|
On November 24 2012 02:37 caradoc wrote:
Since all are tied with sets/wins/mapscore/head-to-head, we have to look at map score amongst tied
Map Score amongst tied
naniwa 3-2
forgg 2-3
nightend 3-2
Forgg is eliminated, resulting in a two-way tie.
Again, both are tied with sets/wins/mapscore, but look at head-to-head
nighend 2-1 naniwa
naniwa eliminated.
Again. NIGHTEND IS 3-3 (2-1 forgg, 1-2 naniwa).
|
On November 24 2012 02:32 TheSwedishFan wrote:
Answer this please
What would have happened if Ret won 2 - 1?
Nani 5-7
forgg 5-7
Ret 6-8
All tied at 2-3 in games and -2 map score.
Internal mapscore would then decide:
nani 2-0 forgg
nani 2-1 ret
Nani advances.
|
On November 24 2012 02:36 garbanzo wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 02:34 Al Bundy wrote:On November 24 2012 02:31 mijellin wrote:
There really needs to be a sticky post at the top of this thread telling everyone that ret throwing game 2 did not matter at all He threw the game. That's unacceptable, period. If anything, he should have forfeited the series instead of playing it and wasting everyone's time and discrediting the scene. Wanting to play a quicker game by doing a ling/baneling all-in is not the same as throwing the game away. If NightEnd wasn't ready for it Ret could have done a lot of damage and actually won the game. After the all-in failed he lost so he just had a bit of fun.
I see reason. It looks awesome.
|
On November 24 2012 02:37 caradoc wrote:
Since all are tied with sets/wins/mapscore/head-to-head, we have to look at map score amongst tied
Map Score amongst tied
naniwa 3-2
forgg 2-3
nightend 3-2
Forgg is eliminated, resulting in a two-way tie.
Again, both are tied with sets/wins/mapscore, but look at head-to-head
nighend 2-1 naniwa
naniwa eliminated.
except ne is 3-3, not 3-2
|
On November 24 2012 02:36 Husnan wrote:
So, on stream 1, we have Ret sending wave after wave on banelings on forcefields and taking 6 bases at once, and on stream 2, we have Sase making Carriers and Mothership in a PvP...
This is utter bullshit, I have higher expectations of Dreamhack events, really.
When a game doesn't matter, DON'T FUCKING PLAY IT.
I have better things to do than watch meaningless retarded games that might as well be played by my 9-year old drooling cousin.
I'm gonna watch Dota2, screw this.
SO
MUCH
MAD
|
Let's all go back in time a bit, and think about what happened in GSL. Naniwa purposely lost vs Nestea and guess what, he lost his code S seed. I am not trying to say here that Ret should be punished hardcore, but I am trying to say that it is not a small matter.
|
On November 24 2012 02:33 caradoc wrote:
Dear dreamhack Gods, please place HerO and Taeja on opposite sides of the tournament.
Ha, we all know the Dreamhack Gods are vengeful deities with an appetite for Liquid suffering.
|
On November 24 2012 02:37 caradoc wrote:
Since all are tied with sets/wins/mapscore/head-to-head, we have to look at map score amongst tied
Map Score amongst tied
naniwa 3-2
forgg 2-3
nightend 3-2
Forgg is eliminated, resulting in a two-way tie.
Again, both are tied with sets/wins/mapscore, but look at head-to-head
nighend 2-1 naniwa
naniwa eliminated.
Nightend is 3-3 for fuck sakes.
|
On November 24 2012 02:32 TheSwedishFan wrote:
Answer this please
What would have happened if Ret won 2 - 1?
Naniwa would go through
Ret 1-4
Nani 4-1
Forgg 2-2
Ret needed 2-0 for the overall better mapscore Nightend was already out he just didn´t know it.
edit perhaps lucky for Nani that Nightend didn´t know.
|
On November 24 2012 02:37 caradoc wrote:
Since all are tied with sets/wins/mapscore/head-to-head, we have to look at map score amongst tied
Map Score amongst tied
naniwa 3-2
forgg 2-3
nightend 3-2
Forgg is eliminated, resulting in a two-way tie.
Again, both are tied with sets/wins/mapscore, but look at head-to-head
nighend 2-1 naniwa
naniwa eliminated.
you don't make a two step elimination process wtf, it's a three-way tie, not a two-way tie, the second part is irrelevant, Nani wins on internal mapscore
also Nightend is 3-3*
|
On November 24 2012 02:23 Anonymous_Coward wrote:
I still don't see how Ret wouldn't have gone through if he won 2-1.
Because there would have been 3 players at 2-3: ForGG, Ret, Naniwa. And Ret lost to both of them so he would be the last one among those.
On the second thought he would have been 6-7 on the maps and Naniwa and ForGG would have been 5-7, and since mapscore difference is counted before head-to-head he should go through
On the 3rd thought he would have been 6-8 on mapscore and a head-to-head would be taken
|
On November 24 2012 02:38 NMHU. wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 02:36 Husnan wrote:
So, on stream 1, we have Ret sending wave after wave on banelings on forcefields and taking 6 bases at once, and on stream 2, we have Sase making Carriers and Mothership in a PvP...
