EPT[GSL] 2012 Season 2 Code S Ro32 Group E - Page 45
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Disengaged
United States6994 Posts
| ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
 | ||
|
Die4Ever
United States17734 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:42 Lann555 wrote: Typical Artosis to like this strategy: It's basically just turtle and pray you can get up to your unstoppable deathball army you mean like mech? MECH MECH MECH MECH!!! lol | ||
|
HaXeR
Czech Republic189 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:41 johnnywup wrote: he was on 1 gate >_> if he was on 3 gate he holds lol, if if if.. if he had 3 gates his stargates would be later, his carriers would be later, probably would die to mutas. And in what universe u can defend 3 base zerg with full sataration with 3 gates? | ||
|
tdt
United States3179 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:43 zelgadissan wrote: Just tuned in, please tell me Inca did DT rushes. He's getting worse, carrier rushes. | ||
|
FrostedMiniWheats
United States30730 Posts
At least we get a ZvT -_- | ||
|
unknownGamer
288 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:43 HaXXspetten wrote: Or like... cut carrier build time in half or smth? The carrier is a unit that treads on a line between OP and UP. Blizzard already admitted they fuck up and are removing it in HoTs. They aren't going to waste time on it when they are currently developing Hots. | ||
|
TheGinko
United States5 Posts
| ||
|
SSWsk
3 Posts
| ||
|
julianto
2292 Posts
| ||
|
-JoKeR-
Canada387 Posts
| ||
|
sc14s
United States5052 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:45 unknownGamer wrote: The carrier is a unit that treads on a line between OP and UP. Blizzard already admitted they fuck up and are removing it in HoTs. They aren't going to waste time on it when they are currently developing Hots. i would honestly prefer revamp of carrier as opposed to just dropping it | ||
|
iglocska
Norway589 Posts
 | ||
|
sc14s
United States5052 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:45 julianto wrote: If Nestea is the disease that killed the Incans... and Virus is a virus, that means... MC will lose to Inca. ??? | ||
|
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:45 sc14s wrote: i would honestly prefer revamp of carrier as opposed to just dropping it Totally agree, coolest unit in the game. | ||
|
FrostedMiniWheats
United States30730 Posts
| ||
|
Daogin
Canada2308 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:45 iglocska wrote: Oh InCa. Please don't get back into code S again Why? inca is very entertaining  , and aside from his crappy vZ he's not THAT bad. | ||
|
Lann555
Netherlands5173 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:44 Die4Ever wrote: you mean like mech? MECH MECH MECH MECH!!! lol yes, mech is superior on any map obviously. It's only because it's too hard to sit on 3 bases and max out that Koreans don't mech EVERY SINGLE GAME. The mind of Artosis moves in mysterious ways | ||
|
unknownGamer
288 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:45 sc14s wrote: i would honestly prefer revamp of carrier as opposed to just dropping it What can you do with it? Carriers in BW will already op if they get to the right amount. In sc2 where micro is not as intense as BW it makes it even easier to use carriers. There are somethings that just can't be balanced and carrier is one of them | ||
|
julianto
2292 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:46 FrostedMiniWheats wrote: Nestea killed inca and took his powers I see. That's why Nestea is cloaked right now! | ||
| ||
