|
On December 12 2014 03:30 Die4Ever wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2014 03:27 madals wrote:On December 12 2014 03:18 Die4Ever wrote:On December 12 2014 03:15 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On December 12 2014 03:12 necrosexy wrote:
lol @ that softpedia link that gives no useful information to the claims that this dingit provides "better quality stream with MUCH less bandwidth" As far as I've seen, it uses less bandwidth because it has less frames per second and looks choppy. But I'm not expert. is it peer-to-peer? they might mean it uses much less bandwidth for their servers No, it doesn't use p2p! Re the frame, the quality on Enhanced HD is 1080/60fps, and it still uses less bandwidth than other streaming services to do that! what video encoding does it use? is it h265? and yea, framerate seems good for me
It does a few very clever things to save bandwidth but still get the good quality. Most are company intellectual property so I can't share, but the FAQ has some details about some of the things we do (such as use UDP rather than TCP) etc.
Glad you like the quality though - anything you think could be improved?
|
On December 12 2014 03:40 madals wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2014 03:30 Die4Ever wrote:On December 12 2014 03:27 madals wrote:On December 12 2014 03:18 Die4Ever wrote:On December 12 2014 03:15 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On December 12 2014 03:12 necrosexy wrote:
lol @ that softpedia link that gives no useful information to the claims that this dingit provides "better quality stream with MUCH less bandwidth" As far as I've seen, it uses less bandwidth because it has less frames per second and looks choppy. But I'm not expert. is it peer-to-peer? they might mean it uses much less bandwidth for their servers No, it doesn't use p2p! Re the frame, the quality on Enhanced HD is 1080/60fps, and it still uses less bandwidth than other streaming services to do that! what video encoding does it use? is it h265? and yea, framerate seems good for me It does a few very clever things to save bandwidth but still get the good quality. Most are company intellectual property so I can't share, but the FAQ has some details about some of the things we do (such as use UDP rather than TCP) etc. Glad you like the quality though - anything you think could be improved?
some quiet music or something animating/moving on the break screen, it just looks like the stream is frozen, especially when using an unfamiliar platform
the video quality option seems to suggest that enhanced hd is higher quality than source? that doesn't make any sense, I mean you could be using some fancy upscaling algorithm or frame interpolation but even that is arguably worse quality than source
|
On December 12 2014 03:47 Die4Ever wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2014 03:40 madals wrote:On December 12 2014 03:30 Die4Ever wrote:On December 12 2014 03:27 madals wrote:On December 12 2014 03:18 Die4Ever wrote:On December 12 2014 03:15 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On December 12 2014 03:12 necrosexy wrote:
lol @ that softpedia link that gives no useful information to the claims that this dingit provides "better quality stream with MUCH less bandwidth" As far as I've seen, it uses less bandwidth because it has less frames per second and looks choppy. But I'm not expert. is it peer-to-peer? they might mean it uses much less bandwidth for their servers No, it doesn't use p2p! Re the frame, the quality on Enhanced HD is 1080/60fps, and it still uses less bandwidth than other streaming services to do that! what video encoding does it use? is it h265? and yea, framerate seems good for me It does a few very clever things to save bandwidth but still get the good quality. Most are company intellectual property so I can't share, but the FAQ has some details about some of the things we do (such as use UDP rather than TCP) etc. Glad you like the quality though - anything you think could be improved? some quiet music or something animating/moving on the break screen, it just looks like the stream is frozen, especially when using an unfamiliar platform the video quality option seems to suggest that enhanced hd is higher quality than source? that doesn't make any sense, I mean you could be using some fancy upscaling algorithm or frame interpolation but even that is arguably worse quality than source
RE the BRB - we are trying to find a good way to make the break screen more obvious and less like it is frozen. I definitely see why that is confusing!
On the quality, Enhanced HD is a higher quality than Source.
|
On December 12 2014 04:15 madals wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2014 03:47 Die4Ever wrote:On December 12 2014 03:40 madals wrote:On December 12 2014 03:30 Die4Ever wrote:On December 12 2014 03:27 madals wrote:On December 12 2014 03:18 Die4Ever wrote:On December 12 2014 03:15 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On December 12 2014 03:12 necrosexy wrote:
lol @ that softpedia link that gives no useful information to the claims that this dingit provides "better quality stream with MUCH less bandwidth" As far as I've seen, it uses less bandwidth because it has less frames per second and looks choppy. But I'm not expert. is it peer-to-peer? they might mean it uses much less bandwidth for their servers No, it doesn't use p2p! Re the frame, the quality on Enhanced HD is 1080/60fps, and it still uses less bandwidth than other streaming services to do that! what video encoding does it use? is it h265? and yea, framerate seems good for me It does a few very clever things to save bandwidth but still get the good quality. Most are company intellectual property so I can't share, but the FAQ has some details about some of the things we do (such as use UDP rather than TCP) etc. Glad you like the quality though - anything you think could be improved? some quiet music or something animating/moving on the break screen, it just looks like the stream is frozen, especially when using an unfamiliar platform the video quality option seems to suggest that enhanced hd is higher quality than source? that doesn't make any sense, I mean you could be using some fancy upscaling algorithm or frame interpolation but even that is arguably worse quality than source RE the BRB - we are trying to find a good way to make the break screen more obvious and less like it is frozen. I definitely see why that is confusing! On the quality, Enhanced HD is a higher quality than Source.
