|
On April 21 2012 09:50 Lowell wrote: Why is liquipedia so late on everything? Its really not usual for them :/ Just login @ Liquipedia. Nobody is around to approve the updates.
|
What happened to PartinG the best at PvT? Gonna lose his GSL group?
|
United States15275 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:49 Havik_ wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2012 09:48 chestnutcc wrote: Looks like Parting just wants a relaxing weekend in NY before getting back to the GSL, absolutely zero information being revealed. This. He doesn't want to reveal too much since he has Code S next week. Show nested quote +On April 21 2012 09:48 Philipd122 wrote:On April 21 2012 09:46 Rainfall7711 wrote:On April 21 2012 09:45 M[o] wrote: guess his pvt isnt as godly as hyped Yes after two series you can obviously draw that conclusion. Stop talking. Yes but there are only 3 terrans and he has faced 2/3 already and is 1-5 all PvT. Now that says something doesn't it? He was hyped as "unbeatable PvT" "making PvT looked imbalanced" PvT only seems imba once Protoss gets AoE, before that, its even or quite Terran favored.
Then he's an even worse player than people are claiming right now. Does he really need to prep to play his standard HT style?
|
Have to agree with the people here saying parting is just hiding his builds for GSL. Nobody can look at these games and accuse Parting of playing even close to his average.
4/6 games 1 base allin? 1 of them worked? (The one vs MKP that didn't even count !) This makes me actively frustrated, I'm almost wishing I hadn't paid for this. I wish there was some way MLG could punish him for it, but I don't really see how.
TT
|
What happened in parting v heart?
|
PartinG has 3 PvT's next week in GSL.. Guess he's just decided to not show anything at all
Thats all I can think off tbh, because these games of his has been awful
|
MP kills 3 hellions w/o losing any of his, saturating his nat.
|
I'm surprised Parting actually showed up at this MLG because if you understand Startale then you know that they don't care about anything except the GSL and GSTL. With his Code S group coming up so soon it seems like an odd decision for someone that is so focused on GSL at the moment.
|
On April 21 2012 09:52 ObliviousNA wrote: Have to agree with the people here saying parting is just hiding his builds for GSL. Nobody can look at these games and accuse Parting of playing even close to his average.
4/6 games 1 base allin? 1 of them worked? (The one vs MKP that didn't even count !) This makes me actively frustrated, I'm almost wishing I hadn't paid for this. I wish there was some way MLG could punish him for it, but I don't really see how.
TT Sometimes people just don't play well.
|
On April 21 2012 09:48 Philipd122 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2012 09:46 Rainfall7711 wrote:On April 21 2012 09:45 M[o] wrote: guess his pvt isnt as godly as hyped Yes after two series you can obviously draw that conclusion. Stop talking. Yes but there are only 3 terrans and he has faced 2/3 already and is 1-5 all PvT. Now that says something doesn't it? He was hyped as "unbeatable PvT" "making PvT looked imbalanced"
PartinG didn't play to his strengths in PvT, he basicly did builds that can be stopped by any scouting terran.
If they had played a longer game were both players upgraded, took 3 or more bases and Marineking and Heart would've still won 5-1 it would be different. Obviously PartinG is not playing his A-game today, losing the scouting probe to scv's in 2-3 games? He isn't in the zone.
|
On April 21 2012 09:49 haegN wrote:HuK vs Ganzi has been played.
was it streamed? dam i missed it T_T_T
|
On April 21 2012 09:55 -_- wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2012 09:49 haegN wrote:On April 21 2012 09:48 -_- wrote: hey did i miss a huk game yet? HuK vs Ganzi has been played. was it streamed? dam i missed it T_T_T
On Gameplay 1, yes.
|
On April 21 2012 09:52 ticklishmusic wrote: MP kills 3 hellions w/o losing any of his, saturating his nat.
Big MKP attack with marine/tank with a lot of medivacs, Ganzi pulls SCVs and doesn't break. GG from Ganzi.
|
On April 21 2012 09:54 duct_TAPE wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2012 09:48 Philipd122 wrote:On April 21 2012 09:46 Rainfall7711 wrote:On April 21 2012 09:45 M[o] wrote: guess his pvt isnt as godly as hyped Yes after two series you can obviously draw that conclusion. Stop talking. Yes but there are only 3 terrans and he has faced 2/3 already and is 1-5 all PvT. Now that says something doesn't it? He was hyped as "unbeatable PvT" "making PvT looked imbalanced" PartinG didn't play to his strengths in PvT, he basicly did builds that can be stopped by any scouting terran. If they had played a longer game were both players upgraded, took 3 or more bases and Marineking and Heart would've still won 5-1 it would be different. Obviously PartinG is not playing his A-game today, losing the scouting probe to scv's in 2-3 games? He isn't in the zone. That or he does it on purpose to rape his code S group and win the gsl
|
Holy shit, MKP just straight-up rolled him!
|
Wait so why was the first game Bo5 and the rest Bo3? Did they just fuck up?
|
On April 21 2012 09:53 mrtomjones wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2012 09:52 ObliviousNA wrote: Have to agree with the people here saying parting is just hiding his builds for GSL. Nobody can look at these games and accuse Parting of playing even close to his average.
4/6 games 1 base allin? 1 of them worked? (The one vs MKP that didn't even count !) This makes me actively frustrated, I'm almost wishing I hadn't paid for this. I wish there was some way MLG could punish him for it, but I don't really see how.
TT Sometimes people just don't play well. These aren't micro mistakes from a tired/jetlagged player. This is one of the best guys in the world who went for 1 base robo FOUR times. For people who are expected to prepare meticulous builds based on their opponents (known weeks in advance), this was frankly an embarassment.
|
Last time I was a HuK vs DRG that was quite painful hopefully this time HuK performs better but I have little hopes DRG is a monster
|
On April 21 2012 09:57 Fandango wrote: Wait so why was the first game Bo5 and the rest Bo3? Did they just fuck up?
3 games are always played, less chance of a tie that way.
DRG looks cold ?
|
On April 21 2012 09:58 Talho wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2012 09:57 Fandango wrote: Wait so why was the first game Bo5 and the rest Bo3? Did they just fuck up? 3 games are always played, less chance of a tie that way. DRG looks cold ?
Oh, that's an odd way to do it but I guess it makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|