• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 13:27
CET 19:27
KST 03:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting12[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3
Community News
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship4[BSL21] RO32 Group Stage3Weekly Cups (Oct 26-Nov 2): Liquid, Clem, Solar win; LAN in Philly2Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win82025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!10
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8) RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting RSL S3 Round of 16
Tourneys
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) $3,500 WardiTV Korean Royale S4 WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace
Brood War
General
SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review [BSL21] RO32 Group Stage BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Practice Partners (Official) [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions
Tourneys
BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION [ASL20] Grand Finals Small VOD Thread 2.0 The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Current Meta How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Dating: How's your luck? Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Why we need SC3
Hildegard
Career Paths and Skills for …
TrAiDoS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1484 users

Verdict: Does SC2 play close to SC1? - Page 6

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 Next All
sluggaslamoo
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Australia4494 Posts
February 19 2010 01:53 GMT
#101
On February 18 2010 23:04 Jyvblamo wrote:
I find I can distinguish most units from a low quality stream, except when they're on creep. Then I don't know fuck all that's going on.


Most of them look like the gamma and contrast is too low. Im sure if you turned them up it would be a lot better.
Come play Android Netrunner - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=409008
GGTeMpLaR
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States7226 Posts
February 19 2010 01:54 GMT
#102
I like it more than any game i've ever played.
gumbum8
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States721 Posts
February 19 2010 05:21 GMT
#103
On February 19 2010 10:54 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
I like it more than any game i've ever played.

The beta is better than anything you've ever played and you've played it for a day?
A little soon maybe lol?
but really, has anyone REALLY been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
D10
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
Brazil3409 Posts
February 19 2010 06:57 GMT
#104
On February 19 2010 14:21 gumbum8 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 19 2010 10:54 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
I like it more than any game i've ever played.

The beta is better than anything you've ever played and you've played it for a day?
A little soon maybe lol?


He didnt say its better, just that he likes it more than all the other things he ever played ...
" We are not humans having spiritual experiences. - We are spirits having human experiences." - Pierre Teilhard de Chardin
Doso
Profile Joined March 2008
Germany769 Posts
February 19 2010 07:13 GMT
#105
I find SC-2 plays faster than SC1, and yes - that is no joke.
Quesadilla
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States1814 Posts
February 19 2010 07:14 GMT
#106
It's really fun.. And it's fast as hell! I feel like I can die in this game 2x as fast as SC1. And the macro things that bothered everybody don't seem to be noobing it up. If you can't macro, you can't macro.
Make a lot of friends. Wear good clothes. Drink good beer. Love a nice girl.
On_Slaught
Profile Joined August 2008
United States12190 Posts
February 19 2010 07:20 GMT
#107
It looks easy and fast because noone has any idea what they are doing.

None is countering anything and first attacks seem to be winning a lot of the games.

It does seem clear, tho, that Blizzard wants games to be faster paced (and this seems to be the case).

For those who think it looks to easy, just wait until you see this stuff in the hands of pros who break down every little thing. They will find ways to form a gap between the good and "everybody else."
son1dow
Profile Joined May 2009
Lithuania322 Posts
February 19 2010 07:40 GMT
#108
On February 18 2010 23:46 jdr_ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2010 09:33 Skyze wrote:
On February 18 2010 09:21 Kenpachi wrote:
On February 18 2010 09:14 StoLiVe wrote:
its seems ez because there is only war3 player and they suck

so for the few starcraft player it's so ez

wait for later after few new invite

it hurts to see war3 players get the key but not SC. WE ARE MORE DESERVING


it'll be funny to see all the war3 players dominating the top 20 US ladder spots in afew weeks. Bank on it. At least 90%.

Its the WOW players playing right now that sucks, its no question the War3 players are probably owning SC/BW players right now.


As someone that was a pretty solid Ladder player on WC3:TFT that recently dropped WC3 alltogether to pick up starcraft, im kinda baffled at your comment.

WC3 is the easier of the two games by far, standard play is always better than unstandard play unless you're going for a pure shock win, races like human can abandon map control indefinitely and still win because towers are fucking overpowered and have been for the last 3 years.

I can tell you that as a C- zerg player i've had to master infinitely more RTS-pertinent skills than I ever had to in wc3, a game where I actually managed to use variations of fiend builds in every matchup. In WC3, map control doesn't matter(very much), macro doesn't matter, and random luck of the draw can lose you a game(tome of experience, blademaster getting a bunch of circlet drops, etc)

SC players are superior.


