|
On April 21 2012 09:05 CptGrackSparrow wrote: just got home.
could someone please update me as to the results? liquidpedia is bare. MKP 2:1 Parting Huk 2:1 Ganzi Violet 2:1 Heart MC 3:0 DRG
|
Odd choice to link liquipedia if no ones going to actually update it.
|
since its a round robin, direct map score can be more important than overall, since you can get same overall scores more easily
|
Wow. Ty sir :D
Not sure what i had there....
|
On April 21 2012 09:05 CptGrackSparrow wrote: just got home.
could someone please update me as to the results? liquidpedia is bare.
Mc 3 - DRG 0 HuK 2 Ganzi 1 MKP 2 Parting 1 Violet 2 Heart 1
1.MC 2.HuK 3.MKP 4.Violet 5.Ganzi 6.Parting 7.Heart 8. DRG
|
DJWheat and Grubby casting! Awwwwww yeah.
Also lol at the Slayers tag for Ganzi.
|
On April 21 2012 09:07 jmbthirteen wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2012 09:05 CptGrackSparrow wrote: just got home.
could someone please update me as to the results? liquidpedia is bare. MKP 2:1 Parting Huk 2:1 Ganzi Violet 2:1 Heart MC 3:0 DRG
ty ty. surprising results from DRG.
|
Aww yeah, Grubby cast, gogogo.
|
On April 21 2012 09:07 MiacroISBADK wrote: Odd choice to link liquipedia if no ones going to actually update it. Just login at Liquipedia with your TL info and you will see all the results.
|
On April 21 2012 09:07 MiacroISBADK wrote: Odd choice to link liquipedia if no ones going to actually update it. I had a bad link somehow. All fixed now.
|
On April 21 2012 09:08 Cylluus wrote: DJWheat and Grubby casting! Awwwwww yeah.
Score!!
|
On April 21 2012 09:05 masakenji wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2012 09:02 Seiniyta wrote:lol @ IdrA on twitter This game is dumb as shit. Poor drg. MC just owned DRG there. I think MC finally figured out how to play DRG properly. i actually empathise with idra. zergs simply can't compete in the current meta.
Well DRG used to, but since he seem to have lost his special touch no there are no real zerg threats to any of the more powerful protoss or terrans.
|
Can someone tell me the results please? Liquipedia not updating.
Don't worry, saw it up the page
|
|
|
lol. First time hearing Grubby's voice...he sounds like a frog. I thought he was trolling for a min there.
|
On April 21 2012 09:07 MiacroISBADK wrote: Odd choice to link liquipedia if no ones going to actually update it.
I am updating it, it just seems like nobody is there to approve.. I posted the results so far in the post above though.
|
On April 21 2012 09:08 iAmBiGbiRd wrote: Can someone tell me the results please? Liquipedia not updating.
scroll up. same page
|
On April 21 2012 09:05 masakenji wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2012 09:02 Seiniyta wrote:lol @ IdrA on twitter This game is dumb as shit. Poor drg. MC just owned DRG there. I think MC finally figured out how to play DRG properly. i actually empathise with idra. zergs simply can't compete in the current meta.
da fuck? MC just straight up outplayed him. DRG made silly mistakes, engaged in silly places, in silly ways.
Of course it can compete. It competes better if you play better than your opponent, though.
|
Heart is going to be ripped out...
|
On April 21 2012 09:06 JackDT wrote:Show nested quote +On April 21 2012 09:03 Thrax wrote:On April 21 2012 09:02 JackDT wrote: Still not liking the fixed-3-matches format. I guess they don't have time for all best-of-5s, but I might actually prefer regular best-of-3s over this. It's a strange dynamic. It's mostly for tie-breakers, since this is round-robin. I agree that it's weird though. If you already lost/won the first 2 games, you don't care all that much about the last one. How different is that than just using overall map wins/losses to break ties like in other pools? because when you dont play all 3 games, map scores will contain different amounts of games, such as 6-5 vs 7-6. Sure technically 6-5 is better percentage wise, but is it really better. Its not the most fair way. By everyone playing the same amount of games, that will not happen
|
|
|
|
|
|