This is utter bullshit, I have higher expectations of Dreamhack events, really.
When a game doesn't matter, DON'T FUCKING PLAY IT.
I have better things to do than watch meaningless retarded games that might as well be played by my 9-year old drooling cousin.
I'm gonna watch Dota2, screw this. SO MUCH MAD
ahaha it amazes me how easily people get offended, they expect pro gamers to behave like saints and make no wrong decisions ever....
|
On November 24 2012 02:36 Hylirion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 02:35 Antithesis wrote:On November 24 2012 02:33 Lukeeze[zR] wrote:nasl sound guy editing liquipedia Ahahaha. Thank god BWC/WCS soundguy is sleeping then.
I believe he has a name....
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/jws7q.jpg)
|
e^iπ = -1, therefore God exists. Now STFU already
|
Fenrax
United States5018 Posts
On November 24 2012 02:37 HaXXspetten wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 02:36 Fenrax wrote:On November 24 2012 02:33 Godwrath wrote:On November 24 2012 02:32 TheSwedishFan wrote:
Answer this please
What would have happened if Ret won 2 - 1? What part of being already a 0-1 Naniwa went through did you not understand ? The 0-1 part makes no sense. a) if head to head: nani advances in that situation and then the 0-1 doesnt matter. b) if map score: Ret advances and being 0-1 doesnt matter. he means that as soon as Ret dropped game 1, Naniwa was through which is true
That still makes no sense. On what did the first game have any influence?
a) if head to head counts for nani vs. ret: nani advances in that situation. The 0-1 doesnt matter because of head to head.
b) if map score: Ret advances and being 0-1 doesnt matter because he still has the better map score.
|
On November 24 2012 02:37 caradoc wrote:
Since all are tied with sets/wins/mapscore/head-to-head, we have to look at map score amongst tied
Map Score amongst tied
naniwa 3-2
forgg 2-3
nightend 3-2
Forgg is eliminated, resulting in a two-way tie.
Again, both are tied with sets/wins/mapscore, but look at head-to-head
nighend 2-1 naniwa
naniwa eliminated.
No. Look at the individual matches.
Naniwa 2-0 ForGG
Nightend 2-1 Naniwa
ForGG 2-1 Nightend
Nightend is 3-3, not 3-2. Hence, Naniwa is through.
|
On November 24 2012 02:36 garbanzo wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 02:34 Al Bundy wrote:On November 24 2012 02:31 mijellin wrote:
There really needs to be a sticky post at the top of this thread telling everyone that ret throwing game 2 did not matter at all He threw the game. That's unacceptable, period. If anything, he should have forfeited the series instead of playing it and wasting everyone's time and discrediting the scene. Wanting to play a quicker game by doing a ling/baneling all-in is not the same as throwing the game away. If NightEnd wasn't ready for it Ret could have done a lot of damage and actually won the game. After the all-in failed he lost so he just had a bit of fun.
Exactly. If he had GGd after the all in failed all the Naniwa fanbois wouldn't have flooded this thread with Naniwa style whining.
|
On November 24 2012 02:36 Astro-Penguin wrote:
Deal with it, theres no way to prove that he did unlike the Naniwa Probe Rush incident which a bunch of people seem so obligated to get butthurt over, don't expect someone to be on their A game when they realize that they are out of the tournament.
On November 24 2012 02:36 garbanzo wrote:
Wanting to play a quicker game by doing a ling/baneling all-in is not the same as throwing the game away. If NightEnd wasn't ready for it Ret could have done a lot of damage and actually won the game. After the all-in failed he lost so he just had a bit of fun.
Did you guys even watch the game? Anyway let's move on.
|
On November 24 2012 02:37 caradoc wrote:
Since all are tied with sets/wins/mapscore/head-to-head, we have to look at map score amongst tied
Map Score amongst tied
naniwa 3-2
forgg 2-3
nightend 3-2
Forgg is eliminated, resulting in a two-way tie.
Again, both are tied with sets/wins/mapscore, but look at head-to-head
nighend 2-1 naniwa
naniwa eliminated.
You fail at basic math lol.
|
On November 24 2012 02:34 Integra wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 02:32 StarCraft2 wrote:On November 24 2012 02:31 Integra wrote:On November 24 2012 02:29 StarCraft2 wrote:
Nani is through, but this we already knew (well I did) and it does not change Retjes behavior, at all. Man I've followed you since your BW run though Korea, didn't think this of you Ret. Oh well, reals fans don't give up so easily, and I won't, but you better spoon Naz tonight! Source please, and don't use the outdated dreamhack bracket, Apollo, or liquipedia. Hellspawn Give a damn link or something, lol.
Just trust me, I'm legit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