I haven't played wc3 too much but from every clue I'm getting, I think they are, but the question is can the SC B-teamers/late sc pros beat the nonstop SC2 wc3ers?
Play more Quake.
IskatuMesk
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
Canada969 Posts
February 19 2010 08:05 GMT
#109
My opinion;

Sc2 is twice as fast as sc1. The economy comes very fast, the units do insane amounts of damage and generally attack faster as well. Big battles can end in seconds except for specific matchups. Flanking is probably more important than individual micro at this point, especially when you are talking about carriers or colossi both of which can utterly decimate most of the things you can throw at them head-on. In my opinion it's too fast, units do too much damage. At first it's very hard to keep yourself from floating tons and tons of cash but as you get used to the game it becomes easier to control that; except for gas, I'm still having problems managing gas and I always run out because I'm too used to sc1-style gas management.

Is it easy? No. Is it easier than sc1? Yes. In my experience it is, once you start getting used to it you start realizing you don't need to pay attention to units as much as you used to because the damage values are so high it devalues unit control. If you have this unit and he has that unit there's a 70% chance you'll curbstomp him no matter what he tries to do. The damage bonuses on some units, like Immortals, are insane. If they reduced the damage values considerably I think the battles would play much more like sc1 and be much more interesting.

Does it play close to sc1? It bears a passing resemblance. But the gameflow is extremely different and more bursty and sporadic. Momentary decisions have mattered more for me than strategic planning or tactical powress. I prefer sc1 over this, but sc2 has its own charm.

Readability? My friend and I built 300-400 zerglings a piece and set the pathing engine to a big test with lings and moving and ultras and such, making huge writhing masses of zerglings that filled about half the screen so dense you could only see flailing wings and legs. Was easy for me to tell whose lings were which. I have zero problems reading the game, and I'm not exactly experienced in that kind of thing. Graphics are crisp but terrain could be higher resolution, it's kind of blurry. I do not believe this a game you want to watch on a 320x200 fuzzy resolution. It won't work. You need HD streams or videos for this. That's just the way high-resolution games are. Sometimes the colors of zerg units do mesh together but ingame it's very easy for me to tell them apart. The differing quality of video codecs and such will most certainly skew this at the lower resolutions.

Performance? My i7, which they've said has performance issues, handles nuking 500 zerglings, 300 overlords, and a bunch of other stuff with no hitch. They've done a really good job with the engine. There is one way to cripple the game though - burrow those zerglings over and over and spawn thousands of burrow decals. Guaranteed to knife your fps. Battles do not impact my performance while frapsing 1920x1200. Geysers can impact my performance; probably a bug of some kind related to their distortion shader.

Everything is subject to change. My opinion now is meaningless because it's a beta. It will change. What I do now will probably not work in a month. It certainly won't apply to release. So I'm just enjoying sc2 for the moment and not caring about specifics.
iFU.pauline
Profile Joined September 2009
France1655 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-19 08:19:49
February 19 2010 08:14 GMT
#110
i think the positive aspect is due to the fact that it is a brand new game, i played, i find it to be very far from sc1. There is a W3 feeling that i don't really like. I guess everybody can understand what i mean. DT sound's like night elf with a sword.
You don't have that deadly precision that offer sc1, sometimes it seems that things just happen like that. That's exactly what i felt when i first tried w3 beta. Things aren't enough BRUTAL, it's too smooth too oily, too easy to watch and play.

SC2 is Disneyland version of SC1, that's MY feeling for now.
No coward soul is mine, No trembler in the world's storm-troubled sphere, I see Heaven's glories shine, And Faith shines equal arming me from Fear
drivec
Profile Joined May 2009
United States354 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-19 08:23:58
February 19 2010 08:23 GMT
#111
fast paced for sure good game i hate protoss in sc1 and now also in sc2 colossi is so hard to counter with anything on the ground(edit as a terran player*) it feels but iam a noob so idk
starcraft is chess at warp speed
Skew
Profile Blog Joined October 2006
United States1019 Posts
February 19 2010 08:23 GMT
#112
it plays like a space sequel to dawn of war, but i wasn't expecting it to be half as good as sc1 anyways so whatever.
Boonbag
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
France3318 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-19 09:38:52
February 19 2010 09:37 GMT
#113
it's funny how a certain level of player basically share the same opinion so far, while most of the newbies share the exact opposite opinion


besides ive been watching streams for the past 24 hours and it's almost as boring as watching wc3 =[

