|
On April 02 2010 03:51 MorroW wrote: they need to make toss better :/ i think maruders r too strong compared to rines
They need to buff rines, nerf marauders. I think they could strike a better balance with that, imo.
|
On April 01 2010 20:27 Geo.Rion wrote: i really dont see what s the reasoning behind buffing Banshees Also broodlords nerf.. idk about it, i think it was fine, it was really hard to tech to broodlords and produce them safely. yes if you actually had them out they were really strong, but you could get killed befor that a lot easier Broodlords really needed to be nerfed, Carrier and BC isnt nearly as effective as broodlord
|
On March 31 2010 06:59 Skyze wrote:Show nested quote +On March 31 2010 06:50 Shiladie wrote:On March 31 2010 06:18 CharlieMurphy wrote:On March 31 2010 05:22 Skyze wrote: bleh. This is a bad patch IMO, done nothing to stop marauders owning everything a zerg has in first 15 minutes.. Terran is too strong, any good terran wont fall for the "baneling bust" and then just send in their MMM to dominate everything.. I doubt sunkens will be changed enough to actually do any damage to MMM.
Its like BW, cept M&M dont take any damage from sunkens... so theres no way to stop the mid-game push. They dont even need tanks, cause marauders are like a walking tank with slow agree with this. If you try and cut your losses and retreat from MnM you lose it all. If MnM tries to cut his losses and retreat he kites you into nothing as he retreats or you just let him get away to lick his wounds. Lings are supposed to counter marauders but they really don't, the marauders have too much Hp even if you sruround them, the reinforcements arrive before you finish them off and like I said you can't retreat at this point because you'll get slowed and raped by stim if you try. This is the same thoughts I've been having, zerg has to flat out win it's battles or terran just keeps getting bigger, marauders are simply too strong vs all other T1, I'd say it's time they get a small HP nerf and an attack speed nerf. That and/or nerf roaches+buff lings... I actually think thats the biggest problem in SC2 (what SpoR said), You basically cant retreat from battles in SC2.. Theres so many units that are just either too slow, or units like the marauders which slow you down.. Even like roaches vs stalkers/sentries, you cant run because the roaches are too slow (without upgrade, but even with upgrade i thnk its the same) and they just own you before you can retreat.. Air units are even worse, altho I like that in a way because it means my mutas can dominate like 5 phoenix's when they start running, but it should be fixed imo. You basically have to commit to attacking in SC2, because you cant retreat. That is probably why we are seeing so many people just sitting in their base massing armies, you cant even really pick off one unit and run back micro because running away doesnt work. The only major design flaw I see so far in SC2.
This is a big deal. On the one hand, you don't want every encounter to be optional. On the other hand you don't want to have to send a scout or scan every inch of the map when you try to move around. Marauders are the most aggravating aspect of this with the slow, no doubt. I wouldn't say all battles are this way... roaches have a ton of HP and can run from other roaches easily. Zealots obviously can run away from other zealots. It's probably a ranged problem/feature.
I guess it sort of goes back to SC/BW situations where if you run zerglings into a pack of marines you are dying if you don't outnumber... not much retreating. Same for goons or most P ground vs tanks in BW.
In summary, marauder needs to be looked at closely to balance in a fun fair way I think.
|
Maybe a buff to storm's damage is (or should be) in the works. Smaller cast area and larger damage rewards more skilled play.
|
Everyone says storm is too powerful vs m&m. Guess what? Storm was powerful vs medic/marine in sc1 too. It raped medic/marine. No reason to nerf storm just because its good.
|
On April 02 2010 05:06 hacpee wrote: Everyone says storm is too powerful vs m&m. Guess what? Storm was powerful vs medic/marine in sc1 too. It raped medic/marine. No reason to nerf storm just because its good. It made medic/marine useless in any tvp except when cheesing. Do you really want that again?
|
On April 02 2010 05:06 hacpee wrote: Everyone says storm is too powerful vs m&m. Guess what? Storm was powerful vs medic/marine in sc1 too. It raped medic/marine. No reason to nerf storm just because its good. The thing is that in SC2 mech actually does not work because of immortals, there were no immortals in SC1 now were there?
You can't do comparisons like that, so much new has been brought in to the game.
|
United Kingdom12022 Posts
On April 02 2010 05:08 Klockan3 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 02 2010 05:06 hacpee wrote: Everyone says storm is too powerful vs m&m. Guess what? Storm was powerful vs medic/marine in sc1 too. It raped medic/marine. No reason to nerf storm just because its good. It made medic/marine useless in any tvp except when cheesing. Do you really want that again?
Hope not, that would be annoying. Brood War seemed to shove Terran to get stuck going Mech in two of the matchups because medic marine just got slaughtered by toss and tanks.
|
On April 02 2010 05:06 hacpee wrote: Everyone says storm is too powerful vs m&m. Guess what? Storm was powerful vs medic/marine in sc1 too. It raped medic/marine. No reason to nerf storm just because its good.
