|
On February 18 2013 06:13 sitromit wrote:
The point is, think of the few times people managed to hold Parting's Immortal all ins. Now add a mothership core to that equation. Artosis was saying on SotG that he doesn't think Parting can even lose a game to Zerg in HotS. I agree.
that's a completely hypothetical scenario ~
also believe it or not, Artosis is an awesome caster - but it's not unheard of that he is wrong once or twice about his predictions ^_^
|
On February 18 2013 06:12 sitromit wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2013 06:09 Mohdoo wrote:On February 18 2013 06:08 sitromit wrote:On February 18 2013 06:07 Doublemint wrote:On February 18 2013 06:05 sitromit wrote:
The highlight of this match was an Immortal Sentry all in no longer being an all in for Protoss, you can botch it, hit recall, and take a 3rd. and when exactly did that happen in the grubby game? Were you afk during the beginning of the game on Cloud Kingdom? You do realize Grubby went for an Immortal Sentry all in? Wasn't an all-in. he went for colossi tech long before he was pushed back. The entire idea being able to TP is that you don't need to make it an all-in, since you can escape. No, he went for Colossus after he got pushed back. He actually walled of his natural when moving out and put down a bunch of cannons. He went for an all in. Only it's no longer all in, because if you botch the attack and get your army trapped, you can safely recall home.
lol try to invalidate the wins of players however you want, its not going to change anything.
|
I love Heart of the Swarm so much every game I see is awesome.
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On February 18 2013 06:16 Pandain wrote:
I love Heart of the Swarm so much every game I see is awesome.
I kind of feel TvT isn't as good as before, but I haven't seen enough to say for sure.
|
Watching two armies both time warped is hilarious, It's like someone put the game on slowest mode.
|
lol Apollo da man 
|
WigglingSquid
5194 Posts
Hahah. I am willing to bet that Apollo practiced that joke before doing this on stream. 
|
Grubby playing really well. Let's see if he can pull off a 6-0.
|
United Arab Emirates439 Posts
I don't understand what sort of counter-play is involved with Time-Warp? It seems like you basically just accept that it is going down if you commit and it goes down and yeah.
|
On February 18 2013 06:26 ZjiublingZ wrote:
I don't understand what sort of counter-play is involved with Time-Warp? It seems like you basically just accept that it is going down if you commit and it goes down and yeah.
Sounds a lot like some other spells that are in this game... you can pre-spread and try to bait a missed one, but that's about it.
|
On February 18 2013 06:26 ZjiublingZ wrote:
I don't understand what sort of counter-play is involved with Time-Warp? It seems like you basically just accept that it is going down if you commit and it goes down and yeah.
reducing micro capability of the opponent I would say, a very nice combo with ff/storm is possible as well so that could be problematic
//edit: and I agree with the guy above me of course.
|
holy shit grubby unstopibol
|
Grubby playing really good, haven't seen him play this good in a while
|
On February 18 2013 06:25 Talron wrote:
Grubby playing really well. Let's see if he can pull off a 6-0.
:D
8-0 incoming! I really want Grubby to do well this year.
|
United Arab Emirates439 Posts
On February 18 2013 06:29 corpuscle wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2013 06:26 ZjiublingZ wrote:
I don't understand what sort of counter-play is involved with Time-Warp? It seems like you basically just accept that it is going down if you commit and it goes down and yeah. Sounds a lot like some other spells that are in this game... you can pre-spread and try to bait a missed one, but that's about it.
Hmm... I expected there would be a reason they kept the spell in the game after getting rid of it on the Oracle. But I haven't seen any interesting uses of it or interesting counter-play against it.
Oh well, I didn't mean to derail the thread! Go DeMuslim!
|
On February 18 2013 06:29 corpuscle wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2013 06:26 ZjiublingZ wrote:
I don't understand what sort of counter-play is involved with Time-Warp? It seems like you basically just accept that it is going down if you commit and it goes down and yeah. Sounds a lot like some other spells that are in this game... you can pre-spread and try to bait a missed one, but that's about it.
I also think pros will find better uses for it, like saving one time warp for after the fight when your opponent or you want to retreat for example. Depends on the matchup of course. But throwing both down in an immortal/archon vs immortal/archon fight doesn't seem to do much.
|
Does timewarp actually decreas attack speed or only movement speed?
|
On February 18 2013 06:36 Takuna wrote:
Does timewarp actually decreas attack speed or only movement speed?
It does decrease attack speed.
|
On February 18 2013 06:36 Takuna wrote:
Does timewarp actually decreas attack speed or only movement speed?
Only movement speed. A shame, as it would be cool if projectiles slowed down in the TimeWarp bubble.
On February 18 2013 06:37 Dodgin wrote:Show nested quote +On February 18 2013 06:36 Takuna wrote:
Does timewarp actually decreas attack speed or only movement speed? It does decrease attack speed.
I don't recall it doing that.
|
On February 18 2013 06:36 Takuna wrote:
Does timewarp actually decreas attack speed or only movement speed?
Movement speed and it also slows down prjectiles afaik, it deoes not affect air units btw (like overlords apollo xD).
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
