• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:09
CEST 04:09
KST 11:09
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, GuMiho, Classic, Cure2Code S RO8 Preview: Classic, Reynor, Maru, GuMiho2Code S RO8 Preview: ByuN, Rogue, herO, Cure4[ASL19] Ro4 Preview: Storied Rivals7Code S RO12 Preview: Maru, Trigger, Rogue, NightMare12
Community News
[BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET1herO & Cure GSL RO8 Interviews: "I also think that all the practice I put in when Protoss wasn’t doing as well is paying off"0Code S Season 1 - herO & Cure advance to RO4 (2025)0Dark to begin military service on May 13th (2025)21Weekly Cups (May 5-11): New 2v2 Champs1
StarCraft 2
General
Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, GuMiho, Classic, Cure 2024/25 Off-Season Roster Moves Code S RO8 Preview: Classic, Reynor, Maru, GuMiho Code S RO8 Preview: ByuN, Rogue, herO, Cure Dark to begin military service on May 13th (2025)
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 1 - RO8 - Group B RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SEL Code A [MMR-capped] (SC: Evo) Cheeseadelphia 2025 - Open Bracket LAN! [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 1 - RO12 - Group B
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat Mutation # 471 Delivery Guaranteed Mutation # 470 Certain Demise
Brood War
General
ASL 19 Tickets for foreigners BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games Battlenet Game Lobby Simulator BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL19] Semifinal B Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL19] Semifinal A [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
[G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player Creating a full chart of Zerg builds [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Beyond All Reason Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Grand Theft Auto VI Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Elon Musk's lies, propaganda, etc. Ask and answer stupid questions here! Iraq & Syrian Civil Wars
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Books] Wool by Hugh Howey
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Why 5v5 Games Keep Us Hooked…
TrAiDoS
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
BW PvZ Balance hypothetic…
Vasoline73
ASL S19 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 17870 users

Oh Micro, Where Art Thou? - Page 39

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 37 38 39 40 41 79 Next
fantomex
Profile Joined June 2009
United States313 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-27 18:29:34
April 27 2010 18:26 GMT
#761
I'm more annoyed that my medivacs don't heal while moving than anything brought up here. But the truth is I just need better micro.

That said... its not a terrible article. Some of the attack/moving mechanics for some units should be changed. Just please don't bring back muta stacking (Sorry but that was dumb)
Replay or GTFO
Zoltan
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States656 Posts
April 27 2010 18:30 GMT
#762
I really hate the tone of this article- but i can feel the OP's need to vent his frustration over one small mechanic. I agree that the fastest air unit in the game (Pheonix) SHOULD be able to hit and run on a group of mutalisks without dying (not currently the case), However, for the rest of the units in the game, you can "dance" with most of them, and i think that hellions would be rediculously OP if you could move attack with them the way you can with vultures.

To be honest- i feel this method of thinking is only goign to set people back in SC2. Somone else already quoted Day[9] [quoteDay9 said a genius thing yesterday on his daily: You should play the game given the current set of rules and ask yourself, how do I play optimally in this situation? After you realize that you can play optimally in most situations (which I doubt anyone can claim right now), then can you only start thinking about whether the current gameplay is in any way favored to lucky all-ins as opposed to a more management macro game approach. [/quote]

And honestly while there arent any vulture/muta micro tricks like BW- theres plenty of sweet micro to be abused. Reapers jumping diagonaly up and down cliffs can cover TONS of ground in no time, hellions require absolute perfect micro to be a good tactical unit, marauders and marine micro is subtle yet wins and loses games on its own. (only terran examples from terran player), but i think i got my point across.
'HOW LONG HAVE THOSE REAPERS BEEN KILLING MY PROBES?!?!
infrinjinsin
Profile Joined April 2010
United States16 Posts
April 27 2010 18:31 GMT
#763
On April 28 2010 03:26 fantomex wrote:
I'm more annoyed that my medivacs don't heal while moving than anything brought up here.

