EPTOn April 21 2012 09:08 iAmBiGbiRd wrote:
Can someone tell me the results please? Liquipedia not updating.
Can someone tell me the results please? Liquipedia not updating.
Check a few posts before you, the results are literally all over this thread.
MLG Spring Arena [Day 1] - Page 58
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Cylluus
United States153 Posts
Check a few posts before you, the results are literally all over this thread. | ||
|
haegN
Norway547 Posts
Map: Entombed Valley Score so far 0 - 0 | ||
|
Marke
Sweden279 Posts
| ||
|
PresenceSc2
Australia4032 Posts
| ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:10 Marke wrote: just wondering about viewers now that they dont have a free stream? They're not going to release that information, but I think it's tiny now. Thing is, with a tiny PPV stream, they make better money than a huge free stream. | ||
|
Noocta
France12578 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:05 masakenji wrote: i actually empathise with idra. zergs simply can't compete in the current meta. Specially after winning last GSL season. Poor zerg players. | ||
|
InceptionEU
Sweden32 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:10 Marke wrote: just wondering about viewers now that they dont have a free stream? Cant se how many viewers they have. Sundance usually talks about it after the events tho | ||
|
iAmBiGbiRd
Australia1029 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:09 Cylluus wrote: Check a few posts before you, the results are literally all over this thread. Yeah i saw sorry, just had my Wisdom teeth out so im pretty doped up atm  | ||
|
priestnoob
243 Posts
| ||
|
Derez
Netherlands6068 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:09 jmbthirteen wrote: because when you dont play all 3 games, map scores will contain different amounts of games, such as 6-5 vs 7-6. Sure technically 6-5 is better percentage wise, but is it really better. Its not the most fair way. By everyone playing the same amount of games, that will not happen I have nothing against this system, but I don't really see the benefit of playing 3 matches over a 'maps won-maps lost' system. Using that, your players would be in a tie and the head to head score would determine the outcome. I see no real problem with that. | ||
|
Noocta
France12578 Posts
Heart going banshee, and probably 1/1/1 again. | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:11 Noocta wrote: Specially after winning last GSL season. Poor zerg players. Well genius did do some dumb builds (carriers? Have yet to see it work in a pro game ). | ||
|
-Kira
352 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:05 masakenji wrote: i actually empathise with idra. zergs simply can't compete in the current meta. I should ban myself from reading those threads, my brain cannot withstand... | ||
|
haegN
Norway547 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:09 haegN wrote: Matchup: Heart - Ganzi Map: Entombed Valley Score so far 0 - 0 Not surprising. Heart going 111, but Parting knows. | ||
|
Cereb
Denmark3388 Posts
Who would have guessed?! | ||
|
Olinim
4044 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:06 GreyKnight wrote: DRG beat MC in 3 matches before today. Looks like DRG himself can't figure out how to beat Protoss suddenly. That was before MC's resurgence and after he became unbeatable in PvZ though. MC best toss easily! 3:0 DRG ez. | ||
|
Derez
Netherlands6068 Posts
| ||
|
drbrown
Sweden442 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:11 Noocta wrote: Specially after winning last GSL season. Poor zerg players. You mean the one season where there were three zergs in the Ro16 and only DRG in the Ro8? Yeah, great zerg season. | ||
|
haegN
Norway547 Posts
 | ||
|
JackDT
724 Posts
On April 21 2012 09:09 jmbthirteen wrote: because when you dont play all 3 games, map scores will contain different amounts of games, such as 6-5 vs 7-6. Sure technically 6-5 is better percentage wise, but is it really better. Its not the most fair way. By everyone playing the same amount of games, that will not happen 6-5 vs 7-6 is a tie in most tournaments using wins - losses, rather than percentage. Just curious how much lower the odds of ties are. It doesn't seem like the odds would be that much different as to warrant a change. think it would be fun to have a single tiebreaker game between anyone who was tied in any case -- it'd be an exciting as hell match. | ||
| ||
