Anything like taht is good for breakfast
Generally speaking vegetable fruits nuts, seeds, meats, birds, fish, eggs, maybe dairy if you ain't allergic
| Forum Index > Sports |
|
eshlow
United States5210 Posts
September 12 2011 23:28 GMT
#11481
Anything like taht is good for breakfast Generally speaking vegetable fruits nuts, seeds, meats, birds, fish, eggs, maybe dairy if you ain't allergic | ||
|
phyre112
United States3090 Posts
September 12 2011 23:38 GMT
#11482
On September 13 2011 08:15 dudeman001 wrote: Show nested quote + On September 13 2011 08:08 Tevo wrote: Hey all, new poster to H&F trying to get into a bit healthier lifestyle. I'm not fat or unfit by any means, I'm a tall, relatively lean (though not skinny) guy. I do eat quite unhealthy though, I absolutely love pasta and pizza, and don't eat nearly enough fruit. I do eat quite some veggies, salads and good meats though so I guess that's good. I've been reading through the OP of this topic, and the main thing I'm wondering is: what do you guys have for breakfast?! I like my bread, I eat healthy(?) brown bread with grains and nuts in it, preferably with peanut butter or some meat like ham or chicken and cheese. Is a breakfast like that really that detrimental to me living healthy? Could someone here please elaborate on their diet? Maybe give an example of what you guys would eat in an ordinary school or workday? It'd be much appreciated, thanks! Eggs, some bacon, ham or sausage. Omelets are the bomb. You could probably cut out a lot of grains from your diet if you're looking to eat healthier. If you can't go without em, try limiting yourself to one or two days a week where you eat some bread, but remember that it's eat, not gorge. This. Omelette with some green pepper, mushroom, onion, and bacon on the side. Two glasses of milk - best breakfast EVER. Just got done a ROUGH day. Went to the gym, 215 3x5 squats, 145 2x5 + 150 1x5 + 160 1x2 bench, 110 3x5 push press, and 4x7 chin ups. Didn't feel a thing in my shoulder. Then I ate (probably only around 1300 kcal) and went to rugby, where we did conditioning for an hour, then worked on tackling and then tackling in a game situation. Turns out I have pretty good instincts for defense, not so good for offense, and my execution on both needs some work. I did get the general idea to "take the guy down, then run him and his team (ruck) over so that we repossess the ball." Being a forward is pretty damn cool, and being faster/harder to take down than I look (thanks strength training) means I did break through the other team's line a couple times. Gotta work on my acceleration and my change of direction though. Anyone have tips? Also my tackling needs work, especially at my position... but that's just the effects of never having played a full contact sport before this. It'll get better with practice. | ||
|
Soliduok
Canada222 Posts
September 12 2011 23:40 GMT
#11483
Is there something specific causing this? Do I need to stretch more or hydrate more? | ||
|
Velocirapture
United States983 Posts
September 12 2011 23:46 GMT
#11484
On September 13 2011 08:40 Soliduok wrote: One thing that often deters me from working out (I used to workout very regularly in highschool) is that I hate the weakness I feel afterwards. You know that shaky feeling in your arm when you just try to lift a glass of water to your mouth? Is there something specific causing this? Do I need to stretch more or hydrate more? I think the soreness etc. is my favorite part lol. Its like a whole day reminder of what a boss you are lol. | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
September 12 2011 23:51 GMT
#11485
| ||
|
DimmuKlok
United States225 Posts
September 12 2011 23:55 GMT
#11486
On September 13 2011 07:35 Froadac wrote: Show nested quote + On September 13 2011 07:23 eshlow wrote: On September 13 2011 07:13 DimmuKlok wrote: I have a question about altering the SS program. My back surgeon's nurse is worried that deadlifting might damage my first vertebrae below the fusion in my back. I have 3 free vertebrae at the bottom of my back, and she thought deadlifting might put excessive pressure on the vertebrae directly below the fusion. She was going to ask my doctor about it, but it's been over a month and I've called several times, and she never got back to me. That sadly deterred me from working out in general but I'm getting back into the swing of things. I'm curious what you guy's think about eliminating deadlifting from the program and if you think it's necessary. A side goal of mine is to be able to do multiple pullups. That's why I'm starting the "Practical Programming Novice Program", but even that has deadlifting in it once a week. It does make me sad that I might