Have you tried patrolling and then a-moving them at a 180 degree angle in rapid succession, to the injured infantry unit? Damn that Dustin Browder and his CnC tyrrany!
ZenDeX
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Philippines2916 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-27 18:36:29
April 27 2010 18:36 GMT
#764
On April 28 2010 03:30 Zoltan wrote:
I really hate the tone of this article- but i can feel the OP's need to vent his frustration over one small mechanic. I agree that the fastest air unit in the game (Pheonix) SHOULD be able to hit and run on a group of mutalisks without dying (not currently the case), However, for the rest of the units in the game, you can "dance" with most of them, and i think that hellions would be rediculously OP if you could move attack with them the way you can with vultures.

To be honest- i feel this method of thinking is only goign to set people back in SC2. Somone else already quoted Day[9] [quoteDay9 said a genius thing yesterday on his daily: You should play the game given the current set of rules and ask yourself, how do I play optimally in this situation? After you realize that you can play optimally in most situations (which I doubt anyone can claim right now), then can you only start thinking about whether the current gameplay is in any way favored to lucky all-ins as opposed to a more management macro game approach.

And honestly while there arent any vulture/muta micro tricks like BW- theres plenty of sweet micro to be abused. Reapers jumping diagonaly up and down cliffs can cover TONS of ground in no time, hellions require absolute perfect micro to be a good tactical unit, marauders and marine micro is subtle yet wins and loses games on its own. (only terran examples from terran player), but i think i got my point across.


You missed the point being so that the game can be GOOD TO WATCH which Patrol Micro clearly promotes. It just shows how the player can allocate his APM on his army so that he can come out on top (against all odds) by just microing his units properly.

If the Hellions prove to be imbalanced with Patrol Micro, the stats can be easily tweaked.
Half
Profile Joined March 2010
United States2554 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-27 18:37:54
April 27 2010 18:36 GMT
#765

I agree with the premise, but I disagree with your conclusion. SC1 has a very strong skill wall between even the lowest level of competitive play and the highest level of casual play. You could call this the D/D- wall.

In order to become D+ as a Zerg, for example, you must learn Muta micro. Period. You don't have to be great at it, but you need minimal proficiency in the concept. And since Muta micro is an arcane concept that requires a nonsensical array of inputs to work correctly, the only way to learn it is to read about it online. You'll never figure out the sequence of inputs and timings necessary otherwise.

So the division is between those who spend time researching online and those who don't.

So long as SC1's skills are based on arbitrary game engine quirks rather than explicit design, discovering them will be a question of culture rather than learning. If you're part of the TeamLiquid.net community, you can find the tricks and get ahead. If you're not, and you're not part of a similar community, you never will.


I don't get it. The premise of your sides argument was that arcane rituals like Mutalisk micro would emerge naturally, while our premise is make the game functional without said arcane rituals.



@Some other guy who posted without thinking....

To be honest- i feel this method of thinking is only goign to set people back in SC2. Somone else already quoted Day[9] [quoteDay9 said a genius thing yesterday on his daily: You should play the game given the current set of rules and ask yourself, how do I play optimally in this situation? After you realize that you can play optimally in most situations (which I doubt anyone can claim right now), then can you only start thinking about whether the current gameplay is in any way favored to lucky all-ins as opposed to a more management macro game approach.


