|
On April 14 2012 15:49 unknownGamer wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2012 15:48 sc14s wrote:On April 14 2012 15:46 unknownGamer wrote:On April 14 2012 15:45 sc14s wrote:On April 14 2012 15:45 unknownGamer wrote:On April 14 2012 15:43 HaXXspetten wrote:On April 14 2012 15:42 CosmicSpiral wrote:On April 14 2012 15:41 Porcelina wrote:On April 14 2012 15:40 CosmicSpiral wrote:On April 14 2012 15:39 Resilient wrote:
Part of me can't wait till the carrier is cut, it's like one of those long running jokes that should have been put of it's misery at beta. Buff carrier, remove corruptor, everyone wins. Which would also facilitate removing the Colossus. EVEN BETTER MUHAHAHAHA. Or like... cut carrier build time in half or smth? The carrier is a unit that treads on a line between OP and UP. Blizzard already admitted they fuck up and are removing it in HoTs. They aren't going to waste time on it when they are currently developing Hots. i would honestly prefer revamp of carrier as opposed to just dropping it What can you do with it? Carriers in BW will already op if they get to the right amount. In sc2 where micro is not as intense as BW it makes it even easier to use carriers. There are somethings that just can't be balanced and carrier is one of them you could at least buff them to be viable in some sort of form instead of current literally useless form. Like I said, they are on a line between OP and UP. Buffing them would just make it too damn strong. They are going to remove it, no point whining about it and pray the tempest is better then it
They are not on the line between OP and UP. They are clearly, clearly, clearly deep in UP territory. Carriers are used like twice a month in pro-games and they always end up losing. They are overpriced, underwhelming and easily hard-countered.
edit: Not trying to balance whine here. I just loooooooooooooooooooove carriers in BW and it pains me to see them suffer in sc2.
|
On April 14 2012 15:50 HaXXspetten wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2012 15:49 unknownGamer wrote:On April 14 2012 15:48 sc14s wrote:On April 14 2012 15:46 unknownGamer wrote:On April 14 2012 15:45 sc14s wrote:On April 14 2012 15:45 unknownGamer wrote:On April 14 2012 15:43 HaXXspetten wrote:On April 14 2012 15:42 CosmicSpiral wrote:On April 14 2012 15:41 Porcelina wrote:On April 14 2012 15:40 CosmicSpiral wrote:
[quote]
Buff carrier, remove corruptor, everyone wins. Which would also facilitate removing the Colossus. EVEN BETTER MUHAHAHAHA. Or like... cut carrier build time in half or smth? The carrier is a unit that treads on a line between OP and UP. Blizzard already admitted they fuck up and are removing it in HoTs. They aren't going to waste time on it when they are currently developing Hots. i would honestly prefer revamp of carrier as opposed to just dropping it What can you do with it? Carriers in BW will already op if they get to the right amount. In sc2 where micro is not as intense as BW it makes it even easier to use carriers. There are somethings that just can't be balanced and carrier is one of them you could at least buff them to be viable in some sort of form instead of current literally useless form. Like I said, they are on a line between OP and UP. Buffing them would just make it too damn strong. They are going to remove it, no point whining about it and pray the tempest is better then it I think it is quite clear that Carriers have quite a long way to go to be considered OP.
Increasing the DPS, shortening the build time, decreasing the build cost? Even one would make it op. Play bw, and make carriers. I guarantee you it will be a sure win as long as you can get to it
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:50 SeeKeR wrote:
How the hell.... after all this time they still spell it "Winner's Match," and "Loser's Match?"........
what's wrong with that?
|
|
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:52 opterown wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2012 15:50 SeeKeR wrote:
How the hell.... after all this time they still spell it "Winner's Match," and "Loser's Match?"........ what's wrong with that?
It should be "Winners' Match" and "Losers' Match"
|
On April 14 2012 15:52 opterown wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2012 15:50 SeeKeR wrote:
How the hell.... after all this time they still spell it "Winner's Match," and "Loser's Match?"........ what's wrong with that?
loser is match, winner is match
|
|
|
Nothing delights me more than Tastetosis's NesTea hyperbole.
|
|
|
I think they just went the wrong design direction with the carrier. It is a high dps unit, which makes it so powerful in mass and therefore in 3v3 or whatever. It should be more of a high tech tanking unit. Hero has been experimenting with a carrier as a tank in PvZ and i think it is a great use and what it should have been designed for in the first place.