have to eliminate deadlifting, though. It was my favorite exercise. Froadac has permission to squat and DL and power clean from his doc and he has like 11 fused vertebrae....? I honestly don't see a problem with lifting with fused vertebrae unless you have a potential pathology such as osteoporosis that would make the bones weak or the muscles dysfunctional? But yeah.... Deadlift might be bad, not sure. I know my doctor said that it can be problematic with lumbar vertebrae, but since mine are all thoracic (and a few cervical) they are for the most part either not under load, or supported by the spinal cage. But really, keep asking. took my doctor 3 weeks to get back. I'll keep asking until my doc answers. I think the reason she was concerned was she thought that the back needed to curve to evenly support the weight of the bar, similarly to a fishing rod bending, but obviously not to that extent. But you can imagine if a fishing rod was forced to be straight near the bottom, it would put a lot of stress right below that point. I know you're supposed to keep your back straight so I'm not sure if what she's worried about even takes place. Just fyi, I have 8 vertebrae fused. I can't remember specifically where the fusion starts but I'm pretty sure it's mid lumbar. I wasn't even going to ask the forum and just ask my doctor, but like I said before, they haven't replyed and I got tired of waiting. | ||
|
barkles
United States285 Posts
September 13 2011 00:10 GMT
#11487
After losing 30 pounds(!) doing only cardio, he noticed it was harder to lose weight. He was reaching a plateau, since I imagine he wasn't varying his workout routine very much, except possibly to add more of the same. Anyone who has ever been a serious athlete in any area can tell you that doing the same thing over and over without change will yield diminishing returns. True progress is made by varying workout type, duration, and intensity. He didn't see a big jump in results because weights are so much better than cardio, but simply because he forced his body to adapt to something new when he switched to lifting weights. The same thing would have happened if he had switched to swimming (from the elliptical workouts he started on). This is the reason that workout programs like P90X work so well for many people: a constantly changing workout routine. Those people who are serious about bodybuilding/powerlifting will know this too: doing exactly the same workouts for more than 4-8 weeks is a very good way to make very little progress. A couple of other concerns I had about the OP, maybe people will help clear these things up for me: 1. The nutritional guide suggests eliminating all dairy from one's diet. For adolescent women (and in fact, many men) this seems like a really, really, fucking stupid idea, since most already struggle to get adequate calcium. I didn't see any mention of calcium supplements anywhere, but even so, getting one's calcium naturally (ie from dairy products) is more efficient and healthier. 2. Should there not be some mention of the dangers of "bonking" or "hitting the wall" made in the OP? Low carbohydrate intake (as is advocated here) throughout the day combined with a workout in the late afternoon or early evening can easily leave the body without enough muscle glycogen to get all the way through the workout. Bonking, for those lucky enough to have not experienced it, is when muscles run out of ready-to-burn fuel in the midst of exercise, blood sugar is low, and the body needs to burn fat or muscle to make sugar to send to the muscles that need it. Out of exercise this process is fine (and obviously losing fat by only lifting weights depends on it!), but during exercise this can make the person exercising feel (among other things) light-headed and nauseated, two things you do not want to be while lifting heavy weights. Also, I'm sure this has been stated many times before in this thread, but since I am always meeting people who don't believe this I will state it again: the only reason to EVER start a low-carb diet is to lose weight. Anyone interested in actually ENHANCING PERFORMANCE should eat a balanced diet in which many of the calories should come from carbohydrates (~50% for strength athletes depending on which part of their training season they are in, and 60-75% for endurance athletes). | ||
|
emjaytron
Australia544 Posts
September 13 2011 00:14 GMT
#11488
