questions here! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Inside the Communication of …
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2048 users

Morrow and Sjow Matchfixing? - Page 13

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 11 12 13 14 15 49 Next All
alacheesu
Profile Joined August 2010
21 Posts
December 22 2010 08:15 GMT
#241
On December 22 2010 17:08 MorNin wrote:
Since they got caught and will no longer do it -_-'

Tournaments are for competition.. Best player should always come ahead, Fixing is wrong....

They didn't "get caught". They asked the organizers beforehand and got told no. Get your facts straight.
-Archangel-
Profile Joined May 2010
Croatia7457 Posts
December 22 2010 08:17 GMT
#242
On December 22 2010 17:15 alacheesu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 17:08 MorNin wrote:
Since they got caught and will no longer do it -_-'

Tournaments are for competition.. Best player should always come ahead, Fixing is wrong....

They didn't "get caught". They asked the organizers beforehand and got told no. Get your facts straight.

No, we do not know that. By the all information we have they might have done that afterwards.
garbanzo
Profile Joined October 2009
United States4046 Posts
December 22 2010 08:18 GMT
#243
On December 22 2010 17:15 -Archangel- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 16:50 garbanzo wrote:
On December 22 2010 16:34 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
I wish people would read, and then in addition to reading try to understand what they read...

I'm very glad that Sjow came in here to clear up what actually ended up happening, and my opinion of neither player has been lowered.

If anything, I think this is a result of the cafe being greedy and putting on an event which discourages competition between the best players. If they were evenly matched, and they split the tournaments 9-9, then neither would get the large prize, but if one of them forfeited only 2 or the finals of the tournaments, then one could actually attain the large prize.

The cafe put up a very good prize with the expectation that no one would realistically be able to win it. I actually find that worse than what Morrow and Sjow were planning. They simply wanted to draw more people into their cafe, make more money, and then keep the prize.

It's really a very stupid format. It's like if for the GSL you won 100,000$ if you 5-0ed your opponent in the finals, but it would be split 2,000$ and 1,000$ if you did anything else... I'm all for the competitiveness of eSports and the spirit of competition, but at the end of the day it's professional gaming. They need to make money, hence the word professional. If anything, I think this reflects a need for more tournaments, sponsors, and larger prize pools, so progamers can actually make money and not need to find ways to maximize profit from the small amount of tournaments available.


Assuming that the following assumptions are true:
1) you have to win 11/18 tournaments to get the "grand prize",
2) players have to pay to play in the tournament,
3) there are no spectators,
then what you're saying is exactly correct.

What they were planning is cheating, but they are cheating the house. They're not cheating you, the community or other players. They're just trying to beat the house. It's exactly cheating in the same way that card counting in blackjack at a casino is cheating.

The house just wanted their money. The tournament structure ensures that if two equally skilled players competed then neither will win the grand prize and the house becomes richer. This is not the type of environment to develop healthy competition.

Sjow and MorroW just wanted to game the system that was biased to begin with. I think they made the right decision by only having one of them compete in the end.

+ Show Spoiler +
Of course I'm hoping that they realize this is the case and know the difference between this and other competition. Key difference lies in the 3 assumptions above.

Wtf? So you are saying it is OK to cheat the house? Any tournament has rules, if you do not like those rules do not join the tournament (of if those rules break some law report them).
By this statement of yours I would guess you also do not want to pay taxes as that is ONLY cheating the "house"?!

When did I say it was okay to cheat the house?

And no, not paying taxes is not equivalent to cheating the house. In theory taxes are used by the government to support the entire community. By not paying taxes you're cheating the community.
Even during difficult times, when I sat down to play the game, there were times where it felt like god has descended down and played [for me].
TehForce
Profile Joined July 2010
1072 Posts
December 22 2010 08:19 GMT
#244
On December 22 2010 17:17 -Archangel- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 17:15 alacheesu wrote:
On December 22 2010 17:08 MorNin wrote:
Since they got caught and will no longer do it -_-'

Tournaments are for competition.. Best player should always come ahead, Fixing is wrong....

They didn't "get caught". They asked the organizers beforehand and got told no. Get your facts straight.

