On July 20 2013 04:49 StarscreamG1 wrote: Almost all people here are NUTS. WoL BL+infestor was weaker than this?!?!?!? You don't know how it is confronting 30 BL's with the only counter being Blink stalkers.
On July 20 2013 04:43 Shellshock1122 wrote: WhiteRa proving once again that Corruptors >>>>>> Carriers
Uhm... that's how it's supposed to be. Corruptor's are meant to be the counter to Carriers.
Kinda the peoples fault from WoL, the +to massive for Corrupters to snipe colossi easier really owned Carriers and BCs. On the other hand BCs could fight them head on easily before if people forgot corruption. Like at that time when the buff hit, where Zergs were to lazy to hit a button. This time will hunt Blizzard forever in Sc2. Before Carriers could fight Corruptors if your micro was good.
On July 20 2013 04:40 fuzzylogic44 wrote: The thing I find frustrating about these games is people constantly saying it's comparable or even worse than BL/infestor... it's like they lost their memory. Nothing happened in BL/infestor games. Nothing. With this style there are constant engagements, multi pronged harass, many moving parts in the armies, etc. Stephano's style of doing it is a little slower and dragged out than usual, but it's normally better and even here it's not even remotely similar to the blandness of BL/infestor.
Constant engagements vs free units is not entertaining..
That's like saying engagements with siege tanks is not entertaining because tanks can shell your army for free.
Too bad you can't turtle behind spines with siege tanks while you attack ur opponent base.
This point I agree with. If anything the issue with zerg is movable static defense. In other words, non-static static defense. If they nerfed that somehow all would be well. Like make it cost 25 minerals to move them.