
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/gGQue.jpg)
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Jiddra
Sweden2685 Posts
March 23 2011 23:34 GMT
#12601
![]() ![]() | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
March 23 2011 23:34 GMT
#12602
| ||
HowSoOnIsNow
Canada480 Posts
March 23 2011 23:34 GMT
#12603
On March 24 2011 05:40 Slow Motion wrote: Tyler is awesome. He put into words everything I've thought about MC. The SC2 guys who call him a god and worship him right now have no idea what a really great player is like. The thing that annoys me the most about MC's in-game BM is that he did a to July. July was indeed a great player in BW. His wins were awe inspiring and beautiful in a way I've never seen from MC. MC has never accomplished what July has and I don't believe with his skills he ever will. It's like watching a cocky high school basketball player beat the current Magic Johnson 1 on 1 and then brag about it. Please, show some respect to someone who is truly greater than you are. When Tyler says he wants to meet MC in a tournament and beat him, it made me feel like standing up and cheering. I love how much Tyler still respects the BW pros. He knows his roots and history, and would never disrespect someone like July. MC is currently Goliath with all his strength and power, but Tyler is definitely David because he stands for everything that is right and honorable in esports. Nony fighting in the TSL!!! While i do not think MC is a god, he was a BW player as well. I was rooting for July at the Finals and do agree that Ming chul never really played a game that impressed me, beside his micro abilities. But thinking that Tyler can beat MC is purely wishful thinking. I also fail at understanding why you're claiming Tyler to be this pure player, the essence of SC. The Golliath vs David analogy is quite strange to me. There's no Protoss in the world that can withstand the guy. SanZenith played brilliantly troughout the GSL and got crushed against MC. Beside if the latency is horrible, Tyler will get 2-0. The guy has the momentum. If Tyler would practice 12 hours a day, 6 days a week, for a few months, he'd stand a chance. But he won't do that, probably never will. It's too bad for him. | ||
iNcontroL
![]()
USA29055 Posts
March 24 2011 00:09 GMT
#12604
On March 24 2011 08:30 Scrandom wrote: Show nested quote + On March 24 2011 08:28 iNcontroL wrote: On March 24 2011 08:01 Scrandom wrote: What Tyler was saying about how he hates MC's playstyle and he was comparing him to BW players like Bisu and Stork and how they clearly dominated their opponents, I don't think it's fair to make that comparison because SC2 is so different that the way MC played is how you win in starcraft 2 its not the same as BW. Also I'm pretty disgusted that they are allowed to give their biased opinions on everything but the viewers who leave their counter biased opinions are ridiculed on air sarcastically. It really makes no sense, kind of a "high-horse" feeling to the show. WHAT THE FUCK? Did you call us horses? TAKE IT BACKKKKKKKKKKKKK I was being mature, thought it would produce discussion ![]() Nah. You were being a shit stirrer ![]() If you watch our show and get butthurt, like actually upset, you are watching / listening to the wrong show. | ||
Ryndika
1489 Posts
March 24 2011 00:10 GMT
#12605
Just like I was actually listening to him. | ||
pezit
Sweden302 Posts
March 24 2011 00:11 GMT
#12606
On March 24 2011 08:01 Scrandom wrote: What Tyler was saying about how he hates MC's playstyle and he was comparing him to BW players like Bisu and Stork and how they clearly dominated their opponents, I don't think it's fair to make that comparison because SC2 is so different that the way MC played is how you win in starcraft 2 its not the same as BW. Also I'm pretty disgusted that they are allowed to give their biased opinions on everything but the viewers who leave their counter biased opinions are ridiculed on air sarcastically. It really makes no sense, kind of a "high-horse" feeling to the show. I don't agree with what Tyler said either, or well of course i'd love to see longer more planned out strategies like they do in sc:bw, but no one does that in sc2... pretty much all the players base their strategies on timing attacks and he just does it better than anyone else. Regarding the "bad manners"... Taunting the other playing during the game is completely different to not saying GG. Just compare it to any other sport or competition, soccer players and hockey players talk shit to each other during games, but afterwards they pretty much almost shake hands, if they don't it's considered unsportsmanlike = what ciara did. And then incontrol rages about the coin-flip thing... i don't even know what to say, it's a joke tournament, for fun, not serious. They're making fun of themselves, which is always high class in my book. | ||
