|
MOD NOTE: The bracket on Liquipedia is not final and should be assumed to be speculative. If you are a competitor, trust what MLG Admins tell you over the bracket. |
On April 21 2013 11:44 Tobblish wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2013 11:42 sitromit wrote:On April 21 2013 11:37 PhoenixVoid wrote:Totalbiscuit @Totalbiscuit 5m
Well at least our guys will get to sleep after this, CranK is hallucinating IRL rather than ingame after 30 hours awake. Everyone still involved must be exhausted. Ko Seok Hyun @QuanticHyuN 24m
아...멘붕.........지금까지 안자고 했는데 자기들 실수라고 하지말래 아 ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ 자러 가야지.... "Ahh... mentally broken.... I was sitting here all this time and didn't tell me it was a mistake *crying face* Lets go to sleep." Poor HyuN  Poor Hyun... Where is Quantic though in all of this? What kind of team are they that they have no idea which qualifier their star player is supposed to play in? Aren't they the ones who should have signed him up and set him up for wherever he needs to play? Hyun could have read the registration rules as well, it's even the first one. Players may only parcipate in one region (Korea, America, or Europe) of the WCS. Yeah, but he clearly misunderstood the exception about being allowed to play in Code A this season in another region for the 3 Code S players. His managers should have handled this.
|
On April 21 2013 11:47 govie wrote: Guys i am not getting it. Can a 14/15 year old work in the states? because in germany u have heromarine and he didnt participate in wcs qualifier but hes really good like xenocider... can xenocider qualify in the states or has blizzard agerules? (else he will get DQ-ed aswell)
Just don't tell the MLG Admins and it will be OK.
|
On April 21 2013 11:42 Cyrak wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2013 11:39 Awesomeness wrote:On April 21 2013 11:31 Cyrak wrote:On April 21 2013 11:30 Dodgin wrote: If it weren't for Koreans/EU players in WCS NA you would have 32 NA players competing for the same prize pool as GSL Code S. A lot of people seem to want this. Seems ridiculous to me as well. Well if you have 15 koreans in the top 16, it will be like Code B with same prize pool as GSL Code S. Right, it is silly either way but that is a result of the way Blizzard designed WCS. The solution to the problem isn't to make it even dumber by making it a NA-only arena with a 100k prize pool.
Why not? It makes sense if it's the best of one region. It makes no sense if it's the lower tier of another region.
|
On April 21 2013 11:47 opterown wrote: i don't think TB is meant to spoil that alicia qualified, MLG will be broadcasting the last matches over the week
Nope, it's on MLGs bracket. That's public information.
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
oh ok fair enough, seems a bit pointless to broadcast matches on their own days that we already know results of though
|
On April 21 2013 11:48 fuzzylogic44 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2013 11:42 Cyrak wrote:On April 21 2013 11:39 Awesomeness wrote:On April 21 2013 11:31 Cyrak wrote:On April 21 2013 11:30 Dodgin wrote: If it weren't for Koreans/EU players in WCS NA you would have 32 NA players competing for the same prize pool as GSL Code S. A lot of people seem to want this. Seems ridiculous to me as well. Well if you have 15 koreans in the top 16, it will be like Code B with same prize pool as GSL Code S. Right, it is silly either way but that is a result of the way Blizzard designed WCS. The solution to the problem isn't to make it even dumber by making it a NA-only arena with a 100k prize pool. Why not? It makes sense if it's the best of one region. It makes no sense if it's the lower tier of another region.
Because you don't deserve the same prize money as the champion of Korea for being the champion of NA.
|
On April 21 2013 11:46 Shellshock1122 wrote: Alicia 2-0  Revival  Oz 2-0  aLive  Alicia and  Oz in Premier league
Oh christ. Poor Demuslim.
|
On April 21 2013 11:48 Tobblish wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2013 11:47 govie wrote: Guys i am not getting it. Can a 14/15 year old work in the states? because in germany u have heromarine and he didnt participate in wcs qualifier but hes really good like xenocider... can xenocider qualify in the states or has blizzard agerules? (else he will get DQ-ed aswell) Just don't tell the MLG Admins and it will be OK.