This is so irrelevant that I think you posted in the wrong thread or something.
Too Busy to Troll!
DreaM)XeRO
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Korea (South)4667 Posts
April 27 2010 18:37 GMT
#766
long ass article. in the process of reading but it seems solid
cw)minsean(ru
AnodyneSea
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Jamaica757 Posts
April 27 2010 18:44 GMT
#767
amazing read, you pretty much nailed it. i felt the exact same way when i first played it... it just didnt feel right like BW
Lost within the hope of freedom, not for control but in the light of our cause
raga4ka
Profile Joined February 2008
Bulgaria5679 Posts
April 27 2010 18:46 GMT
#768
I have to say that the only thing that separated BW from the rest of the RTS games is as mentioned it's outdated and full of bugs as a lot of people like to point out engine . Every RTS has it's share of cool units with cool abilities just like SC 2 , but with just that don't expect it to last nearly as long as BW did . Right now it's riding the huge success wave of it's predecessor and i don't know how much will it last . I just don't get what's wrong with implementing the good features of BW in to SC2 . And everytime someone mentions this people start telling them to shut up , because SC 2 is a diffrent game . Yes it's a different game , but as its successor it should and probably will be more similar to BW then any other RTS game and i'm not talking about units and race characteristics , but how the game feels in general . SC2 should have a similar atmosphere to BW .
Half
Profile Joined March 2010
United States2554 Posts
April 27 2010 18:48 GMT
#769
On April 28 2010 01:33 Qikz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 27 2010 23:49 iG.ClouD wrote:
In my opinion the real problem about Starcraft2 is the complete lack of knowledge of the game by the developers. Moving shot is an huge issue but is not the only one. For example, I could make a thread as big about how bad this retarded unit clumping affects the game, or how some of the units in the game belong to the wrong tier (sentries and banelings), or how poorly balanced the game is due to the only fact zerg queen has larva injection. They are just a bunch of very good but common devs who are making an amazing single player game without having given the slightiest research on how a good multi player rts game should be. That fits perfectly with what Dustin said. They cared about everything else other than the graphics and units coolness after they were done with it. It's a game designed completely around its graphics and units design, which is not the most important and fun thing in an RTS. A dish that has a nice look and a poor taste in comparison. And yet they took a countless amount of years to reach this.



Retarded unit clumping? How about you MICRO your units so they don't do it?


Because clumping is actually more advantageous then Brood War Spread, it allows you to form perfect ranged concaves with two mouse clicks.
Too Busy to Troll!
Squeegy
Profile Joined October 2009
Finland1166 Posts
April 27 2010 18:52 GMT
#770
Yeah, this pretty much nailed the problem. It is one of the main reasons why WoW and its expansion TFT were such bad games. It feels like everything is happening with delay or something.
Stan: Dude, dolphins are intelligent and friendly. Cartman: Intelligent and friendly on rye bread with some mayonnaise.
SaftKalasEmil
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Sweden213 Posts
April 27 2010 18:52 GMT
#771
This is what i have been thinking about the game since i first play'd it some 5-6 weeks back!!! amazing write-up you did here and i thank you very very much for it! i stand by everything you vrote in here and i am tense about your macro write-up in the comming weeks

Take care and GL HF with the next thread!
TeamLiquid CJ Entusman #27 SaftKalasEmil.
Half
Profile Joined March 2010
United States2554 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-27 19:14:18
April 27 2010 18:52 GMT
#772
On April 28 2010 03:08 infrinjinsin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 28 2010 02:21 fatduck wrote:
"Yarr, I drink beer because I'm a real man, you're all nerds go back to brood war"


Bah.. Nerd > Nerd alcoholic

I am a total newb, this cannot be denied. I just registered to respond to this thread specifically because the tone was like "so much is WRONG with SC2." But I think pretty much everything about it is frickin awesome. I played a good deal of BW, not enough to get very good though.

Here's the thing - why on earth would anyone see only being able to select 12 units is a good thing? Only people who have invested a great deal of time to become masters at working around such a limitation could be so inane, and the moving shot exploits are the same I feel. That's kind of why I said "get a grip" but what I meant was more "take a step back and think objectively".



Nobody is suggesting selecting only twelve units in starcraft 2 is a good thing. Well, nobody intelligent.
Too Busy to Troll!
killias2
Profile Joined April 2010
United States20 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-27 19:05:00
April 27 2010 18:53 GMT
#773
I think this article has some good points, but, overall, you're making a mountain out of a mole hill. Yeah, some elements of micro have been lost, but others have been added in. I honestly don't know how you can make the argument that SC2 does not involve micro and/or does not allow pros to distinguish themselves from amateurs. These are critical points to your viewpoint, and you don't come anywhere close to proving them. Hell, as someone who plays fairly frequently (Gold) and watches a lot of replays, I just don't believe either of these points are true. Better players can differentiate themselves in plenty of ways. There are hundreds of important uses for micro in terms of harassment, pitched battles, and scouting, and I just don't see how someone who PLAYS this game can't see that.