The KY
United Kingdom6252 Posts
March 24 2011 00:11 GMT
#12607
On March 24 2011 04:18 HowSoOnIsNow wrote: Show nested quote + On March 24 2011 03:49 Liquid`Tyler wrote: On March 24 2011 03:30 Zlasher wrote: On March 24 2011 03:12 Liquid`Tyler wrote: On March 24 2011 02:42 randplaty wrote: Tyler's opinion on MC is based ALL on SCBW. The game is TOTALLY different. SC1 pros are enamored with macro, but SC2 is MUCH more based on timing attacks and one decisive battle with good positioning than it was in BW. Tyler's style is SO different from MC, but it's obviously that MC's style works much better in SC2. It's not about the game as much as it's about how long people have been playing it. Ever since beta we have been saying that all in plays and strategies focusing on one strong timing will tend to dominate and win a lot. Those types of builds are really really strong and like 10 times easier to develop than the safer and more well rounded builds. That just makes me think of a philosoraptor saying Is it really safer If it loses more often? It doesn't lose more often at similar skill levels. That's essential to the point. It's easier to make and execute an all in build than a standard build. So if we can break down everything into two different styles, one that's riskier and one that's safer, the riskier stuff will be easier to master and the safer stuff will be harder to master. Two players with equal potential start learning SC2. One guy pursues risky style, one guy pursues safe style. The riskier player will master the game first. He'll have a higher skill level than the guy playing safe. But when the safe player's skill level catches up, he'll win more. There's nothing wrong with MC doing what he needs to do to win. Until he starts doing other styles, we can't say what he's capable of. I think people have some irrational faith in his ability to play every protoss style better than every protoss out there, and that he's playing this way only because it's dominating so much right now. Well, I don't believe that. He would have been better at SC1 if that were true. And he must know that he depends a lot on educated guesses rather than solid information. If he could win games by acting purely on solid information all the time, he would. Then he'd really be god protoss. You also have nothing to root your suspicions in his abilities then. You cannot say for a fact that Mc can or cannot play what some may proclaim as safer or standard. Why would he use other styles if he can win a boat load of money with it? People project his abilities in the standard play style because of his talent at the game. He's a talented individual at the game, i doubt that his skills would magically slip away out of his body just because the game goes into standard mode. In my mind, it's easier to critic than emulating success. Every Protoss players try to play how Mc's playing and, they just can't. I'm not a big fan of Ming Chul, but theorizing on his talent of play style or whatnot seems absurd when the guy just won his second GSL title... And any build takes a risk, because the opponent could always do the build that totally counters it. -Lecturing fucking Nony on the subtleties of playing Starcraft Zero points. | ||
zyglrox
United States1168 Posts
March 24 2011 00:14 GMT
#12608
On March 24 2011 08:01 Scrandom wrote: What Tyler was saying about how he hates MC's playstyle and he was comparing him to BW players like Bisu and Stork and how they clearly dominated their opponents, I don't think it's fair to make that comparison because SC2 is so different that the way MC played is how you win in starcraft 2 its not the same as BW. Also I'm pretty disgusted that they are allowed to give their biased opinions on everything but the viewers who leave their counter biased opinions are ridiculed on air sarcastically. It really makes no sense, kind of a "high-horse" feeling to the show. well it is their show, it's one of the reason a lot of people like it too. no bullshit held back and top players speaking their minds for the most part. honestly i can see your point, but then there is no reason to watch it if you don't agree with what they are doing. | ||
Scrandom
Canada2819 Posts
March 24 2011 00:14 GMT
#12609