No, we do not know that. By the all information we have they might have done that afterwards.

only one of them played in the first tournament. first tournament was before this "scandal" was published" => they asked organizers beforhand
NesTea <3
CanucksJC
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Canada1241 Posts
December 22 2010 08:19 GMT
#245
Meanwhile in Korea,
Savior: Hey Luxury, I betted $1,000 on you to lose tonight, so you should throw away the game.
Luxury: Only if I get half share.
Savior: Ok, deal.

Now this,
SjoW: Hey Morrow, one of us gets a computer if we fix matches, so let's do it.
Morrow: Only if you throw the games and I get computer.
SjoW: Ok, pay me back later.

What's so different? I don't even understand how some people are actually defending these assholes. Competition is a competition, and they tried to fix it, now everyone knows, so they drop the plan. Pathetic.
UBC StarCraft Club is official @ UBC Vancouver campus! Your first eSport community on campus. Welcomes players of all levels at UBC. Follow us on facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/group.php?gid=155630424470014 or IRC @ irc.rizon.net #ubcsc
philly5man
Profile Joined July 2010
United Kingdom356 Posts
December 22 2010 08:20 GMT
#246
Can see why they were doing it if the format was as stupid as they say.

If they're the best two players in the tournament by a way, and they split them down the middle 9-9, neither of them get a computer. If they make sure one of them wins 11 times then at least someone gets it.

It's naughty but stuff like that has always happened in CS in the UK (my background).
razamanaz
Profile Joined August 2010
271 Posts
December 22 2010 08:20 GMT
#247
You guy do know that match fixing is mainly problem when there is betting involved ? I mean , if they managed to beat every single person in there , there was no way anyone else couldve won anything even if they didnt plane it .
Askesis
Profile Joined September 2010
216 Posts
December 22 2010 08:23 GMT
#248
On December 22 2010 17:15 alacheesu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 17:08 MorNin wrote:
Since they got caught and will no longer do it -_-'

Tournaments are for competition.. Best player should always come ahead, Fixing is wrong....

They didn't "get caught". They asked the organizers beforehand and got told no. Get your facts straight.

And where are your facts, Mister? All that was states was that they "talked to" the staff. Whether they approached them outright or if the tournament caught wind and asked the players what was up has not been established.

Get YOUR facts straight.
Askesis
Profile Joined September 2010
216 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-22 08:26:36
December 22 2010 08:24 GMT
#249
.
Whiladan
Profile Joined September 2010
United States463 Posts
December 22 2010 08:24 GMT
#250
On December 22 2010 17:04 Ryusei-R1 wrote:
I don't believe this is matchfixing, this is just preset results. Hypothetically they make the finals against each other, they'll have preset results, not toss matches in an effort to make it look real, in order to ensure that either one of them will play. They could, in theory, just play the series and one of the players would simply walk over the other and get a quick victory, but their method is much faster.

It makes complete sense. This isn't something that's going to blow up because people are betting on Sjow/Morrow on some sort of betting campaign and are expecting either one of them toss the game in order to gain money.


You can't just use a synonym and make it something different. That would be like me saying your assertion isn't stupid, it's just moronic.

Regardless of which word we're using, a match with a pre-determined result is a fixed match. This is esports, not the WWE. Let's have some integrity.
decemberscalm
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States1353 Posts
December 22 2010 08:25 GMT
#251
On December 22 2010 17:19 CanucksJC wrote:
Meanwhile in Korea,
Savior: Hey Luxury, I betted $1,000 on you to lose tonight, so you should throw away the game.
Luxury: Only if I get half share.
Savior: Ok, deal.

Now this,
SjoW: Hey Morrow, one of us gets a computer if we fix matches, so let's do it.
Morrow: Only if you throw the games and I get computer.
SjoW: Ok, pay me back later.

What's so different? I don't even understand how some people are actually defending these assholes. Competition is a competition, and they tried to fix it, now everyone knows, so they drop the plan. Pathetic.

Thats an entirely different scenario. No outside gambling is taking place. They even asked the admins about it. As far as we know they weren't caught, but rather they asked. The silly format of the tournament promotes this.

Too lazy to find the post, but someone remarked on how the tournament format would be like the GSL only rewarding players who 4-0'ed their opponents. Thats utter ridiculousness.