|
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On April 21 2013 11:49 Dodgin wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2013 11:48 fuzzylogic44 wrote:On April 21 2013 11:42 Cyrak wrote:On April 21 2013 11:39 Awesomeness wrote:On April 21 2013 11:31 Cyrak wrote:On April 21 2013 11:30 Dodgin wrote: If it weren't for Koreans/EU players in WCS NA you would have 32 NA players competing for the same prize pool as GSL Code S. A lot of people seem to want this. Seems ridiculous to me as well. Well if you have 15 koreans in the top 16, it will be like Code B with same prize pool as GSL Code S. Right, it is silly either way but that is a result of the way Blizzard designed WCS. The solution to the problem isn't to make it even dumber by making it a NA-only arena with a 100k prize pool. Why not? It makes sense if it's the best of one region. It makes no sense if it's the lower tier of another region. Because you don't deserve the same prize money as the champion of Korea for being the champion of NA. idra > roro man, NA > KR
|
On April 21 2013 11:48 opterown wrote: oh ok fair enough, seems a bit pointless to broadcast matches on their own days that we already know results of though
MLG vs Kespa, the latest exhibition tournament at Anaheim. It's a MLG thing 
edit: fixed quote
|
On April 21 2013 11:49 Dodgin wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2013 11:48 fuzzylogic44 wrote:On April 21 2013 11:42 Cyrak wrote:On April 21 2013 11:39 Awesomeness wrote:On April 21 2013 11:31 Cyrak wrote:On April 21 2013 11:30 Dodgin wrote: If it weren't for Koreans/EU players in WCS NA you would have 32 NA players competing for the same prize pool as GSL Code S. A lot of people seem to want this. Seems ridiculous to me as well. Well if you have 15 koreans in the top 16, it will be like Code B with same prize pool as GSL Code S. Right, it is silly either way but that is a result of the way Blizzard designed WCS. The solution to the problem isn't to make it even dumber by making it a NA-only arena with a 100k prize pool. Why not? It makes sense if it's the best of one region. It makes no sense if it's the lower tier of another region. Because you don't deserve the same prize money as the champion of Korea for being the champion of NA.
Maybe not, but the structure of it makes sense. It makes far less sense, and it's also less fair, for the champion of the tier 2 Koreans to get the same as the champion of the tier 1 Koreans
|
|
On April 21 2013 11:51 fuzzylogic44 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2013 11:49 Dodgin wrote:On April 21 2013 11:48 fuzzylogic44 wrote:On April 21 2013 11:42 Cyrak wrote:On April 21 2013 11:39 Awesomeness wrote:On April 21 2013 11:31 Cyrak wrote:On April 21 2013 11:30 Dodgin wrote: If it weren't for Koreans/EU players in WCS NA you would have 32 NA players competing for the same prize pool as GSL Code S. A lot of people seem to want this. Seems ridiculous to me as well. Well if you have 15 koreans in the top 16, it will be like Code B with same prize pool as GSL Code S. Right, it is silly either way but that is a result of the way Blizzard designed WCS. The solution to the problem isn't to make it even dumber by making it a NA-only arena with a 100k prize pool. Why not? It makes sense if it's the best of one region. It makes no sense if it's the lower tier of another region. Because you don't deserve the same prize money as the champion of Korea for being the champion of NA. Maybe not, but the structure of it makes sense. It makes far less sense, and it's also less fair, for the champion of the tier 2 Koreans to get the same as the champion of the tier 1 Koreans
You could say it's a bit of a fuzzy logic
+ Show Spoiler +
|
On April 21 2013 11:51 fuzzylogic44 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2013 11:49 Dodgin wrote:On April 21 2013 11:48 fuzzylogic44 wrote:On April 21 2013 11:42 Cyrak wrote:On April 21 2013 11:39 Awesomeness wrote:On April 21 2013 11:31 Cyrak wrote:On April 21 2013 11:30 Dodgin wrote: If it weren't for Koreans/EU players in WCS NA you would have 32 NA players competing for the same prize pool as GSL Code S. A lot of people seem to want this. Seems ridiculous to me as well. Well if you have 15 koreans in the top 16, it will be like Code B with same prize pool as GSL Code S. Right, it is silly either way but that is a result of the way Blizzard designed WCS. The solution to the problem isn't to make it even dumber by making it a NA-only arena with a 100k prize pool. Why not? It makes sense if it's the best of one region. It makes no sense if it's the lower tier of another region. Because you don't deserve the same prize money as the champion of Korea for being the champion of NA. Maybe not, but the structure of it makes sense. It makes far less sense, and it's also less fair, for the champion of the tier 2 Koreans to get the same as the champion of the tier 1 Koreans
If MC/MVP wins WCS_EU i do not dare to name him tier 2, u?