On March 24 2011 09:09 iNcontroL wrote: Show nested quote + On March 24 2011 08:30 Scrandom wrote: On March 24 2011 08:28 iNcontroL wrote: On March 24 2011 08:01 Scrandom wrote: What Tyler was saying about how he hates MC's playstyle and he was comparing him to BW players like Bisu and Stork and how they clearly dominated their opponents, I don't think it's fair to make that comparison because SC2 is so different that the way MC played is how you win in starcraft 2 its not the same as BW. Also I'm pretty disgusted that they are allowed to give their biased opinions on everything but the viewers who leave their counter biased opinions are ridiculed on air sarcastically. It really makes no sense, kind of a "high-horse" feeling to the show. WHAT THE FUCK? Did you call us horses? TAKE IT BACKKKKKKKKKKKKK I was being mature, thought it would produce discussion ![]() Nah. You were being a shit stirrer ![]() If you watch our show and get butthurt, like actually upset, you are watching / listening to the wrong show. That's the thing though, I'm not getting upset. I'm giving my honest opinion and I don't understand why viewers get ridiculed because of it. Yes you're allowed to give your biased opinions because it is your show, nothing wrong with that. But other people are allowed to have a voice too even if they aren't as entitled to talk about ti as people like the members of sotg | ||
kaisr
Canada715 Posts
March 24 2011 00:18 GMT
#12610
| ||
randplaty
205 Posts
March 24 2011 00:22 GMT
#12611
On March 24 2011 07:38 Talin wrote: Show nested quote + On March 24 2011 06:30 randplaty wrote: I'll give you that there's a distinct possibility that you're right... but perhaps SC2 is a completely different game than BW. Is it possible that there may not be safer builds? The games are based on the same fundamental logic, so it's fairly certain that they're not completely different games. If you're asking if it's possible that there's a 1 or 2 base timing attack that will end up being a player's best option in the long run and that it becomes so powerful that nothing can rival it in terms of success rate over a really long period of time (a year or so) and every player of that race ends up doing it, then I suppose there's a remote possibility that could happen with SC2. But that would also mean that the game is essentially broken, because nobody interested in SC2 wants the game to be revolving around a futuristic variant of a 4/6 Gate in 2014 - nobody would play it, and nobody would watch it because it would make no sense. We're not talking about some sort of a "playstyle" or "vision" that MC happens to have, it's just an abuse of the fact that people haven't yet learned the game and solved the timings puzzle to the smallest detail. The SC2 we've been watching so far is really crude and rough around the edges because of it, and for me and I suppose for most people that have been following BW scene it's really hard to be genuinely impressed by the games that current SC2 programers show. Obviously one can't hate on MC for doing it to win tournaments and cash, but it does go over the edge when you hear him say how his game is "perfect", whereas it's really really far from that. I would say the scenario you posed of a 4/6 gate variant to be the center of certain matchups is already a reality. I believe Blizzard with continue to patch and therefore timing attacks will disappear but new ones will appear. I can definitely see SC2 disappearing if Blizzard isn't able to patch away a lot of these abusive timing pushes. But a couple caveats: 1) The game right now is based on timing attacks. 2) I don't believe anyone will be able to come up with "safe" builds without serious patching from blizzard 3) Blizzard's patching philosophy is to create statistical matchup balance rather than to reduce the strength of abusive timing attacks. It's very possible that Blizzard never does anything change SC2 with regards to abusive timings and SC2 has a much shorter life than BW. That said, the game right now is centered around these timing attacks and MC has a far better understanding of these timings than any other player and that's why he's dominating. A lot of people are assuming that players will eventually discover safe builds. As the game currently stands, I don't have any evidence that those safe builds even exist. Why not admire MC for his understanding of the game and how many different variations of timing attacks that he has and how he can utilize them in different matchups rather than disparage his play based on a completely different game (BW). | ||
Slow Motion
United States6960 Posts
March 24 2011 00:32 GMT
#12612
