EPTUse all the imba stuff and win.
[MLG] Day 2 Winter Championship - Page 348
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
The usual: Don't flame casters or players. Don't discuss balance in this or any LR thread. Don't call your fellow posters idiots. Be excited, happy and entertained. | ||
|
Laryleprakon
New Zealand9496 Posts
Use all the imba stuff and win. | ||
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
| ||
|
Account252508
3454 Posts
| ||
|
Devolved
United States2753 Posts
On March 17 2013 08:40 Darpa wrote: I feel like this is a huge oversight by so many pros. Rather than losing drones to drops every time, take 3-4 and make spines and a spore. Its better to lose 12 drones to defense than 30 drones to drops throughout the game. Yeah, it's kinda weird. They'll make 25 spines vs. Protoss at important chokes, but won't make any vs. Terrans to protect their bases. | ||
|
Aando
1304 Posts
| ||
|
Emzeeshady
Canada4203 Posts
| ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12025 Posts
Leenock ignores static defense 3 games in a row and loses loads of drones every time. If that's great play, I feel that the game was soured by zerg skill in WoL. | ||
|
WhiteSatin
United States308 Posts
On March 17 2013 08:41 ThomasR wrote: So, zergs used to go mutas in part to shut down terran drop play, but now that mutas are not able to do so... so zergs are not making spores/spines - in game 2 leenock had 2000 mins at one point and kept making drones, just to keep loosing them cause he did not build a single spine/spore... They need to adapt.. Zergs were used to leaving home 1 infestor and a move couple lings and the drop was gonna be destroyed 100% of the time, now that is FINALLY more powerful, zergs have to adapt, just like terrrans had to suck it up hardcore when the queen/infestor buff took place. Let them adapt | ||
|
Durp
Canada3117 Posts
| ||
|
Designakrobat
Germany558 Posts
| ||
|
D_bo
United States50 Posts
On March 17 2013 08:42 SafeAsCheese wrote: uh.... you know that with 4 spines at every base as opposed to his 1500 mineral bank, his muta would not HAVE to defend 24/7 and could go around harassing innovations free 4 base econ? :\ 4 spines where the front the back the side??? | ||
|
Kevan
Sweden2303 Posts
| ||
|
dibban
Sweden1279 Posts
| ||
|
umelbumel
2026 Posts
| ||
|
govie
9334 Posts
On March 17 2013 08:40 Darpa wrote: I feel like this is a huge oversight by so many pros. Rather than losing drones to drops every time, take 3-4 and make spines and a spore. Its better to lose 12 drones to defense than 30 drones to drops throughout the game. Indeed. Those drops arent bad until ur on 3 bases or more. Investing in some static defence is cheap and u can have a smaller but higher tech army. Im thinkin zergs should adapt more to hots instead of playing wol-strats. Like terrans and protos are placing building in defence, zerg should do more of that too!  | ||
|
StarVe
Germany13591 Posts
God damn it, Master Jane. Can't they just have Jjakji vs Rain on main stage, it's better than Ret vs Flash anyway. | ||
|
CCa1ss1e
Canada3231 Posts
| ||
|
BoZiffer
United States1841 Posts
| ||
|
n0ise
3452 Posts
On March 17 2013 08:41 Mouzone wrote: It's more the manner in which he beats Leenock. He practically demolishes him in a 3-0 sweep. He was never really threatened in any of the games. But if he'd play TvT against someone who went for a 2base timing, got supply blocked, did 0 damage, then made 12 supply depots later on, wouldn't the game look exactly the same? I don't understand your point. For Newkirk, even if leenock wasn't going over his half of the map, the game was way closer then you think. Until Leenock with perfect overlord spread didn't respond to drops and preferred to float 1500 minerals instead of making static. Again, what's the problem with the result? | ||
|
edgeOut
United States945 Posts
| ||
| ||