On September 13 2011 08:55 DimmuKlok wrote: Show nested quote + On September 13 2011 07:35 Froadac wrote: On September 13 2011 07:23 eshlow wrote: On September 13 2011 07:13 DimmuKlok wrote: I have a question about altering the SS program. My back surgeon's nurse is worried that deadlifting might damage my first vertebrae below the fusion in my back. I have 3 free vertebrae at the bottom of my back, and she thought deadlifting might put excessive pressure on the vertebrae directly below the fusion. She was going to ask my doctor about it, but it's been over a month and I've called several times, and she never got back to me. That sadly deterred me from working out in general but I'm getting back into the swing of things. I'm curious what you guy's think about eliminating deadlifting from the program and if you think it's necessary. A side goal of mine is to be able to do multiple pullups. That's why I'm starting the "Practical Programming Novice Program", but even that has deadlifting in it once a week. It does make me sad that I might have to eliminate deadlifting, though. It was my favorite exercise. Froadac has permission to squat and DL and power clean from his doc and he has like 11 fused vertebrae....? I honestly don't see a problem with lifting with fused vertebrae unless you have a potential pathology such as osteoporosis that would make the bones weak or the muscles dysfunctional? But yeah.... Deadlift might be bad, not sure. I know my doctor said that it can be problematic with lumbar vertebrae, but since mine are all thoracic (and a few cervical) they are for the most part either not under load, or supported by the spinal cage. But really, keep asking. took my doctor 3 weeks to get back. I'll keep asking until my doc answers. I think the reason she was concerned was she thought that the back needed to curve to evenly support the weight of the bar, similarly to a fishing rod bending, but obviously not to that extent. But you can imagine if a fishing rod was forced to be straight near the bottom, it would put a lot of stress right below that point. I know you're supposed to keep your back straight so I'm not sure if what she's worried about even takes place. Just fyi, I have 8 vertebrae fused. I can't remember specifically where the fusion starts but I'm pretty sure it's mid lumbar. I wasn't even going to ask the forum and just ask my doctor, but like I said before, they haven't replyed and I got tired of waiting. Whoaa dude. What happened to you to get lumbar fusion?. Having 8 verts fused makes a massive massive change to your spinal biomechanics. edit- if its thoracic its (maybe) not such an issue -the 12 thoracic vertebrae mainly allow for rotation, not so much flexion/extension (bending). Most of the bending comes from your lumbar verts (bottom 5, below your ribs) | ||
|
shinosai
United States1577 Posts
September 13 2011 00:26 GMT
#11489
This never happens when I just do pullups, only when I deadhang afterward. It doesn't make any sense to me, I'm just wondering if there's anyway I can land without the pain, or do I need a platform? It's really quite confusing since there shouldn't be that much difference in the drop from a pull up and a deadhang, but apparently there is for me. | ||
|
phyre112
United States3090 Posts
September 13 2011 00:29 GMT
#11490
On September 13 2011 09:10 barkles wrote: Did anyone else notice how bullshit the testimonial about how ditching cardio will help you lose weight faster is? Not because of the guy himself, he's a champ for being so dedicated, but the message that is being supported by the argument (cardio<<<weightlifting for losing weight) is flawed. After losing 30 pounds(!) doing only cardio, he noticed it was harder to lose weight. He was reaching a plateau, since I imagine he wasn't varying his workout routine very much, except possibly to add more of the same. Anyone who has ever been a serious athlete in any area can tell you that doing the same thing over and over without change will yield diminishing returns. True progress is made by varying workout type, duration, and intensity. He didn't see a big jump in results because weights are so much better than cardio, but simply because he forced his body to adapt to something new when he switched to lifting weights. The same thing would have happened if he had switched to swimming (from the elliptical workouts he started on). This is the reason that workout programs like P90X work so well for many people: a constantly changing workout routine. Those people who are serious about bodybuilding/powerlifting will know this too: doing exactly the same workouts for more than 4-8 weeks is a very good way to make very little progress. A couple of other concerns I had about the OP, maybe people will help clear these things up for me: 1. The nutritional guide suggests eliminating all dairy from one's diet. For adolescent women (and in fact, many men) this seems like a really, really, fucking stupid idea, since most already struggle to get adequate calcium. I didn't see any mention of calcium supplements anywhere, but even so, getting one's calcium naturally (ie from dairy products) is more efficient and healthier. 