EPTand that "Do people really want chatrooms?" quote in interview is an outrage. lets pray this guy has no idea wtf he's talking about and that the other devs really know whats up and have it on their list
Cross Realm Conundrum - Page 11
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
Zelniq
United States7166 Posts
and that "Do people really want chatrooms?" quote in interview is an outrage. lets pray this guy has no idea wtf he's talking about and that the other devs really know whats up and have it on their list | ||
|
Grunor
United Kingdom19 Posts
| ||
|
Badjas
Netherlands2038 Posts
Blizzard.. how about getting serious. | ||
|
NuKedUFirst
Canada3139 Posts
On May 29 2010 06:52 killstereo wrote: Have they confirmed you will need to buy the new expansions to continue playing online with full features? It would probably be similar to how Battle.net classic works, no one plays the original, only bw. | ||
|
RogerRus
Norway87 Posts
| ||
|
Assault_1
Canada1950 Posts
us east, uswest, europe, asia you can do that in b.net 2 but u have to BUY another copy? anyway D3 is also gonna be using b.net 2.. trading's gonna be really fun without chat channels | ||
|
Zerum
Sweden348 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States46363 Posts
I hope something happens. Way to go, Kennigit! | ||
|
GoDannY
Germany442 Posts
On May 29 2010 06:51 ikarigendo wrote: /signed Blizzard won't let me post there for some reason, even though I have a beta key. Boo. That's no problem, just make sure to spread the word. I was seriosuly kinda shocked about what they said there since the LAN and Gateway thing were around and critizised since day one of beta and it seems like they dont listen at all - blizzard needs a clear feedback on that they are wrong on their choice so go here BATTLENET THREAD ON TOPIC - POST HERE or make your own thread - but leave your vote everywhere possible. | ||
|
Slayer91
Ireland23358 Posts
and then they manage to screw up one of their greatest creations that is battle.net Cross realm support Lan support Custom map support ladder/AMM suppport Stable Functional chat rooms with the basic IRC commands and also the ability to create moderated custom chat rooms for clans Flexible name changing system. Battle.net 2.0 is a mere shell of its former self. All it did was add facebook stuff and that crappy real ID which is a terrible idea anyway. Who wants to read a bunch of real names if you're trying to find someone? You make an ID for a reason. ID's are cooler anyway. Where's the sense of lore? The map descriptions used to be giving you a history while sneaking in the basics of the map, not some bland description that is better described by using the map preview. All this crap about party and conversation is just a weak version of chatrooms. Invite to a party used to be "join channel XX". Where is the logic? Seriously, what do they think they've improved? Added crappy wow stuff like achievements? | ||
|
gREIFOCs
Argentina208 Posts
They came first for the LAN play, and I didn't speak up because I don't play competitively. Then they came for cross-server support, and I didn't speak up because I only play with friends from home. Then they came for chat channels and I didn't speak up because I could manage with a Friends List. THEN THEY CAME for me and by that time I had nowhere left to speak up. I actually signed every petition for LAN play, but still, I found it somehow barely (plus I really like SC). But this, this is just a: "No, we want more money from you.". And I will not be bullied if it doesn't involve a real gun. I'll just download the game from a torrent, wait two months, and play in a private server, just like I would if i bought the game. And if that can't be the case, then I'll just move on with my life and do heavy drugs. Maybe that's better than depending on depelopers to get the fun I require. You are no longer buying SC2, you are buying US SC2, EU SC2, ASIA SC2. For example, I have better latency on US from my country, but i plan to move to Europe in 1 year (this is actually the case). Do I have to buy SC2 again along with the freaking furniture to play on the ladder that currently works better for me? You see how strange is for software to be bound to a certain region of the world? This is not a freaking DVD with extra languages. Its a online interactive plataform. Its beyond that. | ||
|
nofAcedAgent
United States952 Posts
Blizzard says they want to help grow esports with SC2, but so many decisions conflict with this completley. Great post Kennigit. | ||
|
metasonic
United States115 Posts
\singed | ||
|
starcraft911
Korea (South)1263 Posts
| ||
|
Radiomouse
Netherlands209 Posts
| ||
|
Mikilatov
United States3897 Posts
| ||
|
NuKedUFirst
Canada3139 Posts
![[image loading]](http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/3062/fankosc2.jpg) I just hope blizzard doesn't hire a hitman to come at me.. looks great as a wallpaper on your desktop  | ||
|
ThePhan2m
Norway2751 Posts
| ||
|
Piy
Scotland3152 Posts
On May 29 2010 06:47 NuKedUFirst wrote: lololol, you mean KeSPA right? As far as Blizzard managing the Sc2 scene? Im going to start digging a grave now. From the beginning of all their previous games blizzard took a pretty significant role organising tournaments. They continued long term balance problems and issues raised by the community, Now they're just hacking away without stopping to appreciate the problems they're causing. | ||
|
Mikami_
Estonia274 Posts
| ||
| ||