everything looks dull and inacurate
Boonbag
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
France3318 Posts
February 19 2010 09:42 GMT
#114
Like right now im watching guemchi microing his probe vs hydralisks and surronding them and making them bug around and saving his ass and I know this can't happen in sc2 =[
IceCube
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Croatia1403 Posts
February 19 2010 09:43 GMT
#115
From what I saw it looks very freaking easy, but Im not the best judge coz I don't even know half of the units or buildings in sc2.
Forever Vulture.. :(
Boonbag
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
France3318 Posts
February 19 2010 09:51 GMT
#116
What'd be interesting maybe, would be someone able to dig opinion of top wc2 players on SC upon release.
Railz
Profile Joined July 2008
United States1449 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-02-19 10:12:20
February 19 2010 10:04 GMT
#117
I love it as of right now. Base management is still alive and well, especially for Terran and Zerg afaik. The only thing that I feel might need some tweaking is unit HP. Things die too quick. Even when I win, even with a better thought out strategy - it doesn't feel accomplishing on a single battle scale.

I feel like teir 1.5 units do waaaay too much damage throughout the game.

Roaches and Reapers are guilty of this damage scaling way too high for the coast. Reapers grenades need a lower damage, and roaches either need a slower attack speed or movement speed. Stalkers are the only comparable tech wise to those two, but they don't really exhibit immense damage. While stalkers do bonus damage to roaches, they just can't win without blink because of roaches early speed and attack speed. Later on it just gets more difficult with burrow. Archons (Archon/HT old school) are still the strongest against any game zerg but roaches just give zerg too much early map control. Terran just have to out micro and hope to god they can make it to late game or win through harass. Marauders can do decent damage to them, but you'll end up losing a trade off war as not enough marines can spell demise TvZ. I was contemplating a Marauder/Hellion early game ala Fantasy vulture first style but I wasn't sure about timing.

(I hate Roaches if you can't tell)

Beyond that, I just wish Siege Tanks were bigger I guess. They so tiny!
Did the whole world just get a lot smaller and go whooosh?_-` Number 0ne By.Fantasy Fanatic!
Feefee
Profile Joined November 2009
Canada556 Posts
February 19 2010 11:09 GMT
#118
I think it's far too early to claim that the game "plays like war3" or that you "can't bug out Hydralisks with probes". Well maybe you can't but I'm sure nobody had a clue how to do that in the SC1 beta either.
From what I see almost every protoss goes 3 gate zealot right now. Go grab me any noob or even an expert in any RTS that isn't SC1, and have him play a few SC1 games against a 1 base zealot all-in. You sure as hell won't see your amazing micro and your incredible starcraft gameplay. You'll see the exact same thing people are doing in SC2 now: counter mass units is mass units.
I have yet to see any terran make use of his wall-in to tech up, or use siege tanks to secure map control. Is it impossible to do? who knows, nobody has tried.
I wasn't there in the early days but as far as I remember, even in the pro scene, SC1 used to be all 1base play. I bet you'd call SC1 "too WC3-like" if you saw it back then. The way people play the SC2 beta now is the way I used to play SC1 LAN games versus my friend back in the day. Honestly NO difference: one-base, just mass units. Nobody even does good scouting yet in SC2.
ParanoiaDHerO
Profile Joined July 2009
United States183 Posts
February 19 2010 11:28 GMT
#119
On February 19 2010 17:05 IskatuMesk wrote:
My opinion;

Sc2 is twice as fast as sc1. The economy comes very fast, the units do insane amounts of damage and generally attack faster as well. Big battles can end in seconds except for specific matchups. Flanking is probably more important than individual micro at this point, especially when you are talking about carriers or colossi both of which can utterly decimate most of the things you can throw at them head-on. In my opinion it's too fast, units do too much damage. At first it's very hard to keep yourself from floating tons and tons of cash but as you get used to the game it becomes easier to control that; except for gas, I'm still having problems managing gas and I always run out because I'm too used to sc1-style gas management.

Is it easy? No. Is it easier than sc1? Yes. In my experience it is, once you start getting used to it you start realizing you don't need to pay attention to units as much as you used to because the damage values are so high it devalues unit control. If you have this unit and he has that unit there's a 70% chance you'll curbstomp him no matter what he tries to do. The damage bonuses on some units, like Immortals, are insane. If they reduced the damage values considerably I think the battles would play much more like sc1 and be much more interesting.

Does it play close to sc1? It bears a passing resemblance. But the gameflow is extremely different and more bursty and sporadic. Momentary decisions have mattered more for me than strategic planning or tactical powress. I prefer sc1 over this, but sc2 has its own charm.