And SERIOUSLY, chill until you know if they were going to secretively do it, everything seems just like speculation right now. The important factor is knowing if they were going to do it WITHOUT asking the tournament admins first. Otherwise thats seriously just players asking if they can make the ridiculous prize format less ridiculous.
Waxangel
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
United States33559 Posts
December 22 2010 08:25 GMT
#252
Hopefully the two will realize how idiotic and unethical their idea was and never think about pulling anything similar again.
AdministratorHey HP can you redo everything youve ever done because i have a small complaint?
Impervious
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada4216 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-22 08:29:52
December 22 2010 08:26 GMT
#253
On December 22 2010 17:15 -Archangel- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 16:50 garbanzo wrote:
On December 22 2010 16:34 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
I wish people would read, and then in addition to reading try to understand what they read...

I'm very glad that Sjow came in here to clear up what actually ended up happening, and my opinion of neither player has been lowered.

If anything, I think this is a result of the cafe being greedy and putting on an event which discourages competition between the best players. If they were evenly matched, and they split the tournaments 9-9, then neither would get the large prize, but if one of them forfeited only 2 or the finals of the tournaments, then one could actually attain the large prize.

The cafe put up a very good prize with the expectation that no one would realistically be able to win it. I actually find that worse than what Morrow and Sjow were planning. They simply wanted to draw more people into their cafe, make more money, and then keep the prize.

It's really a very stupid format. It's like if for the GSL you won 100,000$ if you 5-0ed your opponent in the finals, but it would be split 2,000$ and 1,000$ if you did anything else... I'm all for the competitiveness of eSports and the spirit of competition, but at the end of the day it's professional gaming. They need to make money, hence the word professional. If anything, I think this reflects a need for more tournaments, sponsors, and larger prize pools, so progamers can actually make money and not need to find ways to maximize profit from the small amount of tournaments available.


Assuming that the following assumptions are true:
1) you have to win 11/18 tournaments to get the "grand prize",
2) players have to pay to play in the tournament,
3) there are no spectators,
then what you're saying is exactly correct.

What they were planning is cheating, but they are cheating the house. They're not cheating you, the community or other players. They're just trying to beat the house. It's exactly cheating in the same way that card counting in blackjack at a casino is cheating.

The house just wanted their money. The tournament structure ensures that if two equally skilled players competed then neither will win the grand prize and the house becomes richer. This is not the type of environment to develop healthy competition.

Sjow and MorroW just wanted to game the system that was biased to begin with. I think they made the right decision by only having one of them compete in the end.

+ Show Spoiler +
Of course I'm hoping that they realize this is the case and know the difference between this and other competition. Key difference lies in the 3 assumptions above.

Wtf? So you are saying it is OK to cheat the house? Any tournament has rules, if you do not like those rules do not join the tournament (of if those rules break some law report them).
By this statement of yours I would guess you also do not want to pay taxes as that is ONLY cheating the "house"?!

They have more to gain by working together than by playing against eachother. If they are playing for the reward at the end, and they would actually make more by working together, then it's a poorly setup system..... Tbh, I don't see anything wrong with it - it's kinda like how many types of auto-racing near the end of the season will often work..... One teammate purposely does worse than he could have done, so the other can maximize his points, as well as doing better in the constructors championships, and hopefully move up the standings/secure a better position; and as a whole, the team does better than they would have otherwise.

It's just a poorly designed prize system. If it was "you have to win the most tournaments to get the "grand prize"" instead, then yes, there would be a problem with them working together, because there is no real benefit of it. All they seem to be doing is taking advantage of some clever marketing scheme designed to prevent the "grand prize" from being won. When part of your motivation to take part in the tournament is the money you'd make from it, they're definitely making the right choice.

And match fixing when related to gambling is completely illegal, so the parodies to what happened in Korea are pretty dumb.....
~ \(ˌ)im-ˈpər-vē-əs\ : not capable of being damaged or harmed.
hypercube
Profile Joined April 2010
Hungary2735 Posts
December 22 2010 08:26 GMT
#254
On December 22 2010 17:20 philly5man wrote:
Can see why they were doing it if the format was as stupid as they say.

If they're the best two players in the tournament by a way, and they split them down the middle 9-9, neither of them get a computer. If they make sure one of them wins 11 times then at least someone gets it.

It's naughty but stuff like that has always happened in CS in the UK (my background).


It is a stupid format. But they could have just agreed that the when one of them reaches 3 or 4 wins the other one won't participate anymore.
"Sending people in rockets to other planets is a waste of money better spent on sending rockets into people on this planet."
-Archangel-
Profile Joined May 2010
Croatia7457 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-22 08:27:57
December 22 2010 08:26 GMT
#255
On December 22 2010 17:18 garbanzo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 17:15 -Archangel- wrote:
On December 22 2010 16:50 garbanzo wrote:
On December 22 2010 16:34 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
I wish people would read, and then in addition to reading try to understand what they read...

