EPTOn November 24 2012 02:31 vijeze wrote:
That PvP went full retard.
Never go full retard.
That PvP went full retard.
Never go full retard.
Sase was trolling so hard =)) 1 Mothership, one carrier =))
[DreamHack] Winter Day 2 - Page 86
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
snorlax1
Singapore233 Posts
Sase was trolling so hard =)) 1 Mothership, one carrier =)) | ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9776 Posts
| ||
|
Al Bundy
7257 Posts
On November 24 2012 02:31 mijellin wrote: There really needs to be a sticky post at the top of this thread telling everyone that ret throwing game 2 did not matter at all He threw the game. That's unacceptable, period. If anything, he should have forfeited the series instead of playing it and wasting everyone's time and discrediting the scene. | ||
|
StarCraft2
160 Posts
| ||
|
Diavlo
Belgium2915 Posts
On November 24 2012 02:31 Fenrax wrote: because he doesnt give a shit about this tournament anymore because he is out and thats why bly has to suffer this is far worse than MLG. At least at MLG nobody has to depend on players who are already out. I'm not sure Sase doesn't give a shit. He played really well in game 1, and here, when it looked like he couldn't win anymore, he still fought back for a shit ton of time. Probably just a bad strategy, or he wasn't expecting Feast to just say "fuck it, i have 10 phoenixes in base, let's just go kill him..." | ||
|
AncientRo
44 Posts
On November 24 2012 02:32 TheSwedishFan wrote: Answer this please What would have happened if Ret won 2 - 1? I am not sue but wouldn't have that make him 6-8 in map scores and take 3rd ? The difference between wins and loses would have been 2, like Nani and ForGG but he would have had 6 wins vs them with 5. | ||
|
-y0shi-
Germany994 Posts
| ||
|
-_-
United States7081 Posts
| ||
|
Integra
Sweden5626 Posts
Give a damn link or something, lol. | ||
|
ramask2
Thailand1024 Posts
| ||
|
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
On November 24 2012 02:33 DarkLordOlli wrote: Well that's just fucked up then, rofl. he's already out, he's not playing seriously  | ||
|
Antithesis
Germany1233 Posts
Ahahaha. | ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10138 Posts
On November 24 2012 02:34 Astro-Penguin wrote: I'm a huge Naniwa fan and if it was Naniwa not advancing I'd say the same thing, this is the problem with Round Robin groups being played out like this, if theres no initiative for someone to advance then they wont ever play their A game thus giving someone a bit of a lucky advantage. Now specifically I'm not saying this situation alone is screwing NE over if anything it helped him however I feel like the system as a whole needs to take a different approach and account for things like this. The problem aren't the rules or how hard to understand are or whatever. The problem is the group round robin is bad, specially when you have 6 guys on groups. GSL groups are way better since there is no "whatever" match. | ||
|
Jackle
Canada859 Posts
On November 24 2012 02:32 TheSwedishFan wrote: Answer this please What would have happened if Ret won 2 - 1? Still Naniwa, Ret would be 2-3 with 4-7 which is worse than ForGG and Naniwa's 2-3 with 5-7, heads up between them would mean Naniwa 2-0's ForGG, still Naniwa, the only way to change things was for Ret to 2-0 and advance, any other result is Naniwa | ||
|
Vapaach
Finland994 Posts
| ||
|
Slardar
Canada7593 Posts
| ||
|
smileface
76 Posts
| ||
|
Dexington
Canada7276 Posts
| ||
|
Oboeman
Canada3980 Posts
so naniwa 3-2, nightend 3-3, forgg 2-3? is that how it works? | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
On November 24 2012 02:32 TheSwedishFan wrote: Answer this please What would have happened if Ret won 2 - 1? Naniwa was sure to advance the moment Nightend won one map. If Ret went 2-1 it would be 6-8 against 5-7, which is the same as in -2 mapscore, but Nani beat Ret so wins head to head. | ||
| ||
