| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Yaotzin
South Africa4280 Posts
On September 22 2010 08:03 shindigs wrote: In my completely zerg biased opinion, the ultra damage should stay because PF's are effing ridiculous. Absolutely. The thing still took out an ultra or two in that video. This just means you can't save your PF from ultras anymore, what's so horrible about that? | ||
|
Kibibit
United States1551 Posts
On September 22 2010 07:23 Ancient.eu wrote: Patch 1.1 is a racist patch. In Blizzard's view, black people and Zergs have nothing to do with Starcraft 2. Fuck, I'm a black Zerg. T____T | ||
|
BladeRunner
United States407 Posts
On September 22 2010 08:03 Chriamon wrote: Lots of buggy things made it through internal testing. Build Order screen is messed up, Eggs stack now (makes it hard to know progress of a specific egg), D Oasis ladder map isn't the correct map, etc. That's why they have all of us participating in this open beta te..... WAIT A MINUTE | ||
|
Fredz
Canada36 Posts
On September 22 2010 07:23 Ancient.eu wrote: Patch 1.1 is a racist patch. In Blizzard's view, black people and Zergs have nothing to do with Starcraft 2. Win. but imho zergs supremacy is just starting. | ||
|
-HellZerg-
United States409 Posts
 | ||
|
sooch
Canada299 Posts
 | ||
|
SpaceYeti
United States723 Posts
On September 22 2010 08:01 1nfamous wrote: you really think something like that would pass through internal testing without getting noticed? this is sure not going to be patched Given their recent track record....yes. Definitely. Without a doubt. It's like saying they indended DKs to be absurdly OP in WoW arena for the first full season after the release of WotLK. I don't have a lot of faith in the rigor of Blizzards internal testing. | ||
|
Grummler
Germany743 Posts
On September 22 2010 07:54 Shifft wrote: THIS IS A FUCKING TRAVESTY You can't lift neutral animals anymore with phoenixes. I demand a refund. If protoss were terran, zerg would say, protoss got a HUGE buff (lololol). Cause now you cant accidentally waste energy on critters anymore. No, seriously, i guess thats the reason why they changed it. | ||
|
gillon
Sweden1578 Posts
On September 22 2010 08:06 Yaotzin wrote: Absolutely. The thing still took out an ultra or two in that video. This just means you can't save your PF from ultras anymore, what's so horrible about that? It SHOULD take out ATLEAST that many ultras. Do you realize what it costs? Do you realize it's STATIONARY DEFENSE? | ||
|
SeeDLiNg
United States690 Posts
Go die plz blizz. | ||
|
Yaotzin
South Africa4280 Posts
On September 22 2010 08:11 gillon wrote: It SHOULD take out ATLEAST that many ultras. OK, so it does. We're agreed then, it's fine. Do you realize what it costs? 150/150? Less than 1 ultra. Do you realize it's STATIONARY DEFENSE? Should my photon cannons become super duper awesome because I can't move them? Terrans are so spoilt. | ||
|
Lucius2
Germany548 Posts
On September 22 2010 08:11 gillon wrote: It SHOULD take out ATLEAST that many ultras. Do you realize what it costs? Do you realize it's STATIONARY DEFENSE? lol, mad? User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
obsid
United States389 Posts
| ||
|
vyyye
Sweden3917 Posts
On September 22 2010 08:11 gillon wrote: It SHOULD take out ATLEAST that many ultras. Do you realize what it costs? Do you realize it's STATIONARY DEFENSE? Yeah, stationary defence should > T3 zerg units. Great logic you got going there. | ||
|
Sapphire.lux
Romania2620 Posts
On September 22 2010 07:56 Brutallus wrote: I made a little video showing the new uber ultralisk splash damage on a PF. 2 Ultras non upgraded vs a PF with armor and range upgrade and ~20 SCVs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_ApCtDpvg0 This is ridiculous lol. | ||
|
Mikilatov
United States3897 Posts
On September 22 2010 07:48 Guiltfeeder wrote: Has no one mentioned the jumbled up build order screen? ![[image loading]](http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/1043/10644125.png) Uploaded with ImageShack.us rofl, yeah. Apparently the Zerg I just played made about 25 Greater Spires within the first 5 mins of the game. | ||
|
Disastorm
United States922 Posts
On September 22 2010 07:47 SpaceYeti wrote: TBH,it sounds like the Ultra splash radius phenomenon is unintended (as they did not originally intend ultras to do splash on buildings in design) and will likely be changed in the future. Dun get your hopes up. uh i thought they said they specifically got rid of ram because the regular ultra attack on buildings + splash damage is better than ram, which makes it sound like they want the splash damage on buildings. heres the quote from the actual blog post: "When ultralisks target tightly packed smaller buildings such as supply depots, the Ram attack is actually outputting considerably less overall damage than its normal attack, as Ram only hits a single target." which clearly states they are aware of the splash damage on buildings. | ||
|
Tennet
United States1458 Posts
| ||
|
RoK Ot7Er
United States219 Posts
| ||
|
Devlin
Sweden91 Posts
On September 22 2010 08:11 gillon wrote: It SHOULD take out ATLEAST that many ultras. Do you realize what it costs? Do you realize it's STATIONARY DEFENSE? It costs 150/150 and you can get it after an engineering bay, whereas ultras require hive, ultralisk cavern (duh) and the ultras themselves for 300/200. Don't even try comparing costs/effectiveness. PF's are still really strong against other ground units. I am a bit concerned though about ultras being too strong against other buildings, such as barracks or factories. Pretty much nothing can be saved by scvs repairing now if ultras are on the field. Then again, could they really be saved before? Haven't received the patch here in eu so haven't been able to test it. Yes, I'm zerg. | ||
| ||
|
|
Stellar Fest
OSC
CranKy Ducklings
Online Event
FEL
AI Arena Tournament
BSL: Ladder Tournament
Sparkling Tuna Cup
INu's Battles
herO vs Classic
Percival vs Rogue
BSL Open Qualifier
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