2. Should there not be some mention of the dangers of "bonking" or "hitting the wall" made in the OP? Low carbohydrate intake (as is advocated here) throughout the day combined with a workout in the late afternoon or early evening can easily leave the body without enough muscle glycogen to get all the way through the workout. Bonking, for those lucky enough to have not experienced it, is when muscles run out of ready-to-burn fuel in the midst of exercise, blood sugar is low, and the body needs to burn fat or muscle to make sugar to send to the muscles that need it. Out of exercise this process is fine (and obviously losing fat by only lifting weights depends on it!), but during exercise this can make the person exercising feel (among other things) light-headed and nauseated, two things you do not want to be while lifting heavy weights. Also, I'm sure this has been stated many times before in this thread, but since I am always meeting people who don't believe this I will state it again: the only reason to EVER start a low-carb diet is to lose weight. Anyone interested in actually ENHANCING PERFORMANCE should eat a balanced diet in which many of the calories should come from carbohydrates (~50% for strength athletes depending on which part of their training season they are in, and 60-75% for endurance athletes). Note 1: more than 4-8 weeks on exactly the same program is FINE for a beginner, which most people coming into this thread are. As long as you increase the stimulus in SOME WAY (in the case of the recommended program here, by increasing weight lifted) you are going to make progress. If you're an intermediate or advanced lifter who actually isn't capable of increasing the weight every single time you go in to lift... well then those programs aren't for you - but you should know that already, and be looking into something different. Note 2: Removing Dairy is only recommended for people who have an allergy - and those people wouldn't be having dairy in the first place. I personally drink much more milk than any one else that I know... and I'm the only person to drink whole milk. I also eat plenty of cheese and Greek Yogurt. It's ok to have dairy, but it's "good" to have for a myriad of reasons OTHER than the calcium. note 3: When people come in and say they are endurance athletes (there was a marathon runner a few pages back, for example) it is essentially understood that they need more carbohydrates. That person was getting, off the top of my head, 60% carbs in his diet? That's great and good for him. For someone who is interested in losing weight (much of the thread) that is WRONG and BAD. For someone who is interested in gaining weight (me) carbs have their place, but still need to come second to more essential nutrients like fat and protein. No one is saying "YOU MUST GO LOW CARB" in this thread, but we are recommending it as a good idea for various subsets of posters. I think the problem that you are having, is that you are taking an OP, which is (although long by necessity) a very general document, that is not aimed to be a wave of information to crash over everyone and give them exactly what they need, but rather to get their feet wet - get them posting in the thread, and interested themselves about fitness and nutrition. To give them a springboard from which to jump and gather more, and more individualized information, from which they are able to make their own choices, then reporting back and (hopefully) adding to the collective knowledge that is already here. | ||
|
DimmuKlok
United States225 Posts
September 13 2011 00:31 GMT
#11491
On September 13 2011 09:10 barkles wrote: + Show Spoiler + Did anyone else notice how bullshit the testimonial about how ditching cardio will help you lose weight faster is? Not because of the guy himself, he's a champ for being so dedicated, but the message that is being supported by the argument (cardio<<<weightlifting for losing weight) is flawed. After losing 30 pounds(!) doing only cardio, he noticed it was harder to lose weight. He was reaching a plateau, since I imagine he wasn't varying his workout routine very much, except possibly to add more of the same. Anyone who has ever been a serious athlete in any area can tell you that doing the same thing over and over without change will yield diminishing returns. True progress is made by varying workout type, duration, and intensity. He didn't see a big jump in results because weights are so much better than cardio, but simply because he forced his body to adapt to something new when he