EPTSorry for the lack of content, but I've searched both google and TL for a long time and have yet to find a definitive answer to this question. I ask because I'm wondering how large of a monitor I should get.
Thanks.
SC2: Maximum Display Resolution?
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
NeVeR
1352 Posts
Sorry for the lack of content, but I've searched both google and TL for a long time and have yet to find a definitive answer to this question. I ask because I'm wondering how large of a monitor I should get. Thanks. | ||
|
Viperskwa
United States106 Posts
| ||
|
Pufftrees
2449 Posts
| ||
|
Chuiu
3470 Posts
| ||
|
Pokebunny
United States10654 Posts
| ||
|
udgnim
United States8024 Posts
more curious if the SC2 beta supports eyefinity resolutions | ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
On February 20 2010 10:41 udgnim wrote: would expect up to 2560*1600 for single monitor more curious if the SC2 beta supports eyefinity resolutions unlikely because that would have to be squished together else eyefinity has a huge advantage of seeing more of the field. eyefinity in games is mean for person point of view 1st and 3rd where you feel engulfed by the environment not a top down view. | ||
|
NeVeR
1352 Posts
| ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
On February 20 2010 11:00 NeVeR wrote: More resolution means you can see more area on the screen, but at the same time, everything becomes smaller. Do you guys think that higher resolutions could impede micro? That's not correct higher resolution should not give more space blizzard should scale the game properly to aspect ratios but camera height should never change. Although i have yet to see a comparison between 4:3 5:4 16  16:10 | ||
|
NeVeR
1352 Posts
On February 20 2010 11:03 Virtue wrote: That's not correct higher resolution should not give more space blizzard should scale the game properly to aspect ratios but camera height should never change. Although i have yet to see a comparison between 4:3 5:4 16 16:10http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=112931 It doesn't look like the game is scaled, according to this. | ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
On February 20 2010 11:05 NeVeR wrote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=112931 It doesn't look like the game is scaled, according to this. I didn't mean aspect raitos but i mean resolution All rts games seem to suffer from inability to show all the same screen no matter what ratio take a look at C&C3 But i hope things like 1440x900 1680x1050 1920x1200 all 16 should show the same picture (although higher resolution the better the game will look smoother etc) | ||
|
NeVeR
1352 Posts
| ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
screens work best but i'd also think having a large screen helps see everything because you don't have to stick you face up against the screen to see detail and high resolution makes the picture cleaner again helping you see the game. | ||
|
NeVeR
1352 Posts
| ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
as 16 gives the most view of the map apparently | ||
|
vaderseven
United States2556 Posts
It defaulted to 1080p / 1920 x 1080 at first but I changed that 1st thing. | ||
|
Tyrannon
Germany113 Posts
| ||
|
sqwert
United States781 Posts
| ||
|
siNdreAd
United States40 Posts
| ||
|
ffswowsucks
Greece2297 Posts
| ||
|
aRoNwAr
Austria3 Posts
| ||
|
baconbits
United States419 Posts
Really not useful though when you have to turn your head to look between your unit count and abilities to the other side of the map.. better for FPS type games then RTS. as for scaling, you see the same viewing area on 1920x1080 as you do at 1366x768; only sd 4:3 resolutions cut off part of the viewing area. | ||
|
bball2
Canada49 Posts
Side note: I play at 1920x1200 resolution on windows 7 with bootcamp. Settings are ultra textures, high graphics, and 3d portraits on; consistently gets about 25-40fps. | ||
|
aRoNwAr
Austria3 Posts
| ||
|
Pufftrees
2449 Posts
On September 03 2010 10:14 aRoNwAr wrote: i want constant 100-200 fps! got a 27" right now with a geforce gtx 460... is it better to buy a smaller monitor 20" or 22" ? After 60 fps or so it's not really noticeable. You must be getting near 60+ with a 460 even on a 27". I run over 60fps with a 9800gtx on a monitor that large (max res). | ||
|
aRoNwAr
Austria3 Posts
and its maybe better to play on a smaller screen ? field of vision.... | ||
|
asdfjh
Canada230 Posts
| ||
|
taeron
2 Posts
| ||
|
DreXxiN
United States494 Posts
| ||
| ||
