EPT
GSL Code S
Global StarCraft II League/2022/Season 1Streams & Casters
Format
- Group Stage 1:
- Dual Tournament Format.
- All matches are Bo3.
- Top 2 players of each group advance to the Group Stage 2.
Map Pool
Group A
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/1099.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/3498.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/951.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/618.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/957.jpg)
Results
CSS: FO-nTTaX
Awesomeness: Panda
Banner: GSL
[GSL 2022] Code S - Ro10 Group A - Day 1
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
Map Pool CSS: FO-nTTaX Awesomeness: Panda Banner: GSL | ||
|
SHODAN
United Kingdom1144 Posts
| ||
|
MarianoSC2
Slovakia1855 Posts
Its just, this is ro10, and for that bo3 is just too gimmicky and weaker players with weird stuff have potential to score more upsets. Which I absolutely love in bo1 and bo3 formats otherwise, but not in a gsl "quarter final". It diminishes the importance of this stage of such a tournament. Hope they change this in next seasons. | ||
|
Swisslink
2954 Posts
On April 11 2022 18:36 MarianoSC2 wrote: I really hate the fact that these are bo3. Its such a problem for me that it makes me not like this new format at all despite the round robin seemed like it could have been interesting otherwise... Its just, this is ro10, and for that bo3 is just too gimmicky and weaker players with weird stuff have potential to score more upsets. Which I absolutely love in bo1 and bo3 formats otherwise, but not in a gsl "quarter final". It diminishes the importance of this stage of such a tournament. Hope they change this in next seasons. Well, Bo5 would take forever with a Round robin format. | ||
|
MarianoSC2
Slovakia1855 Posts
On April 11 2022 18:43 Swisslink wrote: Well, Bo5 would take forever with a Round robin format. It would take longer yes, but maybe have 2 less matches per day and add 1 more round? I am sure there would be a good way to make it a bo5 and not be too lengthy. | ||
|
tigera6
3445 Posts
| ||
|
Mozdk
Denmark6989 Posts
| ||
|
umelbumel
2026 Posts
On April 11 2022 19:03 tigera6 wrote: Wow Ragnarok with pure Roach Ravager on worse upgrade beating Rogue? Never saw this coming. I'm quite speechless | ||
|
Swisslink
2954 Posts
On April 11 2022 19:03 tigera6 wrote: Wow Ragnarok with pure Roach Ravager on worse upgrade beating Rogue? Never saw this coming. When did he pull ahead? Whenever I checked the workers, Rogue seemed to be doing better and resources lost he seemed to be up as well. And suddenly his supply plummeted. | ||
|
MarianoSC2
Slovakia1855 Posts
On April 11 2022 19:04 Swisslink wrote: When did he pull ahead? Whenever I checked the workers, Rogue seemed to be doing better and resources lost he seemed to be up as well. And suddenly his supply plummeted. He massively screwed up an engagement in the middle of the map and was not reacting properly to the burrow movement roaches counter attacks losing his roach warren. Also he was just starting to finally build lurkers but in the worst possible time. Ragnarok never stopped building roaches and just caught him off guard. Very sloppy play there from Rogue he should have easily won that game to be honest. | ||
|
Mozdk
Denmark6989 Posts
On April 11 2022 19:04 Swisslink wrote: When did he pull ahead? Whenever I checked the workers, Rogue seemed to be doing better and resources lost he seemed to be up as well. And suddenly his supply plummeted. When he killed 30 drones with 12 burrowed roaches, and then the warren a few mins later. | ||
|
MarianoSC2
Slovakia1855 Posts
| ||
|
Swisslink
2954 Posts
| ||
|
umelbumel
2026 Posts
| ||
|
Mozdk
Denmark6989 Posts
On April 11 2022 19:21 Swisslink wrote: What the hell is this series. Yes | ||
|
MarianoSC2
Slovakia1855 Posts
| ||
|
swarminfestor
Malaysia2449 Posts
On April 11 2022 19:22 MarianoSC2 wrote: Uhm, so why did Ragnarok decide to completely throw away a won game? Maybe because he lost the third base during the aggressive attack on Rogue's bases made him thinking that massing with ling+banes later wont be feasible enough. | ||
|
tigera6
3445 Posts
| ||
|
Mozdk
Denmark6989 Posts
| ||
|
Swisslink
2954 Posts
On April 11 2022 19:28 swarminfestor wrote: Maybe because he lost the third base during the aggressive attack on Rogue's bases made him thinking that massing with ling+banes later wont be feasible enough. I think he completely misread that situation there and didn't realize how far ahead he was. | ||
|
Mozdk
Denmark6989 Posts
| ||
|
Swisslink
2954 Posts
On April 11 2022 19:32 Mozdk wrote: Wait. Trap hasn't won Code S? Na, "just" a bunch of Super Tournaments. | ||
|
swarminfestor
Malaysia2449 Posts
On April 11 2022 19:32 Mozdk wrote: Wait. Trap hasn't won Code S? Surprisingly, Dear got the one that Trap hadn't attained it yet. | ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany16021 Posts
| ||
|
Argonauta
Spain4958 Posts
| ||
|
tigera6
3445 Posts
| ||
|
MJG
United Kingdom1374 Posts
When everyone else uses Templar, they get EMP'd and the Terran looks amazing. | ||
|
Mozdk
Denmark6989 Posts
| ||
|