Well hopefully in LofV i guess.
|
On April 14 2012 15:52 johnnywup wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2012 15:52 opterown wrote:On April 14 2012 15:50 SeeKeR wrote:
How the hell.... after all this time they still spell it "Winner's Match," and "Loser's Match?"........ what's wrong with that? loser is match, winner is match
No it's possessive, Seeker got it right.
|
I think nestea might have the advantage with this map if he practiced with MVP.
|
On April 14 2012 15:52 unknownGamer wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2012 15:50 HaXXspetten wrote:On April 14 2012 15:49 unknownGamer wrote:On April 14 2012 15:48 sc14s wrote:On April 14 2012 15:46 unknownGamer wrote:On April 14 2012 15:45 sc14s wrote:On April 14 2012 15:45 unknownGamer wrote:On April 14 2012 15:43 HaXXspetten wrote:On April 14 2012 15:42 CosmicSpiral wrote:On April 14 2012 15:41 Porcelina wrote:
[quote]
Which would also facilitate removing the Colossus. EVEN BETTER MUHAHAHAHA. Or like... cut carrier build time in half or smth? The carrier is a unit that treads on a line between OP and UP. Blizzard already admitted they fuck up and are removing it in HoTs. They aren't going to waste time on it when they are currently developing Hots. i would honestly prefer revamp of carrier as opposed to just dropping it What can you do with it? Carriers in BW will already op if they get to the right amount. In sc2 where micro is not as intense as BW it makes it even easier to use carriers. There are somethings that just can't be balanced and carrier is one of them you could at least buff them to be viable in some sort of form instead of current literally useless form. Like I said, they are on a line between OP and UP. Buffing them would just make it too damn strong. They are going to remove it, no point whining about it and pray the tempest is better then it I think it is quite clear that Carriers have quite a long way to go to be considered OP. Increasing the DPS, shortening the build time, decreasing the build cost? Even one would make it op. Play bw, and make carriers. I guarantee you it will be a sure win as long as you can get to it
What? Carriers in BW >>>>>>>>>> Carriers in SC2, what the hell does that have to do with anything? >.<
|
man i hate carriers in bw
all terrans do
|
On April 14 2012 15:52 unknownGamer wrote:Show nested quote +On April 14 2012 15:50 HaXXspetten wrote:On April 14 2012 15:49 unknownGamer wrote:On April 14 2012 15:48 sc14s wrote:On April 14 2012 15:46 unknownGamer wrote:On April 14 2012 15:45 sc14s wrote:On April 14 2012 15:45 unknownGamer wrote:On April 14 2012 15:43 HaXXspetten wrote:On April 14 2012 15:42 CosmicSpiral wrote:On April 14 2012 15:41 Porcelina wrote:
[quote]
Which would also facilitate removing the Colossus. EVEN BETTER MUHAHAHAHA. Or like... cut carrier build time in half or smth? The carrier is a unit that treads on a line between OP and UP. Blizzard already admitted they fuck up and are removing it in HoTs. They aren't going to waste time on it when they are currently developing Hots. i would honestly prefer revamp of carrier as opposed to just dropping it What can you do with it? Carriers in BW will already op if they get to the right amount. In sc2 where micro is not as intense as BW it makes it even easier to use carriers. There are somethings that just can't be balanced and carrier is one of them you could at least buff them to be viable in some sort of form instead of current literally useless form. Like I said, they are on a line between OP and UP. Buffing them would just make it too damn strong. They are going to remove it, no point whining about it and pray the tempest is better then it I think it is quite clear that Carriers have quite a long way to go to be considered OP. Increasing the DPS, shortening the build time, decreasing the build cost? Even one would make it op. Play bw, and make carriers. I guarantee you it will be a sure win as long as you can get to it
they arent even nearly the same in bw to sc2 you cant compare apples and oranges like this..
|
United States15275 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:53 Lann555 wrote:
So how is Virus's TvZ?
It's meh.
|
On April 14 2012 15:54 cam connor wrote:
man i hate carriers in bw
all terrans do
Not since Flash hit the scene! :D
|
♥ Tasteless: "Listen, you're being a bitch nerd"
|
On April 14 2012 15:54 CosmicSpiral wrote:It's meh.
It's weird how little I know about Virus. I can't even recall a single game of his
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