|
On April 21 2013 11:51 fuzzylogic44 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2013 11:49 Dodgin wrote:On April 21 2013 11:48 fuzzylogic44 wrote:On April 21 2013 11:42 Cyrak wrote:On April 21 2013 11:39 Awesomeness wrote:On April 21 2013 11:31 Cyrak wrote:On April 21 2013 11:30 Dodgin wrote: If it weren't for Koreans/EU players in WCS NA you would have 32 NA players competing for the same prize pool as GSL Code S. A lot of people seem to want this. Seems ridiculous to me as well. Well if you have 15 koreans in the top 16, it will be like Code B with same prize pool as GSL Code S. Right, it is silly either way but that is a result of the way Blizzard designed WCS. The solution to the problem isn't to make it even dumber by making it a NA-only arena with a 100k prize pool. Why not? It makes sense if it's the best of one region. It makes no sense if it's the lower tier of another region. Because you don't deserve the same prize money as the champion of Korea for being the champion of NA. Maybe not, but the structure of it makes sense. It makes far less sense, and it's also less fair, for the champion of the tier 2 Koreans to get the same as the champion of the tier 1 Koreans
You're right, the entire thing is fucked. It should be residency requirement to compete in a region (unless you're one of the CN/Australian players who are fucked) with prize pools that fit the skill level of each region
Korea should get X amount, NA should get 40% of that and EU should get 50-60% of that.
|
On April 21 2013 11:52 Shellshock1122 wrote: Center,  Jaedong,  Zenio,  Demuslim, and  Revival all competing for the same spot among others
I feel really bad for Demuslim...
|
On April 21 2013 11:51 fuzzylogic44 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2013 11:49 Dodgin wrote:On April 21 2013 11:48 fuzzylogic44 wrote:On April 21 2013 11:42 Cyrak wrote:On April 21 2013 11:39 Awesomeness wrote:On April 21 2013 11:31 Cyrak wrote:On April 21 2013 11:30 Dodgin wrote: If it weren't for Koreans/EU players in WCS NA you would have 32 NA players competing for the same prize pool as GSL Code S. A lot of people seem to want this. Seems ridiculous to me as well. Well if you have 15 koreans in the top 16, it will be like Code B with same prize pool as GSL Code S. Right, it is silly either way but that is a result of the way Blizzard designed WCS. The solution to the problem isn't to make it even dumber by making it a NA-only arena with a 100k prize pool. Why not? It makes sense if it's the best of one region. It makes no sense if it's the lower tier of another region. Because you don't deserve the same prize money as the champion of Korea for being the champion of NA. Maybe not, but the structure of it makes sense. It makes far less sense, and it's also less fair, for the champion of the tier 2 Koreans to get the same as the champion of the tier 1 Koreans
Which is why Korea should have had higher prize pool.
|
On April 21 2013 11:53 Awesomeness wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2013 11:52 Shellshock1122 wrote: Center,  Jaedong,  Zenio,  Demuslim, and  Revival all competing for the same spot among others I feel really bad for Demuslim...
Same but I think he has an ok chance getting past them.
|
On April 21 2013 11:53 Dodgin wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2013 11:51 fuzzylogic44 wrote:On April 21 2013 11:49 Dodgin wrote:On April 21 2013 11:48 fuzzylogic44 wrote:On April 21 2013 11:42 Cyrak wrote:On April 21 2013 11:39 Awesomeness wrote:On April 21 2013 11:31 Cyrak wrote:On April 21 2013 11:30 Dodgin wrote: If it weren't for Koreans/EU players in WCS NA you would have 32 NA players competing for the same prize pool as GSL Code S. A lot of people seem to want this. Seems ridiculous to me as well. Well if you have 15 koreans in the top 16, it will be like Code B with same prize pool as GSL Code S. Right, it is silly either way but that is a result of the way Blizzard designed WCS. The solution to the problem isn't to make it even dumber by making it a NA-only arena with a 100k prize pool. Why not? It makes sense if it's the best of one region. It makes no sense if it's the lower tier of another region. Because you don't deserve the same prize money as the champion of Korea for being the champion of NA. Maybe not, but the structure of it makes sense. It makes far less sense, and it's also less fair, for the champion of the tier 2 Koreans to get the same as the champion of the tier 1 Koreans You're right, the entire thing is fucked. It should be residency requirement to compete in a region (unless you're one of the CN/Australian players who are fucked) with prize pools that fit the skill level of each region Korea should get X amount, NA should get 40% of that and EU should get 50-60% of that.
Luckily there will be a defacto residency requirement in the coming seasons as the games move entirely offline. At least Koreans will have to stay in their foreign team house for a few weeks as it happens which would mean they can't do proleague or gstl.
|
|
|
|