• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:46
CEST 08:46
KST 15:46
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Ro4 Recap : The Peak13DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Info & Preview19herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2025)17Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, GuMiho, Classic, Cure6Code S RO8 Preview: Classic, Reynor, Maru, GuMiho4
Community News
[BSL20] RO20 Group Stage0EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1)7Weekly Cups (May 12-18): Clem sweeps WardiTV May3Code S Season 2 (2025) - Qualifier Results212025 GSL Season 2 (Qualifiers)14
StarCraft 2
General
Interview with oPZesty on Cheeseadelphia/Coaching herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2025) DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Info & Preview Power Rank: October 2018 Code S Season 2 (2025) - Qualifier Results
Tourneys
DreamHack Dallas 2025 Last Chance Qualifiers for OlimoLeague 2024 Winter $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) EWC 2025 Regional Qualifiers (May 28-June 1)
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat Mutation # 471 Delivery Guaranteed
Brood War
General
[ASL19] Ro4 Recap : The Peak ASL 19 Tickets for foreigners BW General Discussion Cwal.gg not working BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL19] Semifinal B [BSL20] RO20 Group C - Saturday 20:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] RO20 Group Stage
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Yes Sir! How Commanding Impr…
TrAiDoS
Poker
Nebuchad
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 11710 users

Oh Micro, Where Art Thou? - Page 5

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 77 78 79 Next
Sentient66
Profile Joined July 2009
United States651 Posts
April 27 2010 00:18 GMT
#81
Amazing read. I agree with every point you made in this article. I sincerely hope that the guys at Blizzard read this, and start to make some serious changes to the game.
seNsiX.421
Half
Profile Joined March 2010
United States2554 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-27 00:20:24
April 27 2010 00:18 GMT
#82
On April 27 2010 09:14 jewce wrote:
Well written post, but I'm going to have to disagree.

Is it not possible that there is new things to be discovered, now I didn't play BW from the beginning, at least from a non-UMS aspect, but I'm pretty sure most of the micro and tactics discovered in the original didn't come out within the first few months and probably even years from when it came out. And from a spectators point of view, when I watch players like NonY in the HDH invitational I find it to be very entertaining. Give the game some time, and let some new things be found.



This article to surpass that very basic element of analysis. You're looking at metgagame elements, which will be subject to change, but the post looks at the most basic element of any game, the engine. The BW metagame changed so much in such a positive direction precisely because of all the control and player input, the core element of any E-sport the engine afforded.

And the NoNY game was only interesting due to build orders. The actual micro wasn't anything impressive in comparison to BW. I'm not dissing NoNy skill as a player, I'm just saying that it was build order, not play. If that build became standard, their wouldn't be anything impressive about it, while players in SC1 continue to Oh and Ah with the most standard, mundane build orders.



Simply put, the amount something will be able to change will be limited by the amount of variables. The variables here are player input, and SC2 objectively requires less of it in so many ways. Thus, it will also be able to evolve less. One crucial element of this is the current way many units operate.
Too Busy to Troll!
UmmTheHobo
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States650 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-27 00:24:06
April 27 2010 00:18 GMT
#83
On April 27 2010 09:14 jewce wrote:
Well written post, but I'm going to have to disagree.

Is it not possible that there is new things to be discovered, now I didn't play BW from the beginning, at least from a non-UMS aspect, but I'm pretty sure most of the micro and tactics discovered in the original didn't come out within the first few months and probably even years from when it came out. And from a spectators point of view, when I watch players like NonY in the HDH invitational I find it to be very entertaining. Give the game some time, and let some new things be found.


This is bullshit. Starcraft 1 didn't have people who have spent the last ten years meticulously studying it's prequel and then applying the things they had learned to the new game.
...
Yurebis
Profile Joined January 2009
United States1452 Posts
April 27 2010 00:18 GMT
#84
At least kiting is still possible w\ ground, but air combat is completely stale. Either give splash damage or moving shot to air units to spice it up...

On April 27 2010 08:59 zomgzergrush wrote:
If you were to ask someone who has never laid eyes on starcraft before to judge ONLY movement between SC1 and SC2, he will without a doubt say that SC2 movement looks more "real" and "right." As bad as it is for competitive gaming, as a finished game in modern game industry, such details are a necessity and outweigh the need for competition.