Argonauta
Spain4958 Posts
| ||
|
MarianoSC2
Slovakia1855 Posts
On April 11 2022 19:29 tigera6 wrote: Yeah, all Ragnarok need to do is buidling 3-4 Spores around his bases, and he can do whatever the hell he want with lingbane into Rogue base, going to Spire when Rogue was ahead by 12 Mutas is just not very good. All he needed to do was not go mutas. He made the only possible wrong choice that could lose him a won game. I just didnt understand it at all hehe | ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany16021 Posts
| ||
|
GoloSC2
712 Posts
On April 11 2022 20:41 Charoisaur wrote: Never seen an scv pull vs Zerg win... or even attempted I kinda like the idea vs roach-based compositions | ||
|
Argonauta
Spain4958 Posts
On April 11 2022 20:45 GoloSC2 wrote: I kinda like the idea vs roach-based compositions yeah if there are no banelings is as good or better | ||
|
MarianoSC2
Slovakia1855 Posts
| ||
|
Niravroh
165 Posts
| ||
|
Argonauta
Spain4958 Posts
| ||
|
Niravroh
165 Posts
| ||
|
Swisslink
2954 Posts
| ||
|
MarianoSC2
Slovakia1855 Posts
| ||
|
darklycid
3517 Posts
 | ||
|
GoloSC2
712 Posts
| ||
Poopi
France12906 Posts
| ||
|
Argonauta
Spain4958 Posts
| ||
|
GoloSC2
712 Posts
| ||
|
swarminfestor
Malaysia2449 Posts
| ||
|
Poopi
France12906 Posts
| ||
|
Argonauta
Spain4958 Posts
| ||
|
Azzur
Australia6260 Posts
| ||
|
Swisslink
2954 Posts
On April 11 2022 21:57 Azzur wrote: Does anyone know what is the format of the tiebreakers? # Ties are broken in the following order: - Overall 'win point' difference - Overall number of 'map wins' - 'Match win' between tied players - 'Win point' difference between the tied players - Number of 'map wins' between the tied players - Tie breaker match (Bo1) - Coin toss Was mentioned on stream at the beginning. | ||
|
Azzur
Australia6260 Posts
On April 11 2022 22:01 Swisslink wrote: # Ties are broken in the following order: - Overall 'win point' difference - Overall number of 'map wins' - 'Match win' between tied players - 'Win point' difference between the tied players - Number of 'map wins' between the tied players - Tie breaker match (Bo1) - Coin toss Was mentioned on stream at the beginning. Awesome, thx! | ||
|
Azzur
Australia6260 Posts
If that makes it too many games, I would settle for bo5 for the elimination matches in the Ro6. | ||
|
MarianoSC2
Slovakia1855 Posts
| ||
|
tigera6
3445 Posts
| ||
|
tigera6
3445 Posts
On April 11 2022 22:12 MarianoSC2 wrote: Hang on ro6 is bo3 as well? And semi is bo5? Good damn thats so stupid... Why? The ro6 is just a shorten version of the typical group stage in GSL, where you skip the first 2 matches. Yeah, its pretty bad idea to be in Bo3. | ||
|
TossHeroes
281 Posts
On April 11 2022 23:21 tigera6 wrote: The ro6 is just a shorten version of the typical group stage in GSL, where you skip the first 2 matches. Yeah, its pretty bad idea to be in Bo3. Na it’s a fantastic idea Gives my toss boys a higher chance to win due to shorter series GSL here we comeee | ||
|
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10366 Posts
NOT match wins. For example, let's say Rogue goes 2-1, 2-1, 2-1, 2-1. He beats 4 players, but he's only at +4. Let's say Trap goes 2-0, 2-0, 2-0, 1-2. He beats 3 players and loses to 1, but he's at +5. Trap advances in 1st place, not Rogue. It makes sense in a way but it's strange too. Normally the idea of a Bo3 is to give you chances for the better player to win. So if Rogue wins 2-1 vs all 4 players, normally you'd say it doesn't really matter that he didn't dominate those 4 players, he still won the 4 matches which proves consistency and skill. But in this RR format, it puts a lot of emphasis on map wins and how hard you beat your opponent. It's not wrong but it's definitely interesting in that it puts weight on how hard you beat your opponent, and losing 1-2 isn't too bad since it was still a close match. I would say this way is more fun though, and since players still end up playing 4 matches in a RR, it still gives enough chances for players to perform. On April 12 2022 02:23 TossHeroes wrote: Na it’s a fantastic idea Gives my toss boys a higher chance to win due to shorter series GSL here we comeee The Toss buff we didn't know we needed! Time for Creator to win a GSL! | ||
|
Swisslink
2954 Posts
On April 12 2022 14:20 Yoshi Kirishima wrote: Btw I just realized that the main way to determine how players win, is by the "Overall 'win point' difference"... NOT match wins. For example, let's say Rogue goes 2-1, 2-1, 2-1, 2-1. He beats 4 players, but he's only at +4. Let's say Trap goes 2-0, 2-0, 2-0, 1-2. He beats 3 players and loses to 1, but he's at +5. Trap advances in 1st place, not Rogue. I don't think that's correct? These rules only apply in case of a tie - therefore not if Rogue has one victory more than Trap. | ||
|
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10366 Posts
On April 13 2022 06:44 Swisslink wrote: I don't think that's correct? These rules only apply in case of a tie - therefore not if Rogue has one victory more than Trap. Ohh I gotcha, they were only listing tiebreaker rules not rules in general. Thanks! | ||
|
QOGQOG
834 Posts
| ||
| ||