I do think there are some problems with SC2 as things stand. Hard counters are far too prevalent and powerful. I think this is at the heart of most of the controversies. Still, even though you imply the opposite ("Starcraft had a one size fits all damage system. Now how the hell did Blizzard balance it despite not being able to give units arbitrary bonus damage values towards specific armor types?"), Starcraft actually DID have a unit type/damage type system. Why do you think bats were GREAT against Zealots and lings and absolutely awful at everything else? The difference between SC1 and 2 here is that SC2 has beefed up the system, and, IMO, probably a bit too much. This explains why buildings are too easy to destroy, thus rendering defense difficult at best (any unit with + vs. armored will rip through buildings like tissue paper), why Terran ground is essentially worthless against Protoss ground in mid-game (name a Terran unit that isn't hard countered by a major component of a mid-game Protoss army...), and why certain early cheese is so effective (fast reaper.. Jesus, WAY too effective). It also gives off the "rock, paper, scissors" feel that makes games feel slightly more luck-based than SC1 did.

Nonetheless, these problems can be dealt with without your favored mechanic, and, in fact, this mechanic does virtually nothing to address any of these problems. How would better micro-ed air lead to any changes in the balance? Phoenix may be better against Muta... but Muta will be better against virtually everything else. I also not convinced that a well micro-ed Muta couldn't respond to a well micro-ed Phoenix. Even within the contours of the game AS IS, there are solutions to these problems. First and foremost, SCOUT! Scouting is a HUGE part of this game. In fact, due to the hard counters, its quite possibly more important than in the first one. I understand that scouting while creating armies, expanding, macroing, and harassing is difficult.. but that's why you need skill. Along with all the classics of micro (skills, cliff abuse, utilizing opportunities for mobility, harassing, etc.), scouting must also use up valuable APM.

If you can't handle it, please return to Brood War. I'm sure you'll have more fun, and I won't have to read another 10 page piece on how Browder doesn't care about the fans and how SC2 is all about n00bs and bright colors.

Edit: Let me flesh out my complaint a little more here. Although I think this article has nuggets of useful analysis, it also makes -the- standard annoying SC1 fan series of mistakes. Step 1, discuss a potential flaw with SC2. Here I'm with you. Step 2, discuss the ramifications of this flaw. Here, you begin to lose me a bit, as you don't prove that SC2 has no micro, you don't prove that skills don't matter in SC2, and you don't prove that your favored mechanic would really have an impact on balance unless everything is completely rebalanced. But, whatever, it's a first cut analysis, so I can give you some slack here. Step 3, this flaw has ruined the game, possibly beyond repair. Therefore, unless redress is made, you will turn your back to SC2 forever. Here is really where you jump the shark. This game is not "ruined" by the lack of some minor mechanic and tactical differences. A lot of people have a lot of fun with it, and I think this will be born out even further as we get post-release. If you're that wrapped up in a 12 year old game, then go ahead and play it. The mere fact that SC2 has SOME MINOR distinctions from the first one does not destroy it irreparably, as it offers plenty of unique, interesting, and skill intensive elements itself. Step 4, Browder sucks and Blizzard hates its fans. This is where things really go too far. You convince yourself that they've destroyed the game with some minor tweak, and, in order to justify this, you just assume that Blizzard, Browder, Activision, etc. are just money grubbing goblins out to sully Starcraft's good name. Here is really where your analysis rubs me the wrong way, and I think you go too far with it.

In the future, FOCUS ON MAKING YOUR CASE. Talk about the issue more, compare animations. Then, if you wish to make claims about skill, then discuss APM, pro replays, pro commentary, plat tendencies, etc. The data is available. If it's as bad as you say, then APM should have little relationship with victory. If you make this claim, then -actually make the case for this claim.- Only once you've proved that there are ANY ramifications of interest should you go to Steps 3 and 4, i.e. complaining about the game being ruined and about Blizzard going to the dark side.
Qikz
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United Kingdom12022 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-27 18:59:16
April 27 2010 18:58 GMT
#774
I'm dodging out of this thread, people refuse to see both sides of the argument, I can see and understand why you think it and I mean come on this is pretty much a Brood War forum, it formed because of Brood War and there's bound to be die hard fans, but seriously some people here have given the game like 4-6 weeks and they're already moaning that it's not Brood War.