I think airships look more realistic when they at least dont *have* to stop to shoot
Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Nemesis
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Canada2568 Posts
April 27 2010 00:19 GMT
#85
Great Article, finally someone who understands one of the main problems in sc2.
Lee Young Ho fighting! KT P are just CHINTOSSTIC.
Rakanishu2
Profile Joined May 2009
United States475 Posts
April 27 2010 00:19 GMT
#86
Micro exists in a huge way in sc2, there's just less of the micro situations that were created by blizzard on accident. Mutalisk micro created an awesome layer of gameplay, but it also kept out people who couldn't execute it completely. You can't argue blizzard meant for mutas to be played in a group with an overlord to cluster them up and swung around back and forth to maximize damage and safety from attacks.

People will still find ways to spend those APM when microing. Maybe instead of using it to muta harass, you could spend it on focus firing in battles, which I hardly ever see when I'm playing.
10 G's in the packet and I'm ready to roll, on fire like a rocket and I'm ready to blow
opiuman
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States187 Posts
April 27 2010 00:19 GMT
#87
The reason why they don't want to emulate the "buggy" parts is because in terms of overall design it's not particularly fitting. I assume that SC2 runs under some kind of basic physics system. If you kept applying all these special cases to get "unphysical" behavior it would defeat the purpose of designing with with the physics in mind in the first place.

The norm is to want the objects in your physics simulation within your game to obey the physical constraints that you would expect from real life objects. If you begin to adjust this so that the majority of objects do not obey these constraints then it would seem odd that you're spending most of the time trying to describe irregular behavior. As a result the "normal" behavior for your objects is to behave in an irregular manner. This opens up a huge can of worms because the system may become unstable depending on the implementation. It's possible to do but you risk getting strange behavior in the simulation and having all kinds of weird possibilities happening.

By cutting corners and having all the units obey the constraints the overall simulation becomes much easier to implement, has better performance and keeps the simulation accurate. Sure they could add it but I feel like it defeats the design principles of a physical simulation :[
So say we all.
palanq
Profile Blog Joined December 2004
United States761 Posts
April 27 2010 00:19 GMT
#88
Great read.

I don't think this needs to be a huge debate - giving more units moving shots is something that can be made balanced quite easily, as well as increasing the skill cap and feeling of "control" one has over one's units - something that lower level players can appreciate as well.
time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana
Two_DoWn
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States13684 Posts
April 27 2010 00:20 GMT
#89
On April 27 2010 09:15 zomgzergrush wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2010 09:09 MuffinDude wrote:
Yea. the micro mechanics are really really bad in sc2.

Great read.

On April 27 2010 09:09 zomgzergrush wrote:
The basis of this entire article though is criticizing that a design flaw from bw is not in sc2.

"moving shot" was not the only design flaw in the sc1 engine that contributed largely to competitive skill differences. A myriad of issues and poor design paved the way for all competitive sc1. Scarab AI, ALL UNIT pathing AI, pushing units past minerals, air unit clumping when teaming with units off screen, the list goes on.

You guys really think that Blizz in the development of SC1 decided: Hey, lets make hold position fire faster than attack move and skip the de-acceleration sequence before firing and then don't document it. Or: hey, let's make it so that air units stack when they have something grouped with them off screen. Does that sound realistic to you?

Even though by fixing all these issues, sc2 loses its skill gradient, it is completely unrealistic to expect the design flaws from sc1 to carry to sc2.

Then why don't blizzard take the design flaw and actually incorporated into SC2 as they are suppossed to be to increase the skill level.


I'll quote my earlier post:
However, in terms of movement, most people are looking at it at too high of a level (in developer terms, not skill terms); i.e. hold position gives a moving shot while attack move requires deacceleration. You all need to understand what's happening at a lower level(in developer terms, as in, closer to the code) and that this was not intended behavior, but simply a result of some of the flaws in the engine that were overlooked by most but only really discovered by the real competitive gamers. If you were to ask someone who has never laid eyes on starcraft before to judge ONLY movement between SC1 and SC2, he will without a doubt say that SC2 movement looks more "real" and "right." As bad as it is for competitive gaming, as a finished game in modern game industry, such details are a necessity and outweigh the need for competition.

