On April 14 2012 15:54 MrCash wrote:
♥ Tasteless: "Listen, you're being a bitch nerd"
♥ Tasteless: "Listen, you're being a bitch nerd"
hahaha
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
mambar
United States841 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:54 MrCash wrote: ♥ Tasteless: "Listen, you're being a bitch nerd" hahaha | ||
![]()
Porcelina
United Kingdom3249 Posts
??? I am amused. | ||
sc14s
United States5052 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:54 Lann555 wrote: Not since Flash hit the scene! :D T just losses to P late game generally anyways nowadays xD | ||
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:55 Lann555 wrote: Show nested quote + On April 14 2012 15:54 CosmicSpiral wrote: On April 14 2012 15:53 Lann555 wrote: So how is Virus's TvZ? It's meh. It's weird how little I know about Virus. I can't even recall a single game of his Nestea vs Virus not ringing a bell? Was a good game :< | ||
ReallyBigShark
United States81 Posts
| ||
Hall0wed
United States8486 Posts
"You're being a bitch nerd" | ||
jnsjr
United States461 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:54 MrCash wrote: ♥ Tasteless: "Listen, you're being a bitch nerd" and damn you are fast! | ||
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:53 Cassel_Castle wrote: Show nested quote + On April 14 2012 15:52 johnnywup wrote: On April 14 2012 15:52 opterown wrote: On April 14 2012 15:50 SeeKeR wrote: How the hell.... after all this time they still spell it "Winner's Match," and "Loser's Match?"........ what's wrong with that? loser is match, winner is match No it's possessive, Seeker got it right. Maybe it's because GOM sees it as the match to decide the #1 & #4, I.E. the "winner" and the "loser" of the entire group rather than of the first two sets, thus the singular form. | ||
unknownGamer
288 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:53 HaXXspetten wrote: Show nested quote + On April 14 2012 15:52 unknownGamer wrote: On April 14 2012 15:50 HaXXspetten wrote: On April 14 2012 15:49 unknownGamer wrote: On April 14 2012 15:48 sc14s wrote: On April 14 2012 15:46 unknownGamer wrote: On April 14 2012 15:45 sc14s wrote: On April 14 2012 15:45 unknownGamer wrote: On April 14 2012 15:43 HaXXspetten wrote: On April 14 2012 15:42 CosmicSpiral wrote: [quote] EVEN BETTER MUHAHAHAHA. Or like... cut carrier build time in half or smth? The carrier is a unit that treads on a line between OP and UP. Blizzard already admitted they fuck up and are removing it in HoTs. They aren't going to waste time on it when they are currently developing Hots. i would honestly prefer revamp of carrier as opposed to just dropping it What can you do with it? Carriers in BW will already op if they get to the right amount. In sc2 where micro is not as intense as BW it makes it even easier to use carriers. There are somethings that just can't be balanced and carrier is one of them you could at least buff them to be viable in some sort of form instead of current literally useless form. Like I said, they are on a line between OP and UP. Buffing them would just make it too damn strong. They are going to remove it, no point whining about it and pray the tempest is better then it I think it is quite clear that Carriers have quite a long way to go to be considered OP. Increasing the DPS, shortening the build time, decreasing the build cost? Even one would make it op. Play bw, and make carriers. I guarantee you it will be a sure win as long as you can get to it What? Carriers in BW >>>>>>>>>> Carriers in SC2, what the hell does that have to do with anything? >.< Just saying if they buff it to be like bw carriers, it would be OP. Bw carriers with sc2 mechanics? Damn... | ||
eXeHephaistas
Netherlands144 Posts
2 worst maps in those matchups... Whatever Nestea will still crush everyone | ||
Daogin
Canada2308 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:55 Fragile51 wrote: Show nested quote + On April 14 2012 15:55 Lann555 wrote: On April 14 2012 15:54 CosmicSpiral wrote: On April 14 2012 15:53 Lann555 wrote: So how is Virus's TvZ? It's meh. It's weird how little I know about Virus. I can't even recall a single game of his Nestea vs Virus not ringing a bell? Was a good game :< vZ: 12-14 (46.15%) ^^ from the TLPD | ||
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:55 Lann555 wrote: Show nested quote + On April 14 2012 15:54 CosmicSpiral wrote: On April 14 2012 15:53 Lann555 wrote: So how is Virus's TvZ? It's meh. It's weird how little I know about Virus. I can't even recall a single game of his He's a very unremarkable player who often made the RO16 and did little else (Like clide but less refined and without artosis hype), he held some hype early on as an up and coming terran but that promise has died off to reveal a mediocre terran who will probably fail to accomplish much. | ||
sc14s
United States5052 Posts
| ||
Lann555
Netherlands5173 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:55 Fragile51 wrote: Show nested quote + On April 14 2012 15:55 Lann555 wrote: On April 14 2012 15:54 CosmicSpiral wrote: On April 14 2012 15:53 Lann555 wrote: So how is Virus's TvZ? It's meh. It's weird how little I know about Virus. I can't even recall a single game of his Nestea vs Virus not ringing a bell? Was a good game :< Was that the epic game on Crossfire? Wasn't that vs Supernova? | ||