On March 24 2011 08:34 HowSoOnIsNow wrote: Show nested quote + On March 24 2011 05:40 Slow Motion wrote: Tyler is awesome. He put into words everything I've thought about MC. The SC2 guys who call him a god and worship him right now have no idea what a really great player is like. The thing that annoys me the most about MC's in-game BM is that he did a to July. July was indeed a great player in BW. His wins were awe inspiring and beautiful in a way I've never seen from MC. MC has never accomplished what July has and I don't believe with his skills he ever will. It's like watching a cocky high school basketball player beat the current Magic Johnson 1 on 1 and then brag about it. Please, show some respect to someone who is truly greater than you are. When Tyler says he wants to meet MC in a tournament and beat him, it made me feel like standing up and cheering. I love how much Tyler still respects the BW pros. He knows his roots and history, and would never disrespect someone like July. MC is currently Goliath with all his strength and power, but Tyler is definitely David because he stands for everything that is right and honorable in esports. Nony fighting in the TSL!!! While i do not think MC is a god, he was a BW player as well. I was rooting for July at the Finals and do agree that Ming chul never really played a game that impressed me, beside his micro abilities. But thinking that Tyler can beat MC is purely wishful thinking. I also fail at understanding why you're claiming Tyler to be this pure player, the essence of SC. The Golliath vs David analogy is quite strange to me. There's no Protoss in the world that can withstand the guy. SanZenith played brilliantly troughout the GSL and got crushed against MC. Beside if the latency is horrible, Tyler will get 2-0. The guy has the momentum. If Tyler would practice 12 hours a day, 6 days a week, for a few months, he'd stand a chance. But he won't do that, probably never will. It's too bad for him. Yes MC was a BW player, and he was horrible too. The fact that he was in BW makes it worse that he was so cocky when playing July. July gave his dues to esports. He's legend status forever and MC is very very far from that. All I'm asking is for MC to show a little respect to a legend. And for sure Tyler would be the underdog vs MC, but I just loved how he came out and said he wants to play MC, while other players bitch and moan and are so scared of Korean pros. He's got balls of steel and I'll believe in him just like I believed in him to beat Idra in TSL2 even though he was the clear underdog. | ||
joheinous
Iceland522 Posts
March 24 2011 00:34 GMT
#12613
| ||
R0YAL
United States1768 Posts
March 24 2011 00:45 GMT
#12614
On March 24 2011 09:22 randplaty wrote: I would say the scenario you posed of a 4/6 gate variant to be the center of certain matchups is already a reality. I believe Blizzard with continue to patch and therefore timing attacks will disappear but new ones will appear. I can definitely see SC2 disappearing if Blizzard isn't able to patch away a lot of these abusive timing pushes. But a couple caveats: 1) The game right now is based on timing attacks. 2) I don't believe anyone will be able to come up with "safe" builds without serious patching from blizzard 3) Blizzard's patching philosophy is to create statistical matchup balance rather than to reduce the strength of abusive timing attacks. It's very possible that Blizzard never does anything change SC2 with regards to abusive timings and SC2 has a much shorter life than BW. That said, the game right now is centered around these timing attacks and MC has a far better understanding of these timings than any other player and that's why he's dominating. A lot of people are assuming that players will eventually discover safe builds. As the game currently stands, I don't have any evidence that those safe builds even exist. Why not admire MC for his understanding of the game and how many different variations of timing attacks that he has and how he can utilize them in different matchups rather than disparage his play based on a completely different game (BW). Its my belief that narrow minded people like you that will make sc2 go no where. Or at least they may dominate now but when their timing attacks dont work anymore, then what? They will lose. An all in timing attack doesnt make you god, holding it off with solid play and a next step in mind does. | ||
RmoteCntrld
United States596 Posts
March 24 2011 00:52 GMT
#12615
On March 24 2011 06:32 KevinIX wrote: Incontrol and Tyler really made todays SotG a lot of fun. I hope everyone does well in MLG. And Tyler v MC finals TSL3! Make it happen. They'll probably play each other ro8 ![]() | ||
Erandorr
2283 Posts
March 24 2011 00:59 GMT
#12616