Problem is that mech isn't viable in SCII. I've tried. I've tried countless times with my practice partner (I'm platinum T, he's platinum P--Both B- / B iCCup). No matter what psi, how I emp or how I setup, P always rolls over T. Until they fix that (if they fix that), storm is a much bigger problem in this game than the previous.
|
On April 02 2010 05:20 Gnosis wrote:Show nested quote +On April 02 2010 05:06 hacpee wrote: Everyone says storm is too powerful vs m&m. Guess what? Storm was powerful vs medic/marine in sc1 too. It raped medic/marine. No reason to nerf storm just because its good. Problem is that mech isn't viable in SCII. I've tried. I've tried countless times with my practice partner (I'm platinum T, he's platinum P--Both B- / B iCCup). No matter what psi, how I emp or how I setup, P always rolls over T. Until they fix that (if they fix that), storm is a much bigger problem in this game than the previous.
Interesting...
I'm a platinum T player, and I feel the opposite. I feel like TvP greatly favors T currently. Ghosts are quite strong, and nuking is a severely underrated and underused ability right now. If you have ghosts ANYWAY the 100/100 to nuke a protoss base seems borderline unreasonable, to be honest.
Also, psi storm isn't that bad, honestly. Micro out of it, and EMP HTs to prevent it from happening in the first place, if you can. Ghosts have 100 HP and you can put them near the front of your army without feeling bad about it. They are fine fighters, too, against light units. I'm far more scared of colossi than HTs, for sure.
That said, I still feel like TvZ is a bit broken in favor of Z. Either I don't know how to play TvZ at all, but good zergs just roll me over due to the breaking power of banelings, power of zerglings vs bio keeping me in my base earlygame, and the queen/zerg macro mechanics make the matchup seemingly unwinnable.
|
On April 02 2010 06:22 Slurgi wrote:Show nested quote +On April 02 2010 05:20 Gnosis wrote:On April 02 2010 05:06 hacpee wrote: Everyone says storm is too powerful vs m&m. Guess what? Storm was powerful vs medic/marine in sc1 too. It raped medic/marine. No reason to nerf storm just because its good. Problem is that mech isn't viable in SCII. I've tried. I've tried countless times with my practice partner (I'm platinum T, he's platinum P--Both B- / B iCCup). No matter what psi, how I emp or how I setup, P always rolls over T. Until they fix that (if they fix that), storm is a much bigger problem in this game than the previous. Interesting... I'm a platinum T player, and I feel the opposite. I feel like TvP greatly favors T currently. Ghosts are quite strong, and nuking is a severely underrated and underused ability right now. If you have ghosts ANYWAY the 100/100 to nuke a protoss base seems borderline unreasonable, to be honest. Also, psi storm isn't that bad, honestly. Micro out of it, and EMP HTs to prevent it from happening in the first place, if you can. Ghosts have 100 HP and you can put them near the front of your army without feeling bad about it. They are fine fighters, too, against light units. I'm far more scared of colossi than HTs, for sure. That said, I still feel like TvZ is a bit broken in favor of Z. Either I don't know how to play TvZ at all, but good zergs just roll me over due to the breaking power of banelings, power of zerglings vs bio keeping me in my base earlygame, and the queen/zerg macro mechanics make the matchup seemingly unwinnable.
You're speaking in terms of pure mech, right? Not biomech? (I don't consider ghosts to be bio in mech build).
|
|
On April 02 2010 06:26 Gnosis wrote:Show nested quote +On April 02 2010 06:22 Slurgi wrote:On April 02 2010 05:20 Gnosis wrote:On April 02 2010 05:06 hacpee wrote: Everyone says storm is too powerful vs m&m. Guess what? Storm was powerful vs medic/marine in sc1 too. It raped medic/marine. No reason to nerf storm just because its good. Problem is that mech isn't viable in SCII. I've tried. I've tried countless times with my practice partner (I'm platinum T, he's platinum P--Both B- / B iCCup). No matter what psi, how I emp or how I setup, P always rolls over T. Until they fix that (if they fix that), storm is a much bigger problem in this game than the previous. Interesting... I'm a platinum T player, and I feel the opposite. I feel like TvP greatly favors T currently. Ghosts are quite strong, and nuking is a severely underrated and underused ability right now. If you have ghosts ANYWAY the 100/100 to nuke a protoss base seems borderline unreasonable, to be honest. Also, psi storm isn't that bad, honestly. Micro out of it, and EMP HTs to prevent it from happening in the first place, if you can. Ghosts have 100 HP and you can put them near the front of your army without feeling bad about it. They are fine fighters, too, against light units. I'm far more scared of colossi than HTs, for sure. That said, I still feel like TvZ is a bit broken in favor of Z. Either I don't know how to play TvZ at all, but good zergs just roll me over due to the breaking power of banelings, power of zerglings vs bio keeping me in my base earlygame, and the queen/zerg macro mechanics make the matchup seemingly unwinnable. You're speaking in terms of pure mech, right? Not biomech? (I don't consider ghosts to be bio in mech build).