I feel people should atleast give the game alot longer.
FanTaSy's #1 Fan | STPL Caster/Organiser | SKT BEST KT | https://twitch.tv/stpl
junemermaid
Profile Joined September 2006
United States981 Posts
April 27 2010 18:59 GMT
#775
Very good read, but to claim that the design of the engine was intentional in SC1 to allow for the host of all its bugs which later proved necessary for competitive play is delusional.

The SC1 engine was a complete and utter fluke. Blizzard is trying to take, what they think, are the best parts of that engine and incorporating it into SC2. SC2 might have a host of new micro techniques available. Then again, it might not.

Since there are a ton of experienced players trying to figure out how units work, I think we'll find out soon enough if there is enough meat on them bones for SC2 to live up to its predecessor.
the UMP says YER OUT
ZenDeX
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Philippines2916 Posts
April 27 2010 19:00 GMT
#776
On April 28 2010 03:53 killias2 wrote:
[long ass post]

Examine this table:
[image loading]
Fallen
Profile Joined October 2005
Canada192 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-27 19:06:49
April 27 2010 19:01 GMT
#777
On April 28 2010 03:53 killias2 wrote:
I think this article has some good points, but, overall, you're making a mountain out of a mole hill. Yeah, some elements of micro have been lost, but others have been added in. I honestly don't know how you can make the argument that SC2 does not involve micro and/or does not allow pros to distinguish themselves from amateurs. These are critical points to your viewpoint, and you don't come anywhere close to proving them. Hell, as someone who plays fairly frequently (Gold) and watches a lot of replays, I just don't believe either of these points are true. Better players can differentiate themselves in plenty of ways. There are hundreds of important uses for micro in terms of harassment, pitched battles, and scouting, and I just don't see how someone who PLAYS this game can't see that.

I do think there are some problems with SC2 as things stand. Hard counters are far too prevalent and powerful. I think this is at the heart of most of the controversies. Still, even though you imply the opposite ("Starcraft had a one size fits all damage system. Now how the hell did Blizzard balance it despite not being able to give units arbitrary bonus damage values towards specific armor types?"), Starcraft actually DID have a unit type/damage type system. Why do you think bats were GREAT against Zealots and lings and absolutely awful at everything else? The difference between SC1 and 2 here is that SC2 has beefed up the system, and, IMO, probably a bit too much. This explains why buildings are too easy to destroy, thus rendering defense difficult at best (any unit with + vs. armored will rip through buildings like tissue paper), why Terran ground is essentially worthless against Protoss ground in mid-game (name a Terran unit that isn't hard countered by a major component of a mid-game Protoss army...), and why certain early cheese is so effective (fast reaper.. Jesus, WAY too effective). It also gives off the "rock, paper, scissors" feel that makes games feel slightly more luck-based than SC1 did.

Nonetheless, these problems can be dealt with without your favored mechanic, and, in fact, this mechanic does virtually nothing to address any of these problems. How would better micro-ed air lead to any changes in the balance? Phoenix may be better against Muta... but Muta will be better against virtually everything else. I also not convinced that a well micro-ed Muta couldn't respond to a well micro-ed Phoenix. Even within the contours of the game AS IS, there are solutions to these problems. First and foremost, SCOUT! Scouting is a HUGE part of this game. In fact, due to the hard counters, its quite possibly more important than in the first one. I understand that scouting while creating armies, expanding, macroing, and harassing is difficult.. but that's why you need skill. Along with all the classics of micro (skills, cliff abuse, utilizing opportunities for mobility, harassing, etc.), scouting must also use up valuable APM.

If you can't handle it, please return to Brood War. I'm sure you'll have more fun, and I won't have to read another 10 page piece on how Browder doesn't care about the fans and how SC2 is all about n00bs and bright colors.


Well said! I can't believe this thread is getting so much replies.