On March 24 2011 09:14 Scrandom wrote: Show nested quote + On March 24 2011 09:09 iNcontroL wrote: On March 24 2011 08:30 Scrandom wrote: On March 24 2011 08:28 iNcontroL wrote: On March 24 2011 08:01 Scrandom wrote: What Tyler was saying about how he hates MC's playstyle and he was comparing him to BW players like Bisu and Stork and how they clearly dominated their opponents, I don't think it's fair to make that comparison because SC2 is so different that the way MC played is how you win in starcraft 2 its not the same as BW. Also I'm pretty disgusted that they are allowed to give their biased opinions on everything but the viewers who leave their counter biased opinions are ridiculed on air sarcastically. It really makes no sense, kind of a "high-horse" feeling to the show. WHAT THE FUCK? Did you call us horses? TAKE IT BACKKKKKKKKKKKKK I was being mature, thought it would produce discussion ![]() Nah. You were being a shit stirrer ![]() If you watch our show and get butthurt, like actually upset, you are watching / listening to the wrong show. That's the thing though, I'm not getting upset. I'm giving my honest opinion and I don't understand why viewers get ridiculed because of it. Yes you're allowed to give your biased opinions because it is your show, nothing wrong with that. But other people are allowed to have a voice too even if they aren't as entitled to talk about ti as people like the members of sotg This is so hilarious . Tyler specificly explained his opinion and said he would probably have to explain it again and again because some people won't get it. Looks like he was right wasn't he? Tell me honestly that you did not watch the finals and thought "weeell.. that's it i guess?" Those games were not fun creative , they were, for the most part, perfectly executed all-ins that would have left MC without any tech at all should his builds have failed. It was a gamble. What tlyer was getting at was that these builds were not safe, and since MC is the better player, he should probably not rely on risky builds but just play better than his opponent and win with control over the game at all times, like a bisu or stork in their primes. Go watch the game between MC and MVP in gsl 4 i think. Thats what mcs gambles look like when they fail. So that answers the first part of your "discussion topic" , I hope Now the reason you got rediculed is that tyler explained all that (only much better than I can) after he made that statement because he knew people like you would start these "discussions". And you still do not get it. Its pretty funny actually :D | ||
tsuxiit
1305 Posts
March 24 2011 00:59 GMT
#12617
| ||
FliedLice
Germany7494 Posts
March 24 2011 00:59 GMT
#12618
Good stuff. | ||
Dreadwolf
Canada220 Posts
March 24 2011 01:06 GMT
#12619
On March 24 2011 09:59 FliedLice wrote: It's awesome how every little bug-fart produces pages and pages of retarded, pointless, [...], idiotic discussions on this thread which could be avoided to 99% if people would actualy USE THEIR FUCKING BRAIN before posting their crap all over the place. Good stuff. God yeah, this thread never fail to deliver weeks after weeks, the only time this thread let me down a little was when everyone started arguing about the bread scandal. | ||
dacthehork
United States2000 Posts
March 24 2011 01:18 GMT
#12620
On March 24 2011 03:12 Liquid`Tyler wrote: Show nested quote + On March 24 2011 02:42 randplaty wrote: Tyler's opinion on MC is based ALL on SCBW. The game is TOTALLY different. SC1 pros are enamored with macro, but SC2 is MUCH more based on timing attacks and one decisive battle with good positioning than it was in BW. Tyler's style is SO different from MC, but it's obviously that MC's style works much better in SC2. It's not about the game as much as it's about how long people have been playing it. Ever since beta we have been saying that all in plays and strategies focusing on one strong timing will tend to dominate and win a lot. Those types of builds are really really strong and like 10 times easier to develop than the safer and more well rounded builds. There is also a problem that if there are enough different all ins, and a lack of information on one side, the all in builds actually become much stronger than playing safe, even in the long run. Given Zerg's current ability to scout etc. It could be considered longterm safe play, such as the speedling strategies in SC:BW. Jaedong is a good example of a player that mixes in a lot of all ins with sick management style. Though I do agree MC isn't "god protoss" yet. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 RotterdaM StarCraft: Brood War![]() mouzHeroMarine ![]() FunKaTv ![]() ![]() IndyStarCraft ![]() UpATreeSC ![]() SteadfastSC ![]() ProTech150 BRAT_OK ![]() ![]() -ZergGirl ![]() MindelVK ![]() Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games summit1g7992 FrodaN2026 Beastyqt1501 hiko1102 Dendi408 Lowko237 elazer193 Skadoodle111 KnowMe84 Trikslyr72 EmSc Tv ![]() Organizations Dota 2 Other Games StarCraft 2 Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War |
PiGosaur Monday
Code For Giants Cup
Online Event
HupCup
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
SOOP
Dark vs MaxPax
PiG Sty Festival
Serral vs MaxPax
ByuN vs Clem
PiG Sty Festival
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs SHIN
[BSL 2025] Weekly
[ Show More ] Online Event
PiG Sty Festival
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|