|
On November 24 2012 02:34 Al Bundy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 02:31 mijellin wrote:
There really needs to be a sticky post at the top of this thread telling everyone that ret throwing game 2 did not matter at all He threw the game. That's unacceptable, period. If anything, he should have forfeited the series instead of playing it and wasting everyone's time and discrediting the scene.
That's totally fine. You are welcome to criticize him for that. But many people think incorrectly that Ret throwing game 2 had a bearing on nightend/naniwa going on, and that is NOT true. Personal opinions aside, people should be made aware of the facts.
|
all discussion about stats dicks goes there this thread
now let's watch and discuss about the best PvP that is happening right now on stream b
|
Austria24422 Posts
On November 24 2012 02:34 Yello wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 02:32 HaXXspetten wrote:On November 24 2012 02:31 DarkLordOlli wrote:On November 24 2012 02:29 HaXXspetten wrote:
meanwhile
SaSe has Carriers and Mothership in PvP Standard But why does he have them this early? o.O Is he playing some kind of phoenix/observer/cloaked units? he went for the standard ground army with the single carrier and mothership into lose the game wait a second. Sase is already out but Bly and Fraer are still fighting for it. Or rather Sase is fighting against Fraer for Bly. Guys, pull your pitch forks out of Ret's body and put them towards Sase.
Lolololololol
Now, Dreamhack. Put HerO on the first side of the bracket. And then put Taeja on the other side. As far away from each other as possible.
|
On November 24 2012 02:34 Al Bundy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 02:31 mijellin wrote:
There really needs to be a sticky post at the top of this thread telling everyone that ret throwing game 2 did not matter at all He threw the game. That's unacceptable, period. If anything, he should have forfeited the series instead of playing it and wasting everyone's time and discrediting the scene.
Deal with it, theres no way to prove that he did unlike the Naniwa Probe Rush incident which a bunch of people seem so obligated to get butthurt over, don't expect someone to be on their A game when they realize that they are out of the tournament.
|
Why are people hating on ret while sase goes carriers against someone who still has a chance to go through ?
|
Fenrax
United States5018 Posts
On November 24 2012 02:33 Godwrath wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 02:32 TheSwedishFan wrote:
Answer this please
What would have happened if Ret won 2 - 1? What part of being already a 0-1 Naniwa went through did you not understand ?
The 0-1 part makes no sense.
a) if head to head: nani advances in that situation and then the 0-1 doesnt matter.
b) if map score: Ret advances and being 0-1 doesnt matter.
|
On November 24 2012 02:35 Antithesis wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 02:33 Lukeeze[zR] wrote:nasl sound guy editing liquipedia Ahahaha.
Thank god BWC/WCS soundguy is sleeping then.
|
On November 24 2012 02:34 StarCraft2 wrote:
Ants in liquipedia?
Log out of Liquipedia and you won't see the troll edits - Everything being changed on the DH page now requires review from an editor.
|
On November 24 2012 02:36 mijellin wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 02:34 Al Bundy wrote:On November 24 2012 02:31 mijellin wrote:
There really needs to be a sticky post at the top of this thread telling everyone that ret throwing game 2 did not matter at all He threw the game. That's unacceptable, period. If anything, he should have forfeited the series instead of playing it and wasting everyone's time and discrediting the scene. That's totally fine. You are welcome to criticize him for that. But many people think incorrectly that Ret throwing game 2 had a bearing on nightend/naniwa going on, and that is NOT true. Personal opinions aside, people should be made aware of the facts.
Fair enough.
|
On November 24 2012 02:34 Al Bundy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 02:31 mijellin wrote:
There really needs to be a sticky post at the top of this thread telling everyone that ret throwing game 2 did not matter at all He threw the game. That's unacceptable, period. If anything, he should have forfeited the series instead of playing it and wasting everyone's time and discrediting the scene.
Wanting to play a quicker game by doing a ling/baneling all-in is not the same as throwing the game away. If NightEnd wasn't ready for it Ret could have done a lot of damage and actually won the game. After the all-in failed he lost so he just had a bit of fun.
|
On November 24 2012 02:35 Dexington wrote:
An LP admin needs to lock that damn page. Too many people are editing it with incorrect information. Somebody put Fraer to 4-6 and eliminated him. WHERE THE FUCK DOES THAT EVEN COME FROM?
Mad Naniwa fans that don't know against who to rage against now that Ret didn't screw Naniwa.
|
On November 24 2012 02:36 Lukeeze[zR] wrote:
Why are people hating on ret while sase goes carriers against someone who still has a chance to go through ?
To be fair I actually think Sase is playing serious, he does stuff like this time to time. <3
|
So, on stream 1, we have Ret sending wave after wave on banelings on forcefields and taking 6 bases at once, and on stream 2, we have Sase making Carriers and Mothership in a PvP...
This is utter bullshit, I have higher expectations of Dreamhack events, really.
When a game doesn't matter, DON'T FUCKING PLAY IT.
I have better things to do than watch meaningless retarded games that might as well be played by my 9-year old drooling cousin.
I'm gonna watch Dota2, screw this.
|
Mr Bitter said that the admins are going to check it out
(Source Stream 2)
|
What happend in the Ret Vs Nightend games?
|
Since all are tied with sets/wins/mapscore/head-to-head, we have to look at map score amongst tied
Map Score amongst tied
naniwa 3-2
forgg 2-3
nightend 3-2
Forgg is eliminated, resulting in a two-way tie.
Again, both are tied with sets/wins/mapscore, but look at head-to-head
nighend 2-1 naniwa
naniwa eliminated.
|
On November 24 2012 02:34 -y0shi- wrote:
While you guys are talking about ret and a game that doesnt matter, sase is doing questionable shit on his meaningless game... I love sase but he should really play serious..
I mean he looked pretty safely ahead up until he completely misjudged that blink army. At that point things just failscaded. Going into that fight though it looked like he had too much tech on Feast.
|
|
|
On November 24 2012 02:36 Fenrax wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 02:33 Godwrath wrote:On November 24 2012 02:32 TheSwedishFan wrote:
Answer this please
What would have happened if Ret won 2 - 1? What part of being already a 0-1 Naniwa went through did you not understand ? The 0-1 part makes no sense. a) if head to head: nani advances in that situation and then the 0-1 doesnt matter. b) if map score: Ret advances and being 0-1 doesnt matter.
he means that as soon as Ret dropped game 1, Naniwa was through
which is true
|
On November 24 2012 02:37 caradoc wrote:
Since all are tied with sets/wins/mapscore/head-to-head, we have to look at map score amongst tied
Map Score amongst tied
naniwa 3-2
forgg 2-3
nightend 3-2
Forgg is eliminated, resulting in a two-way tie.
Again, both are tied with sets/wins/mapscore, but look at head-to-head
nighend 2-1 naniwa
naniwa eliminated.
Source?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