Readability? My friend and I built 300-400 zerglings a piece and set the pathing engine to a big test with lings and moving and ultras and such, making huge writhing masses of zerglings that filled about half the screen so dense you could only see flailing wings and legs. Was easy for me to tell whose lings were which. I have zero problems reading the game, and I'm not exactly experienced in that kind of thing. Graphics are crisp but terrain could be higher resolution, it's kind of blurry. I do not believe this a game you want to watch on a 320x200 fuzzy resolution. It won't work. You need HD streams or videos for this. That's just the way high-resolution games are. Sometimes the colors of zerg units do mesh together but ingame it's very easy for me to tell them apart. The differing quality of video codecs and such will most certainly skew this at the lower resolutions.

Performance? My i7, which they've said has performance issues, handles nuking 500 zerglings, 300 overlords, and a bunch of other stuff with no hitch. They've done a really good job with the engine. There is one way to cripple the game though - burrow those zerglings over and over and spawn thousands of burrow decals. Guaranteed to knife your fps. Battles do not impact my performance while frapsing 1920x1200. Geysers can impact my performance; probably a bug of some kind related to their distortion shader.

Everything is subject to change. My opinion now is meaningless because it's a beta. It will change. What I do now will probably not work in a month. It certainly won't apply to release. So I'm just enjoying sc2 for the moment and not caring about specifics.



This guy is almost spot on imo. The game is NOT slow, or easy, at all. I like so many cruised through the placement matches to get into platinum league thinking "Lol I'm a badass and this game is easy" Turns out that was not only stupid, but very very wrong. Artosis is the #1 player in my plat division as well, props to him for playing random and owning.

The game feels a lot a like but as has been stated the eco is ridiculous almost, some of the abilities are required to use and you almost cant keep up on spending imo. I play Terran and after my first rax and getting orbital command, i cant keep my money down on 3 rax/fact/port hardly. The game plays very smooth and quick, it only appears to play slowly versus newbs, no offense to them.

I basically coulda just quoted this guy and said that's it but I wanted to explain why I think this way. There is no problem telling which unit is which, at all. If you can't tell by your 10th or game you should probably play every race in custom and build 1 of every unit to check it out.

As for balance.. imo it's not AS balanced as sc, ofc. But who does that really surprise? lol it's beta and it's been out for 2 days. I only see slight imbalance, not huge or game ruining. I also believe Blizzard stated something like "don't see them as imbalance but that they have an exact counter" Which is good, cause if you don't see it that way and are kind of new, you will think some units are grossly OP, imo they aren't, maybe just slightly :p

Great game, perfect pathing as promised, though that may hurt some of us more than help us >.< lol

Osmoses
Profile Blog Joined October 2008
Sweden5302 Posts
February 19 2010 11:36 GMT
#120
Yes I think the issue of less than amazing streamed games are due to the fact that nobody is good at the game yet.
Excuse me hun, but what is your name? Vivian? I woke up next to you naked and, uh, did we, um?
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
LAN Event
18:00
Merivale 8: Swiss Groups Day 2
SteadfastSC205
IndyStarCraft 78
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
UpATreeSC 216
SteadfastSC 205
IndyStarCraft 78
BRAT_OK 70
JuggernautJason41
MindelVK 13
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 436
Hyuk 213
Bonyth 106
White-Ra 85
Rock 28
Aegong 25
Yoon 21
ivOry 15
Free 12
Shine 8
Dota 2
qojqva3226
Dendi1264
420jenkins391
canceldota15
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
ScreaM105
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu289
Other Games
FrodaN1128
Beastyqt821
KnowMe262
Fuzer 238
ToD128
ArmadaUGS113
QueenE74
Trikslyr53
nookyyy 45
Models3
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL231
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 43
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV550
League of Legends
• Nemesis1854
• TFBlade670
Other Games
• imaqtpie481
• Shiphtur230
Upcoming Events
OSC
4h 33m
The PondCast
15h 33m
LAN Event
20h 33m
Replay Cast
1d 4h
OSC
1d 17h
LAN Event
1d 20h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
2 days
LAN Event
2 days
[ Show More ]
IPSL
2 days
dxtr13 vs OldBoy
Napoleon vs Doodle
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
3 days
LAN Event
3 days
IPSL
3 days
JDConan vs WIZARD
WolFix vs Cross
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Classic vs Solar
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 21 Points
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025

Upcoming

BSL Season 21
SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
META Madness #9
LHT Stage 1
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.