In the end, this is all about sales. They can say whatever they want about esports and whatnot, but make no mistake, Blizzard is no different from any other game company. Whether it's a newbie buying the game and playing it for a month vs a seasoned veteran who buys it and plays it for years to come, a sale is a sale, and each of those cases count as one
.


It's very unrealistic to assume that we, the competitive gamers, make up a larger chunk of their sales than the casual gamer. Not to mention the various statements that they want to cater towards the casual gamer.

But what will sell more games: Someone using single hellion to kill a bunch of zerglings to buy enough time to get up a bunker and protect his expansion thus saving himself the game in a tournament or league that could possibly be televised, or that same hellion dying for the sake of looking more realistic?

I for one would buy the game in the first case just so I could try something like that,
"What is the air speed velocity of an unladen courier?" "Dire or Radiant?"
moonman
Profile Joined June 2009
United States33 Posts
April 27 2010 00:21 GMT
#90
On April 27 2010 09:15 Two_DoWn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2010 09:14 jewce wrote:
Well written post, but I'm going to have to disagree.

Is it not possible that there is new things to be discovered, now I didn't play BW from the beginning, at least from a non-UMS aspect, but I'm pretty sure most of the micro and tactics discovered in the original didn't come out within the first few months and probably even years from when it came out. And from a spectators point of view, when I watch players like NonY in the HDH invitational I find it to be very entertaining. Give the game some time, and let some new things be found.

I believe the point that is being made here is that those things wont be able to be found, cuz the game engine wont allow it.


How could you know that the game engine would not allow it?
Ryuu314
Profile Joined October 2009
United States12679 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-27 00:22:25
April 27 2010 00:21 GMT
#91
On April 27 2010 09:16 moonman wrote:
Sorry, but I don't agree with many points in your article. I have to say that with new builds being implemented, like nony's phoenix build, four gateways is not becoming the 'norm'. It will take some time but the variety in this game will show. As for unit dancing, blizzard is just fixing an age old bug that wasn't fixed years ago. What StarCraft II is: a new game for a new era. What it isn't: a remake of broodwar, and too many people are trying to make it just that.

But the issue being discussed here is that in order for a game to become great, it can't JUST be the innovative strategies that win games. It has to also be the skill in executing, in microing that should have a larger factor. Sure, positioning and spell casting are micro, but there's a lot less of the individual unit control and micro.

Starcraft II is a game for a new era. That is true. But that does not mean it needs to abandon all the things that made its predecessor great. This article is not calling for a destruction of the new mechanics and engine. Rather, it's asking for micro to become more viable. Why is that not good? Every successful sequel of games have always maintained what was done right and just built upon it. Take the Halo series, for example. The game engine for all three of those games pretty much stayed the same. New mechanics and items and even character models were added in each game (dual-wielding, item thingies - not sure what to call those, etc...). But why were the Halo sequels so effective and popular? Because the underlying skill it takes to play the game well has not changed. Granted, there's really not much changing that can be done in an FPS as opposed to an RTS, but why does the ability to micro need to be "nerfed" so to speak, so much?

Also, people are sure the game engine does not allow it because doing these micro tricks is stuff people have been trying and testing ever since Blizzcon.
djdolber
Profile Joined May 2008
Sweden85 Posts
April 27 2010 00:21 GMT
#92
Incredible writeup, i agree 100% with OP, very impressive.
SCV good to go sir!
avilo
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
United States4100 Posts
April 27 2010 00:22 GMT
#93
100% agree with this article and every point made. Blizzard needs to listen: now. Before beta is over and it's too late.

But with Browder in charge, it is highly unlikely they are going to change anything from the course they have gone with SC2 so far
Sup
Hammy
Profile Joined January 2009
France828 Posts
April 27 2010 00:22 GMT
#94
The big issue with your arguments is that you seem to be talking in terms of BW all the time. For example, your 8muta vs photon+corsair/phoenix doesn't make very much sense since the phoenix isn't exactly a new corsair. It just seems a bit biased to be comparing those two situations to illustrate your point.
I also object your idea regarding corruptors. Actually I think it's a pretty cool unit, and the corruption ability isn't too shabby. True, it's used rather rarely (and it makes the corruptor die to HT... but feedback is just silly against so many units now... so I doubt it's the other units you should be changing).
Regarding the Phoenix, well I'm not sure the protoss need an airborne counter to mutas. Their ground does just fine, especially with blink. Not every race needs an AtA unit, and I really like the way Protoss is looking right now. If it were up to me I'd just scrap the phoenix alltogether.