switched to lifting weights. The same thing would have happened if he had switched to swimming (from the elliptical workouts he started on). This is the reason that workout programs like P90X work so well for many people: a constantly changing workout routine. Those people who are serious about bodybuilding/powerlifting will know this too: doing exactly the same workouts for more than 4-8 weeks is a very good way to make very little progress. A couple of other concerns I had about the OP, maybe people will help clear these things up for me: 1. The nutritional guide suggests eliminating all dairy from one's diet. For adolescent women (and in fact, many men) this seems like a really, really, fucking stupid idea, since most already struggle to get adequate calcium. I didn't see any mention of calcium supplements anywhere, but even so, getting one's calcium naturally (ie from dairy products) is more efficient and healthier. 2. Should there not be some mention of the dangers of "bonking" or "hitting the wall" made in the OP? Low carbohydrate intake (as is advocated here) throughout the day combined with a workout in the late afternoon or early evening can easily leave the body without enough muscle glycogen to get all the way through the workout. Bonking, for those lucky enough to have not experienced it, is when muscles run out of ready-to-burn fuel in the midst of exercise, blood sugar is low, and the body needs to burn fat or muscle to make sugar to send to the muscles that need it. Out of exercise this process is fine (and obviously losing fat by only lifting weights depends on it!), but during exercise this can make the person exercising feel (among other things) light-headed and nauseated, two things you do not want to be while lifting heavy weights. Also, I'm sure this has been stated many times before in this thread, but since I am always meeting people who don't believe this I will state it again: the only reason to EVER start a low-carb diet is to lose weight. Anyone interested in actually ENHANCING PERFORMANCE should eat a balanced diet in which many of the calories should come from carbohydrates (~50% for strength athletes depending on which part of their training season they are in, and 60-75% for endurance athletes). The guy in the testimonial you're referring to is me. The reason it started to become harder to lose weight after the first 30 lbs was not just because of cardio, it was because I hadn't altered my diet much at that time. The way I lost the weight was nothing but cardio and I thought in order to continue to lose weight I was going to need to do even more cardio than I currently was. I'm not convinced that going from the elliptical to swimming would have continued my weight loss. I needed to clean up my diet and start watching my calories. The reason weight lifting is preferred over cardio for weight loss is stated in the OP and I don't have anything to add that Eshlow didn't already say, so I won't comment on that. I will say though, SS was not the reason I lost the weight. It helped, sure, and I'm confident it did a lot more for me then the cardio did, but in the end it came down to what I was eating and how much I was eating. Thanks for the kind words about me, it's much appreciated. ^^ | ||
|
phyre112
United States3090 Posts
September 13 2011 00:31 GMT
#11492
On September 13 2011 09:26 shinosai wrote: Teamliquid, I had a serious pain moment today and I'm trying to figure out if there's a way to fix it. I've been trying to do pullups for a while now, and a friend suggested I tried deadhanging. So for the first time I tried some deadhangs, and after 40 seconds I let go. When I dropped down the front part of my feet felt INTENSE pain. So I tried again and tried to land on my heel, hoping that I wouldn't feel such ridiculous pain in the front part of my feet, only it was even worse. This never happens when I just do pullups, only when I deadhang afterward. It doesn't make any sense to me, I'm just wondering if there's anyway I can land without the pain, or do I need a platform? It's really quite confusing since there shouldn't be that much difference in the drop from a pull up and a deadhang, but apparently there is for me. Is it possible that you're relaxing your legs when you drop from the deadhang? Most of the muscles in your body would be tense at the end of a regular pullup, but from a deadhang that's not necessarily the case. If you're relaxing your muscles, then they aren't in proper position to take the shock from the impact of you landing. Instead, that impact is taken by your bones, connective tissues and nerves... Which hurts. Maybe consider that the next time you're getting down? I hope it helps. | ||
|
GoTuNk!
