EPT$2000 HotS KotH presented by The GD Studio - Page 8
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
Musicus
Germany23580 Posts
| ||
|
WigglingSquid
5194 Posts
On February 18 2013 06:35 Musicus wrote: I also think pros will find better uses for it, like saving one time warp for after the fight when your opponent or you want to retreat for example. Depends on the matchup of course. But throwing both down in an immortal/archon vs immortal/archon fight doesn't seem to do much. I'll eagerly wait for Timewarp harassment on the mineral line. | ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
| ||
|
Doublemint
Austria8760 Posts
On February 18 2013 06:38 Dodgin wrote: Next time someone uses time warp just look at the units inside, their firing rate is much slower than normal. hm Liquipedia says it reduces movement by 50% - nothing else, so I am rather sceptical of what you are saying  | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23580 Posts
On February 18 2013 06:39 WigglingSquid wrote: I'll eagerly wait for Timewarp harassment on the mineral line. Ah yes, I've seen that on some streams, Tod's for example, but I wonder how effective it is. You can only do it in the early game or you will lose the MSC. Heromarine moved his mules out of the time warp, but ignored it for the most part. | ||
|
pmp10
3401 Posts
On February 18 2013 06:39 WigglingSquid wrote: I'll eagerly wait for Timewarp harassment on the mineral line. Since it delays only movement it's not that effective. It's much better to save your energy for photon overcharge / recall or just use time warp in combat. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15743 Posts
edit: shit lol | ||
|
WigglingSquid
5194 Posts
On February 18 2013 06:43 pmp10 wrote: Since it delays only movement it's not that effective. It's much better to save your energy for photon overcharge / recall or just use time warp in combat. Oh, I see. Shame on Blizzard for giving spells deceptive names. Were it to actually slow everything down, I could see players time warping double assimilators when the geysers are close enough. | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23580 Posts
| ||
|
scampioen
Belgium55 Posts
| ||
|
MCDayC
United Kingdom14464 Posts
| ||
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On February 18 2013 06:50 scampioen wrote: Where did Grubby go wrong? i don't really see it. Just macro problems? No collosus. | ||
|
Sated
England4983 Posts
| ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
| ||
|
Schelim
Austria11528 Posts
he had so many minerals for like the last two minutes of the game. he just let his macro slip imo. | ||
|
Talron
Germany7651 Posts
Was it really just this? To me, as a sc2 beginner this seems quite odd. | ||
|
AgentW
United States7725 Posts
On February 18 2013 06:52 Talron wrote: Was it really just this? To me, as a sc2 beginner this seems quite odd. I disagree with stuchiu's assessment; I think it was just macro mistakes and perhaps not enough HT's for storm. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
TheSir
1830 Posts
On February 18 2013 06:52 Schelim wrote: aah no perfect record for Grubby today =/ he had so many minerals for like the last two minutes of the game. he just let his macro slip imo. i dont see how a few more units would have helped Grubby, no way he could have hold his third. | ||
| ||