And then I wish you hadn't added the "it makes sense in real life" parts, but that's negligible.

Now that that's behind us: damn I agree with so much of this!

-The viking in flight mode, although just fine in terms of balance and all, is suuuuch a stupid design. Why make an air unit with long range if you can't even use it to kite? Does it always have to be on top of turrets or marines to stand a chance?
-I wanted to cry for my opponents when I saw they couldn't even micro their void rays while they were shooting....
-The hellion can kite decently, but the over-the-top damage is obviously there to compensate for maneuverability. That just sucks.
-The banshee: damn i couldn't agree more! Again, the unit is fantastic! The whole concept is great! Mobile AtG unit with cloak, great for harassing etc... and then they just screw it up by making it really bulky and slow and deal insane damage to balance it despite its failure to fulfill its role well.

Generally speaking: YES! Please make units more mobile by allowing moving shots! I don't want this game to be SC1.5, but creating more micro possibilities just adds depth to the game and will help the game succeed in the long run. It's not like top player's skill is already plateauing but it'd be nice to see more options. What I was looking forward to in SC2 is that a micro-heavy player could fight a macro-heavy player toe to toe. Unfortunately, so far there's no such thing as a micro-player or macro-player. I don't how to fix that, but I definitely think that increasing micro possibilities would be a step in the right direction.
Half
Profile Joined March 2010
United States2554 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-27 00:31:16
April 27 2010 00:22 GMT
#95
On April 27 2010 09:20 Two_DoWn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2010 09:15 zomgzergrush wrote:
On April 27 2010 09:09 MuffinDude wrote:
Yea. the micro mechanics are really really bad in sc2.

Great read.

On April 27 2010 09:09 zomgzergrush wrote:
The basis of this entire article though is criticizing that a design flaw from bw is not in sc2.

"moving shot" was not the only design flaw in the sc1 engine that contributed largely to competitive skill differences. A myriad of issues and poor design paved the way for all competitive sc1. Scarab AI, ALL UNIT pathing AI, pushing units past minerals, air unit clumping when teaming with units off screen, the list goes on.

You guys really think that Blizz in the development of SC1 decided: Hey, lets make hold position fire faster than attack move and skip the de-acceleration sequence before firing and then don't document it. Or: hey, let's make it so that air units stack when they have something grouped with them off screen. Does that sound realistic to you?

Even though by fixing all these issues, sc2 loses its skill gradient, it is completely unrealistic to expect the design flaws from sc1 to carry to sc2.

Then why don't blizzard take the design flaw and actually incorporated into SC2 as they are suppossed to be to increase the skill level.


I'll quote my earlier post:
However, in terms of movement, most people are looking at it at too high of a level (in developer terms, not skill terms); i.e. hold position gives a moving shot while attack move requires deacceleration. You all need to understand what's happening at a lower level(in developer terms, as in, closer to the code) and that this was not intended behavior, but simply a result of some of the flaws in the engine that were overlooked by most but only really discovered by the real competitive gamers. If you were to ask someone who has never laid eyes on starcraft before to judge ONLY movement between SC1 and SC2, he will without a doubt say that SC2 movement looks more "real" and "right." As bad as it is for competitive gaming, as a finished game in modern game industry, such details are a necessity and outweigh the need for competition.

In the end, this is all about sales. They can say whatever they want about esports and whatnot, but make no mistake, Blizzard is no different from any other game company. Whether it's a newbie buying the game and playing it for a month vs a seasoned veteran who buys it and plays it for years to come, a sale is a sale, and each of those cases count as one
.


It's very unrealistic to assume that we, the competitive gamers, make up a larger chunk of their sales than the casual gamer. Not to mention the various statements that they want to cater towards the casual gamer.

But what will sell more games: Someone using single hellion to kill a bunch of zerglings to buy enough time to get up a bunker and protect his expansion thus saving himself the game in a tournament or league that could possibly be televised, or that same hellion dying for the sake of looking more realistic?

I for one would buy the game in the first case just so I could try something like that,



I think that should have been the emphasis of the original post, looking at this from a perspective that blizzard would be. Not even necessarily a profit analysis, just saying "Mutalisk micro in SC1 is just more FUN to watch AND to play then Mutalisk micro in SC2"

Not "Which one requires more skill", which while undoubtedly important to them, is something I think they'd overlook or misinterpret in a lot of ways.