Chile4591 Posts
September 13 2011 00:31 GMT
#11493
PR: 101 kg Bench press | ||
|
emperorchampion
Canada9496 Posts
September 13 2011 00:33 GMT
#11494
I think pretty much everything has been covered by these two posts: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=11185776 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=11187342 (which can be found at the bottom of the OP in the spoilers) | ||
|
DimmuKlok
United States225 Posts
September 13 2011 00:34 GMT
#11495
On September 13 2011 09:14 emjaytron wrote: Show nested quote + On September 13 2011 08:55 DimmuKlok wrote: On September 13 2011 07:35 Froadac wrote: On September 13 2011 07:23 eshlow wrote: On September 13 2011 07:13 DimmuKlok wrote: I have a question about altering the SS program. My back surgeon's nurse is worried that deadlifting might damage my first vertebrae below the fusion in my back. I have 3 free vertebrae at the bottom of my back, and she thought deadlifting might put excessive pressure on the vertebrae directly below the fusion. She was going to ask my doctor about it, but it's been over a month and I've called several times, and she never got back to me. That sadly deterred me from working out in general but I'm getting back into the swing of things. I'm curious what you guy's think about eliminating deadlifting from the program and if you think it's necessary. A side goal of mine is to be able to do multiple pullups. That's why I'm starting the "Practical Programming Novice Program", but even that has deadlifting in it once a week. It does make me sad that I might have to eliminate deadlifting, though. It was my favorite exercise. Froadac has permission to squat and DL and power clean from his doc and he has like 11 fused vertebrae....? I honestly don't see a problem with lifting with fused vertebrae unless you have a potential pathology such as osteoporosis that would make the bones weak or the muscles dysfunctional? But yeah.... Deadlift might be bad, not sure. I know my doctor said that it can be problematic with lumbar vertebrae, but since mine are all thoracic (and a few cervical) they are for the most part either not under load, or supported by the spinal cage. But really, keep asking. took my doctor 3 weeks to get back. I'll keep asking until my doc answers. I think the reason she was concerned was she thought that the back needed to curve to evenly support the weight of the bar, similarly to a fishing rod bending, but obviously not to that extent. But you can imagine if a fishing rod was forced to be straight near the bottom, it would put a lot of stress right below that point. I know you're supposed to keep your back straight so I'm not sure if what she's worried about even takes place. Just fyi, I have 8 vertebrae fused. I can't remember specifically where the fusion starts but I'm pretty sure it's mid lumbar. I wasn't even going to ask the forum and just ask my doctor, but like I said before, they haven't replyed and I got tired of waiting. Whoaa dude. What happened to you to get lumbar fusion?. Having 8 verts fused makes a massive massive change to your spinal biomechanics. edit- if its thoracic its (maybe) not such an issue -the 12 thoracic vertebrae mainly allow for rotation, not so much flexion/extension (bending). Most of the bending comes from your lumbar verts (bottom 5, below your ribs) I'm not positive on the exact location of the fusion, sadly. The reason for the surgery was scoliosis. | ||
|
shinosai
United States1577 Posts
September 13 2011 00:34 GMT
#11496
On September 13 2011 09:31 phyre112 wrote: Show nested quote + On September 13 2011 09:26 shinosai wrote: Teamliquid, I had a serious pain moment today and I'm trying to figure out if there's a way to fix it. I've been trying to do pullups for a while now, and a friend suggested I tried deadhanging. So for the first time I tried some deadhangs, and after 40 seconds I let go. When I dropped down the front part of my feet felt INTENSE pain. So I tried again and tried to land on my heel, hoping that I wouldn't feel such ridiculous pain in the front part of my feet, only it was even worse. This never happens when I just do pullups, only when I deadhang afterward. It doesn't make any sense to me, I'm just wondering if there's anyway I can land without the pain, or do I need a platform? It's really quite confusing since there shouldn't be that much difference in the drop from a pull up and a deadhang, but apparently there is for me. Is it possible that you're relaxing your legs when you drop from the deadhang? Most of the muscles in your body would be tense at the end of a regular pullup, but from a deadhang that's not necessarily the case. If you're relaxing your muscles, then they aren't in proper position to take the shock from the impact of you landing. Instead, that impact is taken by your bones, connective tissues and nerves... Which hurts. Maybe consider that the next time you're getting down? I hope it helps. You know, that might be it. I'll try tightening / flexing my leg and feet before I drop and see if that helps. Thanks for the advice. Yea, I definitely felt all the impact going into the bones of my feet, literally. | ||