I'm glad its a different game, I wouldnt like to play "brood war with better graphics". They kept enough of the first game to get the feel of it and they did a marvelous job if you ask me. I wanted new mechanics, new units and totally different strategies and tactics. Thats what I got and im very happy with the results that I've got my hands on.

I'm sure some poeple will come up with "brood war with better graphics" custom maps and all you whiners and BW fanbois can go play that!

I'm also glad lalush wasnt on the balance team, what a horrible POS we would be playing right now lol.
oh hay
Yggdrasil Leaf
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
221 Posts
April 27 2010 19:08 GMT
#778
On April 28 2010 04:00 lolaloc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 28 2010 03:53 killias2 wrote:
[long ass post]

Examine this table:
[image loading]


"A person hears only what they understand" - Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
TheAntZ
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Israel6248 Posts
April 27 2010 19:09 GMT
#779
On April 28 2010 04:00 lolaloc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 28 2010 03:53 killias2 wrote:
[long ass post]

Examine this table:
[image loading]

Dude I am high and tripping shit but that makes sense to EVEN me. Everyone should get the point, but somehow they keep missing the damn thing.
43084 | Honeybadger: "So july, you're in the GSL finals. How do you feel?!" ~ July: "HUNGRY."
jellyfish
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States149 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-27 19:14:41
April 27 2010 19:11 GMT
#780
On April 28 2010 04:01 Fallen wrote:

Well said! I can't believe this thread is getting so much replies.

I'm glad its a different game, I wouldnt like to play "brood war with better graphics". They kept enough of the first game to get the feel of it and they did a marvelous job if you ask me. I wanted new mechanics, new units and totally different strategies and tactics. Thats what I got and im very happy with the results that I've got my hands on.

I'm sure some poeple will come up with "brood war with better graphics" custom maps and all you whiners and BW fanbois can go play that!

I'm also glad lalush wasnt on the balance team, what a horrible POS we would be playing right now lol.


I'm terribly sorry to be so blunt but your condescending attitude is too much:

If you haven't played/studied/followed competitive bw you have no idea what a good, competitive balance means.

And if you weren't talking about competitive balance, then you have no idea what this thread, and the op is talking about.
Prev 1 37 38 39 40 41 79 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
00:00
OSC Elite Rising Star #15
Chance vs TBDLIVE!
PAPI vs Luolis
Ziomek vs TBD
ReBellioN vs HonMonO
xJustxJordanx5
Liquipedia
RSL Revival
23:00
Season 1 Americas Qualifier
CranKy Ducklings118
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft560
PartinGtheBigBoy 418
RuFF_SC2 172
Nina 164
ProTech80
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 831
NaDa 76
Sharp 9
Icarus 8
Dota 2
monkeys_forever118
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
Fnx 2109
fl0m1463
Stewie2K719
Foxcn384
Other Games
summit1g13850
tarik_tv9122
Day[9].tv965
shahzam587
JimRising 349
Trikslyr60
ViBE52
JuggernautJason38
PPMD31
LeX9
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1238
StarCraft 2
ESL.tv98
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta43
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• Scarra1316
• Day9tv965
Upcoming Events
GSL Code S
7h 21m
herO vs GuMiho
Classic vs Cure
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
16h 51m
OSC
21h 51m
Korean StarCraft League
1d
RSL Revival
1d 7h
SOOP
1d 15h
HeRoMaRinE vs Astrea
BSL Season 20
1d 15h
UltrA vs Radley
spx vs RaNgeD
Online Event
2 days
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Percival vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Spirit
MaxPax vs Jumy
[ Show More ]
BSL Season 20
2 days
TerrOr vs HBO
Tarson vs Spine
RSL Revival
2 days
BSL Season 20
2 days
MadiNho vs dxtr13
Gypsy vs Dark
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Nation Wars Season 2
PiG Sty Festival 6.0
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
ASL Season 19
YSL S1
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
China & Korea Top Challenge
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
2025 GSL S1
Heroes 10 EU
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

NPSL S3
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
K-Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
2025 GSL S2
DreamHack Dallas 2025
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.