I especially agree with your corruptor suggestion. All units in SC1 had some sort of directive that promoted a specific playstyle, the Corruptor originally had/could have had many (Fight or Flight decision making, highly encouraged focus firing, target confliction). It had a role that was independent of metagame, but inherently built into the way it functioned. The current corruptor has no role what so ever. I would like someone at blizzard to articulate what a corruptor does without using the word "Collosus". Have fun.
Too Busy to Troll!
dangots0ul
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
United States919 Posts
April 27 2010 00:22 GMT
#96
wow we woah we. very nice, makes ya think
i type teamliquid into the url subconsciously... all...the...time...
Two_DoWn
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States13684 Posts
April 27 2010 00:23 GMT
#97
On April 27 2010 09:21 moonman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2010 09:15 Two_DoWn wrote:
On April 27 2010 09:14 jewce wrote:
Well written post, but I'm going to have to disagree.

Is it not possible that there is new things to be discovered, now I didn't play BW from the beginning, at least from a non-UMS aspect, but I'm pretty sure most of the micro and tactics discovered in the original didn't come out within the first few months and probably even years from when it came out. And from a spectators point of view, when I watch players like NonY in the HDH invitational I find it to be very entertaining. Give the game some time, and let some new things be found.

I believe the point that is being made here is that those things wont be able to be found, cuz the game engine wont allow it.


How could you know that the game engine would not allow it?

It was my understanding of the article that the deceleration shot built into the engine was the source of the problem, and therefore perfect control, predicated on a unit doing exactly what you say (ie, stopping and shooting as quickly as possible) would be impossible.
"What is the air speed velocity of an unladen courier?" "Dire or Radiant?"
weeeee
Profile Joined March 2010
Australia71 Posts
April 27 2010 00:24 GMT
#98
you have the map editor someone edit units behaviour so we can see if its possible (it probably is).
travolta
NonY
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
8748 Posts
April 27 2010 00:25 GMT
#99
Pretty much disagree with almost everything lalush is saying. The only thing I feel partial toward is that flying units should have a true "moving shot" rather than a "gliding shot." That's a good point. But a ton of the conclusions and ideas surrounding this core idea are pretty bad.
"Fucking up is part of it. If you can't fail, you have to always win. And I don't think you can always win." Elliott Smith ---------- Yet no sudden rage darkened his face, and his eyes were calm as they studied her. Then he smiled. 'Witness.'
Boblion
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
France8043 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-27 00:29:06
April 27 2010 00:26 GMT
#100
Great article. Probably the best written so far although you are maybe a bit too negative toward the potential of the game and Browder.

But you are 200% right about the micro problem.

The hellion and air unit micro is pathetic.
fuck all those elitists brb watching streams of elite players.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 77 78 79 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 15m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 262
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 2451
EffOrt 1103
Stork 550
TY 523
Leta 473
ggaemo 237
Zeus 141
sSak 80
Movie 47
Shinee 42
[ Show more ]
Noble 23
Bale 11
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
Dota 2
ODPixel487
League of Legends
JimRising 804
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1125
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0524
Mew2King144
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor185
Other Games
summit1g8398
WinterStarcraft508
shahzam385
PartinGtheBigBoy164
Fuzer 147
SortOf66
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick722
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH272
• practicex 42
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Scarra2641
• Stunt682
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
3h 15m
AllThingsProtoss
4h 15m
SC Evo League
5h 15m
Road to EWC
8h 15m
BSL Season 20
11h 15m
Dewalt vs TT1
UltrA vs HBO
WolFix vs TBD
Afreeca Starleague
22h 15m
BeSt vs Soulkey
AllThingsProtoss
1d 4h
Road to EWC
1d 7h
Wardi Open
2 days
SOOP
3 days
NightMare vs Wayne
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
GSL Code S
4 days
Cure vs Zoun
Solar vs Creator
The PondCast
4 days
Online Event
4 days
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
GSL Code S
5 days
GuMiho vs Bunny
ByuN vs SHIN
Online Event
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-05-16
2025 GSL S1
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
ASL Season 19
YSL S1
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
China & Korea Top Challenge
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Heroes 10 EU
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
2025 GSL S2
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.