|
Froadac
United States6733 Posts
September 13 2011 00:54 GMT
#11497
Ate hamburger. THen had tons of this barley uhh, stuff, my mom made. Eating container of yogurt, then might make omelette because I'm out of food. | ||
|
decafchicken
United States20078 Posts
September 13 2011 01:08 GMT
#11498
On September 13 2011 08:38 phyre112 wrote: Show nested quote + On September 13 2011 08:15 dudeman001 wrote: On September 13 2011 08:08 Tevo wrote: Hey all, new poster to H&F trying to get into a bit healthier lifestyle. I'm not fat or unfit by any means, I'm a tall, relatively lean (though not skinny) guy. I do eat quite unhealthy though, I absolutely love pasta and pizza, and don't eat nearly enough fruit. I do eat quite some veggies, salads and good meats though so I guess that's good. I've been reading through the OP of this topic, and the main thing I'm wondering is: what do you guys have for breakfast?! I like my bread, I eat healthy(?) brown bread with grains and nuts in it, preferably with peanut butter or some meat like ham or chicken and cheese. Is a breakfast like that really that detrimental to me living healthy? Could someone here please elaborate on their diet? Maybe give an example of what you guys would eat in an ordinary school or workday? It'd be much appreciated, thanks! Eggs, some bacon, ham or sausage. Omelets are the bomb. You could probably cut out a lot of grains from your diet if you're looking to eat healthier. If you can't go without em, try limiting yourself to one or two days a week where you eat some bread, but remember that it's eat, not gorge. This. Omelette with some green pepper, mushroom, onion, and bacon on the side. Two glasses of milk - best breakfast EVER. Just got done a ROUGH day. Went to the gym, 215 3x5 squats, 145 2x5 + 150 1x5 + 160 1x2 bench, 110 3x5 push press, and 4x7 chin ups. Didn't feel a thing in my shoulder. Then I ate (probably only around 1300 kcal) and went to rugby, where we did conditioning for an hour, then worked on tackling and then tackling in a game situation. Turns out I have pretty good instincts for defense, not so good for offense, and my execution on both needs some work. I did get the general idea to "take the guy down, then run him and his team (ruck) over so that we repossess the ball." Being a forward is pretty damn cool, and being faster/harder to take down than I look (thanks strength training) means I did break through the other team's line a couple times. Gotta work on my acceleration and my change of direction though. Anyone have tips? Also my tackling needs work, especially at my position... but that's just the effects of never having played a full contact sport before this. It'll get better with practice. Love going to the gym then practice, leaves me feeling dead but awesome. The best advice i can give you offensively is NEVER catch the ball standing still. Unless you're picking it up off the ground, you should be preferably at top speed when you catch the ball and looking for a gap to attack. As for working on acceleration and cutting...most people you run into are going to either naturally have "that step" or not. The best way i can advise you to work on it is to...work on it. Do HIIT with ~20 yard sprints until you puke. Work in cuts/lateral movement/shuttle sprints. If you do that often enough you will get faster. Other than that i'd recommend power cleans/oly lifts. If you can extend my legs fast enough to throw a few hundred pounds to shoulder height, you can push off the ground that much faster when you're starting a sprint. -Tackling. I used to have garbage defense, i would just kind of float around and make it so other people would end up making the tackles. It was largely mental. Eventually i just manned the fuck up. Now i explode up, guide my shoulder into the thighs, wrap up, lift, and punish. Especially once i make that first big hit, i pretty much go straight into rage mode and start hitting anything withing 10 yards of me. You can't play defense with anything resembling fear or timidness, ESPECIALLY at your position. Be fast, hit hard, but don't over commit. Get lower than the man in front of you and smash him. you'll notice a lot of people (especially kids that used to wrestle) do the "rugby dump" where you basically do a single/double leg pick up and turn them/dump them into the ground. It will definitely get better as you get more experience, for now just hit