Maybe I misunderstood. I thought you were stating that mech is unviable, but that psi storm rapes bio as it did in SC1.
You're saying that psi storm is effective against mech in SC2? I struggle a bit to see that, as any sort of spacing at all by tanks makes it unfeasible. It's all a moot point though, because tanks are unfeasible against protoss (almost every unit counters tanks. It's ridiculous). Hellions also don't seem to hold up against anything but zealots. Thors might be better in the matchup than people are giving them credit, but I haven't really tried them or thought it it too much.
|
United States47024 Posts
On April 02 2010 06:47 Slurgi wrote: You're saying that psi storm is effective against mech in SC2? I struggle a bit to see that, as any sort of spacing at all by tanks makes it unfeasible. It's all a moot point though, because tanks are unfeasible against protoss (almost every unit counters tanks. It's ridiculous). Hellions also don't seem to hold up against anything but zealots. Thors might be better in the matchup than people are giving them credit, but I haven't really tried them or thought it it too much. He was responding to a post saying that psionic storm was fine in SC1, and therefore, incredibly powerful psionic storm is fine in SC2. His point was that in SC1, psionic storm forced Terran to go mech. In SC2, Terran doesn't have that option because of how comparatively weak mech is right now, so having storm be so strong that it locks out bio would ruin the matchup.
|
On April 02 2010 06:47 Slurgi wrote:Show nested quote +On April 02 2010 06:26 Gnosis wrote:On April 02 2010 06:22 Slurgi wrote:On April 02 2010 05:20 Gnosis wrote:On April 02 2010 05:06 hacpee wrote: Everyone says storm is too powerful vs m&m. Guess what? Storm was powerful vs medic/marine in sc1 too. It raped medic/marine. No reason to nerf storm just because its good. Problem is that mech isn't viable in SCII. I've tried. I've tried countless times with my practice partner (I'm platinum T, he's platinum P--Both B- / B iCCup). No matter what psi, how I emp or how I setup, P always rolls over T. Until they fix that (if they fix that), storm is a much bigger problem in this game than the previous. Interesting... I'm a platinum T player, and I feel the opposite. I feel like TvP greatly favors T currently. Ghosts are quite strong, and nuking is a severely underrated and underused ability right now. If you have ghosts ANYWAY the 100/100 to nuke a protoss base seems borderline unreasonable, to be honest. Also, psi storm isn't that bad, honestly. Micro out of it, and EMP HTs to prevent it from happening in the first place, if you can. Ghosts have 100 HP and you can put them near the front of your army without feeling bad about it. They are fine fighters, too, against light units. I'm far more scared of colossi than HTs, for sure. That said, I still feel like TvZ is a bit broken in favor of Z. Either I don't know how to play TvZ at all, but good zergs just roll me over due to the breaking power of banelings, power of zerglings vs bio keeping me in my base earlygame, and the queen/zerg macro mechanics make the matchup seemingly unwinnable. You're speaking in terms of pure mech, right? Not biomech? (I don't consider ghosts to be bio in mech build). Maybe I misunderstood. I thought you were stating that mech is unviable, but that psi storm rapes bio as it did in SC1. You're saying that psi storm is effective against mech in SC2? I struggle a bit to see that, as any sort of spacing at all by tanks makes it unfeasible. It's all a moot point though, because tanks are unfeasible against protoss (almost every unit counters tanks. It's ridiculous). Hellions also don't seem to hold up against anything but zealots. Thors might be better in the matchup than people are giving them credit, but I haven't really tried them or thought it it too much.
Ah, sorry I wasn't clear. No, I don't think psi storm is effective against mech in SC2. I think it is (or was) more effective against bio (maybe since patch that's not the case anymore). But otherwise I agree with your thoughts here.
Edit* Didn't see the post above.
|
On April 02 2010 05:09 Puosu wrote:Show nested quote +On April 02 2010 05:06 hacpee wrote: Everyone says storm is too powerful vs m&m. Guess what? Storm was powerful vs medic/marine in sc1 too. It raped medic/marine. No reason to nerf storm just because its good. The thing is that in SC2 mech actually does not work because of immortals, there were no immortals in SC1 now were there? You can't do comparisons like that, so much new has been brought in to the game.
Except that immortals are 100% useless in PvT as long as the Terran has a ghost and isn't mentally handicapped
|
You can't do comparisons like that, so much new has been brought in to the game.
Except that immortals are 100% useless in PvT as long as the Terran has a ghost and isn't mentally handicapped
this
|
|
|
|