I'm very glad that Sjow came in here to clear up what actually ended up happening, and my opinion of neither player has been lowered.

If anything, I think this is a result of the cafe being greedy and putting on an event which discourages competition between the best players. If they were evenly matched, and they split the tournaments 9-9, then neither would get the large prize, but if one of them forfeited only 2 or the finals of the tournaments, then one could actually attain the large prize.

The cafe put up a very good prize with the expectation that no one would realistically be able to win it. I actually find that worse than what Morrow and Sjow were planning. They simply wanted to draw more people into their cafe, make more money, and then keep the prize.

It's really a very stupid format. It's like if for the GSL you won 100,000$ if you 5-0ed your opponent in the finals, but it would be split 2,000$ and 1,000$ if you did anything else... I'm all for the competitiveness of eSports and the spirit of competition, but at the end of the day it's professional gaming. They need to make money, hence the word professional. If anything, I think this reflects a need for more tournaments, sponsors, and larger prize pools, so progamers can actually make money and not need to find ways to maximize profit from the small amount of tournaments available.


Assuming that the following assumptions are true:
1) you have to win 11/18 tournaments to get the "grand prize",
2) players have to pay to play in the tournament,
3) there are no spectators,
then what you're saying is exactly correct.

What they were planning is cheating, but they are cheating the house. They're not cheating you, the community or other players. They're just trying to beat the house. It's exactly cheating in the same way that card counting in blackjack at a casino is cheating.

The house just wanted their money. The tournament structure ensures that if two equally skilled players competed then neither will win the grand prize and the house becomes richer. This is not the type of environment to develop healthy competition.

Sjow and MorroW just wanted to game the system that was biased to begin with. I think they made the right decision by only having one of them compete in the end.

+ Show Spoiler +
Of course I'm hoping that they realize this is the case and know the difference between this and other competition. Key difference lies in the 3 assumptions above.

Wtf? So you are saying it is OK to cheat the house? Any tournament has rules, if you do not like those rules do not join the tournament (of if those rules break some law report them).
By this statement of yours I would guess you also do not want to pay taxes as that is ONLY cheating the "house"?!

When did I say it was okay to cheat the house?

And no, not paying taxes is not equivalent to cheating the house. In theory taxes are used by the government to support the entire community. By not paying taxes you're cheating the community.

OK, you didn't say it is OK, but you agreed with the poster you were quoting (who saw nothing wrong with what Sjow and Morrow tried to do) and you downplayed the cheating by a wrong example.

While technically tax money is the community money, in reality it is not. When you cheat on taxes you effectively cheat the "house" especially in countries like US where you know they will not lower their war budget to cover holes in the civilian sector.
Denizen[9]
Profile Joined July 2010
United States649 Posts
December 22 2010 08:28 GMT
#256
On December 22 2010 17:17 -Archangel- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 17:15 alacheesu wrote:
On December 22 2010 17:08 MorNin wrote:
Since they got caught and will no longer do it -_-'

Tournaments are for competition.. Best player should always come ahead, Fixing is wrong....

They didn't "get caught". They asked the organizers beforehand and got told no. Get your facts straight.

No, we do not know that. By the all information we have they might have done that afterwards.


no, the tournament hasnt happened yet.
Jaedong, Baby | Idra, Marineking, Tester, Nada
Whiladan
Profile Joined September 2010
United States463 Posts
December 22 2010 08:28 GMT
#257
On December 22 2010 17:25 decemberscalm wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 17:19 CanucksJC wrote:
Meanwhile in Korea,
Savior: Hey Luxury, I betted $1,000 on you to lose tonight, so you should throw away the game.
Luxury: Only if I get half share.
Savior: Ok, deal.

Now this,
SjoW: Hey Morrow, one of us gets a computer if we fix matches, so let's do it.
Morrow: Only if you throw the games and I get computer.
SjoW: Ok, pay me back later.

What's so different? I don't even understand how some people are actually defending these assholes. Competition is a competition, and they tried to fix it, now everyone knows, so they drop the plan. Pathetic.