Again, not an expert, but how is it possible to have higher quality than source?
|
On December 12 2014 04:15 madals wrote:Show nested quote +On December 12 2014 03:47 Die4Ever wrote:On December 12 2014 03:40 madals wrote:On December 12 2014 03:30 Die4Ever wrote:On December 12 2014 03:27 madals wrote:On December 12 2014 03:18 Die4Ever wrote:On December 12 2014 03:15 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:On December 12 2014 03:12 necrosexy wrote:
lol @ that softpedia link that gives no useful information to the claims that this dingit provides "better quality stream with MUCH less bandwidth" As far as I've seen, it uses less bandwidth because it has less frames per second and looks choppy. But I'm not expert. is it peer-to-peer? they might mean it uses much less bandwidth for their servers No, it doesn't use p2p! Re the frame, the quality on Enhanced HD is 1080/60fps, and it still uses less bandwidth than other streaming services to do that! what video encoding does it use? is it h265? and yea, framerate seems good for me It does a few very clever things to save bandwidth but still get the good quality. Most are company intellectual property so I can't share, but the FAQ has some details about some of the things we do (such as use UDP rather than TCP) etc. Glad you like the quality though - anything you think could be improved? some quiet music or something animating/moving on the break screen, it just looks like the stream is frozen, especially when using an unfamiliar platform the video quality option seems to suggest that enhanced hd is higher quality than source? that doesn't make any sense, I mean you could be using some fancy upscaling algorithm or frame interpolation but even that is arguably worse quality than source RE the BRB - we are trying to find a good way to make the break screen more obvious and less like it is frozen. I definitely see why that is confusing! On the quality, Enhanced HD is a higher quality than Source.
is the logic that source sounds the same as what twitch has so the max quality had to have a new name? the data has to come from somewhere, the streamer is the source, source means the original video stream sent by the streamer so it is the best, but I could see it just being a marketing decision to rename some things
|
Polt with the in-base 2rax reaper on Catallena
|
On December 12 2014 04:19 Ej_ wrote:
Polt with the in-base 2rax reaper on Catallena
IT'S 5RAX REAPER
|
On December 12 2014 03:35 royalroadweed wrote:
polt WOLing it up.
for realz
|
|
|
|
|
Im not a Polt fan, but he just won a fanboy point there 
|
Why is it showing Hyun vs Lilbow?
|
On December 12 2014 05:03 imrusty269 wrote:
Why is it showing Hyun vs Lilbow?
That is the last show match VOD - this show match has finished but the VOD wont be running for about an hour!
|
|
|
On December 12 2014 15:27 LinYu)Fury wrote:
results?
4-2 Solar
|
On December 12 2014 15:27 LinYu)Fury wrote:
results?
Kespa > koreigner.
|
do they even care about 200 dola? i mean polt won many tournaments for 9001 $ so i don't even know if he cares about 200
i never won anything so i am just curious
|
On December 12 2014 20:15 repomaniak wrote:
do they even care about 200 dola? i mean polt won many tournaments for 9001 $ so i don't even know if he cares about 200
i never won anything so i am just curious
Beating Solar would've been a lot more about prestige and self confidence than pizza money.
Didn't see this but glad Solar won, he is one of my favorite players.
|
well being able to say i won WCS America is probably more important than killing solar in bo5 so i would say it is not that prestigious either
|
On December 12 2014 20:15 repomaniak wrote:
do they even care about 200 dola? i mean polt won many tournaments for 9001 $ so i don't even know if he cares about 200
i never won anything so i am just curious
"Do I practice and play Starcraft for two hours and gain experience just laddering against random people, or do I practice and play Starcraft for two hours, gain competitive experience, compete with a high level opponent, and possibly win money?"
I mean.. why wouldn't he?
And of course 200 dollars is something to care for. Just because you're winning a good prize pool once every couple of months (which is a rare case), doesn't mean you suddenly devalue all money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