hard. I think oly lifting also helped my tackling, they're both pretty similar movements where you're using your legs/back to drive your shoulders up and explode. On September 13 2011 09:10 barkles wrote: Did anyone else notice how bullshit the testimonial about how ditching cardio will help you lose weight faster is? Not because of the guy himself, he's a champ for being so dedicated, but the message that is being supported by the argument (cardio<<<weightlifting for losing weight) is flawed. After losing 30 pounds(!) doing only cardio, he noticed it was harder to lose weight. He was reaching a plateau, since I imagine he wasn't varying his workout routine very much, except possibly to add more of the same. Anyone who has ever been a serious athlete in any area can tell you that doing the same thing over and over without change will yield diminishing returns. True progress is made by varying workout type, duration, and intensity. He didn't see a big jump in results because weights are so much better than cardio, but simply because he forced his body to adapt to something new when he switched to lifting weights. The same thing would have happened if he had switched to swimming (from the elliptical workouts he started on). This is the reason that workout programs like P90X work so well for many people: a constantly changing workout routine. Those people who are serious about bodybuilding/powerlifting will know this too: doing exactly the same workouts for more than 4-8 weeks is a very good way to make very little progress. A couple of other concerns I had about the OP, maybe people will help clear these things up for me: 1. The nutritional guide suggests eliminating all dairy from one's diet. For adolescent women (and in fact, many men) this seems like a really, really, fucking stupid idea, since most already struggle to get adequate calcium. I didn't see any mention of calcium supplements anywhere, but even so, getting one's calcium naturally (ie from dairy products) is more efficient and healthier. 2. Should there not be some mention of the dangers of "bonking" or "hitting the wall" made in the OP? Low carbohydrate intake (as is advocated here) throughout the day combined with a workout in the late afternoon or early evening can easily leave the body without enough muscle glycogen to get all the way through the workout. Bonking, for those lucky enough to have not experienced it, is when muscles run out of ready-to-burn fuel in the midst of exercise, blood sugar is low, and the body needs to burn fat or muscle to make sugar to send to the muscles that need it. Out of exercise this process is fine (and obviously losing fat by only lifting weights depends on it!), but during exercise this can make the person exercising feel (among other things) light-headed and nauseated, two things you do not want to be while lifting heavy weights. Also, I'm sure this has been stated many times before in this thread, but since I am always meeting people who don't believe this I will state it again: the only reason to EVER start a low-carb diet is to lose weight. Anyone interested in actually ENHANCING PERFORMANCE should eat a balanced diet in which many of the calories should come from carbohydrates (~50% for strength athletes depending on which part of their training season they are in, and 60-75% for endurance athletes). ^what phyre said. I hate when people bring up the constant variation argument without the other side of the argument. Take the bulgarian weightlifting system which uses basically the same 3-6 lifts and nothing else and has produced phenomenal results. Take the kenyan marathon runners...they didn't get better at running marathons by doing plyometrics or kettleball swings, they run and run and run and dont stop running every day. If you want to get better at something, doing it is a pretty damn good way. This doesnt relate as much to building muscle size/losing weight, etc. though; mostly just proficiency at a certain activity. | ||
|
AoN.DimSum
United States2983 Posts
September 13 2011 01:33 GMT
#11499
| ||
|
Emporio
United States3069 Posts
September 13 2011 02:10 GMT
#11500
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 RotterdaM StarCraft: Brood WarIndyStarCraft SteadfastSC BRAT_OK Livibee JuggernautJason76 UpATreeSC Dota 2 Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games Grubby4092 FrodaN2793 Beastyqt1010 ArmadaUGS127 C9.Mang0124 Sick97 Mew2King79 QueenE70 KnowMe60 Trikslyr52 Organizations Dota 2 Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
|
OSC
Wardi Open
PiGosaur Cup
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
OSC
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
The PondCast
Replay Cast
OSC
[ Show More ] LAN Event
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
|
|
|