EPT[SPL] KT Rolster vs STX Soul R4 - Page 9
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
M.R. McThundercrotch
United States265 Posts
| ||
|
m0ck
4194 Posts
| ||
|
JJH777
United States4414 Posts
| ||
|
Fuchsteufelswild
Australia2028 Posts
| ||
|
AyaaLa
Spain629 Posts
On April 08 2013 18:06 JJH777 wrote: SNM and Whiplash look nothing like I imagined them. haha, so true | ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
I guess I'll watch some HotS then. | ||
|
Yello
Germany7411 Posts
On April 08 2013 18:04 Megiddosc wrote: Did you miss Bogus losing 40+ scvs? Granted he's terran, and his units are insanely cost effective so it doesn't really matter, but yeah, Action did MAJOR damage with the baneling drop. It's just that terran doesn't need scvs nearly as much as the other races need their harvesters. he killed 40 SCVs when Bogus was actually ahead on workers. Bogus was at 70 workers to Actions ~55 and normally Zerg needs to be ahead. Action did merely catch up in workers with the drops and he didn't do anything to Bogus army at all. Bogus had the huge army lead afterwards (because of better macro) and then attacked with superior micro and good multitasking with drops. | ||
|
Arceus
Vietnam8333 Posts
On April 08 2013 18:01 PredY wrote: think he made too many SHs in the end, they are OKish vs mines but ultimately useless vs mass bio, especially when used just to defend. would love to see him save up that gas for more ultras in panic mode, Action thought those little mushroom could shoot spikes from underground.... ok I wont brought up this discussion again but it's pretty frustrated to see a band of bio run into zerg's expo with like five SHs worth of resource and kill everything with ease | ||
|
therabit
795 Posts
| ||
|
Vindicare605
United States16089 Posts
On April 08 2013 18:06 M.R. McThundercrotch wrote: Hopefully Swarm Host builds will keep losing until Blizzard just does away with them. The bastard child of Lurkers and Brood Lords, I have never seen them do anything interesting. With the decreased role of Fungal Growth, maybe we could see the root removed from that, too... Swarm Hosts are actually really good when used offensively but as for a defensive unit they are not very powerful. The unit is going to take some time to really figure out but trust me, once the pros do people will change their minds about it. | ||
|
NicksonReyes
Philippines4431 Posts
Just checked, actually just 7. The last 5 were vs Baby, Roro, Soulkey, Effort and Innovation. Poor Action. | ||
|
Highwinds
Canada955 Posts
| ||
|
Ragnar1
Australia88 Posts
| ||
|
SayTT
Sweden2158 Posts
 | ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
| ||
|
m0ck
4194 Posts
On April 08 2013 18:07 Yello wrote: he killed 40 SCVs when Bogus was actually ahead on workers. Bogus was at 70 workers to Actions ~55 and normally Zerg needs to be ahead. Action did merely catch up in workers with the drops and he didn't do anything to Bogus army at all. Bogus had the huge army lead afterwards (because of better macro) and then attacked with superior micro and good multitasking with drops. 70 drones vs 48 scvs. But with 3/4 CCs that is obviously not very much of a difference at all. | ||
|
Wintex
Norway16838 Posts
On April 08 2013 18:03 NicksonReyes wrote: He should be for his now 8-loss streak .Action is only meeting strong opponents tho. It's a drag to watch that epic zerg when it happens. He loses confidence. TT Atleast Broejja is awesome every playoff. | ||
|
Giriath
Sweden2412 Posts
On April 08 2013 18:04 Megiddosc wrote: Did you miss Bogus losing 40+ scvs? Granted he's terran, and his units are insanely cost effective so it doesn't really matter, but yeah, Action did MAJOR damage with the baneling drop. It's just that terran doesn't need scvs nearly as much as the other races need their harvesters. That's correct, but protoss and especially zerg can produce workers much faster. While Action was bombing he was also losing his fourth, and to get way ahead from the baneling bombs he would have wanted a fifth. Investing in those bombs cost him a lot, and Innovation was able to use his superior army to make sure Action could not get too far ahead while he rebuilt his SCV count. Then Action went for an army composition that did not work against Innovation, and he was far behind. | ||
|
Ysellian
Netherlands9029 Posts
On April 08 2013 18:07 Vindicare605 wrote: Swarm Hosts are actually really good when used offensively but as for a defensive unit they are not very powerful. The unit is going to take some time to really figure out but trust me, once the pros do people will change their minds about it. Seriously hope they don't remove swarm hosts. I"m actually having more fun playing with them online than I did with lurkers and I think they are good against Protoss or meching terran. (at least at my level of play  ) | ||
|
NeonFlare
Finland1307 Posts
| ||
| ||