Thats an entirely different scenario. No outside gambling is taking place. They even asked the admins about it. As far as we know they weren't caught, but rather they asked. The silly format of the tournament promotes this.

Too lazy to find the post, but someone remarked on how the tournament format would be like the GSL only rewarding players who 4-0'ed their opponents. Thats utter ridiculousness.

And SERIOUSLY, chill until you know if they were going to secretively do it, everything seems just like speculation right now. The important factor is knowing if they were going to do it WITHOUT asking the tournament admins first. Otherwise thats seriously just players asking if they can make the ridiculous prize format less ridiculous.


The only difference is one involves winnings from a third-party taking bets, and the other involves winnings from the tournament itself. The distinction isn't really noteworthy; neither have any place between honorable players of any competition
Boblion
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
France8043 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-22 08:31:24
December 22 2010 08:29 GMT
#258
It reminds me of poker tourneys, when finalists agree to split the prizes.

I have seen that in Sc2 too. DeMuslim and SarenS off racing each other ( i think it was a Go4Sc2 but i'm not sure ).
fuck all those elitists brb watching streams of elite players.
Piski
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Finland3461 Posts
December 22 2010 08:30 GMT
#259
On December 22 2010 17:28 GobIin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 17:17 -Archangel- wrote:
On December 22 2010 17:15 alacheesu wrote:
On December 22 2010 17:08 MorNin wrote:
Since they got caught and will no longer do it -_-'

Tournaments are for competition.. Best player should always come ahead, Fixing is wrong....

They didn't "get caught". They asked the organizers beforehand and got told no. Get your facts straight.

No, we do not know that. By the all information we have they might have done that afterwards.


no, the tournament hasnt happened yet.


He meant after they got caught
huameng
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
United States1133 Posts
December 22 2010 08:30 GMT
#260
On December 22 2010 17:09 hypercube wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 22 2010 17:00 huameng wrote:
A hypothetical scenario:

Same tournament, Morrow and Sjow are the only strong players and they each make the finals every time. Without any discussion at all, Sjow forfeits the finals every time, Morrow wins the computer and gives nothing to Sjow. Live goes on normally.

Is this just as bad as them agreeing to do this and split the prizes beforehand? Bad, but not as bad? Totally okay? Even worse? I'm not totally sure where I stand on this right now so I wanna create some discussion about related scenarios.


Is this a serious question? No, it's not okay to enter a competition and forfeit the final without a good reason.


Yes it's a serious question. Why isn't it okay? No one is being harmed right? This tournament apparently isn't being streamed or anything, (maybe wrong about this idk) so there are no viewers losing out on an exciting finals.
skating
Prev 1 11 12 13 14 15 49 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Master Swan Open #100
CranKy Ducklings25
LiquipediaDiscussion
PiG Sty Festival
09:00
Group C
herO vs NightMare
Reynor vs Cure
PiGStarcraft1186
IndyStarCraft 212
BRAT_OK 166
Rex102
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft1186
IndyStarCraft 212
BRAT_OK 166
ProTech156
Rex 102
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 5244
Calm 3333
Rain 1718
Zeus 707
actioN 289
Killer 260
Leta 166
Soma 164
Flash 143
sorry 140
[ Show more ]
ToSsGirL 94
Dewaltoss 86
HiyA 76
Last 58
Sharp 36
Sea.KH 35
NaDa 32
Hm[arnc] 24
Shine 17
Noble 14
Backho 14
Terrorterran 12
Movie 11
Dota 2
XaKoH 1017
canceldota115
Counter-Strike
zeus1280
byalli675
edward136
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor163
Other Games
singsing1188
ceh9555
Fuzer 397
Mew2King42
Trikslyr26
MindelVK8
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick733
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 14
• Adnapsc2 10
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV506
League of Legends
• Jankos1711
• Stunt840
Upcoming Events
Epic.LAN
1h 41m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4h 41m
Replay Cast
13h 41m
PiG Sty Festival
22h 41m
Serral vs YoungYakov
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Sparkling Tuna Cup
23h 41m
Replay Cast
1d 13h
Replay Cast
1d 22h
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Winter Champion…
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S1: King of Kings
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 1st Round Qualifier
WardiTV Winter 2026
PiG Sty Festival 7.0
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025

Upcoming

Acropolis #4 - TS5
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026: China & Korea Invitational
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round Qualifier
Acropolis #4 - TS6
Acropolis #4
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.