[IEM] Katowice Day 2 - Page 65
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Grettin
42381 Posts
| ||
StarVe
Germany13591 Posts
| ||
BretZ
United States1510 Posts
On January 19 2013 02:11 Grettin wrote: So grubby made it in the end? Yes :> Yet he still rides the "Grubby Line" | ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97274 Posts
On January 19 2013 02:11 Grettin wrote: So grubby made it in the end? Yes he advanced 3rd place in his group | ||
DarkPie
United States42 Posts
On January 19 2013 02:11 Grettin wrote: So grubby made it in the end? Yessir. Thank TLO =P | ||
Mariosatr
294 Posts
On January 19 2013 02:11 Grettin wrote: So grubby made it in the end? Yep, Grubby's 7-6 to Moonglade's 6-5. Would've loved to see both of them make it though =/ | ||
habeck
1120 Posts
| ||
OKMarius
Norway469 Posts
On January 19 2013 02:09 Aynophae wrote: If we only count the games between them 3, both TLO and Grubby are 3-3 on maps and Moonglade is 2-3, he would be out too with this system, some tourney did this iirc. TLO isn't into the equation though since he has better mapscore than both of 'em | ||
Neo.NEt
United States785 Posts
| ||
Chaosu
Poland404 Posts
On January 19 2013 02:05 00Visor wrote: In football it makes sense, because you stimulate the teams to play offensive because you reward more total goals. This doesnt apply to map wins, so it doesnt make sense there. Why, I am asking why you don't stimulate the players to take one game off an opponent even when you're losing a series? | ||
griD77
Germany36 Posts
On January 19 2013 02:13 Neo.NEt wrote: Am I crazy or is that Jeremy from PurePwnage? You are not, it is teh_pwnerer indeed. | ||
oscarsg
75 Posts
| ||
Neo.NEt
United States785 Posts
I'm giggling like a little school girl over here tehehehe | ||
sitromit
7051 Posts
On January 19 2013 02:05 TheBB wrote: This group also went mostly as expected, except for Snute underperforming by quite a bit. Among the other five, the order is okay I think. I also had TLO > Dream, but I guess it was not to be. ![]() Statistics don't account for wins from gimmicky play. ![]() | ||
rasnj
United States1959 Posts
On January 19 2013 02:12 StarVe wrote: HE'S MOVING IN is kind of Khaldor's catchphrase, i think. AND THEY ARE BOTH DROPPING IN SUPPLY! Player X's supply is dropping, but so is player Y's! He has a few things he really likes to repeat in tense situations. I don't really mind though, feel he is a very good caster. | ||
TheBB
Switzerland5133 Posts
On January 19 2013 02:07 ssg wrote: Seems really stupid to pick wins over winning percentage. It's common in football to award offensive play. I guess that's where it comes from. I agree it doesn't make much sense in SC. | ||
00Visor
4337 Posts
On January 19 2013 02:13 Chaosu wrote: Why, I am asking why you don't stimulate the players to take one game off an opponent even when you're losing a series? No. Thats already stimulated, because players would have a worse map difference if they wouldnt take that game. Counting total map wins changes nothing there. | ||
WhurreOdu
Austria1739 Posts
EDIT: ... and german (TakeTV) | ||
goswser
United States3519 Posts
![]() | ||
mijellin
China740 Posts
On January 19 2013 02:16 00Visor wrote: No. Thats already stimulated, because players would have a worse map difference if they wouldnt take that game. Counting total map wins changes nothing there. If a player is down 0-1 he is motivated to try to win 2 in a row regardless lol | ||
| ||