EPT[DreamHack] Winter Day 2 - Page 53
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
shabby
Norway6402 Posts
| ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10138 Posts
On November 24 2012 01:37 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: Unifying being the key word. The issue is there are too many tournaments for the casters to understand all the tiebreaker rules of. Same goes for player information and viewer information. To be honest i think they took it the wrong way. It's about unifying like you say, so casters and viewers aren't confused. | ||
|
Trashman420
232 Posts
| ||
|
SushilS
2115 Posts
 | ||
|
mrtomjones
Canada4020 Posts
| ||
|
Conquest101
United States1395 Posts
This means that Ret must win 2-0 to advance and Snute is through no matter what. Also, Nightend and ForGG are out no matter what. | ||
|
Silvanel
Poland4742 Posts
On November 24 2012 01:34 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: Although this is all slightly amusing, it's pretty bad casters aren't fully informed on how tiebreakers work for the tournament they're casting. Whether this is on the casters or on the tournament I don't know. I hope the DH/ESL/MLG partnership will take a look at tiebreaker rules and unify them. As far as i know DH is using the same rules for tiebreaking for a loonoog time. Its a disgrace they cant grasp it. I never had problems with it, neither should they. Its not that hard. (And the system is wildly used in other sports). Its a disgrace i tell You. Its not professional, they should be ashmed of themselves. | ||
|
Trashman420
232 Posts
On November 24 2012 01:38 shabby wrote: Watching Snute Fraer but listening to incontrol apollo :D Haha, me too... | ||
|
Serelitz
Netherlands2895 Posts
On November 24 2012 01:37 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: Unifying being the key word. The issue is there are too many tournaments for the casters to understand all the tiebreaker rules of. Same goes for player information and viewer information. Not sure why Incontrol makes a joke out of it. It would be really good for the scene if that would happen. He should know as someone who joins tournaments occasionally as a player how good it would be for information supply to players. It's because Incontrol can only joke about any criticism. He can hardly say 'yeah you're right' so he just tries to turn it back on you. Kind of childish. | ||
|
Flonomenalz
Nigeria3519 Posts
| ||
|
Azzur
Australia6260 Posts
| ||
|
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
| ||
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
| ||
|
Dexington
Canada7276 Posts
On November 24 2012 01:38 Mackus wrote: So what is the internal mapscore for STC vs Snute vs Frear? Doesn't matter. There can only be a two way tie and only if it's a 2-0 score either way. If Snute loses 2-0, he is through. If Fraer loses 2-0, StC is through. | ||
|
mikedebo
Canada4341 Posts
| ||
|
Heinsenzerg
Argentina2279 Posts
| ||
|
Kilby
Finland1069 Posts
On November 24 2012 01:34 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: Although this is all slightly amusing, it's pretty bad casters aren't fully informed on how tiebreakers work for the tournament they're casting. Whether this is on the casters or on the tournament I don't know. I hope the DH/ESL/MLG partnership will take a look at tiebreaker rules and unify them and release them publicly. I agree. In my opinion how the tournament rules work in strange and ambigous situations are exactly what casters should study in advance when they are going to cast a tournament. Because that is where it is most valuable that they can actually tell on air how it's going to work when the vast majority of the audience is just scratching their heads. And tie-break situations are not even that uncommon. | ||
|
mikedebo
Canada4341 Posts
| ||
|
mijellin
China740 Posts
| ||
|
Chenz
Sweden1197 Posts
On November 24 2012 01:39 HaXXspetten wrote: so tl;dr Ret 2-0 => Ret advances, anything else => Nani advances Yup. | ||
| ||