![]()
Seeker
![]()
Where dat snitch at?36920 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:55 HaXXspetten wrote: Show nested quote + On April 14 2012 15:53 Cassel_Castle wrote: On April 14 2012 15:52 johnnywup wrote: On April 14 2012 15:52 opterown wrote: On April 14 2012 15:50 SeeKeR wrote: How the hell.... after all this time they still spell it "Winner's Match," and "Loser's Match?"........ what's wrong with that? loser is match, winner is match No it's possessive, Seeker got it right. Maybe it's because GOM sees it as the match to decide the #1 & #4, I.E. the "winner" and the "loser" of the entire group rather than of the first two sets, thus the singular form. I really doubt that that is the reason. That really doesn't make sense to begin with. It's the winners' match, both winners of the previous set, and losers' match, because they lost their sets | ||
julianto
2292 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:55 Fragile51 wrote: Show nested quote + On April 14 2012 15:55 Lann555 wrote: On April 14 2012 15:54 CosmicSpiral wrote: On April 14 2012 15:53 Lann555 wrote: So how is Virus's TvZ? It's meh. It's weird how little I know about Virus. I can't even recall a single game of his Nestea vs Virus not ringing a bell? Was a good game :< I remember Virus because SlayerS_Jessica was jealous of his cuteness. | ||
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:56 Daogin wrote: Show nested quote + On April 14 2012 15:55 Fragile51 wrote: On April 14 2012 15:55 Lann555 wrote: On April 14 2012 15:54 CosmicSpiral wrote: On April 14 2012 15:53 Lann555 wrote: So how is Virus's TvZ? It's meh. It's weird how little I know about Virus. I can't even recall a single game of his Nestea vs Virus not ringing a bell? Was a good game :< vZ: 12-14 (46.15%) ^^ from the TLPD Didn't say he was good, said it was a good game :p | ||
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
On April 14 2012 15:56 unknownGamer wrote: Show nested quote + On April 14 2012 15:53 HaXXspetten wrote: On April 14 2012 15:52 unknownGamer wrote: On April 14 2012 15:50 HaXXspetten wrote: On April 14 2012 15:49 unknownGamer wrote: On April 14 2012 15:48 sc14s wrote: On April 14 2012 15:46 unknownGamer wrote: On April 14 2012 15:45 sc14s wrote: On April 14 2012 15:45 unknownGamer wrote: On April 14 2012 15:43 HaXXspetten wrote: [quote] Or like... cut carrier build time in half or smth? The carrier is a unit that treads on a line between OP and UP. Blizzard already admitted they fuck up and are removing it in HoTs. They aren't going to waste time on it when they are currently developing Hots. i would honestly prefer revamp of carrier as opposed to just dropping it What can you do with it? Carriers in BW will already op if they get to the right amount. In sc2 where micro is not as intense as BW it makes it even easier to use carriers. There are somethings that just can't be balanced and carrier is one of them you could at least buff them to be viable in some sort of form instead of current literally useless form. Like I said, they are on a line between OP and UP. Buffing them would just make it too damn strong. They are going to remove it, no point whining about it and pray the tempest is better then it I think it is quite clear that Carriers have quite a long way to go to be considered OP. Increasing the DPS, shortening the build time, decreasing the build cost? Even one would make it op. Play bw, and make carriers. I guarantee you it will be a sure win as long as you can get to it What? Carriers in BW >>>>>>>>>> Carriers in SC2, what the hell does that have to do with anything? >.< Just saying if they buff it to be like bw carriers, it would be OP. Bw carriers with sc2 mechanics? Damn... ...but then why are you saying even the slightest buff to SC2 carriers would make them OP? They would need countless buffs to be as good as BW carriers... | ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
![]() | ||
Zerothegreat
United States787 Posts
![]() | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games summit1g8601 Grubby5648 FrodaN1892 Dendi1447 shahzam761 JuggernautJason724 elazer502 Liquid`Hasu389 Pyrionflax213 Day[9].tv155 ViBE103 Skadoodle101 Maynarde95 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Hupsaiya StarCraft: Brood War![]() • davetesta37 • musti20045 ![]() • StrangeGG ![]() • IndyKCrew ![]() • sooper7s • Migwel ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • Laughngamez YouTube • intothetv ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Kozan Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Replay Cast
SOOP
SKillous vs Spirit
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
PiG Sty Festival
Serral vs TriGGeR
Cure vs SHIN
The PondCast
Replay Cast
PiG Sty Festival
Clem vs Bunny
Solar vs Zoun
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
PiG Sty Festival
herO vs Rogue
ByuN vs SKillous
[ Show More ] SC Evo Complete
[BSL 2025] Weekly
Replay Cast
PiG Sty Festival
MaxPax vs Classic
Dark vs Maru
Sparkling Tuna Cup
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
|
|